Why Are Liberals Always Trying to Silence Those With Opposing Viewpoints?

Sean Penn probably still thinks of himself as a "Liberal" but he of course is not. He is a loyal Hugo Chavez Butt-Sniffer which makes him a Socialist/Communist. There is a big difference. I have seen many other so-called "Liberals" expressing their worship of Chavez as well. Chavez is not a Liberal. He is a National Socialist which actually makes him a Nazi. He certainly doesn't believe in Free Speech. What Socialist/Communist does? Be very wary of people calling themselves "Liberals" or "Progressives." Most often they are neither. They are more likely to be Socialists instead.

The record is skipping again.

Anybody got a penny?

Takes more than that to buy two active brain cells, a sense of humor and enough literacy to actually read and respond to a thread. Maybe we should take up a collection? :doubt:
 
Oh so now all the "Liberal" Hugo Chavez Butt Sniffers are now claiming they never were Chavez Butt Sniffers? Seems pretty dishonest to me. I seem to remember an awful lot of Chavez Butt Sniffers when George Bush was in there. Most "Liberals" which are really Socialists are also a pretty dishonest bunch.
 
Last edited:
Oh so now all the "Liberal" Hugo Chavez Butt Sniffers are now claiming they never were Chavez Butt Sniffers? Seems pretty dishonest to me. I seem to remember an awful lot of Chavez Butt Sniffers when George Bush was in there. Most "Liberals" which are really Socialists are also a pretty dishonest bunch.


We have a pretty good search function here and we archive back a ways ... please, bring up some posts of some "typical" i.e mainstream regular liberal posters here praising Hugo Chavez or shut your trap.
 
We have a pretty good search function here and we archive back a ways ... please, bring up some posts of some "typical" i.e mainstream regular liberal posters here praising Hugo Chavez or shut your trap.

The odds of you getting a honest answer from the Ron Paul cultist is as likely as me scoring a date with Miranda Kerr. :lol:
 
A lot of their Chavez Butt Sniffing was about BOOOOOOOOOSSH too. That was a part of it for sure. However most so-called Liberals really are actually Socialists at this point. The "Party of JFK" is now officially dead.
 
Has anybody checked to make sure he's not a bot? Seriously.
 
Has anybody checked to make sure he's not a bot? Seriously.

He's much like Terral. He just copy and pastes the same bullshit. I think he's a troll personally much like much of the crowd here.
 
Yeah, but most of them are bizarre, not robotic.

Bizarre and robotic. Stick around here long enough and post enough and you'll see them repeating the same stuff eventually by accident. :razz:
 
We have a pretty good search function here and we archive back a ways ... please, bring up some posts of some "typical" i.e mainstream regular liberal posters here praising Hugo Chavez or shut your trap.

The odds of you getting a honest answer from the Ron Paul cultist is as likely as me scoring a date with Miranda Kerr. :lol:

Miranda Kerr is a friend of mine. I could get you a date. I'm not a Ron Paul cultist though so does that make a difference?

Edit. I better admit that I exaggerated there just a wee bit. I am not exactly a friend of Miranda Kerr but I have met her.
 
Last edited:
Miranda Kerr is a friend of mine. I could get you a date. I'm not a Ron Paul cultist though so does that make a difference?

Edit. I better admit that I exaggerated there just a wee bit. I am not exactly a friend of Miranda Kerr but I have met her.

:lol: I just used the name of the randomly hot model I could think of first. But points indeed.
 
Yea i guess Chavez Butt Sniffing is now out of fashion for the so-called "Liberals" now that their BOOOOOOOOSH Boogeyman is gone. They're still Socialists though. Don't let em fool ya. ;)
 
Oh so now all the "Liberal" Hugo Chavez Butt Sniffers are now claiming they never were Chavez Butt Sniffers? Seems pretty dishonest to me. I seem to remember an awful lot of Chavez Butt Sniffers when George Bush was in there. Most "Liberals" which are really Socialists are also a pretty dishonest bunch.
Liboc, You know I like ya' buddy, but I think they are talking about you posting the same thing 8 times in a thread, Once is enough to make your point. You're not helping our side. It shows desperation. Lets leave that to the liberal loons.

Anyhow, it's a free country, as you were, carry on and do as you please. Just trying to give ya' a lil' nudge, THAT IS ALL!
 
15th post
By accident being the operative term. It's just so annoying to try to post around.

Libobot the Threadkiller.

He's this board Buzz Killington.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTz0oisC3F4]YouTube - Family Guy Scene- Buzz Killington[/ame]
 
Oh so now all the "Liberal" Hugo Chavez Butt Sniffers are now claiming they never were Chavez Butt Sniffers? Seems pretty dishonest to me. I seem to remember an awful lot of Chavez Butt Sniffers when George Bush was in there. Most "Liberals" which are really Socialists are also a pretty dishonest bunch.
Liboc, You know I like ya' buddy, but I think they are talking about you posting the same thing 8 times in a thread, Once is enough to make your point. You're not helping our side. It shows desperation. Lets leave that to the liberal loons.

Anyhow, it's a free country, as you were, carry on and do as you please. Just trying to give ya' a lil' nudge, THAT IS ALL!

If he'd just read the posts and say something actually responsive once in a while. Really, that would make a huge difference. And fewer people would just scroll past trying not to be annoyed.

And you won't find me agreeing with Jester often. It must be pretty obvious! :lol:
 
LOL You know what's funny is that I feel the same about asking a righty to substantiate their claims. Almost every single time I have asked a righty on this board to provide proof to substantiate their claims the primary response I get is that I am attacked personally as they run away from the debate. LOL

that's because you're an asshole.

it's nothing personal

LOL and this is a perfect example of the typical response from one of the several that I have asked for proof and in response it attacked me and then ran away. Thanks for the help. LOL

Stop trying so desperately to transfer your ineptitude in proving your assertions onto me.
It has NOTHING to do with me and EVERYTHING to do with the fact that you can't prove your claims. Then in response to being asked to prove claims that you know you can't you go to the old faithfull and dishonest fallback of attacking the messenger.

The sad thing is that if you started your claims based on the truth then you wouldn't have so many problems proving them when someone asks you to substantiate your claims. LOL
Christ man, even those who share your political bend are telling you you're a ******* moron. Get a ******* clue. Fact is, it doesn't matter what facts are put before you. You will still deny the facts and go off on one of your childish lil' tantrums. And after your lil' tantrum subsides, you start with that childish "well, you said this, but I said that, and you did this, and I did that, and then well, I said that again, and you you said this again and, and, and, and, well then you said that, and well, AAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRGGGGHHHHHH!"

You were like that over on the MSNBC board, and you're still like that over here. Only difference is, people over here, even those on your side, will tell you you're a ******* moron!

Seriously dipshit, how old are you?

I can only imagine what you were like when your mommy took your cookie away.

Man up, or shut the **** up!
 
that's because you're an asshole.

it's nothing personal

LOL and this is a perfect example of the typical response from one of the several that I have asked for proof and in response it attacked me and then ran away. Thanks for the help. LOL

Stop trying so desperately to transfer your ineptitude in proving your assertions onto me.
It has NOTHING to do with me and EVERYTHING to do with the fact that you can't prove your claims. Then in response to being asked to prove claims that you know you can't you go to the old faithfull and dishonest fallback of attacking the messenger.

The sad thing is that if you started your claims based on the truth then you wouldn't have so many problems proving them when someone asks you to substantiate your claims. LOL
Christ man, even those who share your political bend are telling you you're a ******* moron. Get a ******* clue. Fact is, it doesn't matter what facts are put before you. You will still deny the facts and go off on one of your childish lil' tantrums. And after your lil' tantrum subsides, you start with that childish "well, you said this, but I said that, and you did this, and I did that, and then well, I said that again, and you you said this again and, and, and, and, well then you said that, and well, AAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRGGGGHHHHHH!"

You were like that over on the MSNBC board, and you're still like that over here. Only difference is, people over here, even those on your side, will tell you you're a ******* moron!

Seriously dipshit, how old are you?

I can only imagine what you were like when your mommy took your cookie away.

Man up, or shut the **** up!

Sometimes angry posts telling people off are constructive :D
 
Back
Top Bottom