Hillary Clinton says she'd nominate Trump for Nobel prize if he brokers peace between Russia, Ukraine

[Dorian Mode]

An old school liberal is by definition a conservative.

True, the democrats of the 70's and 80's would be considered MAGA today by today's neo-leftists. No doubt there.

 

[Billiejeens]

True, the democrats of the 70's and 80's would be considered MAGA today by today's neo-leftists. No doubt there.

JFK would be a Tea Party Patriot.

 

[Dorian Mode]

Mac freely admits that he lives in a different reality

That's the only thing that he gets right.

He is the only leftist here who sometimes splits from the neo-leftists. Sometimes. IOWs, he might be the only leftist here who isn't paid to promote democrap propaganda.

 

[Billiejeens]

He is the only leftist here who sometimes splits from the neo-leftists. Sometimes. IOWs, he might be the only leftist here who isn't paid to promote democrap propaganda.

Prior to Trump he was simply a nonpartipating malcontent who hated each party.

Trump broke him into a million little pieces.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

True, the democrats of the 70's and 80's would be considered MAGA today by today's neo-leftists. No doubt there.

I think it’s more generational than that. It’s baby-boomer and later who are hardcore Marxist-dupe democrats. That reaches back to the late 60’s.

 

[August West]

America doesn't lock up it's political opponents, retard.

But they`ll beat up 140 cops in an attempt to install a man who clearly lost an election, as POTUS. Were you living overseas during this embarrassing time to be a Republican or were you part of the crowd beating up the police?

 

[Dorian Mode]

I think it’s more generational than that. It’s baby-boomer and later who are hardcore Marxist-dupe democrats. That reaches back to the late 60’s.

Well, there have always been some radical left but they were fringe and stayed quiet during the Cold War and Maoist China. The democrats fought for the center in the 70's and 80's and forced the right to get more conservative. But today the left have gone far left and the GOP owns the center. But I must point out that if you watch the democrap politicians they aren't really Marxists and they only use Marxism to keep the flock engaged and close by. Bernie Sanders and all the progressive democraps talk a great talk, but do not lead the lifestyle of a Marxist. Most of the flock do not either. It's all BS for virtue signaling on the Internet. They are all as fake as press on nails.

 

[August West]

Well, there have always been some radical left but they were fringe and stayed quiet during the Cold War and Maoist China. The democrats fought for the center in the 70's and 80's and forced the right to get more conservative. But today the left have gone far left and the GOP owns the center. But I must point out that if you watch the democrap politicians they aren't really Marxists and they only use Marxism to keep the flock engaged and close by. Bernie Sanders and all the progressive democraps talk a great talk, but do not lead the lifestyle of a Marxist. Most of the flock do not either. It's all BS for virtue signaling on the Internet. They are all as fake as press on nails.

The GOP also owns J6 and that will never go away.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Well, there have always been some radical left but they were fringe and stayed quiet during the Cold War and Maoist China. The democrats fought for the center in the 70's and 80's and forced the right to get more conservative. But today the left have gone far left and the GOP owns the center. But I must point out that if you watch the democrap politicians they aren't really Marxists and they only use Marxism to keep the flock engaged and close by. Bernie Sanders and all the progressive democraps talk a great talk, but do not lead the lifestyle of a Marxist. Most of the flock do not either. It's all BS for virtue signaling on the Internet. They are all as fake as press on nails.

No, they’re Marxists. Don’t be fooled. They just jockey for the upper-echelon positions.

 

[berg80]

I still identify as an old school liberal. But if someone called me a Trumpster today I would be happier with that than if someone called me a neo-leftist.

To do so aligns yourself with anti-democratic neo-fascism, abject cruelty, a lack of respect for the rule of law, an affinity for despots, pathological lying, and a penchant for unbridled, unchecked abuses of power.

 

[berg80]

True, the democrats of the 70's and 80's would be considered MAGA today by today's neo-leftists. No doubt there.

Ridiculous.

 

[Billiejeens]

But they`ll beat up 140 cops in an attempt to install a man who clearly lost an election, as POTUS. Were you living overseas during this embarrassing time to be a Republican or were you part of the crowd beating up the police?

That never happened.

 

[Dorian Mode]

No, they’re Marxists. Don’t be fooled. They just jockey for the upper-echelon positions.

If we look back throughout history, the flock has always been led by a small number of people. It very well could be that Marxism was really created to offer the illusion of equality and a better life so that a small number could more easily grab the reigns of power with the support of the people. When successful that small group never let go of the reigns of power and the flock had to be controlled with authoritarian regimes. Maybe this was already foreseen by Karl Marx? Was Marxism really just a better strategy to get power? And are the modern neo-leftists just trying again?

 

[berg80]

If we look back throughout history, the flock has always been led by a small number of people. It very well could be that Marxism was really created to offer the illusion of equality and a better life so that a small number could more easily grab the reigns of power with the support of the people. When successful that small group never let go of the reigns of power and the flock had to be controlled with authoritarian regimes. Maybe this was already foreseen by Karl Marx? Was Marxism really just a better strategy to get power? And are the modern neo-leftists just trying again?

While you ponder those suggestive questions we don't need to ask the same of trumpery. The second regime has given us the answers. It stands for intolerance, unitary executive power, suppression of dissent, and disingenuous populism as a means to control the base.

 

[Dorian Mode]

Well berg80, the people decided they prefer Trump's fake populism approach to your fake Marxist approach. He obviously was seen as the lesser of two evils. Must be more people saw right through the fakeness of the neo-left. In retrospect, the people chose well and Trump's regime is infinitely better than what the democrap neo-leftists were really up to. And they were so close to grabbing the reigns of power it was scary. They had Big Corporations backing them, the MSM backing them and the uber wealthy backing them. What a recipe for an authoritarian regime. We dodged a bullet thanks to Trump and his voters.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

We dodged a bullet thanks to Trump and his voters.

So far…

 

[Dorian Mode]

So far…

We'll see what happens. Trump is going after the real leadership of the neo-left and has severely cut into their funding. They are losing their minds and will do anything to stop him. I hope he has great security.

 

[Stann]

First, Trump doesn't need her vote just as he didn't need Haleys endorsement. He showed spine by rejecting Haleys endorsement, something I'm not sure I would have done but in that moment he was probably strongest for MAGA.

Many are suggesting she is doing this to try to avoid scrutiny of her Foundation and other issues the DOJ might be exposing.

If bribery from other nations is allowed to continue, than the U.S will become a failed nation-state, it's that simple. There is a reason this is top story on Fox News website, lol.

Hillary Clinton says she'd nominate Trump for Nobel prize if he brokers peace between Russia, Ukraine

Hillary Clinton offered to nominate President Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize if he's able to negotiate an end to the Ukraine war during a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

www.foxnews.com

One of President Donald Trump’s fiercest rivals admitted Friday that he should get the Nobel Peace Prize if he pulled off an end to Russia’s war with Ukraine ahead of his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska.

Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, appearing on the "Raging Moderates" podcast, said she would nominate Trump for the award if he was successful in getting Putin to end his war and give back all the territory his forces took from Ukraine in the conflict.

"You know, look, if we could pull that off, if President Trump were the architect of that, I'd nominate him for a Nobel Peace Prize," she said during the interview

Clinton said that there are several things Trump needs to get Putin to agree to if he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize.

"But maybe this is the opportunity to make it clear that there must be a ceasefire, there will be no exchange of territory, and that, over a period of time, Putin should be actually withdrawing from the territory he seized in order to demonstrate his good faith efforts, let us say, not to threaten European security," she said.

trump is not interested in make by a good peace deal. Look what he did to the Afghan people. He sold them out. Look what he did to the Kurds in Syria. Same thing. Where did anyone get the idea he was a good negotiator I'll never know. Definitely another fantasy promoted by him and his followers

 

[Billiejeens]

So far…

Why would that change?

 

[Billiejeens]

trump is not interested in make by a good peace deal. Look what he did to the Afghan people. He sold them out. Look what he did to the Kurds in Syria. Same thing. Where did anyone get the idea he was a good negotiator I'll never know. Definitely another fantasy promoted by him and his followers

Or you're just an out of reality idiot.

Its that one.