Why Do Trump Supporters Have Such A Hard Time Admitting He's A Convicted Felon?

All of that, and he’s still the President and well, you are still butt hurt.

lol ... i'm over it. & at least i've accepted it - not like donny's whiny bitchfest he has on the daily about 2020.

Amazing, isn’t it?

of course you don't care about yer chosen one being a rapist. why would you? donny loves you long time for that loyalty too!
 
i never said criminal. i have always said he was found liable of sexual assault & the judge who presided adjudicated him a rapist.

don't like it?

tough shit.



give it up, incel.
He was NEVER adjudicated of rape--he was considered by that kangaroo court to be LIBEL for it not guilty OF it. Learn the difference or remain stupid, your choice.
 
He was NEVER adjudicated of rape--he was considered by that kangaroo court to be LIBEL for it not guilty OF it. Learn the difference or remain stupid, your choice.
True, he was adjudicated for sexual abuse. Aside from that, the judge said what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood, but that was not adjudicated.
 
They also don’t admit he was found to have run a fake charity.

1781736346296.webp
 
lol ... i'm over it. & at least i've accepted it - not like donny's whiny bitchfest he has on the daily about 2020.

of course you don't care about yer chosen one being a rapist. why would you? donny loves you long time for that loyalty too!

No, I don’t care that you think he’s a rapist. We have this thing in our country called innocent until proven guilty. I know, that’s something you want applied to everyone except Trump.
 
2x found libel.

tutt tutt.

$90,000,000.00

Being found liable is not the same as being found guilty. One is a civil case and the other is a criminal case. Two completely different standards of proof. The question is are you ignorant of this or just so political bias that you choose to ignore it?
 
15th post
Trumpsters react to criticism of their orange god the way jihadis react to cartoons of Muhammad.
Yeah, can be summed up as he didn't sexually abuse her, she's lying. But if she's not lying, he wasn't convicted in criminal court. But if he was found liable of in a civil court, it's because of a leftie jury. But even if the jury was impartial, he's going to win on appeal. But if he doesn't, he still owns da libz!
 
Being found liable is not the same as being found guilty. One is a civil case and the other is a criminal case. Two completely different standards of proof. The question is are you ignorant of this or just so political bias that you choose to ignore it?

"A distinction without a difference" is a rhetorical or logical expression used when someone argues that two things are different, but the difference has no practical, substantive, or meaningful effect
 
Yeah, can be summed up as he didn't sexually abuse her, she's lying. But if she's not lying, he wasn't convicted in criminal court. But if he was found liable of in a civil court, it's because of a leftie jury. But even if the jury was impartial, he's going to win on appeal. But if he doesn't, he still owns da libz!

does yer back hurt from all that ankle grabbing you do for yer chosen one?
 
Back
Top Bottom