Well, you seem to be a very good Plutocrat Apologist. But frankly, after ten years of hearing this shit, I'm sick of excuses.
The problem with a economic system based on sating the greed of the Mitt Romney's of the world is that it is always self-defeating. They are never satisfied, even when they have enough money to last 100 lifetimes.
Again, you refuse to understand the treuth.
Why did it not give you reason to wonder how it is possible to cvreate mil;lions of jobs YET there are less people in the workforce?
Is it that you prefer to live in a world of fuzzy math?
I dont get it. Didnt it bother you that the numbers didnt add up?
It bothered me.
So I did my research.
What I stated is not only fact....but it is basic logic.
You put out a lot of Plutocratic apolgies I ignored because they were stupid.
Yes, it is possible to create million of jobs,
but still be at the same place. With population growth, the econmy has to produce a minimum of 150,000 jobs a month just to keep pace.
True. But thats the point. We are NOT at the same place. We have LESS people in the workforce. That is where the fuzzy math is. Not a less percentage of people...if that were the case, then yes, population growth is a factor. But no...we have LESS people...an actual number....LESS people in the workforce.
Most of the job losses happened the first few months of Obama's term or the last few months of Bush's term. Since then, the private sector has been growing jobs, just not enough to meet the increases in the work force.
Again, as I said, we have LESS people in the workforce.
Conversely, Romney has never been about creating jobs, he's been about making the rich richer.
He was about success for his company. The way they made money was by buying failing business models and turning them around. Without Bain, those jobs would have been l;ost anyway. With Bain, many were saved. You do not understand what Bain did....despitre my explaining it. Which means the truth hurts, so you refuse to acknowledge it.
A guy who says "I like to be able to fire people" isn't going to instill a lot of confidence that he cares about Joe going to his thankless job every day...
The fact that you are one of the few that still plays on that "taken completely out of context" line sopeaks volumes. If you spent the time to hear what he was speaking about, you would never refer to that line. Reade up on it. He was talking about venodrs that do not live up to their promises and expectations. He made it clear that he would have no problem eliminating a vendor if they did not service him as they promised they would