Why Do Liberals Complain About the Koch Bros but not George Soros?

[bripat9643]

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree

January 14, 2013




The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.


Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree - Los Angeles Times

Your part cant win without cheating.


The dems just need MORE people voting to win.

thems the facts folks

Right.

You need dead people to vote.

You need illegal aliens to vote.

You need cartoon characters to vote.

You need people to vote multiple times.

Democrat motto: Vote early. Vote often.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

And you like the fact that these rich assholes BUY cheating the American people out of their votes?


That is fine with you?

Soros spent 32 times as much as the Koch brothers. And you don't care about that?

 

[Truthmatters]

That is a fact.


they register people to vote.

some of their employees CHEATED them you idiot.

your right wing ASsHOLES wanted them DEAD so there would be fewer voters so they could win.



Now tell us why Rs often gain in mid term elections?



FEWER VOTERS asshole

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree

January 14, 2013




The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.


Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree - Los Angeles Times

Your part cant win without cheating.


The dems just need MORE people voting to win.

thems the facts folks

and to create more voters they are busily importing illegals and creating a bigger dependent class...

 

[whitehall]

Same reason high profile democrats like Jesse Jackson get away with profound insults like "Hymietown" and Al Sharpton's mob gets away with burning out a Jewish owned business in Harlem. Democrats thrive on hatred and Jews are easy targets just like they were when Nazis and Fascists murdered them back in the 30's.

 

[ClosedCaption]

I'd ask the same of the OP. Why complain about Soros and not about Koch? I think we know the answer but I am across the board against the uber rich influencing our politics.

Now when you quote me on some "you dont support the 1st amendment" bullshit. You'll be revealed as not giving a shit about the riches influence on our elections. You just dislike which rich guy is doing it.

I dont want any of them doing it. What say you Mr High and Mighty?

Soros donated 32 times as much as the Koches. 32 times and yet you and your buddies routinely attack Koch donations and never Soros. Go figure.

That was your chance to be bipartisan. You missed it

 

[Truthmatters]

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree

January 14, 2013




The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.


Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree - Los Angeles Times

Your part cant win without cheating.


The dems just need MORE people voting to win.

thems the facts folks

Right.

You need dead people to vote.

You need illegal aliens to vote.

You need cartoon characters to vote.

You need people to vote multiple times.

Democrat motto: Vote early. Vote often.

None of which is true.

I gave you 30 years of USA court decisions going right up to the SCOTUS.


you spouted lies .


Go get proof one false vote was cast in the ACORN scandal idiot.

ACORN flagged the very regs you speak of .

They are the ones who TOLD the government "hey we think our employees may have faked these regs.



It is ILLEAGAL for them to throw any filled out reg away.

The law reguires they turn in EVERY ONE.

they did and tipped the gov off to the ones they thought were bad.


You partisan asshole who ran the ENTIRE vgov at thetime pretended they tried to fake them.


There is not one sherd of evidence in the real record to prove that claim

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Because modern day LOLberals are full blown hypocrites. It's just the way they are. It's like a genetic trait.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree

January 14, 2013




The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.


Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree - Los Angeles Times

Your part cant win without cheating.


The dems just need MORE people voting to win.

thems the facts folks

Right.

You need dead people to vote.

You need illegal aliens to vote.

You need cartoon characters to vote.

You need people to vote multiple times.

Democrat motto: Vote early. Vote often.

Wow thats insane. And if it ever happened that would be terrible. Except what you are crying about are the exceptions not the rules.

Its like complaining about Siamese Twins who ride BMX bikes. You might find one...maybe two...but nothing significant

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Who let TM out of the dungeon anyway? She been back, what? A week? And already she's a broken fuckin' record stuck on stupid. It's like she never left! sigh...

 

[Yurt]

dems never cheat, only pubs

Indiana Dem official sentenced to prison for '08 ballot fraud in Obama-Clinton primary

Indiana Dem official sentenced to prison for '08 ballot fraud in Obama-Clinton primary | Fox News

that is an actual conviction for voter fraud, not a stupid consent decree, but TM will never acknowledge it because she is a liar

 

[TakeAStepBack]

A liar? That's the leasrt of her credibiliity problems.

 

[RandomVariable]

Can any rightie tell me how a world created in the Koch Brother's vision be livable?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Can any rightie tell me how a world created in the Koch Brother's vision be livable?

No but thats the case with most of their ideas. They say stuff and never consider the consequences. They just want it

 

[RandomVariable]

Can any rightie tell me how a world created in the Koch Brother's vision be livable?

No but thats the case with most of their ideas. They say stuff and never consider the consequences. They just want it

Looks like the Kosh Brothers got what they paid for.

 

[Zander]

Can any rightie tell me how a world created in the Koch Brother's vision be livable?

What is their "vision" you speak of?

 

[RandomVariable]

Can any rightie tell me how a world created in the Koch Brother's vision be livable?

What is their "vision" you speak of?

Shall we start with education?

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Can any rightie tell me how a world created in the Koch Brother's vision be livable?

What is their "vision" you speak of?

They do not know.

 

[Vox]

Because soros is a leftard which is their master

 

[Zander]

Can any rightie tell me how a world created in the Koch Brother's vision be livable?

What is their "vision" you speak of?

Shall we start with education?

Sure. Go ahead.