Why has this message board got so personal to the left?

[JakeStarkey]

Old Style your right on some levels there But there was no legislation voted in congress nor that GWB signed that mandated those banks to be stupid With respect, this was a full born full market disaster

The GOP could have but did not prevent it. End of story and acceptance of full responsibility

More uninformed BS, you just can't help it.

The GOP had compliant presidents and the majority for 12 years: yep, you are uninformed.

 

[S.J.]

The GOP could have but did not prevent it. End of story and acceptance of full responsibility

More uninformed BS, you just can't help it.

The GOP had compliant presidents and the majority for 12 years: yep, you are uninformed.

No, they didn't.

 

[JakeStarkey]

More uninformed BS, you just can't help it.

The GOP had compliant presidents and the majority for 12 years: yep, you are uninformed. Republicans had the Congress plus compliant presidents.

104th 1995–1997 100 48 52 — — 435 204 230 1 —
105th 1997–1999 100 45 55 — — 435 207 226 2 —
106th 1999–2001 100 45 55 — — 435 211 223 1 —
107th 2001–2003 100 50 50 — — 435 212 221 2 — GOP had the tie breaker in the Senate with VP Cheney presiding
108th 2003–2005 100 48 51 1 — 435 205 229 1 —
109th 2005–2007 100 44 55 1 — 435 202 231 1 1

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0774721.html

 

[S.J.]

More uninformed BS, you just can't help it.

The GOP had compliant presidents and the majority for 12 years: yep, you are uninformed. Republicans had the Congress plus compliant presidents.

104th 1995–1997 100 48 52 — — 435 204 230 1 —
105th 1997–1999 100 45 55 — — 435 207 226 2 —
106th 1999–2001 100 45 55 — — 435 211 223 1 —
107th 2001–2003 100 50 50 — — 435 212 221 2 — GOP had the tie breaker in the Senate with VP Cheney presiding
108th 2003–2005 100 48 51 1 — 435 205 229 1 —
109th 2005–2007 100 44 55 1 — 435 202 231 1 1

Composition of Congress by Party 1855?2013 ? Infoplease.com

You're full of shit. Clinton lost Congress to Reps in 94. They held majority until 06. Clinton was president until 2000. Bush had a Rep Congress for 6 years. There were NOT 12 years in which Republicans controlled both the W.H. and both houses of Congress. You don't know what the **** you're talking about.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

More uninformed BS, you just can't help it.

The GOP had compliant presidents and the majority for 12 years: yep, you are uninformed. Republicans had the Congress plus compliant presidents.

104th 1995–1997 100 48 52 — — 435 204 230 1 —
105th 1997–1999 100 45 55 — — 435 207 226 2 —
106th 1999–2001 100 45 55 — — 435 211 223 1 —
107th 2001–2003 100 50 50 — — 435 212 221 2 — GOP had the tie breaker in the Senate with VP Cheney presiding
108th 2003–2005 100 48 51 1 — 435 205 229 1 —
109th 2005–2007 100 44 55 1 — 435 202 231 1 1

Composition of Congress by Party 1855?2013 ? Infoplease.com

You're full of shit. Clinton lost Congress to Reps in 94. They held majority until 06. Clinton was president until 2000. Bush had a Rep Congress for 6 years. There were NOT 12 years in which Republicans controlled both the W.H. and both houses of Congress. You don't know what the **** you're talking about.

You have to excuse him, he thinks Clinton is a Republican.

 

[JakeStarkey]

More uninformed BS, you just can't help it.

The GOP had compliant presidents and the majority for 12 years: yep, you are uninformed. Republicans had the Congress plus compliant presidents.

104th 1995–1997 100 48 52 — — 435 204 230 1 —
105th 1997–1999 100 45 55 — — 435 207 226 2 —
106th 1999–2001 100 45 55 — — 435 211 223 1 —
107th 2001–2003 100 50 50 — — 435 212 221 2 — GOP had the tie breaker in the Senate with VP Cheney presiding
108th 2003–2005 100 48 51 1 — 435 205 229 1 —
109th 2005–2007 100 44 55 1 — 435 202 231 1 1

Composition of Congress by Party 1855?2013 ? Infoplease.com

You're full of shit. Clinton lost Congress to Reps in 94. They held majority until 06. Clinton was president until 2000. Bush had a Rep Congress for 6 years. There were NOT 12 years in which Republicans controlled both the W.H. and both houses of Congress. You don't know what the **** you're talking about.

I said compliant presidents, so the Republican Congress had 12 years to save us from the Great Recession. And, of course, by the time Bush left office, the economy was losing 700,000 jobs a month.

All you are denying is the truth. I expect that of Quantum, who does not know up from down on a good day.

 

[JRK]

More uninformed BS, you just can't help it.

The GOP had compliant presidents and the majority for 12 years: yep, you are uninformed.

No, they didn't.

From 1994 through 2006 with the exception of the senate in 00-02 the GOP controlled congress
Balanced budgets
Jobs
simple things that made us the great nation we were

 

[JakeStarkey]

The GOP had compliant presidents and the majority for 12 years: yep, you are uninformed.

No, they didn't.

From 1994 through 2006 with the exception of the senate in 00-02 the GOP controlled congress
Balanced budgets
Jobs
simple things that made us the great nation we were

And the economy was losing 700,000 jobs monthly under Bush because the GOP failed in Congress, although it had compliant presidents.

The GOP had compliant presidents and the majority for 12 years: yep, you are uninformed. Republicans had the Congress plus compliant presidents.

104th 1995–1997 100 48 52 — — 435 204 230 1 —
105th 1997–1999 100 45 55 — — 435 207 226 2 —
106th 1999–2001 100 45 55 — — 435 211 223 1 —
107th 2001–2003 100 50 50 — — 435 212 221 2 — GOP had the tie breaker in the Senate with VP Cheney presiding
108th 2003–2005 100 48 51 1 — 435 205 229 1 —
109th 2005–2007 100 44 55 1 — 435 202 231 1 1

Composition of Congress by Party 1855?2013 ? Infoplease.com[/QUOTE]

 

[JRK]

More uninformed BS, you just can't help it.

The GOP had compliant presidents and the majority for 12 years: yep, you are uninformed. Republicans had the Congress plus compliant presidents.

104th 1995–1997 100 48 52 — — 435 204 230 1 —
105th 1997–1999 100 45 55 — — 435 207 226 2 —
106th 1999–2001 100 45 55 — — 435 211 223 1 —
107th 2001–2003 100 50 50 — — 435 212 221 2 — GOP had the tie breaker in the Senate with VP Cheney presiding
108th 2003–2005 100 48 51 1 — 435 205 229 1 —
109th 2005–2007 100 44 55 1 — 435 202 231 1 1

Composition of Congress by Party 1855?2013 ? Infoplease.com

You're full of shit. Clinton lost Congress to Reps in 94. They held majority until 06. Clinton was president until 2000. Bush had a Rep Congress for 6 years. There were NOT 12 years in which Republicans controlled both the W.H. and both houses of Congress. You don't know what the **** you're talking about.

The GOP lost control Jeffers jumped ship after being elected a repub
he has no idea what he is talking about
your right except the 00-02, which was as I recall a tie with until then as you have correctly stated
On May 24, 2001, Jim Jeffords left the Republican Party, with which he had always been affiliated, and announced his new status as an independent. Jeffords discussed this decision during his announcement that he was leaving the Republican Party. "I will make this change and will caucus with the Democrats for organizational purposes once the conference report on the tax bill is sent to the president. I gave my word to the president that I would not intercept or try to intervene in the signing of that bill". Jeffords decided to switch when the Senate Republicans had refused to fund the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act fully.[5]
The independent status of Jeffords changed the Senate composition from 50-50 (with a Republican Vice President, Dick Cheney, serving as President of the Senate to break tie votes)
Jim Jeffords - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The reason this is so critical is the Iraq war
Do not ever allow the libs to keep lying about that event

 

[JakeStarkey]

The GOP had compliant presidents and the majority for 12 years: yep, you are uninformed. Republicans had the Congress plus compliant presidents.

104th 1995–1997 100 48 52 — — 435 204 230 1 —
105th 1997–1999 100 45 55 — — 435 207 226 2 —
106th 1999–2001 100 45 55 — — 435 211 223 1 —
107th 2001–2003 100 50 50 — — 435 212 221 2 — GOP had the tie breaker in the Senate with VP Cheney presiding
108th 2003–2005 100 48 51 1 — 435 205 229 1 —
109th 2005–2007 100 44 55 1 — 435 202 231 1 1

Composition of Congress by Party 1855?2013 ? Infoplease.com

You're full of shit. Clinton lost Congress to Reps in 94. They held majority until 06. Clinton was president until 2000. Bush had a Rep Congress for 6 years. There were NOT 12 years in which Republicans controlled both the W.H. and both houses of Congress. You don't know what the **** you're talking about.

The GOP lost control Jeffers jumped ship after being elected a repub
he has no idea what he is talking about
your right except the 00-02, which was as I recall a tie with until then as you have correctly stated
On May 24, 2001, Jim Jeffords left the Republican Party, with which he had always been affiliated, and announced his new status as an independent. Jeffords discussed this decision during his announcement that he was leaving the Republican Party. "I will make this change and will caucus with the Democrats for organizational purposes once the conference report on the tax bill is sent to the president. I gave my word to the president that I would not intercept or try to intervene in the signing of that bill". Jeffords decided to switch when the Senate Republicans had refused to fund the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act fully.[5]
The independent status of Jeffords changed the Senate composition from 50-50 (with a Republican Vice President, Dick Cheney, serving as President of the Senate to break tie votes)
Jim Jeffords - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The reason this is so critical is the Iraq war
Do not ever allow the libs to keep lying about that event

Nope, my source is better than yours. Jeffords voted often with the Pubs, giving Cheney the tie breaker. None of your nonsense, JeRK, has anything to do with what we are talking about: the economy.

The Republican Party broke the economy with the help of Bush and Clinton.

This lack of distrust by the American people in the GOP is why BHO won a second term, the Dems increased their majority in the Senate, and they picked up several seats in the House.

If the GOP will not work to restore that trust with the American people, 2014 will result in a Democratic Senate and House.

 

[JRK]

one thing this thread had proved is that the Libs take all of this personal
If there was a GOP president that was failing like BHO
I would never support him.
Bot to worry, the media would never let that happen

GWB had 86 great months and the 10 that where bad, he did nothing to cause
My god his leadership during the crises he kept the country from crashing
Left BHO 350 billion from tarp to do what with as he pleased
Saved GM and trillions in retirement accounts across the country

 

[uscitizen]

Gas prices doubled immediately and have stayed there ever since.
Economic growth is practically at a standstill.
No attempt whatsoever is being made to curb spending.

the price of gas going up raised GDP.
Just like it did for Bush II.

 

[S.J.]

Gas prices doubled immediately and have stayed there ever since.
Economic growth is practically at a standstill.
No attempt whatsoever is being made to curb spending.

the price of gas going up raised GDP.
Just like it did for Bush II.

And???

 

[JRK]

Gas prices doubled immediately and have stayed there ever since.
Economic growth is practically at a standstill.
No attempt whatsoever is being made to curb spending.

the price of gas going up raised GDP.
Just like it did for Bush II.

???????????
The massive increase in gas in 08 was at the same time the GDP began to crash
To be honest th GDP has been really running in negative ground sense 08
we had such of a huge decline when the asset bubble busted that anything less than 5% growth was nothing
now we are at negative growth
not a word from the main stream either
sad

 

[tjvh]

Why has this message board got so personal to the left? It's not just here, it's everywhere. Because even when they win elections, they know that they still cannot ever fully implement the agenda's necessary to realize their utopian fantasy world, because that pesky little thing called the Constitution is always going to get in their way. There are also just enough people out there to keep them pissing and moaning for the rest of their lifetimes because of it, and the fact that they will never get enough support to implement their ideological craziness pisses liberals off, even when their masters are in power.

 

[Esmeralda]

BHO is a failure
the country is in a mess
and they know it.

Obama is not a failure, that is what we know.

Look around the world, everyone is in a recession. No other country is recovering any faster. Why do you expect miracles in America?

It isn't rocket science.

 

[tjvh]

BHO is a failure
the country is in a mess
and they know it.

Obama isi not a failure, that is what we know.

Look around the world, everyone is in a recession. No other country is recovering any faster. Why do you expect miracles in America?

It isn't rocket science.

Wait a minute... The Left has made it very clear that the recession is over. You can't have it both ways, and that's not rocket science.

 

[S.J.]

BHO is a failure
the country is in a mess
and they know it.

Obama isi not a failure, that is what we know.

Look around the world, everyone is in a recession. No other country is recovering any faster. Why do you expect miracles in America?

It isn't rocket science.

You jerk. The United States isn't just another country. Get your liberal head out of Obama's ass.

 

[Esmeralda]

You must be a racist. Obama is great. The country is doing great. Obama can't fix 232 years of mistakes in 4 years.....

The only minority left in this great nation is the white male
either way
I thought BHO was 1/2 white anyway

And yes your spot on
as hard as BHO is trying he cannot change the greatness that once was over night

Please. Not according to "the one drop rule" which was instituted by whites to prevent mulattos from taking advantage of "white privilege".
Learn the difference between "your" and "you're". America is being restored to greatness after it was decimated under Bush/Cheney.

The worst president the US ever had is GW Bush. It's ironic that the right keeps going on and on about Obama when the truth is that it was GW Bush who ruined the country.

 

[Esmeralda]

BHO is a failure
the country is in a mess
and they know it.

Obama isi not a failure, that is what we know.

Look around the world, everyone is in a recession. No other country is recovering any faster. Why do you expect miracles in America?

It isn't rocket science.

Wait a minute... The Left has made it very clear that the recession is over. You can't have it both ways, and that's not rocket science.

no they haven't.....what Obama has said is that recovery is happening although very slowly...he has not said it is over...stop making things up...