Why don't you dumbass liberals WAIT until Trump actually takes office before you say he's reneging

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Lol he posts about beat downs and you respond with this?

WEAKSAUCE

Which came first? The violence there or the violence now?

So now violence is a new creation to Trump? It never existed before?

You're an idiot

Now you're getting it. Trump created violence. By Jove you've figured it out.

Dont eat the glue ok.

This is the way you deflect. Pretend that I'm saying Trump created violence as a legitimate rebuttal

How did Trump make leftists violent? How did he inspire rape at the OWS gatherings? How did he sway Democrats to assassinate cops? How did he convince Democrats to loot, burn, and destroy property in Ferguson and Baltimore.....all of these things happening before he was even a nominee?

Answer?

He didn't. Leftists don't need Trump as an excuse to be violent. You people get violent all by yourselves.

Stop lying, Leftists!

Again, pretend I said Trump crested violence as a lame deflection. Unless you think that's what I meant then you're too stupid to talk to anyway.

It's hard to know what you're saying when you go on and on about what you're not saying. I'm scrolling back and seeing nothing. Just what are you saying if not suggesting Trump makes you people violent?

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

Again, pretend I said Trump crested violence as a lame deflection. Unless you think that's what I meant then you're too stupid to talk to anyway.

We know your filthy party hired the homeless and insane (average democrats) to start violence at Trump rallies, you got caught doing it. We know that the owner of your filthy party, George Soros, pays BLM, OWS, and other leftist hate groups to riot. We know that the #Hillaryriot scumbags are being bused in to create violence.

America knows full well who the violent ones are, democrat.

 

[ClosedCaption]

[

Again, pretend I said Trump crested violence as a lame deflection. Unless you think that's what I meant then you're too stupid to talk to anyway.

We know your filthy party hired the homeless and insane (average democrats) to start violence at Trump rallies, you got caught doing it. We know that the owner of your filthy party, George Soros, pays BLM, OWS, and other leftist hate groups to riot. We know that the #Hillaryriot scumbags are being bused in to create violence.

America knows full well who the violent ones are, democrat.

Blame everyone else for the violence. At first it was whoever caught the punches fault and now....its whoever caught the punches fault. Great update

 

[percysunshine]

You protest
You vandalize businesses
You destroy private property
You call for chaos
You call for assassination
You block traffic
You make innocent people scared

And now you're claiming that Trump has reneged BEFORE he's even assumed the office officially.

It is all FUCKING RETARDED, ALL OF IT. I understand your assholes are sore and the buttcream isn't working but get a damn grip on yourselves.

.
What agreement did Trump have with liberals that he might be going back on?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Which came first? The violence there or the violence now?

So now violence is a new creation to Trump? It never existed before?

You're an idiot

Now you're getting it. Trump created violence. By Jove you've figured it out.

Dont eat the glue ok.

This is the way you deflect. Pretend that I'm saying Trump created violence as a legitimate rebuttal

How did Trump make leftists violent? How did he inspire rape at the OWS gatherings? How did he sway Democrats to assassinate cops? How did he convince Democrats to loot, burn, and destroy property in Ferguson and Baltimore.....all of these things happening before he was even a nominee?

Answer?

He didn't. Leftists don't need Trump as an excuse to be violent. You people get violent all by yourselves.

Stop lying, Leftists!

Again, pretend I said Trump crested violence as a lame deflection. Unless you think that's what I meant then you're too stupid to talk to anyway.

It's hard to know what you're saying when you go on and on about what you're not saying. I'm scrolling back and seeing nothing. Just what are you saying if not suggesting Trump makes you people violent?

He stated he was against violence. I then showed him an instance from a Trump rally that he hurried to defend by saying one violent event was not like another violent event. Then some dumbass suggested that I believe Trump is the creator of violence to deflect and again defend the violence by turning a blind eye...to only some of the violence tho *wink wink*

Now that I've recapped are you caught up now?

 

[BluesLegend]

Trump vows to put Americans first, to make America great again, to bring back high paying jobs, to lower taxes, to enable growth in business and energy...all of which will shore up social programs like social security and Medicare, and the left has a full blown conniption fit, why?

 

[Some Guy]

Trump vows to put Americans first, to make America great again, to bring back high paying jobs, to lower taxes, to enable growth in business and energy...all of which will shore up social programs like social security and Medicare, and the left has a full blown conniption fit, why?

Quite simply, they're whipped up by left wing news outlets. In their desperate attempt to puff up Hillary and hold Trump down, both the media and Hillary's strategy for winning became "demonize Trump as much as possible" so they took every thing he's ever said and mis-represented it to the max (not that he hasn't said some stupid shit).

The true believers lap it up and buy in wholeheartedly to the idea that Trump wants to enslave or kill all black people, rape all women, deport all muslims and all mexicans regardless of their immigration status and wants to kill all lgbt people.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

So now violence is a new creation to Trump? It never existed before?

You're an idiot

Now you're getting it. Trump created violence. By Jove you've figured it out.

Dont eat the glue ok.

This is the way you deflect. Pretend that I'm saying Trump created violence as a legitimate rebuttal

How did Trump make leftists violent? How did he inspire rape at the OWS gatherings? How did he sway Democrats to assassinate cops? How did he convince Democrats to loot, burn, and destroy property in Ferguson and Baltimore.....all of these things happening before he was even a nominee?

Answer?

He didn't. Leftists don't need Trump as an excuse to be violent. You people get violent all by yourselves.

Stop lying, Leftists!

Again, pretend I said Trump crested violence as a lame deflection. Unless you think that's what I meant then you're too stupid to talk to anyway.

It's hard to know what you're saying when you go on and on about what you're not saying. I'm scrolling back and seeing nothing. Just what are you saying if not suggesting Trump makes you people violent?

He stated he was against violence. I then showed him an instance from a Trump rally that he hurried to defend by saying one violent event was not like another violent event. Then some dumbass suggested that I believe Trump is the creator of violence to deflect and again defend the violence by turning a blind eye...to only some of the violence tho *wink wink*

Now that I've recapped are you caught up now?

Lies

I never even said it was a "violent" event, retard. Some fat chic was escorted out.
Meanwhile YOUR ILK smashes cars, breaks into businesses and beats up innocent bystanders for being white.

Kindly fuck off now troll

 

[ClosedCaption]

Now you're getting it. Trump created violence. By Jove you've figured it out.

Dont eat the glue ok.

This is the way you deflect. Pretend that I'm saying Trump created violence as a legitimate rebuttal

How did Trump make leftists violent? How did he inspire rape at the OWS gatherings? How did he sway Democrats to assassinate cops? How did he convince Democrats to loot, burn, and destroy property in Ferguson and Baltimore.....all of these things happening before he was even a nominee?

Answer?

He didn't. Leftists don't need Trump as an excuse to be violent. You people get violent all by yourselves.

Stop lying, Leftists!

Again, pretend I said Trump crested violence as a lame deflection. Unless you think that's what I meant then you're too stupid to talk to anyway.

It's hard to know what you're saying when you go on and on about what you're not saying. I'm scrolling back and seeing nothing. Just what are you saying if not suggesting Trump makes you people violent?

He stated he was against violence. I then showed him an instance from a Trump rally that he hurried to defend by saying one violent event was not like another violent event. Then some dumbass suggested that I believe Trump is the creator of violence to deflect and again defend the violence by turning a blind eye...to only some of the violence tho *wink wink*

Now that I've recapped are you caught up now?

Lies

I never even said it was a "violent" event, retard. Some fat chic was escorted out.
Meanwhile YOUR ILK smashes cars, breaks into businesses and beats up innocent bystanders for being white.

Kindly fuck off now troll

I know thats what I said...Even when shown violence you defend it by downplaying it as she was kicked out. The pushing, yelling, name calling etc wasnt violent....When one side does it *wink wink*

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

How did Trump make leftists violent? How did he inspire rape at the OWS gatherings? How did he sway Democrats to assassinate cops? How did he convince Democrats to loot, burn, and destroy property in Ferguson and Baltimore.....all of these things happening before he was even a nominee?

Answer?

He didn't. Leftists don't need Trump as an excuse to be violent. You people get violent all by yourselves.

Stop lying, Leftists!

Again, pretend I said Trump crested violence as a lame deflection. Unless you think that's what I meant then you're too stupid to talk to anyway.

It's hard to know what you're saying when you go on and on about what you're not saying. I'm scrolling back and seeing nothing. Just what are you saying if not suggesting Trump makes you people violent?

He stated he was against violence. I then showed him an instance from a Trump rally that he hurried to defend by saying one violent event was not like another violent event. Then some dumbass suggested that I believe Trump is the creator of violence to deflect and again defend the violence by turning a blind eye...to only some of the violence tho *wink wink*

Now that I've recapped are you caught up now?

Lies

I never even said it was a "violent" event, retard. Some fat chic was escorted out.
Meanwhile YOUR ILK smashes cars, breaks into businesses and beats up innocent bystanders for being white.

Kindly fuck off now troll

I know thats what I said...Even when shown violence you defend it by downplaying it as she was kicked out. The pushing, yelling, name calling etc wasnt violent....When one side does it *wink wink*

Being escorted out of an event because your a disruptor is not violence dumbass. And yelling and name calling isn't violence either you pathetic scrub.

 

[bendog]

Well, gramps, Trump promised to make the tax code "fairer"

Donald Trump Flip-Flops on Flat Tax in Literally Less than One Minute

And his plan "gives" 47% of cuts to the 1%

So, he's reneging on one or the other.

LOL

 

[ClosedCaption]

Again, pretend I said Trump crested violence as a lame deflection. Unless you think that's what I meant then you're too stupid to talk to anyway.

It's hard to know what you're saying when you go on and on about what you're not saying. I'm scrolling back and seeing nothing. Just what are you saying if not suggesting Trump makes you people violent?

He stated he was against violence. I then showed him an instance from a Trump rally that he hurried to defend by saying one violent event was not like another violent event. Then some dumbass suggested that I believe Trump is the creator of violence to deflect and again defend the violence by turning a blind eye...to only some of the violence tho *wink wink*

Now that I've recapped are you caught up now?

Lies

I never even said it was a "violent" event, retard. Some fat chic was escorted out.
Meanwhile YOUR ILK smashes cars, breaks into businesses and beats up innocent bystanders for being white.

Kindly fuck off now troll

I know thats what I said...Even when shown violence you defend it by downplaying it as she was kicked out. The pushing, yelling, name calling etc wasnt violent....When one side does it *wink wink*

Being escorted out of an event because your a disruptor is not violence dumbass. And yelling and name calling isn't violence either you pathetic scrub.

See? What about the pushing? Helpful support? New Massage therapy?

Its fun watching your credibility take such a hit to defend violence. Here do it with this one

What? He was getting a bug off his shoulder but liberals marching is beyond the pale? He was a nuisance so violence is ok then?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

It's hard to know what you're saying when you go on and on about what you're not saying. I'm scrolling back and seeing nothing. Just what are you saying if not suggesting Trump makes you people violent?

He stated he was against violence. I then showed him an instance from a Trump rally that he hurried to defend by saying one violent event was not like another violent event. Then some dumbass suggested that I believe Trump is the creator of violence to deflect and again defend the violence by turning a blind eye...to only some of the violence tho *wink wink*

Now that I've recapped are you caught up now?

Lies

I never even said it was a "violent" event, retard. Some fat chic was escorted out.
Meanwhile YOUR ILK smashes cars, breaks into businesses and beats up innocent bystanders for being white.

Kindly fuck off now troll

I know thats what I said...Even when shown violence you defend it by downplaying it as she was kicked out. The pushing, yelling, name calling etc wasnt violent....When one side does it *wink wink*

Being escorted out of an event because your a disruptor is not violence dumbass. And yelling and name calling isn't violence either you pathetic scrub.

See? What about the pushing? Helpful support? New Massage therapy?

Its fun watching your credibility take such a hit to defend violence. Here do it with this one

What? He was getting a bug off his shoulder but liberals marching is beyond the pale? He was a nuisance so violence is ok then?

The pushing of the fat chic was preceeded by what? Your video does not include that part for some reason........ And it's PUSHING for Christ's sake.

As to your new video, throw him in jail.


I like how you all post the same handful of videos over & over but ignore the hundreds of videos of your own ilk engaging in REAL VIOLENCE

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

So now violence is a new creation to Trump? It never existed before?

You're an idiot

Now you're getting it. Trump created violence. By Jove you've figured it out.

Dont eat the glue ok.

This is the way you deflect. Pretend that I'm saying Trump created violence as a legitimate rebuttal

How did Trump make leftists violent? How did he inspire rape at the OWS gatherings? How did he sway Democrats to assassinate cops? How did he convince Democrats to loot, burn, and destroy property in Ferguson and Baltimore.....all of these things happening before he was even a nominee?

Answer?

He didn't. Leftists don't need Trump as an excuse to be violent. You people get violent all by yourselves.

Stop lying, Leftists!

Again, pretend I said Trump crested violence as a lame deflection. Unless you think that's what I meant then you're too stupid to talk to anyway.

It's hard to know what you're saying when you go on and on about what you're not saying. I'm scrolling back and seeing nothing. Just what are you saying if not suggesting Trump makes you people violent?

He stated he was against violence. I then showed him an instance from a Trump rally that he hurried to defend by saying one violent event was not like another violent event. Then some dumbass suggested that I believe Trump is the creator of violence to deflect and again defend the violence by turning a blind eye...to only some of the violence tho *wink wink*

Now that I've recapped are you caught up now?

You poor fella. Everyone is getting the EXACT same message from you and you're still not getting it. You're trying to hang any act of violence around Trump's neck while entirely absolving Hillary for the mountain of violence being done in her name even to this day. Everyone reading your posts is gleaning the same thing I am, so no, I'm not missing your point at all.

 

[ClosedCaption]

He stated he was against violence. I then showed him an instance from a Trump rally that he hurried to defend by saying one violent event was not like another violent event. Then some dumbass suggested that I believe Trump is the creator of violence to deflect and again defend the violence by turning a blind eye...to only some of the violence tho *wink wink*

Now that I've recapped are you caught up now?

Lies

I never even said it was a "violent" event, retard. Some fat chic was escorted out.
Meanwhile YOUR ILK smashes cars, breaks into businesses and beats up innocent bystanders for being white.

Kindly fuck off now troll

I know thats what I said...Even when shown violence you defend it by downplaying it as she was kicked out. The pushing, yelling, name calling etc wasnt violent....When one side does it *wink wink*

Being escorted out of an event because your a disruptor is not violence dumbass. And yelling and name calling isn't violence either you pathetic scrub.

See? What about the pushing? Helpful support? New Massage therapy?

Its fun watching your credibility take such a hit to defend violence. Here do it with this one

What? He was getting a bug off his shoulder but liberals marching is beyond the pale? He was a nuisance so violence is ok then?

The pushing of the fat chic was preceeded by what? Your video does not include that part for some reason........ And it's PUSHING for Christ's sake.

As to your new video, throw him in jail.


I like how you all post the same handful of videos over & over but ignore the hundreds of videos of your own ilk engaging in REAL VIOLENCE

If I pushed your wife around like that and you said to her it was only pushing...yeah, that seems likely.

Yeah not like those incidents of fake violence at Trump rallies.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Now you're getting it. Trump created violence. By Jove you've figured it out.

Dont eat the glue ok.

This is the way you deflect. Pretend that I'm saying Trump created violence as a legitimate rebuttal

How did Trump make leftists violent? How did he inspire rape at the OWS gatherings? How did he sway Democrats to assassinate cops? How did he convince Democrats to loot, burn, and destroy property in Ferguson and Baltimore.....all of these things happening before he was even a nominee?

Answer?

He didn't. Leftists don't need Trump as an excuse to be violent. You people get violent all by yourselves.

Stop lying, Leftists!

Again, pretend I said Trump crested violence as a lame deflection. Unless you think that's what I meant then you're too stupid to talk to anyway.

It's hard to know what you're saying when you go on and on about what you're not saying. I'm scrolling back and seeing nothing. Just what are you saying if not suggesting Trump makes you people violent?

He stated he was against violence. I then showed him an instance from a Trump rally that he hurried to defend by saying one violent event was not like another violent event. Then some dumbass suggested that I believe Trump is the creator of violence to deflect and again defend the violence by turning a blind eye...to only some of the violence tho *wink wink*

Now that I've recapped are you caught up now?

You poor fella. Everyone is getting the EXACT same message from you and you're still not getting it.[/qutoe]

Oh, the old "everyone knows" line before you say something weird....thats new.

You're trying to hang any act of violence around Trump's neck while entirely absolving Hillary for the mountain of violence being done in her name even to this day. Everyone reading your posts is gleaning the same thing I am, so no, I'm not missing your point at all.

So just to be clear. I'm wrong for associating violence at Trump rallies with Trump and what I should be doing is associating twitter messages or people not around Hilary at all for violence because thats fair?

How does that work? If you say they are leftist you want me to attack them because you said so but not the guys at the Trump rally who is told they'll have their defense paid for?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

How did Trump make leftists violent? How did he inspire rape at the OWS gatherings? How did he sway Democrats to assassinate cops? How did he convince Democrats to loot, burn, and destroy property in Ferguson and Baltimore.....all of these things happening before he was even a nominee?

Answer?

He didn't. Leftists don't need Trump as an excuse to be violent. You people get violent all by yourselves.

Stop lying, Leftists!

Again, pretend I said Trump crested violence as a lame deflection. Unless you think that's what I meant then you're too stupid to talk to anyway.

It's hard to know what you're saying when you go on and on about what you're not saying. I'm scrolling back and seeing nothing. Just what are you saying if not suggesting Trump makes you people violent?

He stated he was against violence. I then showed him an instance from a Trump rally that he hurried to defend by saying one violent event was not like another violent event. Then some dumbass suggested that I believe Trump is the creator of violence to deflect and again defend the violence by turning a blind eye...to only some of the violence tho *wink wink*

Now that I've recapped are you caught up now?

You poor fella. Everyone is getting the EXACT same message from you and you're still not getting it.[/qutoe]

Oh, the old "everyone knows" line before you say something weird....thats new.

You're trying to hang any act of violence around Trump's neck while entirely absolving Hillary for the mountain of violence being done in her name even to this day. Everyone reading your posts is gleaning the same thing I am, so no, I'm not missing your point at all.

So just to be clear. I'm wrong for associating violence at Trump rallies with Trump and what I should be doing is associating twitter messages or people not around Hilary at all for violence because thats fair?

How does that work? If you say they are leftist you want me to attack them because you said so but not the guys at the Trump rally who is told they'll have their defense paid for?

Let me put it in a way even you can understand. When one party actually pays people to be disruptive at the campaigne events of the other party, that party is in fact directly facilitating the ensuing violence. That means that woman who got socked while she was leaving the event, which you so smugly displayed, was actually injured because she was on an errand for YOUR POS party. Donald Trump has never called for violence, never paid for violence, never condoned violence. Your POS party has.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Again, pretend I said Trump crested violence as a lame deflection. Unless you think that's what I meant then you're too stupid to talk to anyway.

It's hard to know what you're saying when you go on and on about what you're not saying. I'm scrolling back and seeing nothing. Just what are you saying if not suggesting Trump makes you people violent?

He stated he was against violence. I then showed him an instance from a Trump rally that he hurried to defend by saying one violent event was not like another violent event. Then some dumbass suggested that I believe Trump is the creator of violence to deflect and again defend the violence by turning a blind eye...to only some of the violence tho *wink wink*

Now that I've recapped are you caught up now?

You poor fella. Everyone is getting the EXACT same message from you and you're still not getting it.[/qutoe]

Oh, the old "everyone knows" line before you say something weird....thats new.

You're trying to hang any act of violence around Trump's neck while entirely absolving Hillary for the mountain of violence being done in her name even to this day. Everyone reading your posts is gleaning the same thing I am, so no, I'm not missing your point at all.

So just to be clear. I'm wrong for associating violence at Trump rallies with Trump and what I should be doing is associating twitter messages or people not around Hilary at all for violence because thats fair?

How does that work? If you say they are leftist you want me to attack them because you said so but not the guys at the Trump rally who is told they'll have their defense paid for?

Let me put it in a way even you can understand. When one party actually pays people to be disruptive at the campaigne events of the other party, that party is in fact directly facilitating the ensuing violence.

So you're sticking with the "they made me do it, they made me defend the violence" theme. This would've worked if you didnt defend the violence when it happened before you had some conspiracy to blame. Now you defend the violence again with a new defense. "They made him punch, kick, assault them"

That means that woman who got socked while she was leaving the event, which you so smugly displayed, was actually injured because she was on an errand for YOUR POS party. Donald Trump has never called for violence, never paid for violence, never condoned violence. Your POS party has.

No, that just means that every incident where violence happened you can now blame it on everyone else except the people getting physical. You can blame all the ghosts and conspiracies you like....but it still doesnt make it true

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

It's hard to know what you're saying when you go on and on about what you're not saying. I'm scrolling back and seeing nothing. Just what are you saying if not suggesting Trump makes you people violent?

He stated he was against violence. I then showed him an instance from a Trump rally that he hurried to defend by saying one violent event was not like another violent event. Then some dumbass suggested that I believe Trump is the creator of violence to deflect and again defend the violence by turning a blind eye...to only some of the violence tho *wink wink*

Now that I've recapped are you caught up now?

You poor fella. Everyone is getting the EXACT same message from you and you're still not getting it.[/qutoe]

Oh, the old "everyone knows" line before you say something weird....thats new.

You're trying to hang any act of violence around Trump's neck while entirely absolving Hillary for the mountain of violence being done in her name even to this day. Everyone reading your posts is gleaning the same thing I am, so no, I'm not missing your point at all.

So just to be clear. I'm wrong for associating violence at Trump rallies with Trump and what I should be doing is associating twitter messages or people not around Hilary at all for violence because thats fair?

How does that work? If you say they are leftist you want me to attack them because you said so but not the guys at the Trump rally who is told they'll have their defense paid for?

Let me put it in a way even you can understand. When one party actually pays people to be disruptive at the campaigne events of the other party, that party is in fact directly facilitating the ensuing violence.

So you're sticking with the "they made me do it, they made me defend the violence" theme. This would've worked if you didnt defend the violence when it happened before you had some conspiracy to blame. Now you defend the violence again with a new defense. "They made him punch, kick, assault them"

That means that woman who got socked while she was leaving the event, which you so smugly displayed, was actually injured because she was on an errand for YOUR POS party. Donald Trump has never called for violence, never paid for violence, never condoned violence. Your POS party has.

No, that just means that every incident where violence happened you can now blame it on everyone else except the people getting physical. You can blame all the ghosts and conspiracies you like....but it still doesnt make it true

Yes. Actually I can lay the injuries that woman suffered at the feet of the Democrat party. She wouldn't have been there except she was paid to be there, and offered compensation for medical expenses. She was hired to look for trouble and she got it.

It's ironic that Cankles kept repeating the meme, "When they go low, we go high", considering the DNC went lower than anyone could imagine, sabotaging Bernie Sanders, paying protesters, and rigging debates with CNN's help. You people don't even know what a moral high ground is, much less able to attain it.

 

[ClosedCaption]

He stated he was against violence. I then showed him an instance from a Trump rally that he hurried to defend by saying one violent event was not like another violent event. Then some dumbass suggested that I believe Trump is the creator of violence to deflect and again defend the violence by turning a blind eye...to only some of the violence tho *wink wink*

Now that I've recapped are you caught up now?

You poor fella. Everyone is getting the EXACT same message from you and you're still not getting it.[/qutoe]

Oh, the old "everyone knows" line before you say something weird....thats new.

You're trying to hang any act of violence around Trump's neck while entirely absolving Hillary for the mountain of violence being done in her name even to this day. Everyone reading your posts is gleaning the same thing I am, so no, I'm not missing your point at all.

So just to be clear. I'm wrong for associating violence at Trump rallies with Trump and what I should be doing is associating twitter messages or people not around Hilary at all for violence because thats fair?

How does that work? If you say they are leftist you want me to attack them because you said so but not the guys at the Trump rally who is told they'll have their defense paid for?

Let me put it in a way even you can understand. When one party actually pays people to be disruptive at the campaigne events of the other party, that party is in fact directly facilitating the ensuing violence.

So you're sticking with the "they made me do it, they made me defend the violence" theme. This would've worked if you didnt defend the violence when it happened before you had some conspiracy to blame. Now you defend the violence again with a new defense. "They made him punch, kick, assault them"

That means that woman who got socked while she was leaving the event, which you so smugly displayed, was actually injured because she was on an errand for YOUR POS party. Donald Trump has never called for violence, never paid for violence, never condoned violence. Your POS party has.

No, that just means that every incident where violence happened you can now blame it on everyone else except the people getting physical. You can blame all the ghosts and conspiracies you like....but it still doesnt make it true

Yes. Actually I can lay the injuries that woman suffered at the feet of the Democrat party.

Of course you can. You can lay blame with the Gods of Olympus and no one can stop you from it

She wouldn't have been there except she was paid to be there, and offered compensation for medical expenses. She was hired to look for trouble and she got it.

Well to say that would require proof. And since you dont have any you can say she was there for the Gods of Olympus too!