Why did Bill Agree to read what could be considered the "Worst Script Ever?"

Why would Bill agree to read the script to "Innovating to zero?"

  • Bill probably believed that Al Gore was correct and A Carbon Tax was the way to prevent ocean rise

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Bill obviously felt that A Carbon Tax would give him astonishing power over 330 million Americans

    Votes: 1 100.0%
  • Bill wants to be the poster boy for "Neo Malthusian Economic Philosophy."

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nobody around Bill was willing to tell him that the Addition of H2O to Antarctica stopped ocean rise

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other answer, please be specific in a reply

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Could Bill be against turning deserts green?

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1

DennisPTate

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2025
Messages
2,922
Reaction score
1,127
Points
163
Now why would THE Bill Gates with all his billions agree to read what could be considered to be the "Worst Script for a Lecture EVER?"

Considering the types of information that is coming out in Europe about his ventures you would think that even back fifteen years ago he would have known that the script to "Innovating to zero" could potentially get him into trouble?



Innovating to zero! | Bill Gates​



Why wouldn't The Bill Gates know that a Carbon Tax will do essentially NOTHING to prevent ocean levels from rising?

Has Bill surrounded himself with people who were too scared to let him know about that little glitch in the Al Gore formula?

"At a symposium of the Union of Geodesy and geophysics, Dr. Pyyotor Shoumsky reported that the south polar ice cap was growing at a minimum rate of 293 cubic miles of ice annually. To put that number in perspective, Lake Erie contains only 109 cubic miles of water. Thus, a volume of ice forms on top of the existing ice at Antarctica each year which is almost three times the volume of water in Lake Erie!" (Expanded Discussion of The HAB Theory, Gershom Gale, Expanded Discussion on the HAB Theory.)



"Let us consider Antarctica for a moment.
We have already seen that it is big. It has a land area of 5.5
million square miles, and is presently covered by something in excess
of seven million cubic miles of ice weighing an estimated 19
quadrillion tons (19 followed by 15 zeros). What worries the
theorists of earth-crust displacement is that this vast ice-cap is
remorselessly increasing in size and weight:'at the rate of 293 cubic
miles of ice each year--almost as much as if Lake Ontario were frozen
solidly annually and added
to it.(Graham Hancock, Fingerprints of
the Gods, page 480).




I feel that I should leave you with the full text of the article by Mr. Gershom

Expanded Discussion of The HAB Theory
Gershom Gale gershon1
@netvision.net.il


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Geophysical science offers rather thin explanations for the periods of history during which great glaciers advanced and retreated from the polar regions, leaving a great deal of physical evidence.

The more one delves into the actual evidence, the more skeptical one becomes of the existing theories. The truth, according to the HAB Theory, is that periodically - at intervals ranging from 3,000 to 7000 years but averaging around 5,500 years apart - great global cataclysms have occurred which destroyed virtually all of whatever life forms or civilizations had developed on the Earth to that point.

The cataclysms occur when the Earth is thrown off balance due to a massive, unbalanced accumulation of ice at the polar regions. As these polar ice caps grow, their enormous weight, accumulating unevenly as it does, creates an imbalance, and a wobble begins to develop in the rotation of the Earth on its axis. Year by year, as the ice caps grow, this eccentricity increases until, with devastating suddenness, the polar masses are thrown toward the point of greatest spin, which is the equator. Quite abruptly, the areas which were polar now become equatorial, and vice versa.

The resultant cataclysm is, of course monumental across the entire face of the Earth, except at the two points which become pivotal when the capsizing effect occurs.


An Analogy:

Picture the Earth as a round ball spinning in place on a glass table top. Imagine then, that on the uppermost part of this spinning ball, you drop a tiny glob of molten metal, just slightly off center. The ball immediately begins to wobble...

Add more weight and that wobble becomes more pronounced. Add still more and the eccentricity becomes so great the centrifugal force of the spinning ball grips the weight and turns the entire ball so that the weighted portion is thrown to the imaginary line encircling the ball where the speed is greatest - which is coincident with the imaginary line on Earth known to us as the equator.

That is precisely what happens periodically to the Earth. The buildup of ice at the poles increases until its weight is suddenly thrown some 90 degrees from pole to equator. Yes, the Earth is 26 miles greater in diameter when measured around the equator than when measured around the poles, and one might argue that this bulge provides a stability that would make such a sudden tipping unlikely. But consider: such a variance, considering the size of the planet, is far less than the manufacturing tolerances of an ivory billiard ball.

As the sun evaporates the oceans, the moisture thus released precipitates as rain or snow all over the Earth. But the snows that fall on the polar caps do not melt or flow off at anything like the rate at which they evaporate elsewhere. Snow at the poles piles up and gradually turns into glacial ice. As this process continues, the ice caps increase in size.

At a symposium of the Union of Geodesy and geophysics, Dr. Pyyotor Shoumsky reported that the south polar ice cap was growing at a minimum rate of 293 cubic miles of ice annually. To put that number in perspective, Lake Erie contains only 109 cubic miles of water. Thus, a volume of ice forms on top of the existing ice at Antarctica each year which is almost three times the volume of water in Lake Erie! That's enough= ice to form a layer one mile wide and two miles high from New York to Chicago. And this is the buildup of only one year!

These figures were confirmed by Franz Loewe of France and Malcolm Mellors of Australia. There is no mistake.

The present ice mass is considerably over 5.5 million square miles. If the South Pole were over Chicago, that would make a two-mile thick slab of ice extending from Hudson's Bay to Key West, Florida.

Even this wouldn't be a threat if the ice were perfectly centered over the Earth's axis of spin, but it is not. The wobble was discovered by astronomers in 1885. It amounted to only a fraction over an inch. By the mid 1930s, this had increased to just over six feet. In 1970, the radial movement was close to 80 yards. And right now (197, the wobble is approaching a half-mile in radius.

There is no known means of calculating the point at which rollover will occur, though the summer equinox is the most dangerous time each year. It could conceivably happen with another fraction of an inch of added eccentricity. Or the system may remain more or less stable even if the wobble worsened by another mile or more.

Eventually, though, it'll reach the point of no return and the capsizing effect will occur, with essentially no warning. Overcoming the gyroscopic stabilizing effect of the Earth's equatorial bulge, and in obedience to the laws of centrifugal force, the weight of the ice will be thrown toward the equator. The Earth will continue spinning on it's axis as before, but with some dramatic differences: The ice caps will be riding on the equator, and practically all life - Man included - will have been extinguished.

This is not just a one-time occurrence; it has happened over and over again=! There have been thousands of such rollovers, perhaps even millions, during the 4.5-billion year history of the Earth.

How much time have we got before the next capsizing occurs?

The interval between each occurrence in the past has ranged between 3,000 and 7,000 years. The longest period between tilts was just about 7,000 years, give or take 50. The physical evidence indicates that our present epoch has lasted approximately 7,500 years; we've been living on borrowed time for quite a while."

[ Expanded Discussion of The HAB Theory
Gershom Gale]
[/quote]

Could it be perhaps that Bill and his investors do not want to risk AGREEING with President Trump even on a simple idea? Even on a simple way to set up "The Abraham Accords" Phase two, three, four, five and six?




Will world peace begin with immigrants from many nations who go to Canada and find out ways to address the root causes of the conflicts that were going on in the nations that they left?

I am hopeful that this will be the case, for example, immigrants to Canada from the Middle East may be able to turn the world away from the Al Gore Carbon Tax Theory and the Bill Gates, "Innovation to zero" emissions theory, and instead adopt the more down to earth approach to Climate Change advocated in the Jewish, Islamic and Christian scriptures as well as by a New Mexico biologist and coach.

Here is an ancient Islamic prediction that sounds like a brilliant response to both the threat of rising ocean levels... as well as to the Economic Crisis that it appears some influential people seem to want to occur.
Book 005, Number 2208:
"Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (way peace be upon him) as saying: The Last Hour will not come before wealth becomes abundant and overflowing, so much so that a man takes Zakat out of his property and cannot find anyone to accept it from him and till the land of Arabia becomes meadows and rivers."
SAHIH MUSLIM, BOOK 25: The Book on General Behaviour (Kitab Al-Adab)
 
Last edited:
Now why would THE Bill Gates with all his billions agree to read what could be considered to be the "Worst Script for a Lecture EVER?"

Considering the types of information that is coming out in Europe about his ventures you would think that even back fifteen years ago he would have known that the script to "Innovating to zero" could potentially get him into trouble?



Innovating to zero! | Bill Gates​



Why wouldn't The Bill Gates know that a Carbon Tax will do essentially NOTHING to prevent ocean levels from rising?

Has Bill surrounded himself with people who were too scared to let him know about that little glitch in the Al Gore formula?










I feel that I should leave you with the full text of the article by Mr. Gershom


Could it be perhaps that Bill and his investors do not want to risk AGREEING with President Trump even on a simple idea? Even on a simple way to set up "The Abraham Accords" Phase two, three, four, five and six?





Will world peace begin with immigrants from many nations who go to Canada and find out ways to address the root causes of the conflicts that were going on in the nations that they left?

I am hopeful that this will be the case, for example, immigrants to Canada from the Middle East may be able to turn the world away from the Al Gore Carbon Tax Theory and the Bill Gates, "Innovation to zero" emissions theory, and instead adopt the more down to earth approach to Climate Change advocated in the Jewish, Islamic and Christian scriptures as well as by a New Mexico biologist and coach.

Here is an ancient Islamic prediction that sounds like a brilliant response to both the threat of rising ocean levels... as well as to the Economic Crisis that it appears some influential people seem to want to occur.
[/QUOTE]
Bill Gates is lying.
 
Could it be perhaps that Bill and his investors do not want to risk AGREEING with President Trump even on a simple idea? Even on a simple way to set up "The Abraham Accords" Phase two, three, four, five and six?





Will world peace begin with immigrants from many nations who go to Canada and find out ways to address the root causes of the conflicts that were going on in the nations that they left?

I am hopeful that this will be the case, for example, immigrants to Canada from the Middle East may be able to turn the world away from the Al Gore Carbon Tax Theory and the Bill Gates, "Innovation to zero" emissions theory, and instead adopt the more down to earth approach to Climate Change advocated in the Jewish, Islamic and Christian scriptures as well as by a New Mexico biologist and coach.

Here is an ancient Islamic prediction that sounds like a brilliant response to both the threat of rising ocean levels... as well as to the Economic Crisis that it appears some influential people seem to want to occur.
Bill Gates is lying.
[/QUOTE]


Yes.... that is exactly what I suspect as well!


Bill Gates - The deleted documentary​

 
Gates is thinking along the lines of Monty Burns when he blocked out the sun for profit.

I didn't know who you meant by "Monty Burns" at first but thank God for Google search!



Do you have a specific episode in mind?
 

"Mr. Burns Blocks the sun," now that is funny, but also so relevant to our world at this time!


Here is how serious I personally believe that all of this could be? I believe that the film "I n n o v a t i n g To Z e r o" could be compared with the book " M e i n K a m p f."

I believe that Neo- M a l t h u s i a n i s m could be dangerous to our children and grandchildren.


Malthusianism is an economic and demographic theory, originating from Thomas Malthus's 1798 "An Essay on the Principle of Population", proposing that population growth (exponential) will outpace food production (linear), leading to catastrophic shortages. It suggests population "checks" (famine, war, disease) inevitably reduce population to sustainable levels.

Key Aspects of Malthusianism:
  • The Theory: Population naturally increases geometrically (1, 2, 4, 8...), while food supply increases arithmetically (1, 2, 3, 4...), creating an inevitable imbalance.
  • Malthusian Catastrophe/Trap:When population growth exceeds agricultural capacity, causing intense poverty, starvation, and, ultimately, a massive reduction in population
    .
    • Checks on Growth:
      • Positive Checks: Events that increase mortality, such as war, famine, and disease.
      • Preventive Checks: Voluntary measures to reduce birth rates, such as delayed marriage or abstinence.
    • Historical Context: Proposed during the Industrial Revolution, it initially analyzed the relationship between income and population.
    • Criticisms and Limitations: Technological advancements in agriculture (e.g., fertilizers, mechanization) have allowed food production to keep pace with population growth, contradicting the core prediction. Critics, including Karl Marx, argued that poverty results from capitalist distribution, not excessive population growth.









Modern Relevance:
While the specific, short-term predictions of Malthus did not materialize due to technological innovation (sometimes called the "Malthusian Paradox"), the concept remains relevant in discussions regarding sustainable population levels, environmental resource limits, and ecological carrying capacity


Neo-Malthusianism is the advocacy of human population planning to ensure resources and environmental integrities for current and future human populations as well as for other species.<a href="Malthusianism - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a> In Britain the term "Malthusian" can also refer more specifically to arguments made in favour of family planning, hence organizations such as the Malthusian League.<a href="Malthusianism - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>8<span>]</span></a> Neo-Malthusians differ from Malthus's theories mainly in their support for the use of birth control. Malthus, a devout Christian, believed that "self-control" (i.e., abstinence) was preferable to artificial birth control. He also worried that the effect of contraceptive use would be too powerful in curbing growth; it was commonly believed in the 18th century (including by Malthus) that a steadily growing population remained a necessary factor in the continuing "progress of society", generally. Modern neo-Malthusians are generally more concerned than Malthus with environmental degradation and catastrophic famine than with poverty.



Mein Kampf (German: [maɪn ˈkampf]; lit. 'My Struggle') is a 1925 autobiographical and political manifesto by Adolf Hitler, the leader of the Nazi Party. The book outlines many of Hitler's political beliefs, his political ideology, and his future plans for Germany and the world. Volume 1 of Mein Kampf was published in 1925 and Volume 2 in 1926.<a href="Mein Kampf - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a> The combined volumes encompass roughly 750 pages.<a href="Mein Kampf - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a> Emil Maurice, SS member No. 2, was prominent in early transcription, then most of the editing was done by Hitler's deputy Rudolf Hess.



Way back in 1975 near death experiencer Dannion Brinkley was shown many things about the future but Dannion was told that we humans can alter the future by making better decisions and learning the big lessons of this life, [which is to love each other and love Truth].


[Dannion Brinkley] :
BOX 7: The Environmental Religion

The 7th box held powerful images of environmental destruction. I could see areas of the world radiating energy, glowing like a radium watch face in the dark. Telepathically I could hear voices speaking of the need to clean up the environment. These voices came out of Russia at first, but then the accents changed & I could tell that they were emanating from South America, probably from Uruguay or Paraguay. I saw the speaker from Russia as he talked with zeal about our need to heal the environment. People rallied around him quickly, & he soon became so powerful that he was elected one of the leaders of the United Nations. I saw this Russian riding on a white horse, & I knew that his rise would come before the year 2000." [Dannion Brinkley]
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom