Whatever made you this way. It's not your fault. Let it out.
Why I Trust NASA on Man-made Climate Change
- Thread starter Dante
- Start date
What way is that?
The way you are. There's 3 Dings.
a. The way you see yourself. Inaccurate
b. The way people see you. Little more accurate than how you see yourself.
c. The way you really are.
Is it my turn yet?
That's deep. All I know is you are stuck in the present. You can't go back and you will never, ever reach the future. As it always moves.
Apparently you don't know anything. You're a political parrot.
Republicans don't believe humans can affect the weather but these people say they can bring back the Wooley Mammoth and THEY can fix global warming.They sent men to the Moon and back -- plus.
It was risky. Scientific consensus gave NASA and the Astronauts confidence it could and would be pulled off.
The ones who choose to disbelieve NASA? They're still stuck in the past.
Apollo 8: Christmas at the Moon
NASA
Dec 23, 2019
Christmas Eve, 1968. As one of the most turbulent, tragic years in American history drew to a close, millions around the world were watching and listening as the Apollo 8 astronauts—Frank Borman, Jim Lovell and Bill Anders – became the first humans to orbit another world.
As their command module floated above the lunar surface, the astronauts beamed back images of the moon and Earth and took turns reading from the book of Genesis, closing with a wish for everyone “on the good Earth.”
Apollo 8: Christmas at the Moon - NASA
Christmas Eve, 1968. As one of the most turbulent, tragic years in American history drew to a close, millions around the world were watching and listening aswww.nasa.gov
View attachment 878552
View attachment 878553
Look at this too: NASA's First Samples Land On Earth After Release From Spacecraft.
Mammoth - Colossal
Discover Colossal's mammoth de-extinction project, process and progress. Learn the facts about reviving the woolly mammoth, a vital defender of earth.
...if the mammoth ecosystem could be revived, it could help in reversing the rapid warming of the climate and more pressingly, protect the arctic’s permafrost - one of the world’s largest carbon reservoirs.
Bring back the Wooley Mamouth.
if the mammoth steppe ecosystem could be revived, it could help in reversing the rapid warming of the climate and more pressingly, protect the arctic’s permafrost - one of the world’s largest carbon reservoirs.
Mammoth - Colossal
Discover Colossal's mammoth de-extinction project, process and progress. Learn the facts about reviving the woolly mammoth, a vital defender of earth.
Increase resilience of habitats to climate change and environmental upheaval
- Sep 9, 2022
- 24,281
- 11,775
- 1,138
Democrats believe humans do control weather. And they are pissed off at Republicans who know Humans can't control climate or weather. We also know the climate cycles all the time. And humans never caused it to cycle in the past nor today.
- Apr 11, 2023
- 43,370
- 21,158
- 2,488
You have not a clue.
The world's largest carbon reservoir is the ocean. 94% of the planet's CO2 is stored in the ocean.Bring back the Wooley Mamouth.
if the mammoth steppe ecosystem could be revived, it could help in reversing the rapid warming of the climate and more pressingly, protect the arctic’s permafrost - one of the world’s largest carbon reservoirs.
Mammoth - Colossal
Discover Colossal's mammoth de-extinction project, process and progress. Learn the facts about reviving the woolly mammoth, a vital defender of earth.colossal.com
Increase resilience of habitats to climate change and environmental upheaval
Yes but then the ocean would continue to soak up more and more carbon dioxide until global warming heated the ocean enough to slow down ocean circulation. if the ocean starts to take up less carbon because of global warming, more is left in the atmosphere where it can contribute to additional warming.
The ocean releases CO2 as its temperature increases and absorbs CO2 when its temperature decreases.
Walk me through how "global warming" heats the ocean enough to slow down ocean circulation.
That's like asking me to walk a dog through it. Your brain only hears what it wants to hear. Throws out any facts that don't jive with your views.
You should talk to some scientists who specialize in this. They all agree with me. They could walk you through this. Take a fucking class at a community then post your F after the class is done.
I'm only trying to ask what you think the mechanism is for the ocean currents lowing down as ocean temperature increases. Rather than making absurd comments, you should just say you spoke out of turn and don't really understand any of it.
That's a great question. I'll find the answer then you'll ask another question. I'm not a scientist. They say you are wrong. Or has Trump appointed a evolution and climate change denier to head NASA?
Hell even Elon believes in Man made climate change. The rest of the world believes it's fact. Only global polluters and their brainwashed followers (REpublicans voters) don't know it.
Woodznutz
Platinum Member
- Dec 9, 2021
- 26,359
- 13,027
- 973
Dude, it's all around you.
- Sep 9, 2022
- 24,281
- 11,775
- 1,138
Dr Richard Lindzen is a climate scientist and once was on the IPCC. What turned him off most was it turned out to be political and not scientific very much. Happer is a scientist who does not accept the fake claim man has the ability to manage climate.Even when man tries to manage weather, he has bad luck. Curry is another climate scientist who goes against the politics of climate.
An easy way to understand is can you name even one time man prevented a tornado, or a hurricane, or just rain or shooed away clouds?
Most experts say Lindzen is "feeding upon an audience that wants to hear a certain message, and wants to hear it put forth by people with enough scientific reputation that it can be sustained for a while, even if it's wrong science.
another M.I.T. scientist, "Even if there were no political implications, it just seems deeply unprofessional and irresponsible to look at this and say, 'We're sure it's not a problem.'
several other experts said Lindzen had "sacrificed his luminosity by taking a stand that most of us feel is scientifically unsound."
He added that while he regarded some of Lindzen's views as flawed, he said that, "across the board he's generally very good". John Wallace of the University of Washington agreed with Lindzen that progress in climate change science had been exaggerated, but said there are "relatively few scientists who are as skeptical of the whole thing as Dick [Lindzen] is".
The Guardian reported in June 2016 that Lindzen has been a beneficiary of Peabody Energy, a coal company that has funded multiple groups contesting the climate consensus.
The characterization of Lindzen as a contrarian has been reinforced by reports that he claims that lung cancer has only been weakly linked to smoking.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
You can now read about the origins of Covid on the White House website
- Started by lennypartiv
- Replies: 2
-
-
Even Israel knows deporting people is the way to go
- Started by lennypartiv
- Replies: 1
