Why Aren't the Republicans Calling Witnesses to Defend Trump?

[Billy_Bob]

Trump should stop using the phrase "...in american history", because he clearly doesnt know enough about it, my friends!

What’s new? Dude Trump is very dumb.

He doesn’t know a lot of stuff. Firing an ambassador can’t even do it right.

Oh look.. Its dumb and dumber.... Trump's IQ us double you two's combined...

 

[Crepitus]

They have the transcript. No witnesses needed.

LOL

What transcript?

 

[Crepitus]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Are you serious?...Schiff's unfair rules forbid the GOP from calling witnesses that they would like to hear from...you were kidding right?...because if you didn't know that you shouldn't be commenting because you don't know anything....

They wanna turn it into a showcase for those let conspiracy theories. Why don't they call some witnesses who can tell us about the facts in the case?

Hell, we've tried to give them their say, but tRump is telling them not to testify.

 

[Crepitus]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

No need....

Kent, Taylor, and Yovanovitch are far better witnesses for Trump than the ones you named.

The more they open their mouths, the deeper the hole Schiff is in.

Won't stop the kangaroo court from impeaching him.

You must have only seen Fox's edited and cherrypicked clips.

 

[Dick Foster]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

No need....

Kent, Taylor, and Yovanovitch are far better witnesses for Trump than the ones you named.

The more they open their mouths, the deeper the hole Schiff is in.

Won't stop the kangaroo court from impeaching him.

You must have only seen Fox's edited and cherrypicked clips.

Most of us watched the hearings, shitforbrains.

 

[Crepitus]

You did not watch the testimony, did you.

Of course he didn't. He might have seen something he couldn't.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Why does Trump come down and sort it all out under oath?

Where Schitt fuck can deny him due process, his attorney, and all of his witnesses? You cant be this fucking stupid, can you?

Trump's minions are just like him. They are crude and rude. They cannot provide a truthful, well thought out argument so they lie and insult. Absolute disgusting human beings.

 

[Crepitus]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

No need....

Kent, Taylor, and Yovanovitch are far better witnesses for Trump than the ones you named.

The more they open their mouths, the deeper the hole Schiff is in.

Won't stop the kangaroo court from impeaching him.

You must have only seen Fox's edited and cherrypicked clips.

Most of us watched the hearings, shitforbrains.

He apparently didn't.

 

[Nostra]

All the relevant facts are known. No more witnesses are necessary.

And of course, there is no there there. No crime. No bribery, fraud, extortion, QPQ...any of it. It's all bullshit.

No, wait! Trump fired an ambassador he didn't like. The NERVE!!!!!

I think Schifferbrains should dig up the corpse of Mueller, drag him up there, and ask him about his feelings of how Trump treated this Ambassador.

 

[Nostra]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Trump has to prove he's not guilty? Shouldn't the burden of proof be on the prosecution?

Trump, himself, has said he wants to allow the Republicans to defend him. Trump wants whistleblower to testify why not Mulvaney, Pompeo etc.

Why can't Republicans call the witnesses they want? That's how due process works, you fucking dumbass.

No that is not how the process works.

Why don't the Republicans want Mulvaney and Pompeo to testify?

Exactly.

Under Hitler Schiff the process eliminates fairness.

 

[longknife]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

BECAUSE THE DIMOCRAP CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE IS NOT ALLOWING THEM TO.

 

[debbiedowner]

How do you prove a negative? The burden of proof is on the crazy political coup democrats. The president's strategy would be to confront the alleged "whistle blower" but strangely enough he(she) is nowhere to be found. The rest of the alleged "evidence" is nothing but heresay.

An impeachment isn't a fucking coup and in almost any hearings the other side can call witnesses.

You are grotesquely uninformed.

.... And you are a fucking idiot.

 

[charwin95]

I listed the Trumpbot Republicans who ignored the subpoena requiring them to testify.

they refuse to testify -

so STFU about witnesses.

Three branches of government, asshat

WTF is this one liner talking about?

Read the Constitution needle twat

Is that mean anything? One liner?

 

[Jackson]

For those who think the impeachment is a for gone conclusion. Three words...Guilty...Karma ...2016

code : I think he's guilty, but then there's Karma as we know from 2016 electoral count

 

[charwin95]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Zelensky already made a statement that exonerates Trump.

Trump released the transcript that exonerates him.

Trump already has the facts.

Democrats have people feeling like Trump did something wrong. You can't defend against feelings with facts.

Do you have copy of the memo?

 

[Wyatt earp]

I listed the Trumpbot Republicans who ignored the subpoena requiring them to testify.

they refuse to testify -

so STFU about witnesses.

Three branches of government, asshat

WTF is this one liner talking about?

Read the Constitution needle twat

Is that mean anything? One liner?

Its obvious you haven't.

 

[cutter]

Here are the open hearings they cried for. The Public is waiting! Why is the White House not honoring the Congressional ? Why are they hiding?

Here's the Deadline Countdown for Every Trump Impeachment Subpoena Issued So Far

3 branches of government and they can take their Subpoenas and shove it up there ass?

Think potsie think

"Prior court decisions on executive privilege also demonstrate that the president has very little room to keep information from congressional or special counsel investigations. Moreover, the ability to claim executive privilege is generally limited to the president himself, rather than extending to Cabinet members. Some Trump staff have attempted to get around this rule by refusing to testify in case the president later wants to claim executive privilege on the information in question, while others have claimed it outright. In either case, this is not in keeping with court precedents on the policy."

What is executive privilege, anyway? A brief guide to the Trump administration's favorite phrase

Nothing about this investigation has any thing to do court precedents on policy

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

They don’t need a defense. No crime has been charged, because there is no crime. They are going after the dims.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

If you have been watching the hearing, you would see that the Republicans can do nothing with Schiff in charge. He won't even let them finish their comments! Pure political theater.

They are still making him look like the dumbass he is.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Polishprince]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

None of those people have any knowledge of Trump's alleged crimes, because they didn't happen.

Further, none of those proposed witnesses would convince liberals to vote against impeachment/conviction.

Its a lot more effective to focus in on ridiculing libtards about the phony charges.