Why Haven't Dogs Evolved?

They have been subjected to intense genetic specialization for 5,000 years, resulting in the greatest intraspecies variation in Earth's history. Despite a 100X size disparity, a Great Dane and a Chihuahua can still (theoretically) mate. Why? Because they are both still DOGS.

Can someone explain why they haven't evolved into different species?

They have
6 Dog Breeds That Have Changed Significantly Over Time
Call me when they become something other than dogs.
Virus's are mutating into new virus's very quickly.

Good point, and the reason for this is there are trillions of new viruses created daily, so their evolution is highly sped up because of the huge numbers or offspring (or new viruses) they produce. Similar with bacteria.

Some of these people will never get it, they cannot think past the span of their own life as a measurement of 'a long time', when it is not even a blink of a blink in an evolutionary time scale.
 
ARE YOU PEOPLE REALLY THIS STUPID?

I AM ASKING HOW ONE SPECIES CAN PRODUCE GENETICALLY INCOMPATIBLE, BUT VIABLE, OFFSPRING. !

That isn't what you asked originally.

Dogs crossbreed to produce genetically compatible offspring.
Horses and donkeys- different species- can produce offspring which are sterile.

You asked why dogs have not evolved- what makes you think that dogs have not evolved?

You asked why dogs have not evolved to a different species- and I ask- why should they?
 
Virus's are mutating into new virus's very quickly.
Let me know when your virus becomes a hamster.

So it doesnt have to change into something else anymore. Now it has to turn into certain animals or evolution is false?

goalposts_zps4f0bcdaf.gif
You're saying a fish is the pinnacle of evolution?
Interesting.

There is no 'pinnacle of evolution'.

There just is evolution.

If Tilapia exist in the exact same form as 2 million years ago- then clearly that form is working very well for Tilapia.
 
42-267721231-600x557.jpg


^ tardigrade or moss piglet. It’s the king of extreme temperatures, capable of surviving lows near absolute zero (-459°F; -273°C) and highs of more than 302°F (150°C).

What did this "Evolve" from? Where are the predecessors? What evolved FROM this genetically superior species?

Who knows?

Google apparently

http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1793&context=etd
Tardigrade Evolution and Ecology

Did you read the paper? I don't think you did before you posted it
 
42-267721231-600x557.jpg


^ tardigrade or moss piglet. It’s the king of extreme temperatures, capable of surviving lows near absolute zero (-459°F; -273°C) and highs of more than 302°F (150°C).

What did this "Evolve" from? Where are the predecessors? What evolved FROM this genetically superior species?

Who knows?

Google apparently

http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1793&context=etd
Tardigrade Evolution and Ecology

Did you read the paper? I don't think you did before you posted it

Actually I did skim through it- dense and hardly conclusive- but interesting

upload_2015-12-3_17-19-48.webp
 
Dude, I may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer but at least I'm not a home schooled born again flat earther.
 
Some of these people will never get it, they cannot think past the span of their own life as a measurement of 'a long time', when it is not even a blink of a blink in an evolutionary time scale.

This is epitome of profound ignorance. You arrogantly think you know the answer to a question you are apparently unable to comprehend. Hiding behind "deep time" or whatever other terms you have stumbled across merely exposes your fundamental lack of understanding regarding the concept of interspecies transformation.
 
Some of these people will never get it, they cannot think past the span of their own life as a measurement of 'a long time', when it is not even a blink of a blink in an evolutionary time scale.

This is epitome of profound ignorance. You arrogantly think you know the answer to a question you are apparently unable to comprehend. Hiding behind "deep time" or whatever other terms you have stumbled across merely exposes your fundamental lack of understanding regarding the concept of interspecies transformation.

Hmm, understanding evolution and the times required for change is 'arrogant'? Probably because you are looking for some answer that doesn't exist and doesn't need to.

I assume you know what dinosaurs are. Were they birds? Or were they reptiles? The further back you go they certainly cannot be anything but reptiles. The closer you get to the extinction event 65 million years ago the lines are already blurry.

There are new fossils being discovered that show dinosaurs with feathers. And now it may be most dinosaurs had feathers.

Siberian Discovery Suggests Almost All Dinosaurs Were Feathered

For dogs you'll have to research it, but the answers are out there. Go see what you find and report back.

Edit: And as noted in another post some animals do not evolve much because they are suited for long periods to the environment they live in:
Which Animals Have Barely Evolved?
 
Some of these people will never get it, they cannot think past the span of their own life as a measurement of 'a long time', when it is not even a blink of a blink in an evolutionary time scale.

This is epitome of profound ignorance. You arrogantly think you know the answer to a question you are apparently unable to comprehend. Hiding behind "deep time" or whatever other terms you have stumbled across merely exposes your fundamental lack of understanding regarding the concept of interspecies transformation.

Hmm, understanding evolution and the times required for change is 'arrogant'? Probably because you are looking for some answer that doesn't exist and doesn't need to.

I assume you know what dinosaurs are. Were they birds? Or were they reptiles? The further back you go they certainly cannot be anything but reptiles. The closer you get to the extinction event 65 million years ago the lines are already blurry.

There are new fossils being discovered that show dinosaurs with feathers. And now it may be most dinosaurs had feathers.

Siberian Discovery Suggests Almost All Dinosaurs Were Feathered

For dogs you'll have to research it, but the answers are out there. Go see what you find and report back.

Edit: And as noted in another post some animals do not evolve much because they are suited for long periods to the environment they live in:
Which Animals Have Barely Evolved?

Whoosh...
 
Some of these people will never get it, they cannot think past the span of their own life as a measurement of 'a long time', when it is not even a blink of a blink in an evolutionary time scale.

This is epitome of profound ignorance. You arrogantly think you know the answer to a question you are apparently unable to comprehend. Hiding behind "deep time" or whatever other terms you have stumbled across merely exposes your fundamental lack of understanding regarding the concept of interspecies transformation.

Hmm, understanding evolution and the times required for change is 'arrogant'? Probably because you are looking for some answer that doesn't exist and doesn't need to.

I assume you know what dinosaurs are. Were they birds? Or were they reptiles? The further back you go they certainly cannot be anything but reptiles. The closer you get to the extinction event 65 million years ago the lines are already blurry.

There are new fossils being discovered that show dinosaurs with feathers. And now it may be most dinosaurs had feathers.

Siberian Discovery Suggests Almost All Dinosaurs Were Feathered

For dogs you'll have to research it, but the answers are out there. Go see what you find and report back.

Edit: And as noted in another post some animals do not evolve much because they are suited for long periods to the environment they live in:
Which Animals Have Barely Evolved?

Whoosh...

Whoosh indeed. You don't seem to like responses which don't fit into your box.

Dogs crossbreed to produce genetically compatible offspring.
Horses and donkeys- different species- can produce offspring which are sterile.

You asked why dogs have not evolved- what makes you think that dogs have not evolved?

You asked why dogs have not evolved to a different species- and I ask- why should they?
 
15th post
Another GOOFY/DISINGENUOUS Jwoodie Fallacy.
You know, the usual, "when did bats evolve into whales."
His Dishonesty/Incredulity/Curiousity only extends to animals/humans/genesis contradiction.

When did the Himalayas grow/"evolve" into mountains? (No issue with that eh Woodie-godist)
Jwoodie wants PICTURES, or it didn't happen, even if it was gradual, only an inch or two for 50,000,000 Years.
He counts on our tiny lifespans as "proof" it didn't happen because No one saw it!
Of course, One reason we know the Himalayas grew from an Ocean floor is for the same reason we know animals evolved from other now-extinct ones... FOSSILS near the top of it.
Yes, Fossils of Common ancestors with diverging lines. (like the Primate/Simian/Homo one)

Despite believing in a Bogus god/dog, he seems Not to have any Intellectual Imagination.
Not only that, the Jhoodie could easily GOOGLE the question.
But he doesn't want to know, he wants to show Evos are wrong.. with his Breathtaking Ignorance/LACK of curiousity/IQ.

cont'd
 
Last edited:
Here's How DUFUS
Just Google it.
Instead you try to make others show a breathtaking amt of history... and hope they can't.
then you 'win'
Here we are again Klown:
Dogs are just one of the 37 Subspecies of Gray Wolves.. who have ancestrors as well.
Tree-and-branch Evo diagrams can account for ALL life and variants. And as predicted Only by Evo, we find more intermediate species with intermediate features Every year.

Gray Wolf Evolution

What Makes a Wolf a Wolf?

Have you ever looked around and wondered how so many different animals can all be related? In fact, scientists believe that all animals—and all forms of life—share a common ancestor. Gray wolves are only one out of billions of different species that live or used to live on the earth.

Although there are many different types of animals, most of the ones that you will be familiar with belong to the smaller group of vertebrates: animals with a true backbone.

Wolf_Tree1.gif


Gray wolves are part of the order Carnivora, which is grouped largely based on their predatory diet habits. Carnivora consists of over 260 species, including dogs, cats, bears, foxes, skunks, and raccoons. They all have long, pointed teeth and sharp claws used to attack their prey. They are also fairly intelligent animals with highly developed brains.

Wolf_Tree2.gif



Wolves belong to the family Canidae and are most closely related to domestic dogs, foxes, coyotes, dingoes, lycaons, and jackals. There are 14 total living subgroups of Canidae, and they are often referred to as canids. A derived trait for canids is that they have 42 teeth, although bears also share this characteristic. There are, however, other distinguishing features between canids and bears. Canids tend to have long tails, walk on their toes, and have four toes to each hind foot, while bears have short tails, walk on their soles, and have 5 toes to each hind foot.

Wolf_Tree3.gif




The gray wolf looks very similar to other canids, so differentiating species isn’t always straightforward. Throughout its evolution, the wolf has been increasing in size, so wolves tend to have a larger body that most other canids. Furthermore, after collecting skull measurements from the wolf, scientists have found that it has a broader snout and wider nose pad than its other close relatives.

The Gray Wolf: Evolutionary History and the Fossil Record

How old is the Gray Wolf (Canis lupus)? This is a more difficult question than you may at first think!

We believe that the some of the early ancestors of the Gray Wolf were a group of generalized carnivores named the creodonts that first walked the northern hemisphere of the earth between 100 and 120 million years ago. About 55 million years ago, the creodonts gave rise to the carnassials, a group of wolf-like animals that had specialized jaws for eating meat. One member of this family, Miacis, is thought to be the ancestor for all present-day wolves, dogs, weasels, bears, and raccoons.

Miacis branched into a number of species by 30 to 40 million years ago, giving rise to a more recent ancestor of modern wolves. Cynodicits, however, was much smaller than the wolf of today, with shortened legs and a flexible body. Between 15 and 30 million years ago, Cynodictis split into Cynodesmus and Tomarctus to give yield to wolf-like animals with longer legs, more compact feet, a shortened tail, and a smaller big toe (Mech 1972).

When did the wolf become a wolf? Somewhere between 4.5 and 9 million years ago during the Miocene, the recent ancestors of wolves split off from the ancestors of foxes. By 1.8 million years ago, wolves in North America had split from coyotes, and looked very much like they still do today. Just think of this: when you look at a wolf, you are in a way looking at an animal that is 2 million years old!

How do we know this? Of course, there were no people alive 120 million years ago to help us out. So we use the fossil record, which means that we look for evidence of the ancestors of wolves through bones or other remains that have been preserved by the earth over time.

For wolves, the evidence is pretty convincing, although it is incomplete. Scientists have tracked changes in skull size and shape, limb length, the evolution of sharp teeth for tearing meat, and evidence of changes in wolf population and habitat distribution over very long periods of time. In fact, researchers’ use of the fossil record has led them to believe that North American wolves crossed the land bridge to Eurasia and established themselves there 130 to 300 million years ago to evolve into Canis lupus before returning to North America! The wolf species that never left North America became different from those who had left and then returned (Boitani & Mech 2003).

The sheer diversity of canids is amazing. Some of them are more closely related than others, but all share an amazing evolutionary history that might even make you howl!​
 
Last edited:
Evolution on a macro scale involves two key ingredients: separation and incest.

The separation angle is understandable, and happens over a long period of time. When two of the same species are separated long enough, their respective mutations due to their environments eventually lead to incompatible genes. As tectonics and other factors change our environments, when they eventually combine again, the separation of species has already occurred.

But evolution can happen at a much faster pace, through incest. I know that's not a topic humans like to talk about, but it's not taboo at all for the rest of the world.

If the direct predecessor of a chicken, let's call it "bicken", lays an egg with extreme mutations and a "chicken" is hatched, that chicken cannot reproduce unless it mates with another chicken. Those chicken mutations can only exist in the mother/father or sibling. And it is very likely the mother bicken has laid other eggs that have that mutation. So the first chicken can potentially reproduce another chicken by having sex with its parents or siblings. Which they tend to do!

A new species can occur very fast that way, if the new chicken species can procreate fast enough to overwhelm the bickens. Or drive them out of town due to competition of resources. But mass incest is required. While we shun that as humans, animals have no such shame and that's the way they roll!

So... what came first, the chicken or the egg? The egg.
 
I had two labs, brother and sister, both spayed/neutered.

But they would have sex all the time!!!

I would yell and tell them to stop, because it was unnatural to me... But it was natural to them!

And in fact, human rulers in past civs have always used incest to keep bloodlines semi-intact. They used a half-sister, and the reasons were different, but the point is that incest is rampant in sexually-reproducing organisms. And therefore, like-mutations can flourish.
 
Back
Top Bottom