- Moderator
- #321
The federal income tax is also unconstitutional.
Except it isn't
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The federal income tax is also unconstitutional.
his number not mine. I didn't do the research, he did.
it wasn't my claim. It was Romney's ask him to provide it.his number not mine. I didn't do the research, he did.
If you're confident he actually did research instead of just tossing it out there for a cheap laugh among his wealthy friends, I'm sure there must be data somewhere to support his claim.
If there are, you'll provide them (it's called "supporting your claim"). If there aren't, you'll say "Look it up yourself."
And, go...
it wasn't my claim. It was Romney's ask him to provide it.his number not mine. I didn't do the research, he did.
If you're confident he actually did research instead of just tossing it out there for a cheap laugh among his wealthy friends, I'm sure there must be data somewhere to support his claim.
If there are, you'll provide them (it's called "supporting your claim"). If there aren't, you'll say "Look it up yourself."
And, go...
so are you calling me liar? Are you saying Romney didn't say it?it wasn't my claim. It was Romney's ask him to provide it.his number not mine. I didn't do the research, he did.
If you're confident he actually did research instead of just tossing it out there for a cheap laugh among his wealthy friends, I'm sure there must be data somewhere to support his claim.
If there are, you'll provide them (it's called "supporting your claim"). If there aren't, you'll say "Look it up yourself."
And, go...
If he posted here, I would. But you parroted it, which assumes either you believe it or you have no clue. The longer you procrastinate, the more obvious the answer becomes.
so are you calling me liar? Are you saying Romney didn't say it?it wasn't my claim. It was Romney's ask him to provide it.his number not mine. I didn't do the research, he did.
If you're confident he actually did research instead of just tossing it out there for a cheap laugh among his wealthy friends, I'm sure there must be data somewhere to support his claim.
If there are, you'll provide them (it's called "supporting your claim"). If there aren't, you'll say "Look it up yourself."
And, go...
If he posted here, I would. But you parroted it, which assumes either you believe it or you have no clue. The longer you procrastinate, the more obvious the answer becomes.
His statement was to infer that all of those on welfare would be voting against him. I don't care the percentage is right or not. It meant more than the figure.
so are you calling me liar? Are you saying Romney didn't say it?it wasn't my claim. It was Romney's ask him to provide it.his number not mine. I didn't do the research, he did.
If you're confident he actually did research instead of just tossing it out there for a cheap laugh among his wealthy friends, I'm sure there must be data somewhere to support his claim.
If there are, you'll provide them (it's called "supporting your claim"). If there aren't, you'll say "Look it up yourself."
And, go...
If he posted here, I would. But you parroted it, which assumes either you believe it or you have no clue. The longer you procrastinate, the more obvious the answer becomes.
His statement was to infer that all of those on welfare would be voting against him. I don't care the percentage is right or not. It meant more than the figure.
again it wasn't about the number but the meaning of the number. that's over your head.so are you calling me liar? Are you saying Romney didn't say it?it wasn't my claim. It was Romney's ask him to provide it.his number not mine. I didn't do the research, he did.
If you're confident he actually did research instead of just tossing it out there for a cheap laugh among his wealthy friends, I'm sure there must be data somewhere to support his claim.
If there are, you'll provide them (it's called "supporting your claim"). If there aren't, you'll say "Look it up yourself."
And, go...
If he posted here, I would. But you parroted it, which assumes either you believe it or you have no clue. The longer you procrastinate, the more obvious the answer becomes.
His statement was to infer that all of those on welfare would be voting against him. I don't care the percentage is right or not. It meant more than the figure.
I'm saying you're incapable of supporting your beliefs with facts. Keep going; you're doing great.
My sister gets food stamps shes a republican. We want jobs not handouts but well take the handouts until we find a job.Hope you're not confusing social security with welfare.yes I am. why?Well you haven't seen her on the tellie? wow. you don't need to shake her hand to know she exists. wow.
Are you seriously arguing that there aren't people on welfare who vote Republican? Come on man.
Because that is fucking retarded. I just wanted to be clear about how retarded you are before proceeding.
BTW, Mitt Romney even publicly stated it during his campaign run. 47%
Dude, if you really don't believe there are some people in this country who reliably vote Republican and collect SNAP or whatever, you are touched in the head.
again it wasn't about the number but the meaning of the number.
In another thread on poverty republicans or conservatives kept saying that the war on poverty "hasnt worked".
When asked what they thought the goal of the war on poverty was many stated the usual "Liberals said..." followed by impossible things never said by anyone.
Of course if you believe the war on poverty was supposed to make everyone rich, I have bad news for you.
If you believed the war on poverty was supposed to end poor people existing, no wonder you think it "failed"
If you thought that the war on poverty meant everyone would live like Mr Burns from the Simpsons, I understand your frustration.
Of course it did....until Republicans gutted the programIn another thread on poverty republicans or conservatives kept saying that the war on poverty "hasnt worked".
When asked what they thought the goal of the war on poverty was many stated the usual "Liberals said..." followed by impossible things never said by anyone.
Of course if you believe the war on poverty was supposed to make everyone rich, I have bad news for you.
If you believed the war on poverty was supposed to end poor people existing, no wonder you think it "failed"
If you thought that the war on poverty meant everyone would live like Mr Burns from the Simpsons, I understand your frustration.
The war on poverty didn't even REDUCE poverty!...lol
Of course it did....until Republicans gutted the programIn another thread on poverty republicans or conservatives kept saying that the war on poverty "hasnt worked".
When asked what they thought the goal of the war on poverty was many stated the usual "Liberals said..." followed by impossible things never said by anyone.
Of course if you believe the war on poverty was supposed to make everyone rich, I have bad news for you.
If you believed the war on poverty was supposed to end poor people existing, no wonder you think it "failed"
If you thought that the war on poverty meant everyone would live like Mr Burns from the Simpsons, I understand your frustration.
The war on poverty didn't even REDUCE poverty!...lol