Why COVID-19 Testing Is a Tragic Waste

From the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the clarion call has been to test, test and test some more. However, right from the start, serious questions arose about the tests being used to diagnose this infection, and questions have only multiplied since then.

Positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests have been used as the justification for keeping large portions of the world locked down for the better part of 2020.

This, despite the fact that PCR tests have proven remarkably unreliable with high false result rates, and aren’t designed to be used as a diagnostic tool in the first place as they cannot distinguish between inactive viruses and “live” or reproductive ones.

Dr. Mike Yeadon, former vice president and scientific director of Pfizer, has even gone on record stating that false positive results from unreliable PCR tests are being used to “manufacture a ‘second wave’ based on ‘new cases,'” when in fact a second wave is highly unlikely.

Snips
Read the rest @

Covids just a test on how much they can get away with

Wait till ya see what they got in store for the west

View attachment 418248


Yes there is a a cold bug its not really dangerous unless you're old and medically compromised in some way.

Its cold and flu season anyway take your vitamin c and zinc
What should all people who test positive be asking that provider when testing positive for COVID19-SARS? “What’s the Cycle Threshold (CT) value for that test?” I am thinking most people don't even know to ask about that; I didn't have a clue. A low CT value means someone is loaded with virus. A high value, oppositely, means less of a viral load. Beyond a certain level the load is insufficient to either infect someone else or be of any clinical or epidemiological relevance whatsoever.

 

Forum List

Back
Top