Why do Republicans bash socialism - when it's all around them?

[danielpalos]

Socialism is Government.

Our Constitution is a social contract not a capital contract.

Where exactly does it say it's a social contract?

It defines our form of social-ism. It is a self-evident truth.

No it does not as we have no form of socialism

That is fact and in your face

the Public sector is Socialism.

Piss off, troll.

piss off, ogre.

 

[dblack]

Where exactly does it say it's a social contract?

It defines our form of social-ism. It is a self-evident truth.

No it does not as we have no form of socialism

That is fact and in your face

the Public sector is Socialism.

Piss off, troll.

piss off, ogre.

Piss off, troll. See how this works? You post the same ignorant drivel, and I call you a troll. Get used to, kiddo.

 

[Markle]

Where exactly does it say it's a social contract?

It defines our form of social-ism. It is a self-evident truth.

No it does not as we have no form of socialism

That is fact and in your face

the Public sector is Socialism.

Piss off, troll.

piss off, ogre.

Now about 15 pages of our resident troll and...NOTHING!

 

[danielpalos]

It defines our form of social-ism. It is a self-evident truth.

No it does not as we have no form of socialism

That is fact and in your face

the Public sector is Socialism.

Piss off, troll.

piss off, ogre.

Piss off, troll. See how this works? You post the same ignorant drivel, and I call you a troll. Get used to, kiddo.

Piss off, ogre. See how that works.

 

[dblack]

No it does not as we have no form of socialism

That is fact and in your face

the Public sector is Socialism.

Piss off, troll.

piss off, ogre.

Piss off, troll. See how this works? You post the same ignorant drivel, and I call you a troll. Get used to, kiddo.

Piss off, ogre. See how that works.

Piss off, troll.

 

[danielpalos]

It defines our form of social-ism. It is a self-evident truth.

No it does not as we have no form of socialism

That is fact and in your face

the Public sector is Socialism.

Piss off, troll.

piss off, ogre.

Now about 15 pages of our resident troll and...NOTHING!

You merely appeal to ignorance of social-ism.

How noble is that?

 

[Papageorgio]

Argue about what? I am asking you why the left hasn’t solved the poverty and homeless problem in their states? So far you have no answer let alone solutions.

you need a rational argument on how it will break. so far you have no answer let alone rebuttals or refutations.

No answer for what? You are the one claiming the left has the solutions and answers. I am simply asking why the left wing solutions are not working and all you have is blame and excuses. Put up or shut up. That is all I am claiming.

The left is advancing on the goal of equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States.

My State representative has informed me this issue is on the 2020 legislative agenda.

So where has this worked? You still haven't told me the solutions that are currently being used in left ran states such as California, which has the worst homeless problem in the United States, Washington State which has the second worst homeless problem in the United States and Oregon which has the third worst homeless problem in the United States. So far you haven't explained the left wing solution that these left wing states have implemented. Is there a plan in place? Does the left have a solution or are left wing states hoping someone else cleans up their mess?

i will let you know after a year of metadata.

So you lied, no solutions, nothing in progress. If you told me early on that the left had no solutions,we could have saved a lot of time. At least you admit the left has no answers

 

[danielpalos]

you need a rational argument on how it will break. so far you have no answer let alone rebuttals or refutations.

No answer for what? You are the one claiming the left has the solutions and answers. I am simply asking why the left wing solutions are not working and all you have is blame and excuses. Put up or shut up. That is all I am claiming.

The left is advancing on the goal of equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States.

My State representative has informed me this issue is on the 2020 legislative agenda.

So where has this worked? You still haven't told me the solutions that are currently being used in left ran states such as California, which has the worst homeless problem in the United States, Washington State which has the second worst homeless problem in the United States and Oregon which has the third worst homeless problem in the United States. So far you haven't explained the left wing solution that these left wing states have implemented. Is there a plan in place? Does the left have a solution or are left wing states hoping someone else cleans up their mess?

i will let you know after a year of metadata.

So you lied, no solutions, nothing in progress. If you told me early on that the left had no solutions,we could have saved a lot of time. At least you admit the left has no answers

No, i simply didn't dumb it down enough for the clueless and Causeless right wing.

Solving for simple poverty by solving for capitalism's natural of unemployment is a simple solution in our at-will employment States.

What problems can you come up with, story teller, to make such a simple solution fail.

The scenario is, Labor can apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

 

[Papageorgio]

No answer for what? You are the one claiming the left has the solutions and answers. I am simply asking why the left wing solutions are not working and all you have is blame and excuses. Put up or shut up. That is all I am claiming.

The left is advancing on the goal of equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States.

My State representative has informed me this issue is on the 2020 legislative agenda.

So where has this worked? You still haven't told me the solutions that are currently being used in left ran states such as California, which has the worst homeless problem in the United States, Washington State which has the second worst homeless problem in the United States and Oregon which has the third worst homeless problem in the United States. So far you haven't explained the left wing solution that these left wing states have implemented. Is there a plan in place? Does the left have a solution or are left wing states hoping someone else cleans up their mess?

i will let you know after a year of metadata.

So you lied, no solutions, nothing in progress. If you told me early on that the left had no solutions,we could have saved a lot of time. At least you admit the left has no answers

No, i simply didn't dumb it down enough for the clueless and Causeless right wing.

Solving for simple poverty by solving for capitalism's natural of unemployment is a simple solution in our at-will employment States.

What problems can you come up with, story teller, to make such a simple solution fail.

The scenario is, Labor can apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

So why have the states of California, Oregon and Washington not solved simple poverty and homelessness. These states have done nothing to alleviate the issue. go ahead, we are all waiting for you to prove they can.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Socialism is a form of government but not any and all forms of government.

which is why socialist nations have government and so do we but we are not socialist.

I am saying our public sector is socialism. We have a mixed market economy. The private sector is capitalism.

The public sector is not socialism.

Socialism is the government ownership of the means of production.

what you are saying is wrong as you are still defining socialism incorrectly

The constitution never says one nation under god.

Or even the word god

Sorry, the Declaration of Independence. Too bad for you. Now get back in line.

The Declaration of Independence does not say one nation under god either.

i get my understanding of socialism from encyclopedias not dictionaries.

No you do not

You have no understanding of socialism at all and no encyclopedia agrees with your stupid definition

You simply have no understanding of the concepts.

Government is socialism; eminent domain is pure socialism for the "public good."

I have far better understanding of the concepts than you

Government is not socialism and never has been

Eminent domain is not socialism

Socialism is the government ownership of all private and means of production. It is not all forms of government

That is from every dictionary every encyclopedia and every text book on the subject


You are wrong and you are ignorant and that is fact.


Your definitions are dreamed up out of your ass and they are false

 

[Dr Grump]

"Your girl" Madcow has fewer primetime viewers than reruns of "I Love Lucy" at 3 a.m. It could be because Maddow lies her ass off every night and can't deliver on her promises to "get" Trump.

All cable shows rate poorly.

Maddow went from numero uno to numero lasto. <giggle>

still in the top five. Also, 98.5 per cent of Americans don't listen to any of them.

 

[Soupnazi630]

You misunderstood every single definition of it.

lol. i am not the one appealing to the authority of political jargon invented for an obsolete cold war.

You're mumbling with a tamale in your mouth again.

lol. you have nothing but the inferiority of fallacy.

That would be you actually

It is a fallacy to claim all government is socialist or to claim that the Constitution is a social contract.

Government is social-ism.

1. relating to society or its organization.

Government is not socialism

Socialism is only one form of government

Your definition does not even apply

 

[Dr Grump]

Disparities in wealth harm no one and it actually exists between those who have a lot and those who have a lot more.

We do not need a mix we simply have a mix which does not work well and people lie about it claiming it does work well

You have 50-odd million who can't afford healthcare. And a lot more than that that live from pay check to pay check.

Where doesn't it work well?

 

[Dr Grump]

But not all socialism.

Anything else?

Great comment...

 

[Soupnazi630]

Hey, everybody! Want to know what Socialism is for real? Start reading here.. Sorry, no know-it-all sound bite is ever going to do..

Government must be socialism.

Every communist claims that.

only the economically ignorant claim otherwise.

Wrong

The claim that government must be socialist is an ignorant claim both economically and politically

LOL. All you need is any valid argument at all.

Not when your argument is manufactured crap.

I state facts, you simply dream up bullshit

 

[Soupnazi630]

Socialism is Government.

Our Constitution is a social contract not a capital contract.

Where exactly does it say it's a social contract?

It defines our form of social-ism. It is a self-evident truth.

No it does not as we have no form of socialism

That is fact and in your face

the Public sector is Socialism.

No it is not .

Socialism is government ownership of the means of production

The public sector does not own the private sector

Fact you are wrong and ignorant and do not comprehend what socialism is .

 

[Soupnazi630]

Disparities in wealth harm no one and it actually exists between those who have a lot and those who have a lot more.

We do not need a mix we simply have a mix which does not work well and people lie about it claiming it does work well

You have 50-odd million who can't afford healthcare. And a lot more than that that live from pay check to pay check.

Where doesn't it work well?

Those numbers are dreamed up stats

Living paycheck to paycheck is a choice and often it is living well. And it is always a volitional choice which needs no correcting.

It does not work well anywhere

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it does not as we have no form of socialism

That is fact and in your face

the Public sector is Socialism.

Piss off, troll.

piss off, ogre.

Now about 15 pages of our resident troll and...NOTHING!

You merely appeal to ignorance of social-ism.

How noble is that?

No I do not

You are stating a bald faced lie.

I am correcting your willful lies about what socialism is with facts

 

[Dr Grump]

Dr Grump claims that American fiscal structure somehow "And creates huge disparities of wealth between the haves and the have nots.​

American have nots who have suffered the leftist-hated "trickle down" effect live better than kings and queens of the nineteenth century by an exponential rate.

Poor Demmies feel so bad about it, too.

I would say the corrupt unions haven't helped things. Mind you, if the haves were more fair in what they pay people, unions would never be needed. If only those uber capitalists could be counted on to do the right thing. You do realise those tinpot dictatorships of South America in the 1970s and 1980s are what your Utopian capitalist society looks like right? 0.01 per cent of the population unbelievably wealthy, the rest dirt poor? Why? No govt oversight due to the super rich paying off politicians. Without safeguards that is what your wonderful version of society would look like. Great, eh? The Cuban revolution didn't happen in a vacuum. Batista wasn't a benevolent guy. Fidel wasnt' the nicest guy either, but to suggest Cuba was doing great under Batista (with the help from the US) is just BS.

And no, they didn't live better than kings and queens. That's like saying the health care system is better than it was 400 years ago ergo it's better to be a pauper today than a king 400 years ago. Comparing apples and oranges.

 

[Dr Grump]

[
And American Capitalism is what brings home the bacon. Admit it.

And creates huge disparities of wealth between the haves and the have nots.

What's wrong with disparities between those who produce and consume?

Nothing. I'm a capitalist. I think a doctor should get paid way more than a street sweeper.