Why don't you want to tax the rich?

Thats not socialism thats the free market increasing demand
Imports were limited to several percent before the first gas crisis. That was not free market. In fact, the people demanded the percentage e increased as the American cars were pieces of shit. And we kept purchasing them.
 
so you would let Israel be destroyed and taken over by the muslims?


Typical self proclaimed sub human, "the muslims."

Why did W side with Taliban over TNA in the Afghan civil war 2001?

If you cannot answer that correctly and you still love W and believe "the terrorists" did 911 you should be straight jacketed into a mental institution and never allowed to leave...
 
Typical self proclaimed sub human, "the muslims."

Why did W side with Taliban over TNA in the Afghan civil war 2001?

If you cannot answer that correctly and you still love W and believe "the terrorists" did 911 you should be straight jacketed into a mental institution and never allowed to leave...

Why did W side with Taliban over TNA in the Afghan civil war 2001?

Link?
 
Why did W side with Taliban over TNA in the Afghan civil war 2001?

Link?



When the US forces arrived in Afghan in 2001, was there an ongoing Afghan civil war, and what were the two sides of it?
 
If you are opposed, why?

Why do you oppose aggressive taxation of people making more than $250,000+ a year or $400,000+ a year annually?
According to IRS records the top 1% earn about 20% of the income yet pay over 40% of all Federal income taxes

The bottom 50% pay less then 3% of all federal income taxes

It is obvious tje so called rich are the cash cows of the left who are happy to piss through their money
 
Sty
Either/or isn't going to cut it.

It's not making government more efficient or increasing personal income taxes on the top end.

It's both. Or we're just not serious.
Stupid 🐂 🐂 OX. There is enough taxation. Fix your fraud theft graft cheese brained arsejack. Take another look AFTER things are cleaned up.//


According to the Senator, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) estimates that between $250 billion and $521 billion of the over $1 trillion in annual U.S. welfare spending is lost to fraud.

 
Sty

Stupid 🐂 🐂 OX. There is enough taxation. Fix your fraud theft graft cheese brained arsejack. Take another look AFTER things are cleaned up.//


According to the Senator, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) estimates that between $250 billion and $521 billion of the over $1 trillion in annual U.S. welfare spending is lost to fraud.



UTAH MACSTAIN thinks th GOVT is funny? But wants to give them more money? Huh? Failed financial clown much?
 



And then THIS HAPPENED...





One of the worst acts of treason ever. With our troops in the field allied with TNA against Taliban, W flipped off those supplying TNA with money and arms, Iran. That is when TNA stopped cooperating. Many TNA were Shia. The alliance with TNA was over, because W was too busy sticking his nose up the ass of the Star of David to pay any attention to all the US troops who were offed when TNA started firing at our troops over "axis of evil" speech.


Pretty amazing.

Who wanted to off Taliban? Iran

Who didn't?

W
Israel
Traitor Joe
The US Congress


hmmmmmm....


W later admitted "Osama" was "not a priority" and nobody was ever disciplined at all for the hate hoaxed assassination of Pat Tillman
 
I'll wait for your evidence that W was supporting the Taliban.



Essentially you are claiming that the US military simply could not take out the Taliban?

Laughable.

That's just as dumb as believing IDF needed more than a month to off Hamas....
 
According to IRS records the top 1% earn about 20% of the income yet pay over 40% of all Federal income taxes

I often see that quoted but I believe there is a fundamental flaw in its use regarding taxing the rich. Being rich means being wealthy, and the income tax is not designed as a tax on wealth as thousands of pages within the tax code consists of thousands of pages in restricting the definition of income.

I'm not for soaking the rich and believe in a flat tax, but only if the tax code is no longer slanted in their favor. I believe in defining income as all assets having monetary value one receives, no matter the source. Now if everyone was taxed based on that simple definition of income and taking into account expenditures to produce that income, we'd have an equitable tax system.
 
I often see that quoted but I believe there is a fundamental flaw in its use regarding taxing the rich. Being rich means being wealthy, and the income tax is not designed as a tax on wealth as thousands of pages within the tax code consists of thousands of pages in restricting the definition of income.

I'm not for soaking the rich and believe in a flat tax, but only if the tax code is no longer slanted in their favor. I believe in defining income as all assets having monetary value one receives, no matter the source. Now if everyone was taxed based on that simple definition of income and taking into account expenditures to produce that income, we'd have an equitable tax system.
Based on IRS records

 
According to IRS records the top 1% earn about 20% of the income

Again, they're talking about earnings, not wealth.

One person can earn a million and pay a mint in taxes. Another person can get their million and owe nothing in taxes due to a more favorable treatment in the tax code.

 
Again, they're talking about earnings, not wealth.

One person can earn a million and pay a mint in taxes. Another person can get their million and owe nothing in taxes due to a more favorable treatment in the tax code.


If they are following the existing taxes laws when they pay 40% of all federal income taxes collected why the hell do you want any more?

If is sad to see so many people suffer from wealth envy

The Feds spend over $7 trillion a year yet it is not enough for some people
 
Essentially you are claiming that the US military simply could not take out the Taliban?

Laughable.

That's just as dumb as believing IDF needed more than a month to off Hamas....

I'm claiming you're a nutty liar and you still haven't posted evidence to support your claim.
 
15th post
I often see that quoted but I believe there is a fundamental flaw in its use regarding taxing the rich. Being rich means being wealthy, and the income tax is not designed as a tax on wealth as thousands of pages within the tax code consists of thousands of pages in restricting the definition of income.

I'm not for soaking the rich and believe in a flat tax, but only if the tax code is no longer slanted in their favor. I believe in defining income as all assets having monetary value one receives, no matter the source. Now if everyone was taxed based on that simple definition of income and taking into account expenditures to produce that income, we'd have an equitable tax system.

I believe in defining income as all assets having monetary value one receives, no matter the source.


If you receive an asset from your employment, that's taxed.
 
Again, they're talking about earnings, not wealth.

One person can earn a million and pay a mint in taxes. Another person can get their million and owe nothing in taxes due to a more favorable treatment in the tax code.



One person can earn a million and pay a mint in taxes. Another person can get their million and owe nothing in taxes due to a more favorable treatment in the tax code.

You have an example where this is the case?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom