Whoever Thinks Driverless Cars Will Be Good in the Next 100 Years

Everyday my apps are sucking up a gig of data to download a new version because the old one had flaws.
The apps did not have flaws. They have to be adapted to new attacks created by Watson Computer, cyber bots & humans.
Oh boy, let's run with your argument!
Now your car is being hacked!
But that's OK, because next week an update will be coming out!
 
So I'm typing an email in Outlook when suddenly "Your Session Has Timed Out" and it logs me out Outlook completely. Imagine a driverless car going down the freeway at 70mph and "Your Session Has Timed Out"

View attachment 150287
Why would a session time out error cause an issue? It would only be in use after the car had the key removed. Do you think a programmer would even include an idle timer on a car?
Yeah, no problem when the computer in your driverless car turns off! :cuckoo:
The computer in my car never turns off now. Why would it in the future? :cuckoo:

How cars have become rolling computers
 
So I'm typing an email in Outlook when suddenly "Your Session Has Timed Out" and it logs me out Outlook completely. Imagine a driverless car going down the freeway at 70mph and "Your Session Has Timed Out"

View attachment 150287

How many lines of code do you think were written to provide the timer and to sign you out?

Why would you think that code would be added to the car's programming? Are you really that dense?
Claims the Dufus who thinks flawless sophisticated code can be created.

Nonthinkers like you are like driverless cars heading towards a train crossing with no guards.

I have never said any code is flawless.

But I am not the idiot who wants to use Outlook as the measuring stick for all programming.
Nor am I the Dufus who thinks someone writing code for a driverless car would had the "timed Out" feature.

But the driverless car can take the information from 20 sensors simultaneously and process it in a microsecond. The well designed driverless car can "see" better, react faster, and make the right choice more often.
Everyday my apps are sucking up a gig of data to download a new version because the old one had flaws.
I made my fortune as an engineer, don't try to lecture me on how machines perform. When the car in front of you on the 70mph freeway traffic blows a tire, this is what you will get.
View attachment 150494
You must have been a shitty engineer if you were one at all. You dont even know what you are talking about.
 
So I'm typing an email in Outlook when suddenly "Your Session Has Timed Out" and it logs me out Outlook completely. Imagine a driverless car going down the freeway at 70mph and "Your Session Has Timed Out"

View attachment 150287

How many lines of code do you think were written to provide the timer and to sign you out?

Why would you think that code would be added to the car's programming? Are you really that dense?
Claims the Dufus who thinks flawless sophisticated code can be created.

Nonthinkers like you are like driverless cars heading towards a train crossing with no guards.

I have never said any code is flawless.

But I am not the idiot who wants to use Outlook as the measuring stick for all programming.
Nor am I the Dufus who thinks someone writing code for a driverless car would had the "timed Out" feature.

But the driverless car can take the information from 20 sensors simultaneously and process it in a microsecond. The well designed driverless car can "see" better, react faster, and make the right choice more often.
Everyday my apps are sucking up a gig of data to download a new version because the old one had flaws.
I made my fortune as an engineer, don't try to lecture me on how machines perform. When the car in front of you on the 70mph freeway traffic blows a tire, this is what you will get.

And you will see it happen and react. The car will see it, see the cars behind you, and on both sides of you, all at virtually the same time and react faster than you, with more information than you have.
 
So I'm typing an email in Outlook when suddenly "Your Session Has Timed Out" and it logs me out Outlook completely. Imagine a driverless car going down the freeway at 70mph and "Your Session Has Timed Out"

View attachment 150287
Why would a session time out error cause an issue? It would only be in use after the car had the key removed. Do you think a programmer would even include an idle timer on a car?
Yeah, no problem when the computer in your driverless car turns off! :cuckoo:

Why would it turn off? Because your email did? That is ridiculous.
 
Everyday my apps are sucking up a gig of data to download a new version because the old one had flaws.
The apps did not have flaws. They have to be adapted to new attacks created by Watson Computer, cyber bots & humans.
Oh boy, let's run with your argument!
Now your car is being hacked!
But that's OK, because next week an update will be coming out!

Basic safety features will not be accessible except through actual contact and plugging into the computer onboard.
 
I want to see one in winter weather on ice HAHAHAHA
Unless you have not noticed, people ain't that great in those conditions.
"Unless you have not noticed, people ain't that great in those conditions."

And they do much better with computer-assisted driving measures, like traction and power control. In other words, the computer controlling these things is safer than the person controlling them..
 
So I'm typing an email in Outlook when suddenly "Your Session Has Timed Out" and it logs me out Outlook completely. Imagine a driverless car going down the freeway at 70mph and "Your Session Has Timed Out"

View attachment 150287

How many lines of code do you think were written to provide the timer and to sign you out?

Why would you think that code would be added to the car's programming? Are you really that dense?
Claims the Dufus who thinks flawless sophisticated code can be created.

Nonthinkers like you are like driverless cars heading towards a train crossing with no guards.

I have never said any code is flawless.

But I am not the idiot who wants to use Outlook as the measuring stick for all programming.
Nor am I the Dufus who thinks someone writing code for a driverless car would had the "timed Out" feature.

But the driverless car can take the information from 20 sensors simultaneously and process it in a microsecond. The well designed driverless car can "see" better, react faster, and make the right choice more often.
Everyday my apps are sucking up a gig of data to download a new version because the old one had flaws.
I made my fortune as an engineer, don't try to lecture me on how machines perform.

Wait, you say you were an engineer, and you worry about an email Timed Out function will be part of the programming for a driverless car?

It must have been fun driving a train.
 
So I'm typing an email in Outlook when suddenly "Your Session Has Timed Out" and it logs me out Outlook completely. Imagine a driverless car going down the freeway at 70mph and "Your Session Has Timed Out"

View attachment 150287

How many lines of code do you think were written to provide the timer and to sign you out?

Why would you think that code would be added to the car's programming? Are you really that dense?
Claims the Dufus who thinks flawless sophisticated code can be created.

Nonthinkers like you are like driverless cars heading towards a train crossing with no guards.

I have never said any code is flawless.

But I am not the idiot who wants to use Outlook as the measuring stick for all programming.
Nor am I the Dufus who thinks someone writing code for a driverless car would had the "timed Out" feature.

But the driverless car can take the information from 20 sensors simultaneously and process it in a microsecond. The well designed driverless car can "see" better, react faster, and make the right choice more often.
Everyday my apps are sucking up a gig of data to download a new version because the old one had flaws.
I made my fortune as an engineer, don't try to lecture me on how machines perform.

Wait, you say you were an engineer, and you worry about an email Timed Out function will be part of the programming for a driverless car?

It must have been fun driving a train.
No way was he an engineer. If he was then he must have been unemployed.
 
Cars can't do much damage. A autonomous bulldozer could level a town before it get's stopped.
 
One last comment about the Timed Out function.

Weatherman, do you worry about air traffic controllers computers timing out?

Or do the navigation computers for commercial aircraft time out?

Or the computers controlling the cooling systems in nuclear reactors, do they time out?

Your claim is laughable.
 
How many lines of code do you think were written to provide the timer and to sign you out?

Why would you think that code would be added to the car's programming? Are you really that dense?
Claims the Dufus who thinks flawless sophisticated code can be created.

Nonthinkers like you are like driverless cars heading towards a train crossing with no guards.

I have never said any code is flawless.

But I am not the idiot who wants to use Outlook as the measuring stick for all programming.
Nor am I the Dufus who thinks someone writing code for a driverless car would had the "timed Out" feature.

But the driverless car can take the information from 20 sensors simultaneously and process it in a microsecond. The well designed driverless car can "see" better, react faster, and make the right choice more often.
Everyday my apps are sucking up a gig of data to download a new version because the old one had flaws.
I made my fortune as an engineer, don't try to lecture me on how machines perform.

Wait, you say you were an engineer, and you worry about an email Timed Out function will be part of the programming for a driverless car?

It must have been fun driving a train.
No way was he an engineer. If he was then he must have been unemployed.
Interesting how those gullible enough to trust Big Brother to run their lives trust manmade machines to control their lives too.
 

The link does not work fir me. Is it the Tesla that hit the truck?
I saw my first Tesla the other day on the highway going about 70 with no trouble. I just wonder how it goes when it is not being pulled on a trailer by a service truck.

I also saw a driverless car, which seemed to be doing OK, I am not sure if there were people in control or not.
 
One last comment about the Timed Out function.

Weatherman, do you worry about air traffic controllers computers timing out?

Or do the navigation computers for commercial aircraft time out?

Or the computers controlling the cooling systems in nuclear reactors, do they time out?

Your claim is laughable.
Well Dufus. Just so happens air traffic control computers have gone offline several times.

But trained professionals who are on constant alert know exactly what to do.

But you being an uninformed ignorant leftist wouldn't know that.
 
15th post
Claims the Dufus who thinks flawless sophisticated code can be created.

Nonthinkers like you are like driverless cars heading towards a train crossing with no guards.

I have never said any code is flawless.

But I am not the idiot who wants to use Outlook as the measuring stick for all programming.
Nor am I the Dufus who thinks someone writing code for a driverless car would had the "timed Out" feature.

But the driverless car can take the information from 20 sensors simultaneously and process it in a microsecond. The well designed driverless car can "see" better, react faster, and make the right choice more often.
Everyday my apps are sucking up a gig of data to download a new version because the old one had flaws.
I made my fortune as an engineer, don't try to lecture me on how machines perform.

Wait, you say you were an engineer, and you worry about an email Timed Out function will be part of the programming for a driverless car?

It must have been fun driving a train.
No way was he an engineer. If he was then he must have been unemployed.
Interesting how those gullible enough to trust Big Brother to run their lives trust manmade machines to control their lives too.
My fitbit tells me every hour to get up and walk, I am a mindless clone.
 
Seeing that data suggest that they're safer compared to normal cars I'd say with a few decades of testing they should be ready.

The data lies.

So far, self-driving cars are kept out of difficult situations, either totally or by turning control over to the driver. And, so far, self-driving cars are well maintained by researchers, rather than being 10-years-old and never having maintenance.

But, self-driving cars are safer than incompetent drivers. And, I hope to see them starting to go mainstream in the next few years.

A half assed system of partial driverless and partial human drivers would give you all of the problems, none of the benefits. You can't enact lightless intersections and seamless merging unless all vehicles are automated.
 
There was an incident two days ago where an older lady floored her car and ran into a building. We also had a man at work go into some sort of seizure and floored his car. He luckily went over a hill surprisingly missing everyone.

So yeah there are glitches in whatever system employed. Personally I want to be in control. But I am lucky to have driver's assist. She sits next to me everywhere I go and apparently I have become quite the bad driver.
 
Back
Top Bottom