Seymour Flops
Diamond Member
Banning something you call "assault weapons," is one of your key talking points, yet whenever any politician or politial appointee is asked for the official definition of assault weapon, he or she can't do it.
Because your politicials cannot define them, there is no official definition. Give your own, if you like, but that isn't my question. You may be able to answer, but you don't have to worry about whatever policial ramifications your leaders seem to think would come with just define a term that they use so often.
So my question is why don't your leaders answer?
Because your politicials cannot define them, there is no official definition. Give your own, if you like, but that isn't my question. You may be able to answer, but you don't have to worry about whatever policial ramifications your leaders seem to think would come with just define a term that they use so often.
So my question is why don't your leaders answer?