Against federal law and a Supreme Court ruling, tard. What an icon of justice, not.She's corrupt because she disagreed with a federal court about releasing prisoners who still had time to serve? OK. I'll take that as your genuine Soy Boy argument.
C'mon, Duke, you know better. The law doesn't apply to Democrats. Just ask 'em.Against federal law and a Supreme Court ruling, tard. What an icon of justice, not.
She was stretching the lengths of her authority as well. Federalism inherently creates competing authority between the States and the Federal government. It's not like her and California seceded and fought a war over it or anything. In that case you might want a statue of her.Against federal law and a Supreme Court ruling, tard. What an icon of justice, not.
The law is an argument you ignorant clowns. Lawyers and judges go back and forth on rulings all the time. Big Dukey won't tell you but she never actually broke the law. She stretched their order to its breaking point and then the state acquiesced in the end. In fact it was Republican Supreme Court justices who just said President's get immunity for offical acts so if she wins the election she will be above the law but not because of us.
I know y'all were hoping Biden would order the assassination of Trump because he'd have immunity...but ordering the assassination of political enemies is not an official act and therefore would be prosecutable.The law is an argument you ignorant clowns. Lawyers and judges go back and forth on rulings all the time. Big Dukey won't tell you but she never actually broke the law. She stretched their order to its breaking point and then the state acquiesced in the end. In fact it was Republican Supreme Court justices who just said President's get immunity for offical acts so if she wins the election she will be above the law but not because of us.
