When the Democrats field a candidate who can govern according to the best interests of all Americans, your call for Tea Partiers to shut up might have some weight.
You sound like those on the right who say that people who can't figure out how to get a gov't ID are probably not the people you want deciding the fate of an election --- except that you have less grounds for your position since your own candidates are unqualified by your own criteria.
We've yet to see a Tea Party winner demonstrate the first clue as to how to govern. The congressional delegation certainly wasn't sent to Washington to govern, they were sent to sabotage and obstruct. Scott Walker in Wisconsin uses signatures on his recall petition as an enemies list. Tea Party governance? Where?
Democrat governance where? Where?
If a party has to lie to pass a law because they do not trust their legislation or their constituency, that is not governance. That is subversion of democratic principles.
When one side is not held in check by democratic principles, by morals or by the fourth estate, then sabotage and obstruction are legitimate tools.
Doing nothing is better than doing something as bad as O-care. Republicans were in the right. Democrats were in the wrong, not governing according to the best interests of all Americans, and in fact harming all Americans by the tricks they played with the legislative process. Our government has significantly less integrity now than it did when the Democrats took over. Significantly more precedent for the idea that the ends justify the means, no matter how cravenly the means are.