[
Well, as long as we're throwing out, cracy...s
I'm going with this one, an Obama Ineptocracy
(in-ep-toc'-ra-cy) - a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.
If you really want to go there.
In 2000, we had a country that was at peace. We were posting 400 billion dollar surpluses, unemployment was at 3.9%, real wages for working people were on the rise.
Then the GOP ran a guy whose ONLY qualification was that his father was a failed president. He was born on third base, and thought he hit a triple. Most of the businesses he started failed and had to be bailed out by friends of his father.
And despite people voting for the other guy in greater numbers, we still made him president.
We got two wars that busted the budget, unemployment shot up to 10%, people lost half their wealth when the housing and stock markets crashed... A major city was wiped out because he appointed a guy who ran horse shows to run FEMA...
But the wealthy got what they wanted out of the deal, so it was all good. Oh, no, wait. They lost billions, too.
What amazes me is, under Obama, the wealthy should have LESS cause to whinge. The Dow bounced back and 93% of the money created inObama's recovery went to the 1%. But they just blew a couple billion dollars trying to put the GOP back in power. And failed.
The GOP needs to get right with working people. Otherwise, it will keep losing. The old tricks of screaming about gays and abortion aren't working anymore.