Why Do Democrats Continue To Engage In Political Theater / Waste Our Time?

[BlindBoo]

Executive Privilege will not apply in the case.

None has been cited or requested....so, again, why are you claiming / suggesting things that are not happening / have not happened? Trump told Barra and the GOP to release everything they can....and that is being done.

Did you read what and who I was responding to?

 

[toomuchtime_]

I’ll wait to see how many of these traitors Trumps DOJ throws in jail. If none then we know all this crap you are spewing is nothing more than political garbage.

How so? You attempt to spread the false narrative that if someone is not convicted they never committed the crime. We know that NOT to be the case. The Obama administration and Democrats protected just about the entire Obama administration Cabinet / Agency Directors from indictment despite being proven to have committed crimes.
- Clapper was caught perjuring himself multiple times but protected.

- Brennan was caught illegally spying on US Senators - his 'punishment' was to admit it before Congress.

- Holder was protected from indictment for Perjury but was the 1st Presidential Administration Cabinet Member in US history to be Censured after being caught committing Felony Perjury while trying to cover up Obama's fast and furious.

- THE FBI publicly announced they had recovered over 15,000 official subpoenaed documents Hillary had attempted to destroy that were each individually 1 count of Obstruction and violations of both the FOIA and Federal records act.
*** Evidence has now exposed the Obama administration's DOJ and FBI agreement to protect Hillary from indictment / prison for her crimes.

Nice fairy tale, snowflake, but Democrats protecting Democrats from being held accountable for their crimes is just another reality on the list of things snowflakes refuse to accept.

If all of that was true then Trump would surly rectify it now that he is in charge, right? I’ll wait and see but forgive me for not holding my breath.

If Trump were a Democrat he undoubtedly would because the Democrats have no agenda for America other than to use political office to attack Republicans, but President Trump has full agenda of items he wishes to accomplish for America and he will not allow himself to be sidetracked, no matter how angry he gets, by the petty revenge motives that constitute the entire substance of the Democratic Party. That's why Hillary isn't in prison now.

 

[easyt65]

Yet I just gave you an example how Trumpybear recently dictated that Congress receive highly classified data.

Again, you are just embarrassing yourself, looking dumber and dumber with every post.

The President called on the US AG to release all the information he legally can, which is being done.

The Democrats have already demonstrated hoe THEY get classified information exposed / released:
- Hillary illegally hung TS+ data on an unauthorized, unencrypted ,unsecured server.
- Comey leaked it to a college professor buddy who released it to the media.
- McCabe was recommended by the US IG for prosecution already for leaking....
- Schiff leaks, again, like a screen door on a submarine....

I love watching the false narratives and lies blow up in snowflake faces, shredding any credibility they may have left....

Please, continue....

 

[Slade3200]

Democrats? How about Dems and Reps... or Congress. It’s coming from both sides and has for a while now. If you can’t see that then you have blinders on.

Both engage in political theater. The Democrats are the only ones doing it right now as part of their on-going exposed criminal / treasonous coup attempt.

The coup is overblown rhetoric. If you want to stick to facts and reality then talk about their politicalization of the investigation. When you take it a step to far like you do then you discredit yourself.

is it?

*if* they lied to get an elected president out of office by means of using the government against them, then a threat like this to me is every bit as bad as if russia were in fact involved.

the president is here to defend the constitution against foreign OR domestic threats. *if* this was all based off revenge politics then the coup is NOT overblown rhetoric and i would want it dug into. this is not revenge on the democrats but rather, if no issue was there we cannot allow some kabuki theater every time someone is elected you don't like. that WILL happen if we don't penalize people for the behavior IF NOT based off actual events, but contrived ones it would seem that it was.

That’s just the thing... people like Rush and Hannity have been pushing false narratives and inaccurate timelines to create this coup conspiracy. Chris Wallace just debunked some
Major talking points of theirs a few days ago.

Fox News' Chris Wallace sets record straight on Russia probe: "This is going to drive some of our viewers nuts"

No one likes Chris Wallace. Chris Wallace exists to provide opposition opinion. Chris Wallace is more suited to CBS or MSNBC.

He is not bad enough to ever place at CNN. He'd be an outcast there.

Haha, classic response. Don’t address anything of substance, just go for the personal attacks. Can you be any more dimwitted? My guess is yes... carry on please

 

[BlindBoo]

and it came out last week

No it didn't. What came out last week was a letter from the newly appointed AG. One who showed publicly his bias in this case. He cited a couple of sentences from Mueller's report, which I assume is very similar in form to Comey's statement about the investigation into Hillary's email shit. But since no one has seen Mueller's summation except Barr, we'll just have to wait to see if their are any similarities.

lol What a crock of shit. Barr addressed the important issues of the investigation succinctly and instead of showing bias presented a cogent argument for concluding there was not any obstruction of justice. All of this huffing an puffing by Democrats is just an effort to distract voters from the fact they have not heard one word of truth from any Democrat in Congress on this issue in over two years.

No he didn't. He put out the first salvo in the Talking Point's war over the Mueller Report. He's there to protect Trumpybear. It's obvious they are scared of what the report says. It's the only reason to use a tactic like that.

 

[Slade3200]

I’ll wait to see how many of these traitors Trumps DOJ throws in jail. If none then we know all this crap you are spewing is nothing more than political garbage.

How so? You attempt to spread the false narrative that if someone is not convicted they never committed the crime. We know that NOT to be the case. The Obama administration and Democrats protected just about the entire Obama administration Cabinet / Agency Directors from indictment despite being proven to have committed crimes.
- Clapper was caught perjuring himself multiple times but protected.

- Brennan was caught illegally spying on US Senators - his 'punishment' was to admit it before Congress.

- Holder was protected from indictment for Perjury but was the 1st Presidential Administration Cabinet Member in US history to be Censured after being caught committing Felony Perjury while trying to cover up Obama's fast and furious.

- THE FBI publicly announced they had recovered over 15,000 official subpoenaed documents Hillary had attempted to destroy that were each individually 1 count of Obstruction and violations of both the FOIA and Federal records act.
*** Evidence has now exposed the Obama administration's DOJ and FBI agreement to protect Hillary from indictment / prison for her crimes.

Nice fairy tale, snowflake, but Democrats protecting Democrats from being held accountable for their crimes is just another reality on the list of things snowflakes refuse to accept.

If all of that was true then Trump would surly rectify it now that he is in charge, right? I’ll wait and see but forgive me for not holding my breath.

Any
Day
Now.

Give us about 3 years of tormenting you until we put these people behind bars.

I’m still waiting for Trump to lock her up... it’s been what, three years now since he made that promise?

 

[BlindBoo]

The President called on the US AG to release all the information he legally can,

Trumpybear lies all the time. He also said he "Wanted" to testify under oath to the Mueller team.

If you believed that, I have some nice land in East Texas I'l like to sell you.......

 

[easyt65]

No he didn't. He put out the first salvo in the Talking Point's war over the Mueller Report. .

Every time you post you LIE. Barr quoted directly from Mueller's report - NO EVIDENCE, NO CRIME, NO COLLUSION.

You are pushing the false narrative that Mueller and his 19 lawyers are sitting silently on their ass as Barr hijacks their report and lies about his finding. Mueller has already proven he will have none of that shit by stepping up earlier to correct a false statement made to the public about his investigation, so he has already proved that you are lying because he proved he would never allow that to happen.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Why? Because proving you're full of shit is just fun.

But all you succeeded in demonstrating is that you are a reality-denying, fake-news spreading liar, continuing to help facilitate the Democrats' continued coup attempt against Trump....or that you are just stupid and had no idea that there is actually law that dictates what can and can not be released.

Whatever makes you happy in your own little delusional bubble....

Yet I just gave you an example how Trumpybear recently dictated that Congress receive highly classified data.

Yes, the coup will be completed some time in Nov. 2020 and will involve over 65 million American citizens rising up in unison to destroy the Trumpybear......um ....errrr, ops, I mean vote. Yeah rise up and vote....

That will be hard to do without a credible candidate. Who will lead them to victory? The creepy handsy old white man? The fake Mexican? The fake Native American? The too old and too white Socialist? The not gay enough gay man? Or will it be the former Ca AG who argued against prison reform and now wants to pay reparations to Oprah because slavery prevented her from being successful and accumulating wealth? It's like looking at a freak show at the carnival.

 

[easyt65]

The President called on the US AG to release all the information he legally can,

Trumpybear lies all the time. He also said he "Wanted" to testify under oath to the Mueller team.

If you believed that, I have some nice land in East Texas I'l like to sell you.......

Yet he did so, you know it, and here we are with you lying your ass off and spinning when you get busted...

 

[The Original Tree]

Both engage in political theater. The Democrats are the only ones doing it right now as part of their on-going exposed criminal / treasonous coup attempt.

The coup is overblown rhetoric. If you want to stick to facts and reality then talk about their politicalization of the investigation. When you take it a step to far like you do then you discredit yourself.

is it?

*if* they lied to get an elected president out of office by means of using the government against them, then a threat like this to me is every bit as bad as if russia were in fact involved.

the president is here to defend the constitution against foreign OR domestic threats. *if* this was all based off revenge politics then the coup is NOT overblown rhetoric and i would want it dug into. this is not revenge on the democrats but rather, if no issue was there we cannot allow some kabuki theater every time someone is elected you don't like. that WILL happen if we don't penalize people for the behavior IF NOT based off actual events, but contrived ones it would seem that it was.

That’s just the thing... people like Rush and Hannity have been pushing false narratives and inaccurate timelines to create this coup conspiracy. Chris Wallace just debunked some
Major talking points of theirs a few days ago.

Fox News' Chris Wallace sets record straight on Russia probe: "This is going to drive some of our viewers nuts"

No one likes Chris Wallace. Chris Wallace exists to provide opposition opinion. Chris Wallace is more suited to CBS or MSNBC.

He is not bad enough to ever place at CNN. He'd be an outcast there.

Haha, classic response. Don’t address anything of substance, just go for the personal attacks. Can you be any more dimwitted? My guess is yes... carry on please

I did not personally attack Chris Wallace. I criticized his left leaning reporting.

Did I call him The Orange Menace?

 

[BlindBoo]

When Obama cited executive privilege over fast and furious documents

He cited privileges communication between his AG and himself. You can't make a case that the report is privileged communication between the President and anyone.

 

[Slade3200]

The coup is overblown rhetoric. If you want to stick to facts and reality then talk about their politicalization of the investigation. When you take it a step to far like you do then you discredit yourself.

is it?

*if* they lied to get an elected president out of office by means of using the government against them, then a threat like this to me is every bit as bad as if russia were in fact involved.

the president is here to defend the constitution against foreign OR domestic threats. *if* this was all based off revenge politics then the coup is NOT overblown rhetoric and i would want it dug into. this is not revenge on the democrats but rather, if no issue was there we cannot allow some kabuki theater every time someone is elected you don't like. that WILL happen if we don't penalize people for the behavior IF NOT based off actual events, but contrived ones it would seem that it was.

That’s just the thing... people like Rush and Hannity have been pushing false narratives and inaccurate timelines to create this coup conspiracy. Chris Wallace just debunked some
Major talking points of theirs a few days ago.

Fox News' Chris Wallace sets record straight on Russia probe: "This is going to drive some of our viewers nuts"

No one likes Chris Wallace. Chris Wallace exists to provide opposition opinion. Chris Wallace is more suited to CBS or MSNBC.

He is not bad enough to ever place at CNN. He'd be an outcast there.

Haha, classic response. Don’t address anything of substance, just go for the personal attacks. Can you be any more dimwitted? My guess is yes... carry on please

I did not personally attack Chris Wallace. I criticized his left leaning reporting.

Did I call him The Orange Menace?

What about his reporting on this topic are you criticizing? What do you disagree with? I posted a link to what he said

 

[BlindBoo]

The President called on the US AG to release all the information he legally can,

Trumpybear lies all the time. He also said he "Wanted" to testify under oath to the Mueller team.

If you believed that, I have some nice land in East Texas I'l like to sell you.......

Yet he did so, you know it, and here we are with you lying your ass off and spinning when you get busted...

Trumpybear did not testify under oath.

It's a fine patch of land. A little swampy when it rains, but heck, it hardly ever rains in the Piney Woods.......

 

[toomuchtime_]

and it came out last week

No it didn't. What came out last week was a letter from the newly appointed AG. One who showed publicly his bias in this case. He cited a couple of sentences from Mueller's report, which I assume is very similar in form to Comey's statement about the investigation into Hillary's email shit. But since no one has seen Mueller's summation except Barr, we'll just have to wait to see if their are any similarities.

lol What a crock of shit. Barr addressed the important issues of the investigation succinctly and instead of showing bias presented a cogent argument for concluding there was not any obstruction of justice. All of this huffing an puffing by Democrats is just an effort to distract voters from the fact they have not heard one word of truth from any Democrat in Congress on this issue in over two years.

No he didn't. He put out the first salvo in the Talking Point's war over the Mueller Report. He's there to protect Trumpybear. It's obvious they are scared of what the report says. It's the only reason to use a tactic like that.

lol It's obvious you are scared of what the report says. There was no salvo, no talking points, no cover up. Barr presented a reasoned argument for why there could be no obstruction of justice, and not one Democrat has been able to present a reasoned argument to refute it. For you guys, this is all about show business and not at all about government. You are just trying to create the illusion there is something in Mueller's report that doesn't make you all look like fools, but we both know there isn't.

 

[The Original Tree]

is it?

*if* they lied to get an elected president out of office by means of using the government against them, then a threat like this to me is every bit as bad as if russia were in fact involved.

the president is here to defend the constitution against foreign OR domestic threats. *if* this was all based off revenge politics then the coup is NOT overblown rhetoric and i would want it dug into. this is not revenge on the democrats but rather, if no issue was there we cannot allow some kabuki theater every time someone is elected you don't like. that WILL happen if we don't penalize people for the behavior IF NOT based off actual events, but contrived ones it would seem that it was.

That’s just the thing... people like Rush and Hannity have been pushing false narratives and inaccurate timelines to create this coup conspiracy. Chris Wallace just debunked some
Major talking points of theirs a few days ago.

Fox News' Chris Wallace sets record straight on Russia probe: "This is going to drive some of our viewers nuts"

No one likes Chris Wallace. Chris Wallace exists to provide opposition opinion. Chris Wallace is more suited to CBS or MSNBC.

He is not bad enough to ever place at CNN. He'd be an outcast there.

Haha, classic response. Don’t address anything of substance, just go for the personal attacks. Can you be any more dimwitted? My guess is yes... carry on please

I did not personally attack Chris Wallace. I criticized his left leaning reporting.

Did I call him The Orange Menace?

What about his reporting on this topic are you criticizing? What do you disagree with? I posted a link to what he said

Clapper says that Obama ordered The Russian Collusion Smear Operation Against Trump. That means we can suspect that certain Media Personalities participated in it, since this was an Obama FBI, DOJ, CIA, NSA operation ordered by Obama.

If the shoe fits Wallace's Ass, then boot him with it.

 

[easyt65]

When Obama cited executive privilege over fast and furious documents

He cited privileges communication between his AG and himself. You can't make a case that the report is privileged communication between the President and anyone.

You mean his criminal US AG who was caught committing Felony Perjury before Congress in an attempt to protect Barry over his Fast and Furious Scandal, who Obama protected from indictment / judicial punishment, and yet was still Censured by a Bipartisan Congress for his crime, making Holder the 1st Presidential Administration Cabinet Member in US history to be Censured....

...a distinguished part of the Obama Legacy.

 

[toomuchtime_]

When Obama cited executive privilege over fast and furious documents

He cited privileges communication between his AG and himself. You can't make a case that the report is privileged communication between the President and anyone.

That's not the point. Obama lost the case in court, but it took 3 1/2 years for the decision, so he won it by denying Congress access to the documents for 3 1/2 years.

 

[Slade3200]

That’s just the thing... people like Rush and Hannity have been pushing false narratives and inaccurate timelines to create this coup conspiracy. Chris Wallace just debunked some
Major talking points of theirs a few days ago.

Fox News' Chris Wallace sets record straight on Russia probe: "This is going to drive some of our viewers nuts"

No one likes Chris Wallace. Chris Wallace exists to provide opposition opinion. Chris Wallace is more suited to CBS or MSNBC.

He is not bad enough to ever place at CNN. He'd be an outcast there.

Haha, classic response. Don’t address anything of substance, just go for the personal attacks. Can you be any more dimwitted? My guess is yes... carry on please

I did not personally attack Chris Wallace. I criticized his left leaning reporting.

Did I call him The Orange Menace?

What about his reporting on this topic are you criticizing? What do you disagree with? I posted a link to what he said

Clapper says that Obama ordered The Russian Collusion Smear Operation Against Trump. That means we can suspect that certain Media Personalities participated in it, since this was an Obama FBI, DOJ, CIA, NSA operation ordered by Obama.

If the shoe fits Wallace's Ass, then boot him with it.

Do I need to repost my last question that you completely ignored or are you savvy enough to scroll up and read it again. How about you try answering it this time. Take 2, go!

 

[The Original Tree]

When Obama cited executive privilege over fast and furious documents

He cited privileges communication between his AG and himself. You can't make a case that the report is privileged communication between the President and anyone.

You mean his criminal US AG who was caught committing Felony Perjury before Congress in an attempt to protect Barry over his Fast and Furious Scandal, who Obama protected from indictment / judicial punishment, and yet was still Censured by a Bipartisan Congress for his crime, making Holder the 1st Presidential Administration Cabinet Member in US history to be Censured....

...a distinguished part of the Obama Legacy.

That was just the tip of The Iceberg. If Holder was lying and committing felonies, and The Obama Administration had everything rigged to cover for such people like Holder, Kosiken, Lerner, Lynch etc. etc., Then we only know about 25% of what Obama did. The other 75% of criminal acts are hidden, just like an Iceberg has most of itself hidden under the water.