Why Hillary Will Win (probably)

[candycorn]

Yes, children......

This is going to be a fun election to watch

Hillary wins the WH

The democrats with the senate.

The GOP keeps the house.

It will be SSDD

Whomever prevails, you can say goodbye to the sequester...that is the universal truth. So it won't be SSDD; spending will be in fashion again and you'll see it take place.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Look at it this way

The Presidential campaign is like a marathon race. It's a long road to the finish

Pretenders can run up and keep pace with the lead runners, they may even sprint out to short lived leads, but they will eventually drop out of contention. Wise candidates like Hillary and Bush have the experience to know not to get too upset with the pretenders early in the race.

Yepp.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Statistikhengst]

I wonder what the LWNJ's will say after Trump wraps up the GOP nomination sometime in early march?

I wonder what the LWNJ's will say when the polls show Trump destroying hiLIARy in every poll?

Will democrat voters still believe that hiLIARy is better than a crackpot socialist and a retarded Veep?

Oh, I would love to see Trump become your nominee...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Statistikhengst]

What part of the fact that Hillary and Trump are the leading candidates at this point in time just like Bush jr was the leading candidate at this point in time is confusing you?

Bush was fighting with McCain at this point in 2000

Trump is a sideshow

Oh another great point RW!!!

Hillary VS Sanders!!!

Always strange how you on your own can make your party look mentally retarded.

Type in Hillary to google, hit news and see just how popular she is =)

I want Sanders to be President personally, and I'm not even joking.

Hillary is barely running at this point
Sanders is doing a great job but is unelectable

With a good effort in 2016, Republicans could have knocked off Hillary

This circus they are running only makes a Hillary election more certain

I have to give you props for delusional thinking there RW, I truly do!

Thanks for posting

Lol...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Statistikhengst]

A kasich/rubio ticket could win it for the republicans with a fairly moderate general election campaign. Simply because Kasich would take Ohio which is a MUST and rubio would help with non-whites.

Yes, just like Romney took Michigan and Massachusetts! Lol...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Statistikhengst]

Now you want experience? I thought being a community organizer was enough. Interesting.

More experience than your reality TV star

How is he my reality TV star? I'd vote him over Hillary but not too many others.

I find the Democrats inconsistency amusing. Eights years ago experience was over rated. Now it is a must. LOL!

Well, Obama was in the Illinois Legislature and elected as US Senator.
So yes, Obama had more experience than a reality TV Start. That you are so ignorant of history is consistently amusing. LOL!

Ok, no real experience. As far as Trump, he is a property mogul. The fact you twist shit proves how dishonest you are.

Twist?

Obama held political office. Hence experience.
Trump has not. Hence no experience.

Christ, I hope you're just pretending to be this dense.

No, I think he means it.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[ScienceRocks]

A kasich/rubio ticket could win it for the republicans with a fairly moderate general election campaign. Simply because Kasich would take Ohio which is a MUST and rubio would help with non-whites.

Yes, just like Romney took Michigan and Massachusetts! Lol...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

If this ticket couldn't do it...I seriously doubt any other could. I don't think there's nearly enough I hate government types in this country to do it.

 

[Zander]

I wonder what the LWNJ's will say after Trump wraps up the GOP nomination sometime in early march?

I wonder what the LWNJ's will say when the polls show Trump destroying hiLIARy in every poll?

Will democrat voters still believe that hiLIARy is better than a crackpot socialist and a retarded Veep?

Oh, I would love to see Trump become your nominee...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

Be careful what you wish for Stat. I felt the same way about Obama in 2008 . I thought, how could the American people be so ******* stupid to support this community organizing moron! He's a skinny *** who has no record, no experience and speaks in vague platitudes. I said to myself, I hope he's the nominee, we'll crush him!

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

 

[HenryBHough]

I have come to seek out thread as the first to read each day.

So nice to begin the day with a good laugh!

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Yes, children......

This is going to be a fun election to watch

Hillary wins the WH

The democrats with the senate.

The GOP keeps the house.

It will be SSDD

Whomever prevails, you can say goodbye to the sequester...that is the universal truth. So it won't be SSDD; spending will be in fashion again and you'll see it take place.

And what makes you say that ?

 

[rightwinger]

More experience than your reality TV star

How is he my reality TV star? I'd vote him over Hillary but not too many others.

I find the Democrats inconsistency amusing. Eights years ago experience was over rated. Now it is a must. LOL!

Well, Obama was in the Illinois Legislature and elected as US Senator.
So yes, Obama had more experience than a reality TV Start. That you are so ignorant of history is consistently amusing. LOL!

Ok, no real experience. As far as Trump, he is a property mogul. The fact you twist shit proves how dishonest you are.

Trump is a reality TV Star and runs beauty pageants

Presidential material for Conservatives

And a real estate mogul, he owns the beauty pageants, something Hillary could never get close to. He also runs many other companies. Hillary only knows how to illegally siphon money into her foundation.

Hillary is the most experienced in the field

Trump does reality TV

 

[Papageorgio]

How is he my reality TV star? I'd vote him over Hillary but not too many others.

I find the Democrats inconsistency amusing. Eights years ago experience was over rated. Now it is a must. LOL!

Well, Obama was in the Illinois Legislature and elected as US Senator.
So yes, Obama had more experience than a reality TV Start. That you are so ignorant of history is consistently amusing. LOL!

Ok, no real experience. As far as Trump, he is a property mogul. The fact you twist shit proves how dishonest you are.

Trump is a reality TV Star and runs beauty pageants

Presidential material for Conservatives

And a real estate mogul, he owns the beauty pageants, something Hillary could never get close to. He also runs many other companies. Hillary only knows how to illegally siphon money into her foundation.

Hillary is the most experienced in the field

Trump does reality TV

Experience doesn't matter, that is what the left told us in 08. Remember?

 

[Papageorgio]

More experience than your reality TV star

How is he my reality TV star? I'd vote him over Hillary but not too many others.

I find the Democrats inconsistency amusing. Eights years ago experience was over rated. Now it is a must. LOL!

Well, Obama was in the Illinois Legislature and elected as US Senator.
So yes, Obama had more experience than a reality TV Start. That you are so ignorant of history is consistently amusing. LOL!

Ok, no real experience. As far as Trump, he is a property mogul. The fact you twist shit proves how dishonest you are.

Twist?

Obama held political office. Hence experience.
Trump has not. Hence no experience.

Christ, I hope you're just pretending to be this dense.

No, I think he means it.

Love when I get under libbies skin. Experience didn't count in 08 according to libbies, doesn't count now. Just the way life is.

 

[RKMBrown]

One smart thing the GOP did was limit the number of debates. On the surface, at least, this was smart because it gives the whackjob candidacies of Cruz and Paul less official forums to announce their positions. Contrary to the belief that the Parties pick the candidtes; they actually have very little authority over them let alone control what they say. The flip side is that the urge to make a "big splash" may be too great for either of them to understand. Those who are looking to put their marker down somewhere between the hard right and the moderate right are probably the most dangerous.

Every karem to or pander toward the hard right forces the eventual nominee to move in that direction. This will, of course, hamstring him in the general election when the enevitable move back to the center has to be made.

The reason Hillary will win is because no such force sits to her left which would force her to react in such an irrational manner. Also, if such a force were to materialize, there would still be no need for Clinton to make the move; the voters on the hard left will be there for her in November. If we learned anything from 2012 it is that the hard right will abandon a GOP candidate that is seen as not willing to carry their water and message.

Obama fatigue and the ocassional flub (if they are ocassional) and tactical mis-step of the Clinton campaign will play a role as well but there shouldn't be enough of them to swing the election.

She isn't a shoo-in for the Presidency; there is still a long way to go. But it would be hard to imagine a better set-up for Secretary Clinton than what has happened in the last few weeks with Cruz, Paul and Rubio entering the race

She will win because too many Americans don't pay attention to truth and reality, and have spent 12 years being indoctrinated in democrat run schools...and some go on to 4 more years of intense indoctrination in college.

In 30 states, the GOP runs the schools. In the same number of states, the GOP usually appoints the people who run the State colleges.

You are, as always, lying.

rofl... what a dumb ass you are.

The governor usually appoints the head of the education agency. The same voters that elected a GOP governor vote for school boards.

The GOP owns the schools in 30 states. It's that simple--so why can't you understand it?

You're a moron.

 

[candycorn]

One smart thing the GOP did was limit the number of debates. On the surface, at least, this was smart because it gives the whackjob candidacies of Cruz and Paul less official forums to announce their positions. Contrary to the belief that the Parties pick the candidtes; they actually have very little authority over them let alone control what they say. The flip side is that the urge to make a "big splash" may be too great for either of them to understand. Those who are looking to put their marker down somewhere between the hard right and the moderate right are probably the most dangerous.

Every karem to or pander toward the hard right forces the eventual nominee to move in that direction. This will, of course, hamstring him in the general election when the enevitable move back to the center has to be made.

The reason Hillary will win is because no such force sits to her left which would force her to react in such an irrational manner. Also, if such a force were to materialize, there would still be no need for Clinton to make the move; the voters on the hard left will be there for her in November. If we learned anything from 2012 it is that the hard right will abandon a GOP candidate that is seen as not willing to carry their water and message.

Obama fatigue and the ocassional flub (if they are ocassional) and tactical mis-step of the Clinton campaign will play a role as well but there shouldn't be enough of them to swing the election.

She isn't a shoo-in for the Presidency; there is still a long way to go. But it would be hard to imagine a better set-up for Secretary Clinton than what has happened in the last few weeks with Cruz, Paul and Rubio entering the race

She will win because too many Americans don't pay attention to truth and reality, and have spent 12 years being indoctrinated in democrat run schools...and some go on to 4 more years of intense indoctrination in college.

In 30 states, the GOP runs the schools. In the same number of states, the GOP usually appoints the people who run the State colleges.

You are, as always, lying.

rofl... what a dumb ass you are.

The governor usually appoints the head of the education agency. The same voters that elected a GOP governor vote for school boards.

The GOP owns the schools in 30 states. It's that simple--so why can't you understand it?

You're a moron.

So, by your logic anyone who is elected to office is not responsible for what happens in the States they govern? Interesting. Bat-shit crazy but interesting.

 

[candycorn]

Well, Obama was in the Illinois Legislature and elected as US Senator.
So yes, Obama had more experience than a reality TV Start. That you are so ignorant of history is consistently amusing. LOL!

Ok, no real experience. As far as Trump, he is a property mogul. The fact you twist shit proves how dishonest you are.

Trump is a reality TV Star and runs beauty pageants

Presidential material for Conservatives

And a real estate mogul, he owns the beauty pageants, something Hillary could never get close to. He also runs many other companies. Hillary only knows how to illegally siphon money into her foundation.

Hillary is the most experienced in the field

Trump does reality TV

Experience doesn't matter, that is what the left told us in 08. Remember?

OF course you could quote where you were told that...right? Oh wait, you're lying....AGAIN.

Why is it conserve-hate-ives can't tell the truth?

 

[JoeB131]

Love when I get under libbies skin. Experience didn't count in 08 according to libbies, doesn't count now. Just the way life is.

Obama had Experience.
Trump doesn't.
Carson doesn't

 

[MarcATL]

One smart thing the GOP did was limit the number of debates. On the surface, at least, this was smart because it gives the whackjob candidacies of Cruz and Paul less official forums to announce their positions. Contrary to the belief that the Parties pick the candidtes; they actually have very little authority over them let alone control what they say. The flip side is that the urge to make a "big splash" may be too great for either of them to understand. Those who are looking to put their marker down somewhere between the hard right and the moderate right are probably the most dangerous.

Every karem to or pander toward the hard right forces the eventual nominee to move in that direction. This will, of course, hamstring him in the general election when the enevitable move back to the center has to be made.

The reason Hillary will win is because no such force sits to her left which would force her to react in such an irrational manner. Also, if such a force were to materialize, there would still be no need for Clinton to make the move; the voters on the hard left will be there for her in November. If we learned anything from 2012 it is that the hard right will abandon a GOP candidate that is seen as not willing to carry their water and message.

Obama fatigue and the ocassional flub (if they are ocassional) and tactical mis-step of the Clinton campaign will play a role as well but there shouldn't be enough of them to swing the election.

She isn't a shoo-in for the Presidency; there is still a long way to go. But it would be hard to imagine a better set-up for Secretary Clinton than what has happened in the last few weeks with Cruz, Paul and Rubio entering the race

Donald Trump; the gift that keeps on giving.

Can't wait for next week's debate.

Hillary Clinton the gift that keeps on giving. Can't wait for her to be put in jail.

What LAW did she break?

Sent from my SM-N910T3 using Tapatalk

 

[MarcATL]

I think the democrats need to come up with an alternative to Hillary Clinton. She's definitely no shoe-in for the presidency. There's too much controversy surrounding her. Joe Biden lost the bid for president before and Bernie Sanders is too far left for your average independent voter like myself. It's time to bring in someone new. A non-politician and contributor to the democratic party. The candidate needs instant name recognition. Perhaps the democratic voting public can cajole Jamie Foxx into running for the post. He's instant name recognition, a democrat contributor and popular. We've had a peanut farmer president, an actor president, an actor governor and a wrestler governor; might as well try another actor.

Not being a shoo-in is no detrement in my book. I think any battle that you survive makes you stronger. The small number of debates may be an issue for the Democratic nominee as the POTUS debates are usually 3 for the top of the ticket and one for the VP.

As for the candidates themselves, Hillary is doing well in my opinion. The idea that she was going to blow others out of the water was disproven in 2008 so I'm not quite certain why some expected her just to show up and take the title this time. I'm also happy to see that she is largely doing this on her own without the close air-support of Bill. Undoubtedly, Bill is like a Hall of Fame closer you can bring out of the bull pen to finish off the competition. The GOP has nobody they can draw on from previous administrations that is in his class. And, next fall, just wait until Obama starts campaigning for her. They may not appear together often but as a fund raiser, Obama will be extremely effective.

People are already tiring of her and her stale outlook.

****, anyone with a brain is already tired of your slash, cut and deregulate bs....So look whos talking!

**** off, you have no ******* clue of my views or who I may support. Racist piece of crap.

You've been posting here and sharing your personal views here for how long?

Sent from my SM-N910T3 using Tapatalk