Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Morris cites interlal polls.
Guy must know something - has been around.......................................
CNN manipulated their polling | Education NewsCNN is grabbing political headlines tonight with the release of its latest poll. It shows Obama surging to a 6-point lead over Romney, 52-46, among likely. Before the start of the Democrat convention, the candidates had been tied in the poll. Since it purportedly confirms a narrative the media is trying to build, i.e. that Obama is starting to pull away with the race, it is getting wide coverage. However, there are a couple of strange things within the poll that cast doubt on its veracity. And, at least one concern warrants a response from CNN.
First, this being a media poll, it has an obvious skew towards Democrats. The partisan breakdown is (D/R/I) 50/45/5. It perhaps isn’t surprising that Obama is leading a D+5 poll by 6 points. Throughout the campaign season, Obama’s margin usually is very close to the partisan skew in the sample. It is surprising, though, that Independents make up only 5% of the sample. Tellingly, Romney leads this group by 14 points.
Never trust a word they say: NY Times, Quinnipiac skew polling in attempt to depress turnout of voters frustrated with the failures of Obamanomics « Bob OwensJammie Wearing catches the NY Times/Quinnipiac poll dramatically skewing the methodology of the poll to strongly over-sample Democrats:
So Obama is up 9 in Florida with a D+9 sample, up 10 in Ohio with a D+9 sample and up 12 in Pennsylvania with a D+11 sample. I notice in all the orgasmic news reports this morning none of them mention the ridiculous skew to the polls. But all you will hear all day is how big a lead Obama has.
Dick Morris is ALWAYS right. He has never made a prediction that turned out to be inaccurate.
What do you suppose Democratic/Republican turnout was in 1996 compared to 1994??
Dick Morris is ALWAYS right. He has never made a prediction that turned out to be inaccurate.
He's been wrong quite a bit but the man is fun to listen to. At this point I give him a SLIGHT edge over all the bullshit polls we've endured to this point.
He has played in the sandbox on both sides of the isle. I've never read his books so I dunno why he switched but I bet it's an interesting story.
Dick Morris is ALWAYS right. He has never made a prediction that turned out to be inaccurate.
He's been wrong quite a bit but the man is fun to listen to. At this point I give him a SLIGHT edge over all the bullshit polls we've endured to this point.
He has played in the sandbox on both sides of the isle. I've never read his books so I dunno why he switched but I bet it's an interesting story.
And.....knowing how you are so firmly planted in reality that you have never been suckered.....those words are so very meaningful. You give DICK FUCKING MORRIS an edge over ALL. the other polls. Wonderfully stupid of you.
What do you suppose Democratic/Republican turnout was in 1996 compared to 1994??
I'll give you a hint......
This ISN'T 2006 so your point is as stupid as it Is moot
Morris makes millions on his perpicuity!
Meaningful requires basic intellect. You cannot claim that if you buy something......ANYTHING.....that Dick Morris says.
What do you suppose Democratic/Republican turnout was in 1996 compared to 1994??
I'll give you a hint......
This ISN'T 2006 so your point is as stupid as it Is moot
No, it's an incumbent president running for re-election after taking a bad hit in the midterms. Which is what 1996 was.
Why didn't you jump on the other poster's shit for bringing up 2010?