Why do Republicans bash socialism - when it's all around them?

[Soupnazi630]

Name one socialist country that does not have Government.

Socialism is a form of government but not any and all forms of government.

which is why socialist nations have government and so do we but we are not socialist.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Socialism is Government.

Our Constitution is a social contract not a capital contract.

It's a social contract for liberty and capitalism. If you don't like it, then why are you here and trying to get the rest of your brownies in?

lol. I know our Founding Fathers did an most excellent job at the convention with our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land and have no problem being, full of Faith instead of full of fallacy, in its defense.

Not your Founding Fathers who were all white. You're browner than bear turd.

They were the founding fathers of the nation not just for white people.

At the time it was for white people... and the odd Chinaman.

No where does it say that in the constitution

 

[Taz]

Socialism is Government.

Our Constitution is a social contract not a capital contract.

It's a social contract for liberty and capitalism. If you don't like it, then why are you here and trying to get the rest of your brownies in?

lol. I know our Founding Fathers did an most excellent job at the convention with our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land and have no problem being, full of Faith instead of full of fallacy, in its defense.

Not your Founding Fathers who were all white. You're browner than bear turd.

what color are you? hypocrite.

Our Constitution was intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral from Inception.

Now you know why equality matters.

Constitution was drawn up by whites. Like me. Coons weren't even full citizens. Like you.

 

[Taz]

It's a social contract for liberty and capitalism. If you don't like it, then why are you here and trying to get the rest of your brownies in?

lol. I know our Founding Fathers did an most excellent job at the convention with our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land and have no problem being, full of Faith instead of full of fallacy, in its defense.

Not your Founding Fathers who were all white. You're browner than bear turd.

They were the founding fathers of the nation not just for white people.

At the time it was for white people... and the odd Chinaman.

No where does it say that in the constitution

One Nation under God. Not some Zulu mothafucker, or Allah, or Buddah... The white god.

 

[Soupnazi630]

lol. I know our Founding Fathers did an most excellent job at the convention with our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land and have no problem being, full of Faith instead of full of fallacy, in its defense.

Not your Founding Fathers who were all white. You're browner than bear turd.

They were the founding fathers of the nation not just for white people.

At the time it was for white people... and the odd Chinaman.

No where does it say that in the constitution

One Nation under God. Not some Zulu mothafucker, or Allah, or Buddah... The white god.

The constitution never says one nation under god.

Or even the word god

 

[danielpalos]

Socialism is Government.

Our Constitution is a social contract not a capital contract.

It's a social contract for liberty and capitalism. If you don't like it, then why are you here and trying to get the rest of your brownies in?

lol. I know our Founding Fathers did an most excellent job at the convention with our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land and have no problem being, full of Faith instead of full of fallacy, in its defense.

Not your Founding Fathers who were all white. You're browner than bear turd.

They were the founding fathers of the nation not just for white people.

At the time it was for white people... and the odd Chinaman.

...brown people from south of the border got a better deal due to the historical management of the Holy Roman Empire, in the good old days. brown people had to be treated as well as people from the former Spanish and French territories.

 

[danielpalos]

Name one socialist country that does not have Government.

Socialism is a form of government but not any and all forms of government.

which is why socialist nations have government and so do we but we are not socialist.

I am saying our public sector is socialism. We have a mixed market economy. The private sector is capitalism.

 

[Papageorgio]

So is that you're moron. No argument about it.

you need a valid rebuttal; i don't pay attention to inferior arguments.

Here's one, but you may not get it right away.

Y'know how Rachel Maddow is on YOUR team, YOUR side, and she was gonna get President Trump's tax returns and absolutely, positively KILL HIS CHARACTER with it! She was gonna wipe him straight off the map of this planet with the revelations she and her partners at CNN were going to discover.

Turns out Maddow was played by the Master, President Trump, and here's how Gutfield rendered her true puerile pretentiousness in which she was going to ruin him with:

​

we have no problem with "our girl" doing an investigative, follow the money, report.

She will turn them over any day now.

Now, why have the left wing cities not been able to solve simple poverty and homeless in their cities and states? You claim the left has the solutions why have you not given any examples?

it may take more time to prepare an, expose of following the money trail.

Because, dear. The "social horror" of the Poor benefiting is sometimes more than the right wing can bear. Nothing but repeal is not better solutions at lower cost.

That is why some on the left have no problem with "echelon order until we can maneuver to hammer and anvil." Just stay in one place, right wingers.

Again, you claimed the left has the solutions and in states and cities where the leftists claim rule, such as California, Washington and Oregon the homeless population is continuing to rise, the poverty continues to rise. It seems your solution is to blame other people, no t a good solution in anyone’s book, however that is what happens when you have no real solutions.

 

[danielpalos]

you need a valid rebuttal; i don't pay attention to inferior arguments.

Here's one, but you may not get it right away.

Y'know how Rachel Maddow is on YOUR team, YOUR side, and she was gonna get President Trump's tax returns and absolutely, positively KILL HIS CHARACTER with it! She was gonna wipe him straight off the map of this planet with the revelations she and her partners at CNN were going to discover.

Turns out Maddow was played by the Master, President Trump, and here's how Gutfield rendered her true puerile pretentiousness in which she was going to ruin him with:

​

we have no problem with "our girl" doing an investigative, follow the money, report.

She will turn them over any day now.

Now, why have the left wing cities not been able to solve simple poverty and homeless in their cities and states? You claim the left has the solutions why have you not given any examples?

it may take more time to prepare an, expose of following the money trail.

Because, dear. The "social horror" of the Poor benefiting is sometimes more than the right wing can bear. Nothing but repeal is not better solutions at lower cost.

That is why some on the left have no problem with "echelon order until we can maneuver to hammer and anvil." Just stay in one place, right wingers.

Again, you claimed the left has the solutions and in states and cities where the leftists claim rule, such as California, Washington and Oregon the homeless population is continuing to rise, the poverty continues to rise. It seems your solution is to blame other people, no t a good solution in anyone’s book, however that is what happens when you have no real solutions.

we have solutions. the right wing refuses to argue and take voice votes.

 

[Taz]

Not your Founding Fathers who were all white. You're browner than bear turd.

They were the founding fathers of the nation not just for white people.

At the time it was for white people... and the odd Chinaman.

No where does it say that in the constitution

One Nation under God. Not some Zulu mothafucker, or Allah, or Buddah... The white god.

The constitution never says one nation under god.

Or even the word god

Sorry, the Declaration of Independence. Too bad for you. Now get back in line.

 

[Taz]

It's a social contract for liberty and capitalism. If you don't like it, then why are you here and trying to get the rest of your brownies in?

lol. I know our Founding Fathers did an most excellent job at the convention with our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land and have no problem being, full of Faith instead of full of fallacy, in its defense.

Not your Founding Fathers who were all white. You're browner than bear turd.

They were the founding fathers of the nation not just for white people.

At the time it was for white people... and the odd Chinaman.

...brown people from south of the border got a better deal due to the historical management of the Holy Roman Empire, in the good old days. brown people had to be treated as well as people from the former Spanish and French territories.

Then perhaps you should go back to Europe?

 

[Papageorgio]

Here's one, but you may not get it right away.

Y'know how Rachel Maddow is on YOUR team, YOUR side, and she was gonna get President Trump's tax returns and absolutely, positively KILL HIS CHARACTER with it! She was gonna wipe him straight off the map of this planet with the revelations she and her partners at CNN were going to discover.

Turns out Maddow was played by the Master, President Trump, and here's how Gutfield rendered her true puerile pretentiousness in which she was going to ruin him with:

​

we have no problem with "our girl" doing an investigative, follow the money, report.

She will turn them over any day now.

Now, why have the left wing cities not been able to solve simple poverty and homeless in their cities and states? You claim the left has the solutions why have you not given any examples?

it may take more time to prepare an, expose of following the money trail.

Because, dear. The "social horror" of the Poor benefiting is sometimes more than the right wing can bear. Nothing but repeal is not better solutions at lower cost.

That is why some on the left have no problem with "echelon order until we can maneuver to hammer and anvil." Just stay in one place, right wingers.

Again, you claimed the left has the solutions and in states and cities where the leftists claim rule, such as California, Washington and Oregon the homeless population is continuing to rise, the poverty continues to rise. It seems your solution is to blame other people, no t a good solution in anyone’s book, however that is what happens when you have no real solutions.

we have solutions. the right wing refuses to argue and take voice votes.

Again you have only blame and no solutions. California, Oregon and Washington are all ran by the left, why is their poverty, and homelessness? What is the solution.

 

[danielpalos]

lol. I know our Founding Fathers did an most excellent job at the convention with our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land and have no problem being, full of Faith instead of full of fallacy, in its defense.

Not your Founding Fathers who were all white. You're browner than bear turd.

They were the founding fathers of the nation not just for white people.

At the time it was for white people... and the odd Chinaman.

...brown people from south of the border got a better deal due to the historical management of the Holy Roman Empire, in the good old days. brown people had to be treated as well as people from the former Spanish and French territories.

Then perhaps you should go back to Europe?

i am part native. that makes me, part real American.

 

[danielpalos]

we have no problem with "our girl" doing an investigative, follow the money, report.

She will turn them over any day now.

Now, why have the left wing cities not been able to solve simple poverty and homeless in their cities and states? You claim the left has the solutions why have you not given any examples?

it may take more time to prepare an, expose of following the money trail.

Because, dear. The "social horror" of the Poor benefiting is sometimes more than the right wing can bear. Nothing but repeal is not better solutions at lower cost.

That is why some on the left have no problem with "echelon order until we can maneuver to hammer and anvil." Just stay in one place, right wingers.

Again, you claimed the left has the solutions and in states and cities where the leftists claim rule, such as California, Washington and Oregon the homeless population is continuing to rise, the poverty continues to rise. It seems your solution is to blame other people, no t a good solution in anyone’s book, however that is what happens when you have no real solutions.

we have solutions. the right wing refuses to argue and take voice votes.

Again you have only blame and no solutions. California, Oregon and Washington are all ran by the left, why is their poverty, and homelessness? What is the solution.

Equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation is a simple solution to simple poverty.

 

[Papageorgio]

She will turn them over any day now.

Now, why have the left wing cities not been able to solve simple poverty and homeless in their cities and states? You claim the left has the solutions why have you not given any examples?

it may take more time to prepare an, expose of following the money trail.

Because, dear. The "social horror" of the Poor benefiting is sometimes more than the right wing can bear. Nothing but repeal is not better solutions at lower cost.

That is why some on the left have no problem with "echelon order until we can maneuver to hammer and anvil." Just stay in one place, right wingers.

Again, you claimed the left has the solutions and in states and cities where the leftists claim rule, such as California, Washington and Oregon the homeless population is continuing to rise, the poverty continues to rise. It seems your solution is to blame other people, no t a good solution in anyone’s book, however that is what happens when you have no real solutions.

we have solutions. the right wing refuses to argue and take voice votes.

Again you have only blame and no solutions. California, Oregon and Washington are all ran by the left, why is their poverty, and homelessness? What is the solution.

Equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation is a simple solution to simple poverty.

Why haven’t California, Oregon and Washington adopted this solution? The states have the right to execute their laws.

 

[danielpalos]

it may take more time to prepare an, expose of following the money trail.

Because, dear. The "social horror" of the Poor benefiting is sometimes more than the right wing can bear. Nothing but repeal is not better solutions at lower cost.

That is why some on the left have no problem with "echelon order until we can maneuver to hammer and anvil." Just stay in one place, right wingers.

Again, you claimed the left has the solutions and in states and cities where the leftists claim rule, such as California, Washington and Oregon the homeless population is continuing to rise, the poverty continues to rise. It seems your solution is to blame other people, no t a good solution in anyone’s book, however that is what happens when you have no real solutions.

we have solutions. the right wing refuses to argue and take voice votes.

Again you have only blame and no solutions. California, Oregon and Washington are all ran by the left, why is their poverty, and homelessness? What is the solution.

Equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation is a simple solution to simple poverty.

Why haven’t California, Oregon and Washington adopted this solution? The states have the right to execute their laws.

We could have solved simple poverty, Yesterday. "It is simply too much social horror for the right wing to bear Because the Poor may benefit."

 

[Taz]

Not your Founding Fathers who were all white. You're browner than bear turd.

They were the founding fathers of the nation not just for white people.

At the time it was for white people... and the odd Chinaman.

...brown people from south of the border got a better deal due to the historical management of the Holy Roman Empire, in the good old days. brown people had to be treated as well as people from the former Spanish and French territories.

Then perhaps you should go back to Europe?

i am part native. that makes me, part real American.

Native to what? A taco stand?

 

[danielpalos]

lol. ..."the mother lode".

 

[beautress]

To the question:

Why do Republicans bash socialism - when it's all around them?

Not your Founding Fathers who were all white. You're browner than bear turd.

They were the founding fathers of the nation not just for white people.

At the time it was for white people... and the odd Chinaman.

...brown people from south of the border got a better deal due to the historical management of the Holy Roman Empire, in the good old days. brown people had to be treated as well as people from the former Spanish and French territories.

Then perhaps you should go back to Europe?

i am part native. that makes me, part real American.

There are more descendants of natives who are Republicans, danielpalos, whose great grandmothers were named Prairieflower, and great-great grandfathers had names like Nocono, than you are aware of.

 

[danielpalos]

To the question:

Why do Republicans bash socialism - when it's all around them?

They were the founding fathers of the nation not just for white people.

At the time it was for white people... and the odd Chinaman.

...brown people from south of the border got a better deal due to the historical management of the Holy Roman Empire, in the good old days. brown people had to be treated as well as people from the former Spanish and French territories.

Then perhaps you should go back to Europe?

i am part native. that makes me, part real American.

There are more descendants of natives who are Republicans, danielpalos, whose great grandmothers were named Prairieflower, and great-great grandfathers had names like Nocono, than you are aware of.

it is about simple bigotry. no "honest Injeun" should give in when he is in the right and going "honest Injeun" on his State or the Union; to anyone, much less a person so far removed from the mountains of the True caucasians.