Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 52,624
- 38,652
- 3,545
Exactly.
They should not have lied and claim their primaries are not rigged.
"rigged" implies something illegal -
Nothing was illegal.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly.
They should not have lied and claim their primaries are not rigged.
"rigged" implies something illegal -
Nothing was illegal.
The DNC claimed everyone running was on an equal footing. They were not.
I am saying they lied. I did not say it was illegal.
Your inference is on you. I did not imply anything.
They said Bernie and Hillary were treated the same. They were not.
IT IS THEATER.
The literal WEBSTER DICTIONARY DEFINITION OF RIGGED IS: “manipulated or controlled by deceptive or dishonest means”
Does not have to break federal, state, or local laws to be “rigged”.
The DNC claimed everyone running was on an equal footing. They were not.
I am saying they lied. I did not say it was illegal.
Your inference is on you. I did not imply anything.
They said Bernie and Hillary were treated the same. They were not.
IT IS THEATER.
The literal WEBSTER DICTIONARY DEFINITION OF RIGGED IS: “manipulated or controlled by deceptive or dishonest means”
Does not have to break federal, state, or local laws to be “rigged”.
Sorry but --![]()
Court Concedes DNC Had the Right to Rig Primaries Against Sanders
The court affirmed that the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Hillary Clinton.observer.com
We were told the DNC primaries WERE NOT RIGGED.
Then in court, the DNC said, “YES, WE RIG OUR PRIMARIES AND WE ARE ALLOWED TO….**** BERNIE SANDERS AND ALL HIS SUPPORTERS.”
The DNC is legally allowed to rig their primaries….AND THEY DO.
THE DEMOCRATS HAVE NO INTEREST IN DEMOCRACY.
![]()
Court Concedes DNC Had the Right to Rig Primaries Against Sanders
The court affirmed that the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Hillary Clinton.observer.com
We were told the DNC primaries WERE NOT RIGGED.
Then in court, the DNC said, “YES, WE RIG OUR PRIMARIES AND WE ARE ALLOWED TO….**** BERNIE SANDERS AND ALL HIS SUPPORTERS.”
The DNC is legally allowed to rig their primaries….AND THEY DO.
THE DEMOCRATS HAVE NO INTEREST IN DEMOCRACY.
And there are already plenty of fascist countries on earth they can illegally immigrate to and enjoy fascism.They are fascists.
Yea, I was STUPID enough to believe (prior to Obama) that the Dem Primaries were not WWE, Hulk Hogan against Andre the Giant.Sorry but --
That's not news to anybody.
the dimocrap scum party is a totes top-down arrangement. Always has been, always will be.
The truth is, in the Primary process, dimocrap scum have the right to be the scum they are.Yea, I was STUPID enough to believe (prior to Obama) that the Dem Primaries were not WWE, Hulk Hogan against Andre the Giant.
Dem primaries are predetermined scripted theater. The fund raising, the campaigning, getting the electors. ALL SCRIPTED DRAMA.
Watch it like a miniseries…but thinking it is real is like thinking THE HANDMAIDS TALE is a documentary.
I was DUMB AS JOE BIDEN to think Dem primaries are not pre determined.
Why does anyone bother to vote in Dem primaries when we all know the outcome is predetermined regardless of vote results?
Serious question. Do you hold a single position that isn't identical to the positions held by historical fascist groups? Because I literally don't see even one. Down the line, on every position, you're a perfect fascist bootlicker. Same with all the Trump cult fascists on this thread.NORTH KOREA would love you lefties…just sneak on in.
I would like to see the Party cleaned out of the elitist fascist that control the Party and returned to the Party of the past.
What they did to Sanders was to change the rules at the last minute to benefit Clinton. Was that fair? No. Was it against the Law? Court said no.
I'm still waiting for one of you nitwits to tell me how they "rigged" the primary against Sanders, a guy the allowed to run even though he wasn't a member of their party.
Sanders lost because he got less votes and lost more primaries.
How were they "rigged", exactly.
Here's why Commie Bernie lost.
He got less votes.
View attachment 1115523
And they weren't. Your article gives no evidence that they were. You propanda masters are making crazy stuff up again.
And, as always, you fell for it.
Stop projecting. Only your side suckles at the anus of corruption.
"rigged" implies something illegal -
Nothing was illegal.
Then in court, the DNC said, “YES, WE RIG OUR PRIMARIES AND WE ARE ALLOWED TO….**** BERNIE SANDERS AND ALL HIS SUPPORTERS.”
Dems have the right to RIG, shocker. Hell they don't even bother with primaries now, they just get a few big donors in a back room and coronate someone.![]()
Court Concedes DNC Had the Right to Rig Primaries Against Sanders
The court affirmed that the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Hillary Clinton.observer.com
We were told the DNC primaries WERE NOT RIGGED.
Then in court, the DNC said, “YES, WE RIG OUR PRIMARIES AND WE ARE ALLOWED TO….**** BERNIE SANDERS AND ALL HIS SUPPORTERS.”
The DNC is legally allowed to rig their primaries….AND THEY DO.
THE DEMOCRATS HAVE NO INTEREST IN DEMOCRACY.
They did more than that.
They gave Hillary the debate questions ahead of time.
They allowed uncommitted super delegates to outvote the elected delegates.
Rigged does not imply illegal, but deceptive.
It is deceptive to make it appear Hillary won the primary when she actually did not.
Its not illegal since there are no laws dictating what parties what to do.
But it is deceptive.