Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You didn't build that....
Doubling down on stupidity.
That's 3,000 jobs right there.
Great thread title.
She is right. Businesses do not create jobs.
This very discussion is going on NOW in three different threads. Go find them and stop trying to bore liberals to fucking death.
Watch this and learn something.
Nick Hanauer Beware fellow plutocrats the pitchforks are coming Talk Video TED.com
Great thread title.
She is right. Businesses do not create jobs.
This very discussion is going on NOW in three different threads. Go find them and stop trying to bore liberals to fucking death.
Watch this and learn something.
Nick Hanauer Beware fellow plutocrats the pitchforks are coming Talk Video TED.com
Jesus H Christ.......what a fucking idiot you are......
You didn't build that....
Doubling down on stupidity.
That's 3,000 jobs right there.
Yeah, but those aren't "real" jobs because they don't afford the workers the opportunity to spend their "down time" being "photographers, dancers and artists" Like the idiot Pelosi said about all the part-time jobs in America......
Thanks for the totally out of context bumper sticker bs, but Obama was saying we need good infrastructure, and Hillary was saying trickle down is a disaster. See if you can spot the effect of trickle down, dingbats:
Over the past 30 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:
1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.
Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%
A 13% drop since 1980
2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%
An increase of 16% since Reagan.
3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.
The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.
1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)
A 12.3% drop after Reagan.
4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.
Household Debt as percentage of GDP:
1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%
A 45% increase after 1980.
5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.
Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:
1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%
A 5.6 times increase.
6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.
The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:
1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%
A 10% Decrease.
Links:
1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg image
2 – Congratulations to Emmanuel Saez The White House
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis BEA
4 = http://www.prudentbear.com/index.php/household-sector-debt-of-gdp
4 = FRB Z.1 Release--Financial Accounts of the United States--September 18 2014
5/6 = Wealth And Inequality In America - Business Insider
Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts
You didn't build that....
Doubling down on stupidity.
That's 3,000 jobs right there.
Yeah, but those aren't "real" jobs because they don't afford the workers the opportunity to spend their "down time" being "photographers, dancers and artists" Like the idiot Pelosi said about all the part-time jobs in America......
3000 jobs from Europe, where they invest in training, tech education, health care, vacations etc etc for workers. And hate the GOP.
As always, you don't hear what Pelosi said. She was saying that more Americans could follow their dreams without worrying about healthcare. If we had more artists and fewer a-holes, we wouldn't be in such a gd Pub mess, Pub dupe.
What she said was trickle down doesn't work, hater dupe. FACT. Except for greedy idiot mega rich Pubs.
Thanks for the totally out of context bumper sticker bs, but Obama was saying we need good infrastructure, and Hillary was saying trickle down is a disaster. See if you can spot the effect of trickle down, dingbats:
Over the past 30 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:
1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.
Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%
A 13% drop since 1980
2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%
An increase of 16% since Reagan.
3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.
The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.
1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)
A 12.3% drop after Reagan.
4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.
Household Debt as percentage of GDP:
1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%
A 45% increase after 1980.
5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.
Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:
1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%
A 5.6 times increase.
6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.
The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:
1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%
A 10% Decrease.
Links:
1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg image
2 – Congratulations to Emmanuel Saez The White House
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis BEA
4 = http://www.prudentbear.com/index.php/household-sector-debt-of-gdp
4 = FRB Z.1 Release--Financial Accounts of the United States--September 18 2014
5/6 = Wealth And Inequality In America - Business Insider
Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts
You're an economic ignoramus. There's no hopeno we don't ... never have... what we believe is a combination of government jobs and private sector jobs is what makes a good philosophy... what we liberals know is if you want to stimulate the economy and increase the private sector job market in the private sector, is to pass job bills that the government pays for... every time we as a country have done this, the private sector jobs go throught the roof, do to the denmand created from private sector jobs by the government jobs we created... you on the right feel we don't need these government jobs for any reason.. that is your demented uniformed idea... this Idea that all we liberals think about is government freebee's is total bull shit...t pull your lips off the right wings butt and go look at what we liberals are about...Liberals think that the Government IS the US economy.
it's staggering stupidity, but that's what they believe. it what underlies their entire failed economic philosophy. It's why they favor 90% income tax. They labor under the stupid belief that high taxes create economic growth
View attachment 33496
Hillary said yesterday, that businesses don't create jobs. Are you kidding me? If she runs for president, if I was the republican running against her, I would have a banner with that saying behind me at all the debates. This is crazy, why do liberals hate the private sector?
you said "Pelosi says that welfare is the engine of recovery"... according to the CBO, they said that welfare helps stimulating the economy along with the private sector and government workers... all pelosi did wasdoing was repeating what the CBO said ... she never said it like you have stated here ... She never said that welfare is the engine for recovery ... that you distorting the facts of what was told to her by the CBO .... so stop your lyingShe said it stimulates the economy.you have a sourse of this bull shit lie of yours??? didn't think soWhen Nancy says that welfare is the engine of recovery...you know the depth of libtard stupidity.
