Who’s Lookin’ Out For You???

[PoliticalChic]

8. Now…..how can we compare the iniquity of the Democrat Party to the actions of the finest President on over a century?

Watch this:



“Reagan Directive on “Pre-emptive Neutralization” of Terrorists

By Steven Aftergood • September 28, 2012

In 1984, President Reagan ordered the Director of Central Intelligence to develop “capabilities for the pre-emptive neutralization of anti-American terrorist groups which plan, support, or conduct hostile terrorist acts against U.S. citizens, interests, and property overseas.”
The President further ordered the DCI to “develop a clandestine service capability, using all lawful means, for effective response overseas against terrorist acts commmitted against U.S. citizens, facilities, or interests.”

Those instructions were contained in National Security Decision Directive 138, “Combatting Terrorism,” which was issued on April 3, 1984.



A few weeks earlier, Hezbollah forces in Lebanon had kidnapped William Buckley, the CIA station chief in Beirut.
NSDD 138 remained classified for many years and was not fully declassified until two years into the Obama Administration.
Categories: Secrecy
Categories: Secrecy
Reagan Directive on "Pre-emptive Neutralization" of Terrorists





Reagan’s Preemptive Neutralization Program.

April 3, 1984, Reagan signed the National Security Decision Directive 138, authorizing the CIA to develop capabilities for the preemptive neutralization of anti-American terrorist groups that plan, support, or conduct hostile terrorist acts against US citizens, interests, and properties overseas.

You can see the classified version of it here: https://irp.fas.org/offdocs/nsdd/nsdd-138.pdf





De-classified by whom???

And to whose benefit???

"Here at home, the [Democrat] Obama administration has gravely impaired our capability to gather human intelligence by declassifying hundreds of pages of documents that explain our interrogation techniques—information that is now probably in al-Qaeda training manuals."

President Obama’s Foreign Policy: An Assessment

This image of President Obama standing above his country and above the world sums up the post-American way of thinking.

imprimis.hillsdale.edu

The anti-American axis: Feinstein-Biden-Obama

Just one small part of the Liberal/Progressive Democrat anti-America cabal.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Isn't it a legitimate query to one who, I am certain, considers himself articulate and intelligent?


Shouldn't you be able to defend your position????

I always can, mine.



Last chance:

I challenge you to

a. find any error in that post or any of the rest I have planned.

b. author a similar one indicting the Republicans

c. Or admit you are a lying low-life, if you can do neither.

And...you can't.

I'm never wrong.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You and I both know you're embarrassed.
You wish you had a cogent resonse to those questions.

I hope you'll consider the big picture the next time you vote, and the next time you post.

 

[PoliticalChic]

9. This might be a good time to remind all the simpletons who try to claim any association between the Right and the Kremlin, that the “Liberal Lion,” murderer and Democrat candidate for president, actually offered to work for the Russians against the American government.



“In 1983, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy offered to help the Soviets mount a public-relations offensive in the United States. This propaganda attack would target President Reagan and his policies. These are the same policies that eventually ended the Cold War and reduced the possibility of nuclear annihilation. … validate reports that were first published by Vasili Mitrokhin — the former KGB historian who secretly copied sensitive KGB files and released them after the fall of the Soviet Union.
According to this research and released KGB papers, Mr. Kennedy felt that the booming economy during Mr. Reagan's presidency made him popular — and thus a difficult target for Democratic criticism.



….Kennedy felt the Soviets might be of assistance, if Mr. Kennedy and the Democrats could get the ear of the general-secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
… this anti-Reagan/anti-U.S. conspiracy was not a one-man operation by Mr. Kennedy. They indicate that former Sen. John V. Tunney, a California Democrat, went to Moscow and met with officials of the KGB on Mr. Kennedy's behalf. Additionally, in their book "The Sword And The Shield," Christopher Andrew and Vasili Metrokhin said that as early as 1975 the KGB began operations to penetrate the inner circles of a number of leading Democrats, including the likes of Mr. Kennedy and Ramsey Clark. They also mentioned that a Democratic Party activist had been recruited by the KGB and had supplied the Soviets with information from a variety of Democratic leaders, including President Carter.


… after Mr. Reagan left office, Mr. Tunney said that he had indeed contacted the Soviets on behalf of several U.S. senators — not just Mr. Kennedy. So, the question is, did some of the Democratic Party leadership offer to work with the Soviet KGB against Mr. Reagan? If so, were they later blackmailed into working for the KGB and against the United States on other fronts? How many Democratic politicians were compromised and later blackmailed? Lastly, if they were controlled by the Soviets, are they now "influenced" by the Russians? Inquiring minds want to know.
http://forum.gon.com/archive/index.php/t-100151.html




And, of course, another of your candidates worked with the Kremlin to produce the bogus dossier, designed to sink Trump.



It appears that they are secrets only to lamebrains who vote Democrat.

 

[PoliticalChic]

10. Always remember Rule #2​

To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.




For years, Democrats and their allies claimed that Trump worked with the Kremlin….then we learned that it was Democrat Hillary Clinton who conspired with the Russians to produce the bogus dossier.



Republicans like Reagan, and Trump, were always opponents of communists, and terrorists, and we saw same in Trump’s ending Soleimani’s attacks on American soldiers, and Trump’s warning to the Afghanistan terrorist and his plan to leave:



“Pompeo Says Trump Warned Taliban That US Would Attack Militants’ Villages if They Harmed Americans

Former Trump secretary of state Mike Pompeo has expressed disappointment with the Biden administration over its chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan, and criticised the White House’s reported pleading with the Taliban* not to attack the US Embassy if they take Kabul.

Asked how the Trump administration would have proceeded with the withdrawal, Pompeo stressed that the administration had “conditions attached to how we were thinking about this withdrawal,” and that he personally was “part of those negotiations.”

“I was also in the room when President Trump made very clear to Mullah Baradar, the senior Taliban negotiator, that if ya threaten an American, if you scared an American, certainly if you hurt an American, that we would bring all American power to bear to make sure that we went to your village, to your house. We were very clear about the things that we were prepared to do to protect American lives,” the former diplomat, who also previously served as Trump’s CIA chief, said.” Pompeo Says Trump Warned Taliban That US Would Attack Militants’ Villages if They Harmed Americans



Which party is lookin’ out for America and Americans?

It’s crystal clear.

 

[Dragonlady]

6. What effect has the emasculation of our Intell community had on our nation?

Did it really remove protections???

You betcha'!!!!!!

“In the wake of the September 11th terror attack, some legislators are now proclaiming their commitment to unleashing the CIA and rebuilding its human “assets.” Just a short while ago these same legislators were leading the charge to curtail the agency. One such convert is the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Joseph Biden. The Delaware Democrat was one of seventeen Senators who voted in 1974 to ban all covert operations, and proudly noted during his 1988 campaign for president that he had threatened to “go public” with covert action plans by the Reagan administration, causing them to cancel the operations.

Hopefully Senator Biden, and other congressional converts, are undergoing a genuine epiphany. Perhaps they now realize, as Henry Kissinger once observed about the Church Committee, that it is an illusion that “tranquility can be achieved by an abstract purity of motive for which history offers no example.” It is precisely this illusion which has prevailed in congressional circles since the heyday of Frank Church and Otis Pike. As Church himself once argued, the United States should not “fight fire with fire . . . evil with evil.”
Congressional Oversight and the Crippling of the CIA | History News Network



[Liberal Democrat] Congressional meddling is primarily responsible for this new CIA ethos, transforming it from an agency willing to take risks, and act at times in a Machiavellian manner, into just another sclerotic Washington bureaucracy. This cautious, legalistic attitude has crippled the agency’s effectiveness and will not change unless the oversight committees of Congress acknowledge the uniquely executive character of intelligence and covert operations, and start to dismantle the cumbersome oversight apparatus erected during the last twenty five years."
History News Network Congressional Oversight and the Crippling of the CIA


Democrats:
A major reason why we were unable to detect the 9/11 attack!

They detected the attack well in advance. The Republican president didn’t believe the Intel, and did nothing.

After the attack, the Republican president started wars that lasted 20 years, drove the country deeply into debt and crashed the economy.

The Republicans have done nothing, but put the country into debt and let the infrastructure crumble.

 

[Dragonlady]

10. Always remember Rule #2​

To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.




For years, Democrats and their allies claimed that Trump worked with the Kremlin….then we learned that it was Democrat Hillary Clinton who conspired with the Russians to produce the bogus dossier.



Republicans like Reagan, and Trump, were always opponents of communists, and terrorists, and we saw same in Trump’s ending Soleimani’s attacks on American soldiers, and Trump’s warning to the Afghanistan terrorist and his plan to leave:



“Pompeo Says Trump Warned Taliban That US Would Attack Militants’ Villages if They Harmed Americans

Former Trump secretary of state Mike Pompeo has expressed disappointment with the Biden administration over its chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan, and criticised the White House’s reported pleading with the Taliban* not to attack the US Embassy if they take Kabul.

Asked how the Trump administration would have proceeded with the withdrawal, Pompeo stressed that the administration had “conditions attached to how we were thinking about this withdrawal,” and that he personally was “part of those negotiations.”

“I was also in the room when President Trump made very clear to Mullah Baradar, the senior Taliban negotiator, that if ya threaten an American, if you scared an American, certainly if you hurt an American, that we would bring all American power to bear to make sure that we went to your village, to your house. We were very clear about the things that we were prepared to do to protect American lives,” the former diplomat, who also previously served as Trump’s CIA chief, said.” Pompeo Says Trump Warned Taliban That US Would Attack Militants’ Villages if They Harmed Americans



Which party is lookin’ out for America and Americans?

It’s crystal clear.

Republicans don’t give a rats ass about America. They’re just doing it for the money.

You seem somewhat triggered that your thread isn’t going the way you thought it would.

It’s just laughable that you think the Republicans care about the American people. How gullible and stupid are you?

 

[Dragonlady]

Whose objective is to take care of Americans, and whose is simply out for their own benefits??

Which party has sold out to those other nations which pay them off, or who falls in line with an anti-freedom ideology?




1.Perhaps you’ve heard, and been re-assured, by this quote attributed to Orwell:

“We sleep soundly in our beds, because rough men stand ready in the night to do violence on those who would harm us"

Is this not one that should be impressed on our highest government officials?



2. “President Washington, in his first annual message to Congress in 1790, requested a Contingency Fund, or “secret service” fund, as one member of Congress described it. Washington was given this fund, in the amount of $40,000, a sizable sum in the early 1790s. The president was not required to report how he spent this money, he merely had to divulge the amount of money spent, without revealing to whom or for what reasons it had been spent.

Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Andrew Jackson, and Abraham Lincoln, all authorized clandestine operations out of this fund, and did not report the details to Congress. This pattern persisted until the mid-1970s with little or no change, other than the increasing size and bureaucratization of the nation’s intelligence apparatus in the twentieth century.”
Congressional Oversight and the Crippling of the CIA | History News Network


Are you aware that one party has forbid such clandestine operations aimed at preserving America, and changed the intelligence agencies into weapons against the American Party, the Republicans?
You've watched in take place, haven't you.

It's the European Party using methods Europeans used in the last century.




3. In the half century that Democrats have held power, a very different view of 'protecting' Americans has been in effect: basically….they don’t care to do so.

What were the Church and Pike committees?

The Church and Pike Commissions were two parallel committees run in the US House and Senate investigating illegal activities by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the National Security Agency (NSA) in the 1970's.
Church and Pike Commissions



4. During the 1970’s, the Democrat Congress decided to gain control over the intelligence community.“… including the most controversial tool of that policy, covert action. Secrecy was seen as antithetical to the American way, and there was widespread agreement that “rogue” agencies such as the CIA were a threat to liberty.

a. [Democrat] Senator Frank Church and his allies claimed that an assertive legislative role would bring the United States “back to the genius of the Founding Fathers.” This assertion was made despite the fact that American presidents from 1789 to 1974 were given wide latitude to conduct clandestine operations they believed were in the national interest.

The damage done to the CIA by this congressional oversight regime (Democrat-controlled Pike and Church Committees) is quite extensive.




5. [A]s Henry Kissinger once observed about the Church Committee, that it is an illusion that “tranquility can be achieved by an abstract purity of motive for which history offers no example.” It is precisely this illusion which has prevailed in congressional circles since the heyday of Frank Church and Otis Pike. As Church himself once argued, the United States should not “fight fire with fire . . . evil with evil.”
Congressional Oversight and the Crippling of the CIA Congressional Oversight and the Crippling of the CIA | History News Network



If you have any doubt as to which party protects America and Americans, look at the quote in item #1 and ask Soleimani about it.

American's don't need a government to "look out for them", they need a government who provides a stable economic platform, protection of private property, and the education, infrastructure, and political stability to allow people to achieve their potential.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Republicans don’t give a rats ass about America. They’re just doing it for the money.

You seem somewhat triggered that your thread isn’t going the way you thought it would.

It’s just laughable that you think the Republicans care about the American people. How gullible and stupid are you?

• Under Trump gasoline was about $1.80 a gallon….but you voted against that
• Under Trump we were energy independent….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump 80% of illegal alien were kept in Mexico….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump inflation was 1.4%….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump crime was far lower, as were homicides….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump Iran was kept in a box….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump America had an airbase near both China and Iran….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump our President wasn’t on China’s payroll….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump cartels weren’t free to operate….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump government didn’t favor racism, CRT, gender mutilation….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump we didn’t have confiscatory tax policy….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump we didn’t have a government working with big tech to end free speech….but you voted against that.
• 
  
• You have proven to be one of the America-hating 5th columnists. Proud?

 

[badbob85037]

Thankfully, we have the Democrats looking out for us
Healthcare, Education, the Environment, civil rights

Republicans exist to look out for the wealthy

I am not trying to get you angry. only help while there is a chance for you to once again see the reality you now only destort. Take a cold shower. Beat yourself in the face with a brick, Spend the weekend with Joe and the Pope but do something buddy cause you are losing it.

 

[Dragonlady]

• Under Trump gasoline was about $1.80 a gallon….but you voted against that
• Under Trump we were energy independent….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump 80% of illegal alien were kept in Mexico….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump inflation was 1.4%….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump crime was far lower, as were homicides….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump Iran was kept in a box….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump America had an airbase near both China and Iran….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump our President wasn’t on China’s payroll….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump cartels weren’t free to operate….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump government didn’t favor racism, CRT, gender mutilation….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump we didn’t have confiscatory tax policy….but you voted against that.
• Under Trump we didn’t have a government working with big tech to end free speech….but you voted against that.
• 
  
• You have proven to be one of the America-hating 5th columnists. Proud?

The $1.80 a gallon gasoline was under Obama, Sweetheart. It was $2.80 a gallon under Trump.

Also, the energy independence was created by Obama and Biden. Trump simply took credit for it, and then drove it into a ditch during the pandemic.

Last, but not least as a Canadian, I don’t vote vote in American elections.