Why Do They Pass Dumb Laws?

[PoliticalChic]

What would happen if government allowed all who pass a background check, and take a safety course, have and wear a gun if they chose?


1. Violent crime would decrease

2. There's be far, far fewer massacres of innocent citizens.

3. Soooo....why do Democrats insist on counter-intuitive gun laws????





This is what Democrats voted for.

 

[alang1216]

Government should encourage citizens having guns rather than working for the success of criminals.

The Constitution says you have the right to own 'arms'. Why don't localities get to decide how they want deal with when and where guns may be carried outside a home? If you want to walk around with a flintlock that gives the neighborhood some character. If you want to walk around with an Uzi, I'd keep my kids indoors.

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

Assault weapons ban is one thing the democrats in Virginia cannot get passed despite controlling both chambers and all major offices in the state, and that is a watered down version that just prevents future sales, not outlawing possession.

Why do the Democrats work so assiduously for criminals?

Birds of a feather....

 

[PoliticalChic]

Government should encourage citizens having guns rather than working for the success of criminals.

The Constitution says you have the right to own 'arms'. Why don't localities get to decide how they want deal with when and where guns may be carried outside a home? If you want to walk around with a flintlock that gives the neighborhood some character. If you want to walk around with an Uzi, I'd keep my kids indoors.

Government either treats individual as citizens, or treats them as subjects.

You are the example of what happens when individuals accept being serfs and subjects, rather than think responsible, thinking, adults.



Here is what happens when government treats citizens correctly:

"Iowa Governor Signs Bill Into Law Letting Residents Buy, Carry Guns Without Permits

Iowa Governor Signs Bill Into Law Letting Residents Buy, Carry Guns Without Permits
Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds signed legislation into law on Friday lifting some restrictions to buy or carry a handgun in the state for law-abiding citizens.

www.theepochtimes.com


"Iowans would no longer need a permit to carry or buy guns under a GOP bill in the Legislature
it would remove the need for Iowans to get "a permission slip" to exercise their right to keep and bear arms, while opponents say it would threaten public safety and roll back some of Iowa's background check requirements."

Iowans would no longer need a permit to carry or buy guns under a GOP bill in the Legislature
Iowans buying guns from federally licensed dealers would still have to pass a background check or present a permit to carry. Not so for private sales.
www.desmoinesregister.com




Unlike Democrat officials, the Republican ones treat citizens like responsible adults.


Then again......Democrat voters are far from responsible adults.


Now why don't you present the results of this sort of governance?
Not your hand-wringing propaganda.....the actual results.

Caution: if this is the first time you have ever tried thinking, you might be in danger of an aneurysm.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Assault weapons ban is one thing the democrats in Virginia cannot get passed despite controlling both chambers and all major offices in the state, and that is a watered down version that just prevents future sales, not outlawing possession.

Why do the Democrats work so assiduously for criminals?

Birds of a feather....

Perhaps it should be Duck Season.

 

[alang1216]

Government should encourage citizens having guns rather than working for the success of criminals.

The Constitution says you have the right to own 'arms'. Why don't localities get to decide how they want deal with when and where guns may be carried outside a home? If you want to walk around with a flintlock that gives the neighborhood some character. If you want to walk around with an Uzi, I'd keep my kids indoors.

Government either treats individual as citizens, or treats them as subjects.

You are the example of what happens when individuals accept being serfs and subjects, rather than think responsible, thinking, adults.



Here is what happens when government treats citizens correctly:

"Iowa Governor Signs Bill Into Law Letting Residents Buy, Carry Guns Without Permits

Iowa Governor Signs Bill Into Law Letting Residents Buy, Carry Guns Without Permits
Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds signed legislation into law on Friday lifting some restrictions to buy or carry a handgun in the state for law-abiding citizens.

www.theepochtimes.com


"Iowans would no longer need a permit to carry or buy guns under a GOP bill in the Legislature
it would remove the need for Iowans to get "a permission slip" to exercise their right to keep and bear arms, while opponents say it would threaten public safety and roll back some of Iowa's background check requirements."

Iowans would no longer need a permit to carry or buy guns under a GOP bill in the Legislature
Iowans buying guns from federally licensed dealers would still have to pass a background check or present a permit to carry. Not so for private sales.
www.desmoinesregister.com




Unlike Democrat officials, the Republican ones treat citizens like responsible adults.


Then again......Democrat voters are far from responsible adults.


Now why don't you present the results of this sort of governance?
Not your hand-wringing propaganda.....the actual results.

Caution: if this is the first time you have ever tried thinking, you might be in danger of an aneurysm.

Those brave legislators, allowing their citizens to carry guns. They would be less hypocritical if they let people carry their guns into the legislature. They don't. Why is that? Don't they want the same protections they are offering everyone else in Iowa?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Government should encourage citizens having guns rather than working for the success of criminals.

The Constitution says you have the right to own 'arms'. Why don't localities get to decide how they want deal with when and where guns may be carried outside a home? If you want to walk around with a flintlock that gives the neighborhood some character. If you want to walk around with an Uzi, I'd keep my kids indoors.

Government either treats individual as citizens, or treats them as subjects.

You are the example of what happens when individuals accept being serfs and subjects, rather than think responsible, thinking, adults.



Here is what happens when government treats citizens correctly:

"Iowa Governor Signs Bill Into Law Letting Residents Buy, Carry Guns Without Permits

Iowa Governor Signs Bill Into Law Letting Residents Buy, Carry Guns Without Permits
Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds signed legislation into law on Friday lifting some restrictions to buy or carry a handgun in the state for law-abiding citizens.

www.theepochtimes.com


"Iowans would no longer need a permit to carry or buy guns under a GOP bill in the Legislature
it would remove the need for Iowans to get "a permission slip" to exercise their right to keep and bear arms, while opponents say it would threaten public safety and roll back some of Iowa's background check requirements."

Iowans would no longer need a permit to carry or buy guns under a GOP bill in the Legislature
Iowans buying guns from federally licensed dealers would still have to pass a background check or present a permit to carry. Not so for private sales.
www.desmoinesregister.com




Unlike Democrat officials, the Republican ones treat citizens like responsible adults.


Then again......Democrat voters are far from responsible adults.


Now why don't you present the results of this sort of governance?
Not your hand-wringing propaganda.....the actual results.

Caution: if this is the first time you have ever tried thinking, you might be in danger of an aneurysm.

Those brave legislators, allowing their citizens to carry guns. They would be less hypocritical if they let people carry their guns into the legislature. They don't. Why is that? Don't they want the same protections they are offering everyone else in Iowa?

Because they're Democrats, dunce.



Here are the facts.



CCW Permit Holders Charged/Convicted

State	Year	Crime	Charged or Convicted	% of Total Convictions	Out of Total Violent Crimes
Louisianna	2016	Any Felony	16	0.0092
	2015	Any Felony	19	0.0123	25,208
	2014	Any Felony	15	0.0109	23,983
Michigan	2016	Aggravated Assault	17	0.003
	2015	Aggravated Assault	11	0.002
	2016	Violent Crime	22	0.053	41,231
	2015	Violent Crime	18	0.00352	42,348
Minnesota	2015	Any Assault	0	0	7,094
	2014	Any Assault	0	0
	2013	Any Assault	0	0
	2012	Any Assault	0	0
	2011	Any Assault	0	0
	2010	Any Assault	0	0
Oregon	2016	Any Felony	19	0.0074
Oklahoma	2016	Any Felony	20	0.0071
	2015	Any Felony	16	0.0062	16,506
	2014	Any Felony	15	0.0069
	2013	Any Felony	15	0.0078
	2012	Any Felony	10	? Unknown due to no permit data
Tennessee	2016	Any Assault	0
	2015	Any Assault	0		40,400
	2016	Any Felony	29	0.0049
	2015	Any Felony	31	0.0061
Texas	2016	Aggravated Assault	8	0.00067
	2015	Aggravated Assault	10	0.0011	67,727

The percentage of total convictions indicates how many concealed carry permit holders account for the crime compared to the general population. As an example if we look at Texas in 2015 you will see that just 0.0011 of permit holders accounted for the crime of aggravated assault.

Concealed Carry Permit Holders Crime Statistics (updated)

Check out the concealed carry permit holders crime statistics? We can tell you how many CCW permit holders have committed crimes in seven states.

www.gunstocarry.com

There is no more law-abiding segment of the population than these folks......certainly not the rioters, arsonists, looters who are Biden voters.

 

[alang1216]

Government should encourage citizens having guns rather than working for the success of criminals.

The Constitution says you have the right to own 'arms'. Why don't localities get to decide how they want deal with when and where guns may be carried outside a home? If you want to walk around with a flintlock that gives the neighborhood some character. If you want to walk around with an Uzi, I'd keep my kids indoors.

Government either treats individual as citizens, or treats them as subjects.

You are the example of what happens when individuals accept being serfs and subjects, rather than think responsible, thinking, adults.



Here is what happens when government treats citizens correctly:

"Iowa Governor Signs Bill Into Law Letting Residents Buy, Carry Guns Without Permits

Iowa Governor Signs Bill Into Law Letting Residents Buy, Carry Guns Without Permits
Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds signed legislation into law on Friday lifting some restrictions to buy or carry a handgun in the state for law-abiding citizens.

www.theepochtimes.com


"Iowans would no longer need a permit to carry or buy guns under a GOP bill in the Legislature
it would remove the need for Iowans to get "a permission slip" to exercise their right to keep and bear arms, while opponents say it would threaten public safety and roll back some of Iowa's background check requirements."

Iowans would no longer need a permit to carry or buy guns under a GOP bill in the Legislature
Iowans buying guns from federally licensed dealers would still have to pass a background check or present a permit to carry. Not so for private sales.
www.desmoinesregister.com




Unlike Democrat officials, the Republican ones treat citizens like responsible adults.


Then again......Democrat voters are far from responsible adults.


Now why don't you present the results of this sort of governance?
Not your hand-wringing propaganda.....the actual results.

Caution: if this is the first time you have ever tried thinking, you might be in danger of an aneurysm.

Those brave legislators, allowing their citizens to carry guns. They would be less hypocritical if they let people carry their guns into the legislature. They don't. Why is that? Don't they want the same protections they are offering everyone else in Iowa?

Because they're Democrats, dunce.



Here are the facts.



CCW Permit Holders Charged/Convicted

State	Year	Crime	Charged or Convicted	% of Total Convictions	Out of Total Violent Crimes
Louisianna	2016	Any Felony	16	0.0092
	2015	Any Felony	19	0.0123	25,208
	2014	Any Felony	15	0.0109	23,983
Michigan	2016	Aggravated Assault	17	0.003
	2015	Aggravated Assault	11	0.002
	2016	Violent Crime	22	0.053	41,231
	2015	Violent Crime	18	0.00352	42,348
Minnesota	2015	Any Assault	0	0	7,094
	2014	Any Assault	0	0
	2013	Any Assault	0	0
	2012	Any Assault	0	0
	2011	Any Assault	0	0
	2010	Any Assault	0	0
Oregon	2016	Any Felony	19	0.0074
Oklahoma	2016	Any Felony	20	0.0071
	2015	Any Felony	16	0.0062	16,506
	2014	Any Felony	15	0.0069
	2013	Any Felony	15	0.0078
	2012	Any Felony	10	? Unknown due to no permit data
Tennessee	2016	Any Assault	0
	2015	Any Assault	0		40,400
	2016	Any Felony	29	0.0049
	2015	Any Felony	31	0.0061
Texas	2016	Aggravated Assault	8	0.00067
	2015	Aggravated Assault	10	0.0011	67,727

The percentage of total convictions indicates how many concealed carry permit holders account for the crime compared to the general population. As an example if we look at Texas in 2015 you will see that just 0.0011 of permit holders accounted for the crime of aggravated assault.

Concealed Carry Permit Holders Crime Statistics (updated)

Check out the concealed carry permit holders crime statistics? We can tell you how many CCW permit holders have committed crimes in seven states.

www.gunstocarry.com

There is no more law-abiding segment of the population than these folks......certainly not the rioters, arsonists, looters who are Biden voters.

If that is the case, why did the legislators make it a crime for their citizens to carry guns the building where the legislature meets? Don't they want the same protections they are offering everyone else in Iowa?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Government should encourage citizens having guns rather than working for the success of criminals.

The Constitution says you have the right to own 'arms'. Why don't localities get to decide how they want deal with when and where guns may be carried outside a home? If you want to walk around with a flintlock that gives the neighborhood some character. If you want to walk around with an Uzi, I'd keep my kids indoors.

Government either treats individual as citizens, or treats them as subjects.

You are the example of what happens when individuals accept being serfs and subjects, rather than think responsible, thinking, adults.



Here is what happens when government treats citizens correctly:

"Iowa Governor Signs Bill Into Law Letting Residents Buy, Carry Guns Without Permits

Iowa Governor Signs Bill Into Law Letting Residents Buy, Carry Guns Without Permits
Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds signed legislation into law on Friday lifting some restrictions to buy or carry a handgun in the state for law-abiding citizens.

www.theepochtimes.com


"Iowans would no longer need a permit to carry or buy guns under a GOP bill in the Legislature
it would remove the need for Iowans to get "a permission slip" to exercise their right to keep and bear arms, while opponents say it would threaten public safety and roll back some of Iowa's background check requirements."

Iowans would no longer need a permit to carry or buy guns under a GOP bill in the Legislature
Iowans buying guns from federally licensed dealers would still have to pass a background check or present a permit to carry. Not so for private sales.
www.desmoinesregister.com




Unlike Democrat officials, the Republican ones treat citizens like responsible adults.


Then again......Democrat voters are far from responsible adults.


Now why don't you present the results of this sort of governance?
Not your hand-wringing propaganda.....the actual results.

Caution: if this is the first time you have ever tried thinking, you might be in danger of an aneurysm.

Those brave legislators, allowing their citizens to carry guns. They would be less hypocritical if they let people carry their guns into the legislature. They don't. Why is that? Don't they want the same protections they are offering everyone else in Iowa?

Because they're Democrats, dunce.



Here are the facts.



CCW Permit Holders Charged/Convicted

State	Year	Crime	Charged or Convicted	% of Total Convictions	Out of Total Violent Crimes
Louisianna	2016	Any Felony	16	0.0092
	2015	Any Felony	19	0.0123	25,208
	2014	Any Felony	15	0.0109	23,983
Michigan	2016	Aggravated Assault	17	0.003
	2015	Aggravated Assault	11	0.002
	2016	Violent Crime	22	0.053	41,231
	2015	Violent Crime	18	0.00352	42,348
Minnesota	2015	Any Assault	0	0	7,094
	2014	Any Assault	0	0
	2013	Any Assault	0	0
	2012	Any Assault	0	0
	2011	Any Assault	0	0
	2010	Any Assault	0	0
Oregon	2016	Any Felony	19	0.0074
Oklahoma	2016	Any Felony	20	0.0071
	2015	Any Felony	16	0.0062	16,506
	2014	Any Felony	15	0.0069
	2013	Any Felony	15	0.0078
	2012	Any Felony	10	? Unknown due to no permit data
Tennessee	2016	Any Assault	0
	2015	Any Assault	0		40,400
	2016	Any Felony	29	0.0049
	2015	Any Felony	31	0.0061
Texas	2016	Aggravated Assault	8	0.00067
	2015	Aggravated Assault	10	0.0011	67,727

The percentage of total convictions indicates how many concealed carry permit holders account for the crime compared to the general population. As an example if we look at Texas in 2015 you will see that just 0.0011 of permit holders accounted for the crime of aggravated assault.

Concealed Carry Permit Holders Crime Statistics (updated)

Check out the concealed carry permit holders crime statistics? We can tell you how many CCW permit holders have committed crimes in seven states.

www.gunstocarry.com

There is no more law-abiding segment of the population than these folks......certainly not the rioters, arsonists, looters who are Biden voters.

If that is the case, why did the legislators make it a crime for their citizens to carry guns the building where the legislature meets? Don't they want the same protections they are offering everyone else in Iowa?

So hand-wringing panty waists like you believe their propaganda about how guns jump up an kill people.


Where are your statistics about lawful individuals with CCW permits causing massacres?

Shall I wait, or simply conclude that you are not bright enough to understand that there are no such stats?

 

[alang1216]

Government should encourage citizens having guns rather than working for the success of criminals.

The Constitution says you have the right to own 'arms'. Why don't localities get to decide how they want deal with when and where guns may be carried outside a home? If you want to walk around with a flintlock that gives the neighborhood some character. If you want to walk around with an Uzi, I'd keep my kids indoors.

Government either treats individual as citizens, or treats them as subjects.

You are the example of what happens when individuals accept being serfs and subjects, rather than think responsible, thinking, adults.



Here is what happens when government treats citizens correctly:

"Iowa Governor Signs Bill Into Law Letting Residents Buy, Carry Guns Without Permits

Iowa Governor Signs Bill Into Law Letting Residents Buy, Carry Guns Without Permits
Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds signed legislation into law on Friday lifting some restrictions to buy or carry a handgun in the state for law-abiding citizens.

www.theepochtimes.com


"Iowans would no longer need a permit to carry or buy guns under a GOP bill in the Legislature
it would remove the need for Iowans to get "a permission slip" to exercise their right to keep and bear arms, while opponents say it would threaten public safety and roll back some of Iowa's background check requirements."

Iowans would no longer need a permit to carry or buy guns under a GOP bill in the Legislature
Iowans buying guns from federally licensed dealers would still have to pass a background check or present a permit to carry. Not so for private sales.
www.desmoinesregister.com




Unlike Democrat officials, the Republican ones treat citizens like responsible adults.


Then again......Democrat voters are far from responsible adults.


Now why don't you present the results of this sort of governance?
Not your hand-wringing propaganda.....the actual results.

Caution: if this is the first time you have ever tried thinking, you might be in danger of an aneurysm.

Those brave legislators, allowing their citizens to carry guns. They would be less hypocritical if they let people carry their guns into the legislature. They don't. Why is that? Don't they want the same protections they are offering everyone else in Iowa?

Because they're Democrats, dunce.



Here are the facts.



CCW Permit Holders Charged/Convicted

State	Year	Crime	Charged or Convicted	% of Total Convictions	Out of Total Violent Crimes
Louisianna	2016	Any Felony	16	0.0092
	2015	Any Felony	19	0.0123	25,208
	2014	Any Felony	15	0.0109	23,983
Michigan	2016	Aggravated Assault	17	0.003
	2015	Aggravated Assault	11	0.002
	2016	Violent Crime	22	0.053	41,231
	2015	Violent Crime	18	0.00352	42,348
Minnesota	2015	Any Assault	0	0	7,094
	2014	Any Assault	0	0
	2013	Any Assault	0	0
	2012	Any Assault	0	0
	2011	Any Assault	0	0
	2010	Any Assault	0	0
Oregon	2016	Any Felony	19	0.0074
Oklahoma	2016	Any Felony	20	0.0071
	2015	Any Felony	16	0.0062	16,506
	2014	Any Felony	15	0.0069
	2013	Any Felony	15	0.0078
	2012	Any Felony	10	? Unknown due to no permit data
Tennessee	2016	Any Assault	0
	2015	Any Assault	0		40,400
	2016	Any Felony	29	0.0049
	2015	Any Felony	31	0.0061
Texas	2016	Aggravated Assault	8	0.00067
	2015	Aggravated Assault	10	0.0011	67,727

The percentage of total convictions indicates how many concealed carry permit holders account for the crime compared to the general population. As an example if we look at Texas in 2015 you will see that just 0.0011 of permit holders accounted for the crime of aggravated assault.

Concealed Carry Permit Holders Crime Statistics (updated)

Check out the concealed carry permit holders crime statistics? We can tell you how many CCW permit holders have committed crimes in seven states.

www.gunstocarry.com

There is no more law-abiding segment of the population than these folks......certainly not the rioters, arsonists, looters who are Biden voters.

If that is the case, why did the legislators make it a crime for their citizens to carry guns the building where the legislature meets? Don't they want the same protections they are offering everyone else in Iowa?

So hand-wringing panty waists like you believe their propaganda about how guns jump up an kill people.


Where are your statistics about lawful individuals with CCW permits causing massacres?

Shall I wait, or simply conclude that you are not bright enough to understand that there are no such stats?

I'm still waiting for you to answer to my questions. Shall I wait, or simply conclude that you are not bright enough to understand them?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Keep this in mind when the liars of the Wehrmacht.....the Democrats.....tell you they don't aim to confiscate guns.

"This 9-0 SCOTUS Ruling on Guns Shows Just How Extreme (and Dangerous) the Biden Administration Really Is​

Did you hear that Joe Biden’s Department of Justice wanted the Supreme Court to rule that police could search Americans’ homes for firearms — and confiscate them — without a warrant?



In the case of Caniglia vs. Strom, this issue was in play. Had SCOTUS ruled that police could do that, your Second Amendment rights would have been in grave jeopardy.

In March, Biden’s DoJ filed a brief with the Supreme Court in this case. It said:

In its first amicus brief before the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice argued the actions taken by law enforcement to confiscate the petitioner’s firearms without a warrant were “reasonable.”
“The touchstone of the Fourth Amendment is reasonableness,” the DOJ’s brief stated. “For criminal investigations, this Court has generally incorporated the Warrant Clause into the Fourth Amendment’s overarching reasonableness requirement, but it has not generally done so for searches or seizures objectively premised on justifications other than the investigation of wrongdoing.”

This 9-0 SCOTUS Ruling on Guns Shows Just How Extreme (and Dangerous) the Biden Administration Really Is

pjmedia.com

 

[alang1216]

Keep this in mind when the liars of the Wehrmacht.....the Democrats.....tell you they don't aim to confiscate guns.

"This 9-0 SCOTUS Ruling on Guns Shows Just How Extreme (and Dangerous) the Biden Administration Really Is​

Did you hear that Joe Biden’s Department of Justice wanted the Supreme Court to rule that police could search Americans’ homes for firearms — and confiscate them — without a warrant?



In the case of Caniglia vs. Strom, this issue was in play. Had SCOTUS ruled that police could do that, your Second Amendment rights would have been in grave jeopardy.

In March, Biden’s DoJ filed a brief with the Supreme Court in this case. It said:

In its first amicus brief before the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice argued the actions taken by law enforcement to confiscate the petitioner’s firearms without a warrant were “reasonable.”
“The touchstone of the Fourth Amendment is reasonableness,” the DOJ’s brief stated. “For criminal investigations, this Court has generally incorporated the Warrant Clause into the Fourth Amendment’s overarching reasonableness requirement, but it has not generally done so for searches or seizures objectively premised on justifications other than the investigation of wrongdoing.”

This 9-0 SCOTUS Ruling on Guns Shows Just How Extreme (and Dangerous) the Biden Administration Really Is

pjmedia.com

PoliticalChic appears to have overlooked the reason the search was conducted in the first place. The gun owner was in the hospital getting a psych evaluation and help as he had, the day before, threatened suicide. Should someone in such a state have easy access to a gun?

The other legal issue was if a car, where such a search would be legal, is the same as a house. The court decided they were not. The case was not a 2nd amendment issue so much as a privacy issue.

As usual, you have to ask yourself what facts PoliticalChic has omitted and which she has spun to suit her ideology. Either way, beware.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Keep this in mind when the liars of the Wehrmacht.....the Democrats.....tell you they don't aim to confiscate guns.

"This 9-0 SCOTUS Ruling on Guns Shows Just How Extreme (and Dangerous) the Biden Administration Really Is​

Did you hear that Joe Biden’s Department of Justice wanted the Supreme Court to rule that police could search Americans’ homes for firearms — and confiscate them — without a warrant?



In the case of Caniglia vs. Strom, this issue was in play. Had SCOTUS ruled that police could do that, your Second Amendment rights would have been in grave jeopardy.

In March, Biden’s DoJ filed a brief with the Supreme Court in this case. It said:

In its first amicus brief before the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice argued the actions taken by law enforcement to confiscate the petitioner’s firearms without a warrant were “reasonable.”
“The touchstone of the Fourth Amendment is reasonableness,” the DOJ’s brief stated. “For criminal investigations, this Court has generally incorporated the Warrant Clause into the Fourth Amendment’s overarching reasonableness requirement, but it has not generally done so for searches or seizures objectively premised on justifications other than the investigation of wrongdoing.”

This 9-0 SCOTUS Ruling on Guns Shows Just How Extreme (and Dangerous) the Biden Administration Really Is

pjmedia.com

PoliticalChic appears to have overlooked the reason the search was conducted in the first place. The gun owner was in the hospital getting a psych evaluation and help as he had, the day before, threatened suicide. Should someone in such a state have easy access to a gun?

The other legal issue was if a car, where such a search would be legal, is the same as a house. The court decided they were not. The case was not a 2nd

amendment issue so much as a privacy issue.

As usual, you have to ask yourself what facts PoliticalChic has omitted and which she has spun to suit her ideology. Either way, beware.

Sooooo.....I'll put you in favor of warrant-less searches and confiscations.


I am surprised that you don’t feel conspicuous, marching around in that brown shirt and the helmet with the spike on top….

 

[alang1216]

Sooooo.....I'll put you in favor of warrant-less searches and confiscations.

I am surprised that you don’t feel conspicuous, marching around in that brown shirt and the helmet with the spike on top….

Put me down as considering the life of a person more valuable than any ideology.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Sooooo.....I'll put you in favor of warrant-less searches and confiscations.

I am surprised that you don’t feel conspicuous, marching around in that brown shirt and the helmet with the spike on top….

Put me down as considering the life of a person more valuable than any ideology.

"Put me down as considering the life of a person more valuable than any ideology."

Watch me smash this custard pie in your ugly lying kisser:

TOTAL ABORTIONS SINCE 1973:
59,115,995

Based on numbers reported by the Guttmacher Institute 1973-2014, with projections of 926,190 for 2015-16. GI estimates a possible 3 percent under reporting rate, which is factored into the overall total. [1/17]​

http://www.christianliferesources.com/article/u-s-abortion-statistics-by-year-1973-current-1042

No, don't forget to get that check out to Planned Slaughterhood.

 

[alang1216]

Sooooo.....I'll put you in favor of warrant-less searches and confiscations.

I am surprised that you don’t feel conspicuous, marching around in that brown shirt and the helmet with the spike on top….

Put me down as considering the life of a person more valuable than any ideology.

Watch me smash this custard pie in your ugly lying kisser:

TOTAL ABORTIONS SINCE 1973:
59,115,995

Based on numbers reported by the Guttmacher Institute 1973-2014, with projections of 926,190 for 2015-16. GI estimates a possible 3 percent under reporting rate, which is factored into the overall total. [1/17]​

http://www.christianliferesources.com/article/u-s-abortion-statistics-by-year-1973-current-1042

No, don't forget to get that check out to Planned Slaughterhood.

Deflect much? Hypocritical of you to ignore the fact the cops were trying to protect the man from himself yet focus on abortion. As I recall you don't concern yourself with the aged or ill either. I see your philosophy is that life begins at conception and ends at birth.

 

[westwall]

Sooooo.....I'll put you in favor of warrant-less searches and confiscations.

I am surprised that you don’t feel conspicuous, marching around in that brown shirt and the helmet with the spike on top….

Put me down as considering the life of a person more valuable than any ideology.

Watch me smash this custard pie in your ugly lying kisser:

TOTAL ABORTIONS SINCE 1973:
59,115,995

Based on numbers reported by the Guttmacher Institute 1973-2014, with projections of 926,190 for 2015-16. GI estimates a possible 3 percent under reporting rate, which is factored into the overall total. [1/17]​

http://www.christianliferesources.com/article/u-s-abortion-statistics-by-year-1973-current-1042

No, don't forget to get that check out to Planned Slaughterhood.

Deflect much? Hypocritical of you to ignore the fact the cops were trying to protect the man from himself yet focus on abortion. As I recall you don't concern yourself with the aged or ill either. I see your philosophy is that life begins at conception and ends at birth.

You're the person deflecting. You don't care about lives at all. If you did you wouldn't create free fire zones, for criminals to use, you wouldn't let violent criminals out of prison, you wouldn't prevent people from having the means to protect themselves from violent predators, you wouldn't import millions of violent predators to the country, you wouldn't incite violence based on lies, and you wouldn't turn a blind eye to the millions of children who have been aborted.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Sooooo.....I'll put you in favor of warrant-less searches and confiscations.

I am surprised that you don’t feel conspicuous, marching around in that brown shirt and the helmet with the spike on top….

Put me down as considering the life of a person more valuable than any ideology.

Watch me smash this custard pie in your ugly lying kisser:

TOTAL ABORTIONS SINCE 1973:
59,115,995

Based on numbers reported by the Guttmacher Institute 1973-2014, with projections of 926,190 for 2015-16. GI estimates a possible 3 percent under reporting rate, which is factored into the overall total. [1/17]​

http://www.christianliferesources.com/article/u-s-abortion-statistics-by-year-1973-current-1042

No, don't forget to get that check out to Planned Slaughterhood.

Deflect much? Hypocritical of you to ignore the fact the cops were trying to protect the man from himself yet focus on abortion. As I recall you don't concern yourself with the aged or ill either. I see your philosophy is that life begins at conception and ends at birth.

You're the person deflecting. You don't care about lives at all. If you did you wouldn't create free fire zones, for criminals to use, you wouldn't let violent criminals out of prison, you wouldn't prevent people from having the means to protect themselves from violent predators, you wouldn't import millions of violent predators to the country, you wouldn't incite violence based on lies, and you wouldn't turn a blind eye to the millions of children who have been aborted.

Hey!!!


He's allowed to lie......he's a Democrat.

 

[alang1216]

Sooooo.....I'll put you in favor of warrant-less searches and confiscations.

I am surprised that you don’t feel conspicuous, marching around in that brown shirt and the helmet with the spike on top….

Put me down as considering the life of a person more valuable than any ideology.

Watch me smash this custard pie in your ugly lying kisser:

TOTAL ABORTIONS SINCE 1973:
59,115,995

Based on numbers reported by the Guttmacher Institute 1973-2014, with projections of 926,190 for 2015-16. GI estimates a possible 3 percent under reporting rate, which is factored into the overall total. [1/17]​

http://www.christianliferesources.com/article/u-s-abortion-statistics-by-year-1973-current-1042

No, don't forget to get that check out to Planned Slaughterhood.

Deflect much? Hypocritical of you to ignore the fact the cops were trying to protect the man from himself yet focus on abortion. As I recall you don't concern yourself with the aged or ill either. I see your philosophy is that life begins at conception and ends at birth.

You're the person deflecting. You don't care about lives at all. If you did you wouldn't create free fire zones, for criminals to use, you wouldn't let violent criminals out of prison, you wouldn't prevent people from having the means to protect themselves from violent predators, you wouldn't import millions of violent predators to the country, you wouldn't incite violence based on lies, and you wouldn't turn a blind eye to the millions of children who have been aborted.

You'll be relieved to know I have done none of those things. How about you? If you knew someone was thinking about suicide and he owned a gun which would concern you more, his life or his 2nd amendment rights?

 

[alang1216]

Hey!!!

He's allowed to lie......he's a Democrat.

Exactly what lie are you accusing me of? Or is that another of your lies?

Actually I'd stack the Dems against the GOP for honestly any day, certainly ever since Trump's 2016 campaign. What did he say about Cruz' grandfather and JFK?