It’s not impossible. And it’s not my problem that you guys are so upset about a minor inconvenience. I think you guys just love to whine.
Except that masks are counter productive with our current strategy.
There are 2 main strategies.
One is totally quarantine, to quickly end it with the least number of infections.
They other is to quickly spread infection deliberately to those most likely to survive, to use up hosts and quickly end it, with the least number of deaths.
Clearly which of these 2 strategies you pick depends on lethality.
With something like Ebola, you quarantine.
With something like flu, you instead deliberately try to spread it among the young, so that it ends quickly and the elderly don't get it eventually.
While we have forgotten about the fact "variolation" is the traditional way to deal with measles, mumps, chickenpox, etc., that is the reality.
Now that we do not have to because we have vaccines, we need to remember that variolation is the historic and only strategy when we do not have vaccines and the lethality is not high enough for full quarantine.
So then getting back to covid.
We did not have vaccines and it was not very lethal, so our strategy likely should have been variolation.
Why we instead went with "flattening the curve" is VERY suspect.
It appears we deliberately killed half half a million elderly so that we could sell very dubious vaccines.
Before someone brings up the fact Fauci claimed that would mean 2.4 million deaths, I have to explain why Fauci was wrong.
First of all his lethality specs were very high because those infected but with few/no symptoms were not being counted.
Second is his lethality specs were very high because he did not consider age differential in that most of those dying were over 70, and you could allow only volunteers for variolation who were under 40. That reduces deaths by a factor of 400. Divide 2.4 million by 400 and you only get 6,000 deaths.