Who Is Right About WMDs in Iraq, the Right or Trump?

[Billo_Really]

Don't you people know how to use the Internet? Or do you just go to sites that support your point of view??
FAKE NEWS sites!

Don't blame me if you don't know international law. Regime change is illegal. Now go do your homework and come back when you're ready to talk intelligently about this subject.

 

[cnelsen]

It doesn't do any good to open my stupid mouth, if you won't open your dumbass ears.

A thinking person says "Let my ideas conform to my observations". healthmyths says, "Let my observations conform to my ideas". She is thus a hopeless ideologue. No amount of reasoned, informed debate will move her--no matter how absurd her position becomes. This is why ideologues (zealots, Zionists, Bolsheviks, Communists, fascists, progressives, frequent flyers, etc.) are so dangerous. In his own mind, a genocidal ideologue is the pinnacle of human moral perfection, reality be damned.

 

[cnelsen]

Saddam did not start the war with Iran, Iranians did that by infiltrating the southern marshes in Iraq and attacking government forces.
Islam is the most peaceful religion in the world, except maybe Buddhists. And even the Buddhists in Burma are very violent these days. Saddam was the first Iraqi leader to not get assassinated in his first year or so. He was what he had to be, and was only as violent as he had to be.
Iraq did not attack the US, the US attacked Iraq.

I agree with your post. But puzzled by this:

Islam the most peaceful religion, is this a joke?
islam is the most violent cult the planet has ever known, nothing else is even close.
Every Muslim controlled country has absolutely zero tolerance for any other religion/viewpoint.

You are right. My mistake. Islam is every bit as primitive and blood thirsty as Judaism. I was agreeing with the last lines only.

 

[cnelsen]

Patriotic conservatives wanted us to increase our troop strength in Iraq. Cut-and-run traitors like registered Democrat Donald Trump wanted us to leave.

Who was right?

A simple question you cowards are also avoiding.

And Trump was wrong even though I support MOST of what Trump says and does!

If Trump was wrong by demanding we cut and run from Iraq, what room does he have to criticize Obama for drawing down our troops and claiming that led to the birth of ISIS?

How dare he do that? And what does it say about his own judgment? What does it say about the judgment of the people who let Trump get away with that?

He doesn't say that NOW!

Of course he doesn't. He is pretending to be a Republican now, and you morons totally fell for it.

No other person claiming to be a Republican would have gotten away with that. You jackasses call someone a RINO for much, much, much less reasons than the things Trump is guilty of.

But all he had to do to win your favor was attack Mexicans and Muslims. Hucksters are very good at finding the stains on your souls and exploiting them.

You are a good example of why the libtards keep losing. You simply do not get it. You can't imagine someone would have a position on immigration that wasn't motivated by racial hatred. This is because race permeates your own view of the world. But people can want less immigration and not hate foreigners in the same way someone on a diet doesn't hate food. Can you ever grasp that? I suspect not. In my case, I was fully behind Trump from the day after he announced. Why? Because for 24 hours the people I loathe more than any other people in the world, the main stream media, had been going ballistic over Trump's announcement remarks concerning Mexico. And when, on the day after, he didn't apologize and grovel before the New York Times, I was on board. Get it?

 

[Political Junky]

Here was the Right's position on WMDs in Iraq, right up to the present day:

Fox News 2002: Iraq Likely Has Weapons of Mass Destruction

Fox News 2003: The Connection Between 9/11 and Iraq



July 2004: UN Confirms: WMDs Smuggled Out of Iraq

Fox News 2006: Report: Hundreds of WMDs Found in Iraq


September 2012: 63% of Republicans STILL Think Iraq Had WMDs

There were...Syria has them now.

fuck yeah.

the wmd were transported to syria.

What's this???? MORE EVIDENCE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS

GulfLINK Home

December 2012: Will Saddam’s WMDs Fall into the Hands of Al Qaeda?


June 2014:
Saddam’s WMDs: The Left’s Iraq Lies Exposed

The recent turmoil in Iraq brought on by the rise of the Sunni extremist group known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has ironically struck a blow to the American Left’s endlessly repeated narrative that there were no weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in Iraq prior to the war.

Indeed.. you're expecting Zombie cattle-like creatures who believe they come from monkey's to be able to read and actually comprehend .. Not going to happen..

October 2013: Flashback: Chemical Weapons In Syria Include WMDs Shipped From Iraq



October 2014: Remember folks when you read this ...THERE WERE NEVER NEVER any WMDs!!!

In all, American troops secretly reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials, and heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

We've heard rumors of this, but now we have the proof.

Bush didn't lie after all folks.

January 2015: Saddam's WMDs Went To Syria, Then Lebanon....


August 2015: ISIS Using WMDs. Where Did They Get Them? HMMMMM????



So we see the Right claimed Saddam had WMDs right up until 2015. This milestone is very important to note.



Now, some mainstream Democrats also believed Saddam had WMDs. Their opinions were formed by the information fed to them by the Bush Administration.

But on the extreme left wing fringes of the Democratic spectrum, there were those who said that it was all lies. They held mass protests all over the country.

So here is the far left liberal Democrat position on WMDs in Iraq:

Oh no! "Negged"? Whatever shall I do?

Bush lied to invade Iraq. Bush lied to invade Iraq.

Say it out loud to yourself. "Bush lied to invade Iraq."

Welcome to Earth.

Back then, a very famous registered New York limousine liberal Democrat also voiced his far left position on the fake news channel CNN:


Trump: "I was surprised that she (Nancy Pelosi) didn't do more in terms of Bush and going after Bush. It was almost -- it just seemed like she was going to really look to impeach Bush and get him out of office, which, personally, I think would have been a wonderful thing."

Blitzer: "Impeaching him?"

Trump: "Absolutely, for the war, for the war."

Blitzer: "Because of the conduct of the war."

Trump: "Well, he lied. He got us into the war with lies. And, I mean, look at the trouble Bill Clinton got into with something that was totally unimportant. And they tried to impeach him, which was nonsense. And, yet, Bush got us into this horrible war with lies, by lying, by saying they had weapons of mass destruction, by saying all sorts of things that turned out not to be true."


Trump repeated his far left belief during the 2016 campaign. And the Chumps just sat there and took it. That's why you no longer hear them claiming there were WMDs in Iraq. Because retards vote for anyone who has an R after their name. Even one who was a far left D.

That's how stupid they are.

You are not being fair, "everyone" was told the lie that WMD was a mistake even after we found some and knew of movement into Syria. He is only as good as the info feed to him and back then it was leftist influenced media and friends. You just smacked the left for being that missinformation propagandist they are.
There might have been a reaspn for the lie for classified reasons but most likely the typical leftist game playing to demonize the opposition party. They blamed Bush for everything even though they had majority and were part of that same gov't they moaned about.

^^ More Bullshit

 

[HaShev]

Here was the Right's position on WMDs in Iraq, right up to the present day:

Fox News 2002: Iraq Likely Has Weapons of Mass Destruction

Fox News 2003: The Connection Between 9/11 and Iraq



July 2004: UN Confirms: WMDs Smuggled Out of Iraq

Fox News 2006: Report: Hundreds of WMDs Found in Iraq


September 2012: 63% of Republicans STILL Think Iraq Had WMDs

There were...Syria has them now.

fuck yeah.

the wmd were transported to syria.

What's this???? MORE EVIDENCE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS

GulfLINK Home

December 2012: Will Saddam’s WMDs Fall into the Hands of Al Qaeda?


June 2014:
Saddam’s WMDs: The Left’s Iraq Lies Exposed

The recent turmoil in Iraq brought on by the rise of the Sunni extremist group known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has ironically struck a blow to the American Left’s endlessly repeated narrative that there were no weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in Iraq prior to the war.

Indeed.. you're expecting Zombie cattle-like creatures who believe they come from monkey's to be able to read and actually comprehend .. Not going to happen..

October 2013: Flashback: Chemical Weapons In Syria Include WMDs Shipped From Iraq



October 2014: Remember folks when you read this ...THERE WERE NEVER NEVER any WMDs!!!

In all, American troops secretly reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials, and heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

We've heard rumors of this, but now we have the proof.

Bush didn't lie after all folks.

January 2015: Saddam's WMDs Went To Syria, Then Lebanon....


August 2015: ISIS Using WMDs. Where Did They Get Them? HMMMMM????



So we see the Right claimed Saddam had WMDs right up until 2015. This milestone is very important to note.



Now, some mainstream Democrats also believed Saddam had WMDs. Their opinions were formed by the information fed to them by the Bush Administration.

But on the extreme left wing fringes of the Democratic spectrum, there were those who said that it was all lies. They held mass protests all over the country.

So here is the far left liberal Democrat position on WMDs in Iraq:

Oh no! "Negged"? Whatever shall I do?

Bush lied to invade Iraq. Bush lied to invade Iraq.

Say it out loud to yourself. "Bush lied to invade Iraq."

Welcome to Earth.

Back then, a very famous registered New York limousine liberal Democrat also voiced his far left position on the fake news channel CNN:


Trump: "I was surprised that she (Nancy Pelosi) didn't do more in terms of Bush and going after Bush. It was almost -- it just seemed like she was going to really look to impeach Bush and get him out of office, which, personally, I think would have been a wonderful thing."

Blitzer: "Impeaching him?"

Trump: "Absolutely, for the war, for the war."

Blitzer: "Because of the conduct of the war."

Trump: "Well, he lied. He got us into the war with lies. And, I mean, look at the trouble Bill Clinton got into with something that was totally unimportant. And they tried to impeach him, which was nonsense. And, yet, Bush got us into this horrible war with lies, by lying, by saying they had weapons of mass destruction, by saying all sorts of things that turned out not to be true."


Trump repeated his far left belief during the 2016 campaign. And the Chumps just sat there and took it. That's why you no longer hear them claiming there were WMDs in Iraq. Because retards vote for anyone who has an R after their name. Even one who was a far left D.

That's how stupid they are.

You are not being fair, "everyone" was told the lie that WMD was a mistake even after we found some and knew of movement into Syria. He is only as good as the info feed to him and back then it was leftist influenced media and friends. You just smacked the left for being that missinformation propagandist they are.
There might have been a reaspn for the lie for classified reasons but most likely the typical leftist game playing to demonize the opposition party. They blamed Bush for everything even though they had majority and were part of that same gov't they moaned about.

^^ More Bullshit

Which is why you couldn't state why with proof and resources?
Instead you took the low road ad hominem route, so eloquently stated at that.

 

[Billo_Really]

A thinking person says "Let my ideas conform to my observations". healthmyths says, "Let my observations conform to my ideas". She is thus a hopeless ideologue. No amount of reasoned, informed debate will move her--no matter how absurd her position becomes. This is why ideologues (zealots, Zionists, Bolsheviks, Communists, fascists, progressives, frequent flyers, etc.) are so dangerous. In his own mind, a genocidal ideologue is the pinnacle of human moral perfection, reality be damned.

She? I thought she was a dude. She talks like a guy. Well, just like her hero, she's fixing the intel around her policy. People like her have so much invested in the position they take that admitting they were wrong, after they were proven wrong, is tantamount to death.

 

[g5000]

Patriotic conservatives wanted us to increase our troop strength in Iraq. Cut-and-run traitors like registered Democrat Donald Trump wanted us to leave.

Who was right?

A simple question you cowards are also avoiding.

And Trump was wrong even though I support MOST of what Trump says and does!

If Trump was wrong by demanding we cut and run from Iraq, what room does he have to criticize Obama for drawing down our troops and claiming that led to the birth of ISIS?

How dare he do that? And what does it say about his own judgment? What does it say about the judgment of the people who let Trump get away with that?

He doesn't say that NOW!

Of course he doesn't. He is pretending to be a Republican now, and you morons totally fell for it.

No other person claiming to be a Republican would have gotten away with that. You jackasses call someone a RINO for much, much, much less reasons than the things Trump is guilty of.

But all he had to do to win your favor was attack Mexicans and Muslims. Hucksters are very good at finding the stains on your souls and exploiting them.

You are a good example of why the libtards keep losing. You simply do not get it. You can't imagine someone would have a position on immigration that wasn't motivated by racial hatred. This is because race permeates your own view of the world. But people can want less immigration and not hate foreigners in the same way someone on a diet doesn't hate food. Can you ever grasp that? I suspect not. In my case, I was fully behind Trump from the day after he announced. Why? Because for 24 hours the people I loathe more than any other people in the world, the main stream media, had been going ballistic over Trump's announcement remarks concerning Mexico. And when, on the day after, he didn't apologize and grovel before the New York Times, I was on board. Get it?

Sorry, you're wrong. 80 percent of Americans want illegals to have a path to legal status or citizenship.

I can't wait to see the looks on your faces when Democrat Trump gives amnesty to the illegals.

 

[g5000]

Here was the Right's position on WMDs in Iraq, right up to the present day:

Fox News 2002: Iraq Likely Has Weapons of Mass Destruction

Fox News 2003: The Connection Between 9/11 and Iraq



July 2004: UN Confirms: WMDs Smuggled Out of Iraq

Fox News 2006: Report: Hundreds of WMDs Found in Iraq


September 2012: 63% of Republicans STILL Think Iraq Had WMDs

There were...Syria has them now.

fuck yeah.

the wmd were transported to syria.

What's this???? MORE EVIDENCE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS

GulfLINK Home

December 2012: Will Saddam’s WMDs Fall into the Hands of Al Qaeda?


June 2014:
Saddam’s WMDs: The Left’s Iraq Lies Exposed

The recent turmoil in Iraq brought on by the rise of the Sunni extremist group known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has ironically struck a blow to the American Left’s endlessly repeated narrative that there were no weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in Iraq prior to the war.

Indeed.. you're expecting Zombie cattle-like creatures who believe they come from monkey's to be able to read and actually comprehend .. Not going to happen..

October 2013: Flashback: Chemical Weapons In Syria Include WMDs Shipped From Iraq



October 2014: Remember folks when you read this ...THERE WERE NEVER NEVER any WMDs!!!

In all, American troops secretly reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials, and heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

We've heard rumors of this, but now we have the proof.

Bush didn't lie after all folks.

January 2015: Saddam's WMDs Went To Syria, Then Lebanon....


August 2015: ISIS Using WMDs. Where Did They Get Them? HMMMMM????



So we see the Right claimed Saddam had WMDs right up until 2015. This milestone is very important to note.



Now, some mainstream Democrats also believed Saddam had WMDs. Their opinions were formed by the information fed to them by the Bush Administration.

But on the extreme left wing fringes of the Democratic spectrum, there were those who said that it was all lies. They held mass protests all over the country.

So here is the far left liberal Democrat position on WMDs in Iraq:

Oh no! "Negged"? Whatever shall I do?

Bush lied to invade Iraq. Bush lied to invade Iraq.

Say it out loud to yourself. "Bush lied to invade Iraq."

Welcome to Earth.

Back then, a very famous registered New York limousine liberal Democrat also voiced his far left position on the fake news channel CNN:


Trump: "I was surprised that she (Nancy Pelosi) didn't do more in terms of Bush and going after Bush. It was almost -- it just seemed like she was going to really look to impeach Bush and get him out of office, which, personally, I think would have been a wonderful thing."

Blitzer: "Impeaching him?"

Trump: "Absolutely, for the war, for the war."

Blitzer: "Because of the conduct of the war."

Trump: "Well, he lied. He got us into the war with lies. And, I mean, look at the trouble Bill Clinton got into with something that was totally unimportant. And they tried to impeach him, which was nonsense. And, yet, Bush got us into this horrible war with lies, by lying, by saying they had weapons of mass destruction, by saying all sorts of things that turned out not to be true."


Trump repeated his far left belief during the 2016 campaign. And the Chumps just sat there and took it. That's why you no longer hear them claiming there were WMDs in Iraq. Because retards vote for anyone who has an R after their name. Even one who was a far left D.

That's how stupid they are.

You are not being fair, "everyone" was told the lie that WMD was a mistake even after we found some and knew of movement into Syria. He is only as good as the info feed to him and back then it was leftist influenced media and friends. You just smacked the left for being that missinformation propagandist they are.
There might have been a reaspn for the lie for classified reasons but most likely the typical leftist game playing to demonize the opposition party. They blamed Bush for everything even though they had majority and were part of that same gov't they moaned about.

So you hate the people who demonized Bush, right?

People like Donald Trump.

"Well, he lied. He got us into the war with lies. And, I mean, look at the trouble Bill Clinton got into with something that was totally unimportant. And they tried to impeach him, which was nonsense. And, yet, Bush got us into this horrible war with lies, by lying, by saying they had weapons of mass destruction, by saying all sorts of things that turned out not to be true."


"I was surprised that she (Nancy Pelosi) didn't do more in terms of Bush and going after Bush. It was almost -- it just seemed like she was going to really look to impeach Bush and get him out of office, which, personally, I think would have been a wonderful thing."

 

[TheDude]

These are two of my favorite forms of entertainment:

I like irony, let's play irony. The OP says folks for the war are stupid for supporting Trump "That's how stupid they are" were his exact words. As I've demonstrated with the above videos, by his logic anyone who didn't support the war should have voted for Trump, and you know Democrats must have done that..............HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

Wholly hypocrisy and tables turned Batman. This thread just took a major dive. BTW dumb ass, I'm conservative and DIDN"T support the war. You call the opinion far left.......THAT WOULD BE YOUR SECOND ERROR.

Say OP, did you ever address this? I see you're still posting on the subject, so I'll assume you didn't see it. If you did, why are you still posting?

 

[g5000]

These are two of my favorite forms of entertainment:

I like irony, let's play irony. The OP says folks for the war are stupid for supporting Trump "That's how stupid they are" were his exact words. As I've demonstrated with the above videos, by his logic anyone who didn't support the war should have voted for Trump, and you know Democrats must have done that..............HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

Wholly hypocrisy and tables turned Batman. This thread just took a major dive. BTW dumb ass, I'm conservative and DIDN"T support the war. You call the opinion far left.......THAT WOULD BE YOUR SECOND ERROR.

Say OP, did you ever address this? I see you're still posting on the subject, so I'll assume you didn't see it. If you did, why are you still posting?

Sorry, I did not see your post. Thank you for bumping it.

I will address it now.

Your "logic" is deeply flawed. No one should support a hypocrite and huckster. No Democrat should. No Republican should. No conservative should. No liberal should.

Got it now?

 

[TheDude]

These are two of my favorite forms of entertainment:

I like irony, let's play irony. The OP says folks for the war are stupid for supporting Trump "That's how stupid they are" were his exact words. As I've demonstrated with the above videos, by his logic anyone who didn't support the war should have voted for Trump, and you know Democrats must have done that..............HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

Wholly hypocrisy and tables turned Batman. This thread just took a major dive. BTW dumb ass, I'm conservative and DIDN"T support the war. You call the opinion far left.......THAT WOULD BE YOUR SECOND ERROR.

Say OP, did you ever address this? I see you're still posting on the subject, so I'll assume you didn't see it. If you did, why are you still posting?

Sorry, I did not see your post. Thank you for bumping it.

I will address it now.

Your "logic" is deeply flawed. No one should support a hypocrite and huckster. No Democrat should. No Republican should. No conservative should. No liberal should.

Got it now?

I see.......Let's do this at the kindergarten level.

A. Trump didn't support the war. SUPPOSEDLY all conservatives support the war (i.e., OP stereotypes). Therefore, all Republicans are fucking stupid having voted for Trump.

B. Hillary did support the war. SUPPOSEDLY all liberals didn't support the war. Somehow Democrats are not stupid for voting for Hillary. Only Republicans are stupid. Let me guess, you didn't support the war and voted for Hillary? How come you didn't vote for Trump? Answer, you're ignorant & your accusations are worthless.

Then there's:

Republicans pushed us into war. Quite sure these videos put that business into perspective. Your OP is a lie and PURE forms of ignorance, hypocrisy and bias.

 

[healthmyths]

And Trump was wrong even though I support MOST of what Trump says and does!

If Trump was wrong by demanding we cut and run from Iraq, what room does he have to criticize Obama for drawing down our troops and claiming that led to the birth of ISIS?

How dare he do that? And what does it say about his own judgment? What does it say about the judgment of the people who let Trump get away with that?

He doesn't say that NOW!

Of course he doesn't. He is pretending to be a Republican now, and you morons totally fell for it.

No other person claiming to be a Republican would have gotten away with that. You jackasses call someone a RINO for much, much, much less reasons than the things Trump is guilty of.

But all he had to do to win your favor was attack Mexicans and Muslims. Hucksters are very good at finding the stains on your souls and exploiting them.

You are a good example of why the libtards keep losing. You simply do not get it. You can't imagine someone would have a position on immigration that wasn't motivated by racial hatred. This is because race permeates your own view of the world. But people can want less immigration and not hate foreigners in the same way someone on a diet doesn't hate food. Can you ever grasp that? I suspect not. In my case, I was fully behind Trump from the day after he announced. Why? Because for 24 hours the people I loathe more than any other people in the world, the main stream media, had been going ballistic over Trump's announcement remarks concerning Mexico. And when, on the day after, he didn't apologize and grovel before the New York Times, I was on board. Get it?

Sorry, you're wrong. 80 percent of Americans want illegals to have a path to legal status or citizenship.

I can't wait to see the looks on your faces when Democrat Trump gives amnesty to the illegals.

A) Where is your FACT that 80% of Americans want illegals have path? What is YOUR source?
B) Here is a FACT that that number is bogus...
1) More than 653,000 immigrants naturalized in the United States in fiscal year (FY) 2014,
bringing the total number of naturalized U.S. citizens to 20 million,
Naturalization Trends in the United States
So you are telling me that THESE 20 million like Trump's wife, my daughter in law who were all "LEGAL" immigrants that became citizens are OK with illegals?
Bull shit! Because that would totally negate Trump's wife, my daughter in law efforts to do it legally. These people WOULD never be in favor of someone taking a short cut!
The problem is you and MOST people that depend on the biased MSM forget that simple adjective "LEGAL"!
Trump, nor me with my daughter-in-law, nor 40 million Americans are NOT anti-immigrant! We LOVE legal immigrants because THAT's what makes America exceptional!
But that simple adjective is missing!
Please once and for don't fall for the biased MSM BIASED presentation of the difference.
Case in point I just did a Google search and here are the results for "Trump anti-immigrant"!
120,000 results ALL missing the adjective "LEGAL"!
Trump is married to a LEGAL immigrant! My daughter-in-law is a "Legal" immigrant... so are 20 million "legal" and their 20 million relatives that love them also.
So please be more accurate!

 

[LaDexter]

SUPPOSEDLY all conservatives support the war

That is the biggest lie of all.

The biggest supporters of the war were all BIG SPENDERS and LIBERALS...

Dianne Feinstein
Chuck Schumer
Joe Liebermann
John SELLOUT McAIPAC
Lindsay Graham
Henry Waxman


Zionism is not conservative. It is 180 degrees from it.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

TheDude, post: 17100642

B. Hillary did support the war. SUPPOSEDLY all liberals didn't support the war. Somehow Democrats are not stupid for voting for Hillary. Only Republicans are stupid. Let me guess, you didn't support the war and voted for Hillary? How come you didn't vote for Trump? Answer, you're ignorant & your accusations are worthless.

Hillary did not support Bush kicking the inspectors out. She wanted Bush to give the inspectors more time. She only would support the war if the inspectors said inspections were being obstructed by Saddam Hussein. Bush was the one that obstructed the inspections.

Huge difference.

Hillary was right. Bush was wrong. No hypocrisy for voting for Clinton over the damned fool move the Decider decided to do.

 

[Doc1]

Saddam did not start the war with Iran, Iranians did that by infiltrating the southern marshes in Iraq and attacking government forces.
Islam is the most peaceful religion in the world, except maybe Buddhists. And even the Buddhists in Burma are very violent these days. Saddam was the first Iraqi leader to not get assassinated in his first year or so. He was what he had to be, and was only as violent as he had to be.
Iraq did not attack the US, the US attacked Iraq.

"Islam is the most peaceful religion in the world, except maybe Buddhists."

Said no thinking person ever.

 

[deltex1]

So who is correct about Saddam's WMDs, Chumps: the Right or Donald Trump?

Simple question. And you will dodge and weave and close this topic and pretend you didn't see it.

I don't give a fuck who said what. Iraq had wmd...for sure.

 

[LaDexter]

Iraq had wmd

They had old pre-Gulf War sarin shells that weren't any good because they were too old.

They had 20 metric tons of yellowcake they could not enrich.

The reasons given for invading Iraq were all deliberate 100% intentional lies, and any sub human still parroting those lies is a treasonous bastard who has precisely ZERO patriotism to the US and should be immediately deported to Israel.

 

[HaShev]

Here was the Right's position on WMDs in Iraq, right up to the present day:

Fox News 2002: Iraq Likely Has Weapons of Mass Destruction

Fox News 2003: The Connection Between 9/11 and Iraq



July 2004: UN Confirms: WMDs Smuggled Out of Iraq

Fox News 2006: Report: Hundreds of WMDs Found in Iraq


September 2012: 63% of Republicans STILL Think Iraq Had WMDs

There were...Syria has them now.

fuck yeah.

the wmd were transported to syria.

What's this???? MORE EVIDENCE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS

GulfLINK Home

December 2012: Will Saddam’s WMDs Fall into the Hands of Al Qaeda?


June 2014:
Saddam’s WMDs: The Left’s Iraq Lies Exposed

The recent turmoil in Iraq brought on by the rise of the Sunni extremist group known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has ironically struck a blow to the American Left’s endlessly repeated narrative that there were no weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in Iraq prior to the war.

Indeed.. you're expecting Zombie cattle-like creatures who believe they come from monkey's to be able to read and actually comprehend .. Not going to happen..

October 2013: Flashback: Chemical Weapons In Syria Include WMDs Shipped From Iraq



October 2014: Remember folks when you read this ...THERE WERE NEVER NEVER any WMDs!!!

In all, American troops secretly reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials, and heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

We've heard rumors of this, but now we have the proof.

Bush didn't lie after all folks.

January 2015: Saddam's WMDs Went To Syria, Then Lebanon....


August 2015: ISIS Using WMDs. Where Did They Get Them? HMMMMM????



So we see the Right claimed Saddam had WMDs right up until 2015. This milestone is very important to note.



Now, some mainstream Democrats also believed Saddam had WMDs. Their opinions were formed by the information fed to them by the Bush Administration.

But on the extreme left wing fringes of the Democratic spectrum, there were those who said that it was all lies. They held mass protests all over the country.

So here is the far left liberal Democrat position on WMDs in Iraq:

Oh no! "Negged"? Whatever shall I do?

Bush lied to invade Iraq. Bush lied to invade Iraq.

Say it out loud to yourself. "Bush lied to invade Iraq."

Welcome to Earth.

Back then, a very famous registered New York limousine liberal Democrat also voiced his far left position on the fake news channel CNN:


Trump: "I was surprised that she (Nancy Pelosi) didn't do more in terms of Bush and going after Bush. It was almost -- it just seemed like she was going to really look to impeach Bush and get him out of office, which, personally, I think would have been a wonderful thing."

Blitzer: "Impeaching him?"

Trump: "Absolutely, for the war, for the war."

Blitzer: "Because of the conduct of the war."

Trump: "Well, he lied. He got us into the war with lies. And, I mean, look at the trouble Bill Clinton got into with something that was totally unimportant. And they tried to impeach him, which was nonsense. And, yet, Bush got us into this horrible war with lies, by lying, by saying they had weapons of mass destruction, by saying all sorts of things that turned out not to be true."


Trump repeated his far left belief during the 2016 campaign. And the Chumps just sat there and took it. That's why you no longer hear them claiming there were WMDs in Iraq. Because retards vote for anyone who has an R after their name. Even one who was a far left D.

That's how stupid they are.

You are not being fair, "everyone" was told the lie that WMD was a mistake even after we found some and knew of movement into Syria. He is only as good as the info feed to him and back then it was leftist influenced media and friends. You just smacked the left for being that missinformation propagandist they are.
There might have been a reaspn for the lie for classified reasons but most likely the typical leftist game playing to demonize the opposition party. They blamed Bush for everything even though they had majority and were part of that same gov't they moaned about.

So you hate the people who demonized Bush, right?

People like Donald Trump.

"Well, he lied. He got us into the war with lies. And, I mean, look at the trouble Bill Clinton got into with something that was totally unimportant. And they tried to impeach him, which was nonsense. And, yet, Bush got us into this horrible war with lies, by lying, by saying they had weapons of mass destruction, by saying all sorts of things that turned out not to be true."


"I was surprised that she (Nancy Pelosi) didn't do more in terms of Bush and going after Bush. It was almost -- it just seemed like she was going to really look to impeach Bush and get him out of office, which, personally, I think would have been a wonderful thing."

I already answered this.
His lack of understanding the situation comes from his not being privy to classified info back then. His source of news and friends were left leaning propagandist doing the demonization, so his info and opinion comes from being missinformed back then. Basically you are blasting the Liberal media for his then view, which is why he understands fake news and it's significance more now then he did then.
There's also things that
CAN'T BE DISCUSSED.

 

[Doc1]

These are two of my favorite forms of entertainment:

I like irony, let's play irony. The OP says folks for the war are stupid for supporting Trump "That's how stupid they are" were his exact words. As I've demonstrated with the above videos, by his logic anyone who didn't support the war should have voted for Trump, and you know Democrats must have done that..............HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

Wholly hypocrisy and tables turned Batman. This thread just took a major dive. BTW dumb ass, I'm conservative and DIDN"T support the war. You call the opinion far left.......THAT WOULD BE YOUR SECOND ERROR.

Say OP, did you ever address this? I see you're still posting on the subject, so I'll assume you didn't see it. If you did, why are you still posting?

Sorry, I did not see your post. Thank you for bumping it.

I will address it now.

Your "logic" is deeply flawed. No one should support a hypocrite and huckster. No Democrat should. No Republican should. No conservative should. No liberal should.

Got it now?

When the choice is between two "hucksters" it's a problem.