Zebra
Gold Member
I am used to Jonas, with an s as in Moses.
But lately one often reads Jona.
But lately one often reads Jona.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
btw .... the Bible does not speak of a whale, just of a big fish
Wait, God had people vote as to whether Jonah would be swallowed?I am used to Jonas, with an s as in Moses.
But lately one often reads Jona.
I see that you prefer the spelling Jonah.People in the bible had no idea that Whales were mammals.
All that said, this is just another bible story that's fairly improbable. A person couldn't survive more than a few minutes in a whale or a fish. They'd be digested.
Only on Mondays and Fridays.I see that you prefer the spelling Jonah.![]()
the name is YONA It's a real word-----it means DOVE ? JONAS ?I am used to Jonas, with an s as in Moses.
But lately one often reads Jona.
Maybe stop reading allegorical accounts literally. Or better yet, try using google to find out the meaning of that account.People in the bible had no idea that Whales were mammals.
All that said, this is just another bible story that's fairly improbable. A person couldn't survive more than a few minutes in a whale or a fish. They'd be digested.
Actually, the word "Ding" means allegory in Greek, so no need to respond to the post since the post is pure allegory as well.Maybe stop reading allegorical accounts literally. Or better yet, try using google to find out the meaning of that account.

heartburn or acid reflux?So, Jonas, Jona, and Jonah were sitting around a campfire in the belly of a whale. . .
Nope, no camp fireSo, Jonas, Jona, and Jonah were sitting around a campfire in the belly of a whale. . .
Do you believe that account was intended to be read literally?Actually, the word "Ding" means allegory in Greek, so no need to respond to the post since the post is pure allegory as well.
![]()
I think you can't wrap your mind around miracles, so it's your only alternative.Do you believe that account was intended to be read literally?
The miracles performed by Jesus were the point of those accounts. OT embellishments were not the point of the OT accounts.I think you can't wrap your mind around miracles, so it's your only alternative.
It's like watching people on the history channel trying to scientifically explain the parting of the Red Sea.
It's just nutty.
So, you don't believe that the miracles of Jesus were allegory?The miracles performed by Jesus were the point of those accounts. OT embellishments were not the point of the OT accounts.
it's a story-----the author was probably paid by the word like DickensDo you believe that account was intended to be read literally?
People in the bible had no idea that Whales were mammals.
All that said, this is just another bible story that's fairly improbable. A person couldn't survive more than a few minutes in a whale or a fish. They'd be digested.
Exodus was embellished to make the account more memorable and easier to pass down.I think you can't wrap your mind around miracles, so it's your only alternative.
It's like watching people on the history channel trying to scientifically explain the parting of the Red Sea.
It's just nutty.