No...I'm sure they'll have the
dignity of a job. Where did I ever say that money automatically made someone "useless"? I have said that Willard is VERY out of touch and I'm sure it is the obscene amount of money he has always had that helped make him so.
Did you feel that John Kennedy was out of touch?
Ted Kennedy?
Nancy Pelosi?
Apples to oranges. They can pull off authentic, Romney can't. They don't come off as awkward and out of touch. Romney does.
Oh...and of course there is the difference in policies. Romney's policies will benefit Romney and friends of Romney. Guess what? The unwashed masses with their 7-11 cookies, aren't friends of Romney.
so what I get from your post is what I expected in thee nd with a debate with you...
Wealthy Democrats are genuine.
Wealthy Republicans are in it for the rich and dont care about the poor.
Let me explain something to you...I know...youve heard it.....but I will say it anyway...
It is no brainer that the poor need help. It is a no brainer that the wealthy have lots and the poor have little...and the wealthy can pay lots more to help the poor not struggle....THAT IS A NO BRAINER......Romney knows it, I kow it, Paul knows it...
And yes, we can trend to that ideology...and trhe rich will feel little affects and the poor will feel great affects...so a win win for all...
A NO BRAINER.
The reason the GOP takes rthe position they take is not becuase they do not see the logic in the liberal ideology. They do.
They take their position becuase they believe, as I do, that America would be better off in the long run sticking to the "non entitlement" ideology.
Sure...we can be like Europe. But we never wanted to be like Europe.
SO there is a party trying to prevent it.
Enough with the spin. TRY TO UNDERSTAND the conservative ideology. We are not evil animals....and we are not stupid.
We get it Seawytch...we get it.....we just dont think it is a good idea in the long run.