Why are all the leaks coming from Washington Post????

[jc456]

Anyone think to ask why the Washington Post is THE ONLY one that "anonymous sources" are speaking too regarding President Trump,etc.?

Why is it ONLY the Washington Post that has these "anonymous sources"?

One of their rumors Post told us this back in May 10,2017.......
But the private accounts of more than 30 officials at the White House, the Justice Department, the FBI and on Capitol Hill, as well as Trump confidants and other senior Republicans, paint a conflicting narrative centered on the president’s brewing personal animus toward Comey.
Many of those interviewed spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to candidly discuss internal deliberations.
Inside Trump’s anger and impatience — and his sudden decision to fire Comey

NOW some of those spoke WITHOUT anonymity! Why doesn't the POST reveal them?

I did a search on the very latest rumor..
"Special Counsel Robert Mueller investigating U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner",
over 286,000 results!

• Special Counsel Robert Mueller is examining the finances and business deals of White House aide and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, the Washington Post reported, citing officials familiar with the matter.
• Special counsel Mueller reportedly investigating Trump aide Jared Kushner's finances, business deals
  
• Special counsel Mueller investigating Jared Kushner's finances, Washington Post reports
  Special counsel Mueller investigating Jared Kushner's finances, Washington Post reports
  
  
• The Washington Post had earlier reported that investigators were scrutinizing separate meetings that Kushner held with Russians in December – first with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak and then with Sergey Gorkov, the head of a state-owned Russian development bank. At the time of that report it was not clear that the FBI was investigating Kushner’s business dealings.
  The officials who described the financial focus of the investigation spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.
  Special counsel is investigating Jared Kushner's business dealings

Because they are the only ones who have no journalistic integrity and publish unknown sources.

hidden sources are and have always been, the backbone of journalism....that's why we have the first amendment protecting the press from revealing their sources.

we would only have the news and propaganda, the govt wants us to have... if it were not for unnamed sources....it would be the opposite of a free press, it would be a govt run press....

there is a protocol they follow on unnamed sources, need more than one, their editors double check the sources the journalists use AND they notify the dept of justice on every article they write with unknown gvt sources and give the justice dept a heads up and a chance to stop them if critical to national security, before any article goes to print...

but they have failed you today. they are now just liars.

 

[g5000]

Many of WaPo's 'leaks' have been Fake News stories of un-substantiated reports by 'anonymous' sources.

They are about as trustworthy as CNN.

That being said, the leaks are probably coming from Comey and his mentor, Mueller.

Mueller wasn't even in the picture until recently, you unbelievably stupid little man.

And I bet you can't even see the profound hypocrisy of your totally made-up bogus speculations as you whine about "fake news".

 

[jc456]

If you can’t understand the concept of preserving the sources you have as a journalist, you’re pretty stupid.

then why make a comment? just say anonymous and move on. nope that was done intentionally. now they must name those few sources. they didn't ask to be withheld. The post doesn't get to make that call.

 

[jc456]

Many of WaPo's 'leaks' have been Fake News stories of un-substantiated reports by 'anonymous' sources.

They are about as trustworthy as CNN.

That being said, the leaks are probably coming from Comey and his mentor, Mueller.

Mueller wasn't even in the picture until recently, you unbelievably stupid little man.

And I bet you can't even see the profound hypocrisy of your totally made-up bogus speculations as you whine about "fake news".

well all of it is fake. no one has stepped up to take ownership. until then Comey already confirmed under oath the papers lied. oops.

 

[jc456]

Anyone think to ask why the Washington Post is THE ONLY one that "anonymous sources" are speaking too regarding President Trump,etc.?

False premise.

Fox News, MSNBC, The New York Times, Breitbart, The Blaze, The Daily Caller, et. al have ALL quoted anonymous sources.

NEXT!

some of those though don't print or report unless they know there are facts of evidence. so careful where you walk bubba. you don't know when you might step in something.

 

[healthmyths]

Hell I still say it's someone from Trumps inner circle. It makes both Trump and the investigation look bad.

I think it's been Mueller, letting the American public know what's happening without "breaking the rules." Nothing is being leaked that could jeopardize the investigation--just a status update, so far as I've heard.

Leaking of any kind is illegal.

Then again why don't those "few that didn't speak on condition of anonymity " be identified!

Do you understand this issue?
Many of those interviewed spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to candidly discuss internal deliberations.
But the private accounts of more than 30 officials at the White House, the Justice Department, the FBI and on Capitol Hill, as well as Trump confidants and other senior Republicans, paint a conflicting narrative centered on the president’s brewing personal animus toward Comey.
Many of those interviewed spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to candidly discuss internal deliberations.
Inside Trump’s anger and impatience — and his sudden decision to fire Comey

My position is to CALL THE POST on this statement! Who are the FEW that didn't ask for anonymity!

The Washington Post named four of those interviewed: Sam Nunberg, Newt Gingrich, Roger Stone, and George Lombardi.
Your thread just died and you got caught not reading the article you had an issue with.

NOPE YOU ARE WRONG!
the quotes are NOT "conflicting narrative centered on the president’s brewing personal animus toward Comey.

NONE of these were "conflicting"! Words have meaning!!!
Sam Nunberg, a former political adviser to Trump, said the FBI director misunderstood the president:
“James Comey made the mistake of thinking that just because he announced the FBI was investigating possible collusion between the Russian government and the Trump campaign, he had unfettered job security.In my opinion, the president should have fired Comey the day he was sworn in.”
That is NOT a conflicting NARRATIVE! So Nunberg is NOT one of the "30 officials that paint a conflicting view!

Roger Stone:
The men influencing Trump include Roger Stone, a self-proclaimed dirty trickster and longtime Trump confidant who himself has been linked to the FBI’s Russia investigation; former New York mayor Rudolph Giuliani, a Comey critic who has been known to kibbitz about the ousted FBI director with like-minded law enforcement figures; and Keith Schiller, a former New York police officer who functioned as Trump’s chief bodyguard and works in the West Wing as director of Oval Office operations.
“What Comey did to Hillary was disgraceful,” Stone said. “I’m glad Trump fired him over it.”
STONE Presents a "conflicting view" HE FAVORED THE FIRING!!! Where is that Conflcting???

George Lombardi,
a friend of the president and a frequent guest at his Mar-a-Lago Club, said: “This was a long time coming. There had been a lot of arguments back and forth in the White House and during the campaign, a lot of talk about what side of the fence [Comey] was on or if he was above political dirty tricks.”
AGAIN WHERE IS IT A CONFLICTING VIEW?? Lombardi favored the firing... CONFLICTING????

Newt Gingrich:
You can’t be the quarterback of the team if the rest of the team is not in the huddle,” Gingrich said. “The president has to learn to go a couple steps slower so that everyone can organize around him. When you don’t loop people in, you deprive yourself of all of the opportunities available to a president of the United States.”
Gingrich favored the firing! Where is the CONFLICTING THERE???

See you didn't read the article close enough!

Again tell me who the POST quoted had CONFLICTING narrative ? WHICH of the four above didn't think firing Comey was right? That is what a "conflicting"
narrative is.
NOW tell me again WHO among the 30 WH did NOT ask for anonymity and were NOT in agreement with Trump?
Who were they???

 

[g5000]

Anyone think to ask why the Washington Post is THE ONLY one that "anonymous sources" are speaking too regarding President Trump,etc.?

False premise.

Fox News, MSNBC, The New York Times, Breitbart, The Blaze, The Daily Caller, et. al have ALL quoted anonymous sources.

NEXT!

some of those though don't print or report unless they know there are facts of evidence. so careful where you walk bubba. you don't know when you might step in something.

O'rly?

Here's Breitbart:

Multiple White House sources confirmed to Breitbart News on Sunday evening that reports earlier on Sunday that Sebastian Gorka, a deputy assistant to President Donald Trump, is somehow leaving the White House are incorrect.
“Incorrect,” one source told Breitbart News when asked about reports from the Washington Examiner and CNN that Gorka was leaving the White House.

A second White House source with direct knowledge of these matters confirmed to Breitbart News that the reports are wrong.

White House Sources: Reports of Gorka Leaving White House Are ‘Incorrect’ - Breitbart


Need more, retard?

 

[healthmyths]

Hell I still say it's someone from Trumps inner circle. It makes both Trump and the investigation look bad.

I think it's been Mueller, letting the American public know what's happening without "breaking the rules." Nothing is being leaked that could jeopardize the investigation--just a status update, so far as I've heard.

Leaking of any kind is illegal.

Then again why don't those "few that didn't speak on condition of anonymity " be identified!

Do you understand this issue?
Many of those interviewed spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to candidly discuss internal deliberations.
But the private accounts of more than 30 officials at the White House, the Justice Department, the FBI and on Capitol Hill, as well as Trump confidants and other senior Republicans, paint a conflicting narrative centered on the president’s brewing personal animus toward Comey.
Many of those interviewed spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to candidly discuss internal deliberations.
Inside Trump’s anger and impatience — and his sudden decision to fire Comey

My position is to CALL THE POST on this statement! Who are the FEW that didn't ask for anonymity!

The Washington Post named four of those interviewed: Sam Nunberg, Newt Gingrich, Roger Stone, and George Lombardi.
Your thread just died and you got caught not reading the article you had an issue with.

Those four that were interviewed gave no indication of what the article claimed.

AGREE!

the quotes are NOT "conflicting narrative centered on the president’s brewing personal animus toward Comey.

NONE of these were "conflicting"! Words have meaning!!!
Sam Nunberg, a former political adviser to Trump, said the FBI director misunderstood the president:
“James Comey made the mistake of thinking that just because he announced the FBI was investigating possible collusion between the Russian government and the Trump campaign, he had unfettered job security.In my opinion, the president should have fired Comey the day he was sworn in.”
That is NOT a conflicting NARRATIVE! So Nunberg is NOT one of the "30 officials that paint a conflicting view!

Roger Stone:
The men influencing Trump include Roger Stone, a self-proclaimed dirty trickster and longtime Trump confidant who himself has been linked to the FBI’s Russia investigation; former New York mayor Rudolph Giuliani, a Comey critic who has been known to kibbitz about the ousted FBI director with like-minded law enforcement figures; and Keith Schiller, a former New York police officer who functioned as Trump’s chief bodyguard and works in the West Wing as director of Oval Office operations.
“What Comey did to Hillary was disgraceful,” Stone said. “I’m glad Trump fired him over it.”
STONE Presents a "conflicting view" HE FAVORED THE FIRING!!! Where is that Conflcting???

George Lombardi,
a friend of the president and a frequent guest at his Mar-a-Lago Club, said: “This was a long time coming. There had been a lot of arguments back and forth in the White House and during the campaign, a lot of talk about what side of the fence [Comey] was on or if he was above political dirty tricks.”
AGAIN WHERE IS IT A CONFLICTING VIEW?? Lombardi favored the firing... CONFLICTING????

Newt Gingrich:
You can’t be the quarterback of the team if the rest of the team is not in the huddle,” Gingrich said. “The president has to learn to go a couple steps slower so that everyone can organize around him. When you don’t loop people in, you deprive yourself of all of the opportunities available to a president of the United States.”
Gingrich favored the firing! Where is the CONFLICTING THERE???

See you didn't read the article close enough!

Again tell me who the POST quoted had CONFLICTING narrative ? WHICH of the four above didn't think firing Comey was right? That is what a "conflicting"
narrative is.
NOW tell me again WHO among the 30 WH did NOT ask for anonymity and were NOT in agreement with Trump?
Who were they???

 

[jc456]

Anyone think to ask why the Washington Post is THE ONLY one that "anonymous sources" are speaking too regarding President Trump,etc.?

False premise.

Fox News, MSNBC, The New York Times, Breitbart, The Blaze, The Daily Caller, et. al have ALL quoted anonymous sources.

NEXT!

some of those though don't print or report unless they know there are facts of evidence. so careful where you walk bubba. you don't know when you might step in something.

O'rly?

Here's Breitbart:

Multiple White House sources confirmed to Breitbart News on Sunday evening that reports earlier on Sunday that Sebastian Gorka, a deputy assistant to President Donald Trump, is somehow leaving the White House are incorrect.
“Incorrect,” one source told Breitbart News when asked about reports from the Washington Examiner and CNN that Gorka was leaving the White House.

A second White House source with direct knowledge of these matters confirmed to Breitbart News that the reports are wrong.

White House Sources: Reports of Gorka Leaving White House Are ‘Incorrect’ - Breitbart

oh yeah! what's your point?

 

[healthmyths]

Anyone think to ask why the Washington Post is THE ONLY one that "anonymous sources" are speaking too regarding President Trump,etc.?

False premise.

Fox News, MSNBC, The New York Times, Breitbart, The Blaze, The Daily Caller, et. al have ALL quoted anonymous sources.

NEXT!

some of those though don't print or report unless they know there are facts of evidence. so careful where you walk bubba. you don't know when you might step in something.

O'rly?

Here's Breitbart:

Multiple White House sources confirmed to Breitbart News on Sunday evening that reports earlier on Sunday that Sebastian Gorka, a deputy assistant to President Donald Trump, is somehow leaving the White House are incorrect.
“Incorrect,” one source told Breitbart News when asked about reports from the Washington Examiner and CNN that Gorka was leaving the White House.

A second White House source with direct knowledge of these matters confirmed to Breitbart News that the reports are wrong.

White House Sources: Reports of Gorka Leaving White House Are ‘Incorrect’ - Breitbart

I agree they all use "anonymous sources"...
But in the case of this Post article Almost all the MSM are quoting the Post they are not reporting the story themselves but quoting the POST story!
And the POST has the onus of telling us which of the 30 WH officials speaking freely had a conflict with the firing which was the main premise of the story!

 

[healthmyths]

Anyone think to ask why the Washington Post is THE ONLY one that "anonymous sources" are speaking too regarding President Trump,etc.?

False premise.

Fox News, MSNBC, The New York Times, Breitbart, The Blaze, The Daily Caller, et. al have ALL quoted anonymous sources.

NEXT!

some of those though don't print or report unless they know there are facts of evidence. so careful where you walk bubba. you don't know when you might step in something.

O'rly?

Here's Breitbart:

Multiple White House sources confirmed to Breitbart News on Sunday evening that reports earlier on Sunday that Sebastian Gorka, a deputy assistant to President Donald Trump, is somehow leaving the White House are incorrect.
“Incorrect,” one source told Breitbart News when asked about reports from the Washington Examiner and CNN that Gorka was leaving the White House.

A second White House source with direct knowledge of these matters confirmed to Breitbart News that the reports are wrong.

White House Sources: Reports of Gorka Leaving White House Are ‘Incorrect’ - Breitbart

oh yeah! what's your point?

The point is who were the FEW that spoke freely? Not these guys because they supported the firing!

the quotes are NOT "conflicting narrative centered on the president’s brewing personal animus toward Comey.

NONE of these were "conflicting"! Words have meaning!!!
Sam Nunberg, a former political adviser to Trump, said the FBI director misunderstood the president:
“James Comey made the mistake of thinking that just because he announced the FBI was investigating possible collusion between the Russian government and the Trump campaign, he had unfettered job security.In my opinion, the president should have fired Comey the day he was sworn in.”
That is NOT a conflicting NARRATIVE! So Nunberg is NOT one of the "30 officials that paint a conflicting view!

Roger Stone:
The men influencing Trump include Roger Stone, a self-proclaimed dirty trickster and longtime Trump confidant who himself has been linked to the FBI’s Russia investigation; former New York mayor Rudolph Giuliani, a Comey critic who has been known to kibbitz about the ousted FBI director with like-minded law enforcement figures; and Keith Schiller, a former New York police officer who functioned as Trump’s chief bodyguard and works in the West Wing as director of Oval Office operations.
“What Comey did to Hillary was disgraceful,” Stone said. “I’m glad Trump fired him over it.”
STONE Presents a "conflicting view" HE FAVORED THE FIRING!!! Where is that Conflcting???

George Lombardi,
a friend of the president and a frequent guest at his Mar-a-Lago Club, said: “This was a long time coming. There had been a lot of arguments back and forth in the White House and during the campaign, a lot of talk about what side of the fence [Comey] was on or if he was above political dirty tricks.”
AGAIN WHERE IS IT A CONFLICTING VIEW?? Lombardi favored the firing... CONFLICTING????

Newt Gingrich:
You can’t be the quarterback of the team if the rest of the team is not in the huddle,” Gingrich said. “The president has to learn to go a couple steps slower so that everyone can organize around him. When you don’t loop people in, you deprive yourself of all of the opportunities available to a president of the United States.”
Gingrich favored the firing! Where is the CONFLICTING THERE???

See you didn't read the article close enough!

Again tell me who the POST quoted had CONFLICTING narrative ? WHICH of the four above didn't think firing Comey was right? That is what a "conflicting"
narrative is.
NOW tell me again WHO among the 30 WH did NOT ask for anonymity and were NOT in agreement with Trump?
Who were they???

 

[g5000]

Republican congressional investigators expect a potential “smoking gun” establishing that the Obama administration spied on the Trump transition team, and possibly the president-elect himself, will be produced to the House Intelligence Committee this week, a source told Fox News.

<snip>

The intelligence corroborated information about surveillance of the Trump team that was known to Nunes, sources said, even before President Trump accused his predecessor of having wiretapped him in a series of now-infamous tweets posted on March 4.







Potential 'smoking gun' showing Obama administration spied on Trump team, source says

 

[jc456]

Anyone think to ask why the Washington Post is THE ONLY one that "anonymous sources" are speaking too regarding President Trump,etc.?

False premise.

Fox News, MSNBC, The New York Times, Breitbart, The Blaze, The Daily Caller, et. al have ALL quoted anonymous sources.

NEXT!

some of those though don't print or report unless they know there are facts of evidence. so careful where you walk bubba. you don't know when you might step in something.

O'rly?

Here's Breitbart:

Multiple White House sources confirmed to Breitbart News on Sunday evening that reports earlier on Sunday that Sebastian Gorka, a deputy assistant to President Donald Trump, is somehow leaving the White House are incorrect.
“Incorrect,” one source told Breitbart News when asked about reports from the Washington Examiner and CNN that Gorka was leaving the White House.

A second White House source with direct knowledge of these matters confirmed to Breitbart News that the reports are wrong.

White House Sources: Reports of Gorka Leaving White House Are ‘Incorrect’ - Breitbart

oh yeah! what's your point?

The point is who were the FEW that spoke freely? Not these guys because they supported the firing!

the quotes are NOT "conflicting narrative centered on the president’s brewing personal animus toward Comey.

NONE of these were "conflicting"! Words have meaning!!!
Sam Nunberg, a former political adviser to Trump, said the FBI director misunderstood the president:
“James Comey made the mistake of thinking that just because he announced the FBI was investigating possible collusion between the Russian government and the Trump campaign, he had unfettered job security.In my opinion, the president should have fired Comey the day he was sworn in.”
That is NOT a conflicting NARRATIVE! So Nunberg is NOT one of the "30 officials that paint a conflicting view!

Roger Stone:
The men influencing Trump include Roger Stone, a self-proclaimed dirty trickster and longtime Trump confidant who himself has been linked to the FBI’s Russia investigation; former New York mayor Rudolph Giuliani, a Comey critic who has been known to kibbitz about the ousted FBI director with like-minded law enforcement figures; and Keith Schiller, a former New York police officer who functioned as Trump’s chief bodyguard and works in the West Wing as director of Oval Office operations.
“What Comey did to Hillary was disgraceful,” Stone said. “I’m glad Trump fired him over it.”
STONE Presents a "conflicting view" HE FAVORED THE FIRING!!! Where is that Conflcting???

George Lombardi,
a friend of the president and a frequent guest at his Mar-a-Lago Club, said: “This was a long time coming. There had been a lot of arguments back and forth in the White House and during the campaign, a lot of talk about what side of the fence [Comey] was on or if he was above political dirty tricks.”
AGAIN WHERE IS IT A CONFLICTING VIEW?? Lombardi favored the firing... CONFLICTING????

Newt Gingrich:
You can’t be the quarterback of the team if the rest of the team is not in the huddle,” Gingrich said. “The president has to learn to go a couple steps slower so that everyone can organize around him. When you don’t loop people in, you deprive yourself of all of the opportunities available to a president of the United States.”
Gingrich favored the firing! Where is the CONFLICTING THERE???

See you didn't read the article close enough!

Again tell me who the POST quoted had CONFLICTING narrative ? WHICH of the four above didn't think firing Comey was right? That is what a "conflicting"
narrative is.
NOW tell me again WHO among the 30 WH did NOT ask for anonymity and were NOT in agreement with Trump?
Who were they???

actually, that wasn't the point of that particular exchange, go back and reread it.

 

[jc456]

Republican congressional investigators expect a potential “smoking gun” establishing that the Obama administration spied on the Trump transition team, and possibly the president-elect himself, will be produced to the House Intelligence Committee this week, a source told Fox News.

<snip>

The intelligence corroborated information about surveillance of the Trump team that was known to Nunes, sources said, even before President Trump accused his predecessor of having wiretapped him in a series of now-infamous tweets posted on March 4.

reality winnner, we got the leak. that anonymous source was right. so?

 

[g5000]

Oh, look! LEAKERS!:

Because Nunes’s intelligence came from multiple sources during a span of several weeks, and he has not shared the actual materials with his committee colleagues, he will be the only member of the panel in a position to know whether the NSA has turned over some or all of the intelligence he is citing.

 

[healthmyths]

Republican congressional investigators expect a potential “smoking gun” establishing that the Obama administration spied on the Trump transition team, and possibly the president-elect himself, will be produced to the House Intelligence Committee this week, a source told Fox News.

<snip>

The intelligence corroborated information about surveillance of the Trump team that was known to Nunes, sources said, even before President Trump accused his predecessor of having wiretapped him in a series of now-infamous tweets posted on March 4.

I agree. Almost all the MSM use "anonymous sources"!
But this story is exclusively the Post. They are being quoted by ALL the MSM and they point I'm making is that which of the
30 WH officials had a conflicting narrative which is the exact term used by the Post...AND that were willing to speak on the record!
Who were they? Not these guys

the quotes are NOT "conflicting narrative centered on the president’s brewing personal animus toward Comey.

NONE of these were "conflicting"! Words have meaning!!!
Sam Nunberg, a former political adviser to Trump, said the FBI director misunderstood the president:
“James Comey made the mistake of thinking that just because he announced the FBI was investigating possible collusion between the Russian government and the Trump campaign, he had unfettered job security.In my opinion, the president should have fired Comey the day he was sworn in.”
That is NOT a conflicting NARRATIVE! So Nunberg is NOT one of the "30 officials that paint a conflicting view!

Roger Stone:
The men influencing Trump include Roger Stone, a self-proclaimed dirty trickster and longtime Trump confidant who himself has been linked to the FBI’s Russia investigation; former New York mayor Rudolph Giuliani, a Comey critic who has been known to kibbitz about the ousted FBI director with like-minded law enforcement figures; and Keith Schiller, a former New York police officer who functioned as Trump’s chief bodyguard and works in the West Wing as director of Oval Office operations.
“What Comey did to Hillary was disgraceful,” Stone said. “I’m glad Trump fired him over it.”
STONE Presents a "conflicting view" HE FAVORED THE FIRING!!! Where is that Conflcting???

George Lombardi,
a friend of the president and a frequent guest at his Mar-a-Lago Club, said: “This was a long time coming. There had been a lot of arguments back and forth in the White House and during the campaign, a lot of talk about what side of the fence [Comey] was on or if he was above political dirty tricks.”
AGAIN WHERE IS IT A CONFLICTING VIEW?? Lombardi favored the firing... CONFLICTING????

Newt Gingrich:
You can’t be the quarterback of the team if the rest of the team is not in the huddle,” Gingrich said. “The president has to learn to go a couple steps slower so that everyone can organize around him. When you don’t loop people in, you deprive yourself of all of the opportunities available to a president of the United States.”
Gingrich favored the firing! Where is the CONFLICTING THERE???

See you didn't read the article close enough!

Again tell me who the POST quoted had CONFLICTING narrative ? WHICH of the four above didn't think firing Comey was right? That is what a "conflicting"
narrative is.
NOW tell me again WHO among the 30 WH did NOT ask for anonymity and were NOT in agreement with Trump?
Who were they???

 

[g5000]

Republican congressional investigators expect a potential “smoking gun” establishing that the Obama administration spied on the Trump transition team, and possibly the president-elect himself, will be produced to the House Intelligence Committee this week, a source told Fox News.

<snip>

The intelligence corroborated information about surveillance of the Trump team that was known to Nunes, sources said, even before President Trump accused his predecessor of having wiretapped him in a series of now-infamous tweets posted on March 4.

reality winnner, we got the leak. that anonymous source was right. so?

Anonymous sources have been right about Trump, too. So?

And Reality Winner was not the source of that story, retard.

 

[jc456]

Oh, look! LEAKERS!:

Because Nunes’s intelligence came from multiple sources during a span of several weeks, and he has not shared the actual materials with his committee colleagues, he will be the only member of the panel in a position to know whether the NSA has turned over some or all of the intelligence he is citing.

again, that was accurate. I'm looking for the ones that are accurate coming from the post and times. so far you got squat juice.

 

[g5000]

So as I said. The OP is built on an entirely false premise.

 

[jc456]

Republican congressional investigators expect a potential “smoking gun” establishing that the Obama administration spied on the Trump transition team, and possibly the president-elect himself, will be produced to the House Intelligence Committee this week, a source told Fox News.

<snip>

The intelligence corroborated information about surveillance of the Trump team that was known to Nunes, sources said, even before President Trump accused his predecessor of having wiretapped him in a series of now-infamous tweets posted on March 4.

reality winnner, we got the leak. that anonymous source was right. so?

Anonymous sources have been right about Trump, too. So?

And Reality Winner was not the source of that story, retard.

where and which ones. comey invalidated them all under oath. so I'm still waiting.