Why do poor communities exist in America?

[danielpalos]

No it would not.

That is established historic fact

Votye for the opposiete of whatever some fool like Dani says

Simply making up stories is what storytellers do not patriots for the greater glory of our Republic.

Why do You believe unemployment compensation on an at-will basis would do what You allege instead of solve simple poverty? Capital matters under Capitalism; and this needs to be True under our Constitutional form of Government: The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Because the Law must be this Majestic.

“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

― Anatole France

 

[Soupnazi630]

Simply making up stories is what storytellers do not patriots for the greater glory of our Republic.

Why do You believe unemployment compensation on an at-will basis would do what You allege instead of solve simple poverty? Capital matters under Capitalism; and this needs to be True under our Constitutional form of Government: The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Because the Law must be this Majestic.

“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

― Anatole France

No story but fact.

Welfare has never reduced poverty and never will

The rest of your mindless babblings is simply a stupid attempt to ignore that fact

 

[danielpalos]

Because they would still have the same failings and short comings which made them poor in the first place you idiot

They prefer to not be, Mistunderstood. Besides, You merely claiming that means nothing since you have nothing but bigotry and ignorance on this topic not any form of valid reasoning.

And, all that may be required under Capitalism, is Capital. Increasing market friendly participation by solving that simple form of poverty can only be a Good thing for any market based Economy.

 

[Soupnazi630]

They prefer to not be, Mistunderstood. Besides, You merely claiming that means nothing since you have nothing but bigotry and ignorance on this topic not any form of valid reasoning.

And, all that may be required under Capitalism, is Capital. Increasing market friendly participation by solving that simple form of poverty can only be a Good thing for any market based Economy.

I have facts and history on the topic you have delusion and stupidiy.

Throwing money at poor people is not market friendly and does not encourage participation.

 

[danielpalos]

easy
it's disparity and inequity cloaked in the guise of racism , so we are at each other's throats instead of having another ( direly needed) bastille day

~S~

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

We should insist the Judiciary do the Job they get Paid to do under our form of Capitalism.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

We should insist the Judiciary do the Job they get Paid to do under our form of Capitalism.

They do

 

[danielpalos]

I gave the best counter argument. That welfare has been trying to solve simple poverty for decades and has failed. The only significant difference between welfare and the unemployment compensation you want is means testing. And for the overwhelming majority of the nation's poor, the means testing changes nothing.

The only people effected by means testing are those who CAN survive on their own, but want someone else's money too.

You only have a fallacy of false Cause. Welfare as we currently know it is not meant to solve simple poverty only complex forms of poverty by "concentrating wealth" as indicated by the means tests. Trying to solve simple poverty is not what means testing can do under our current regime.

 

[danielpalos]

Welfare has not solved simple poverty. Unemployment compensation as you want it would become welfare and still fail.

Since the only significant difference between welfare and the unemployment you want is means testing, and you insist that UC as you want it will solve simple poverty, can you tell us why means testing is the cause of simple poverty?

Only if you appeal to ignorance of economics and the law. At-will means something very specific as a Legal term under the Law.

You have no valid argument as to why simple poverty would not be solved on an at-will basis in any at-will employment State.

Or, you can simply present a valid argument instead of only manufacturing stories that are indistinguishable from straw man arguments.

 

[danielpalos]

No story but fact.

Welfare has never reduced poverty and never will

The rest of your mindless babblings is simply a stupid attempt to ignore that fact

Thanks for supporting my contention that means testing Can't solve simple poverty since it was never meant to do that.

 

[danielpalos]

I have facts and history on the topic you have delusion and stupidiy.

Throwing money at poor people is not market friendly and does not encourage participation.

Why do right-wingers prefer to "hate on the Poor" instead of solving simple poverty via market friendly means? We have a first world economy not a third world economy.

I have no idea under our form of Capitalism how you reached the conclusion you did except for the ignorant Bliss of right-wing fantasy. Capital is all that may be required under Capitalism. Isn't Capitalism, Wonderful right-wingers?

 

[danielpalos]

They do

Because you are Blissfuly ignorant? Those of us, taking point, on this issue would beg to disagree.

 

[Soupnazi630]

You only have a fallacy of false Cause. Welfare as we currently know it is not meant to solve simple poverty only complex forms of poverty by "concentrating wealth" as indicated by the means tests. Trying to solve simple poverty is not what means testing can do under our current regime.

Wrong.

Welfare in any form is meant to dsolve poverty in any form sijmpple or otherwise.

it is precisely that form of idiotic denial of fact which undermines debunks and disproves all of your uneducated assertions.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Because you are Blissfuly ignorant? Those of us, taking point, on this issue would beg to disagree.

You disagree out of ignorance and stupidity the fact is you are wrong and that has been proven

 

[Soupnazi630]

Why do right-wingers prefer to "hate on the Poor" instead of solving simple poverty via market friendly means? We have a first world economy not a third world economy.

I have no idea under our form of Capitalism how you reached the conclusion you did except for the ignorant Bliss of right-wing fantasy. Capital is all that may be required under Capitalism. Isn't Capitalism, Wonderful right-wingers?

No one hates on them.

Stating fact is not hatred fool

]

 

[Soupnazi630]

Thanks for supporting my contention that means testing Can't solve simple poverty since it was never meant to do that.

It was meant to and failed
Government cannot solve poverty

 

[danielpalos]

Wrong.

Welfare in any form is meant to dsolve poverty in any form sijmpple or otherwise.

it is precisely that form of idiotic denial of fact which undermines debunks and disproves all of your uneducated assertions.

Means testing by definition is not meant to solve simple poverty only test for it and try to mitigate complex poverty. Our over a generation long alleged war on poverty is proof.

 

[danielpalos]

You disagree out of ignorance and stupidity the fact is you are wrong and that has been proven

Why should I have Any confidence in Your sincerity when you have no valid arguments only your right-wing fantasy?

 

[danielpalos]

No one hates on them.

Stating fact is not hatred fool

You wish, right-winger. Y'all prefer to try to find ways to criminalize poverty since the abolition of black codes.

 

[danielpalos]

It was meant to and failed
Government cannot solve poverty

No, it wasn't; means testing proved that already; except in right-wing fantasy and we know right-wingers have no problems whatsoever, repeating historical mistakes.

Besides, we have a better understanding of economics now such that it is easily recognizable that equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation can solve simple poverty. You prove it by having no valid arguments for rebuttal every time You resort to fallacy. Thanks for confirming my point of view.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Means testing by definition is not meant to solve simple poverty only test for it and try to mitigate complex poverty. Our over a generation long alleged war on poverty is proof.

Welfare by definition is measnt in theory to solve poverty whether simple or otherwise.

Your ludicrous definitions change nothing about that fact