Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who presided over the demolition of the Democratic party...Obama, Reid, and Pelosi. Losses so historic you have to go all the way back to 1921 to find a beating that epic. And that's with the entire MSM lying and spinning and flying cover for these idiots. Imagine the destruction if we actually had unbiased reporting.
While moderate Democrats are on record accepting responsibility the left wing of the Democratic party are in full on denial mode blaming everything and everyone other than themselves.
Moderate Democrats who supported free trade are the ones who cost the Democrats the election.
Out of the choices below, who is most responsible for the Dems having the least power in Washington since the 1920s?
Nah! Can't blame them. They did an excellent job. Look at the dinosaurs they had to work with!Biased msm....by far
Who is MOST responsible for the 2016 crash of the Democratic Party?
The party didn't crash. Clinton lost the EC and the Dems picked up seats in both houses.
Clinton +2.5 million votes.
In case you haven't heard, the popular vote doesn't matter, and we have no way of knowing what the results would have been if it did.
In case you haven't noticed, the premise of the thread is that the democratic party has collapsed.
Getting more votes than your opponent in the general and gaining seats in both houses of Congress is hardly a collapse.
Oh no, I heard. And getting more votes still doesn't matter. The reason many people see it as a collapse is because the Demys thought they would take back the senate because the republicans had so many more seats to defend (24-10), but the Libs couldn't do it. You seem a bit touchy about it being labeled a COLLAPSE. Prep H that ass boi, maybe the swelling will go down in a month or 2. Bwahahahahaha.
Who is MOST responsible for the 2016 crash of the Democratic Party?
The party didn't crash. Clinton lost the EC and the Dems picked up seats in both houses.
Clinton +2.5 million votes.
In case you haven't heard, the popular vote doesn't matter, and we have no way of knowing what the results would have been if it did.
In case you haven't noticed, the premise of the thread is that the democratic party has collapsed.
Getting more votes than your opponent in the general and gaining seats in both houses of Congress is hardly a collapse.
Oh no, I heard. And getting more votes still doesn't matter. The reason many people see it as a collapse is because the Demys thought they would take back the senate because the republicans had so many more seats to defend (24-10), but the Libs couldn't do it. You seem a bit touchy about it being labeled a COLLAPSE. Prep H that ass boi, maybe the swelling will go down in a month or 2. Bwahahahahaha.
The Democrats gained seats in both the Senate and the House. In a collapse you go down, not up.
The left living in a fantasy bubble world is also a reason Democrats are insignificant now.Who is MOST responsible for the 2016 crash of the Democratic Party?
The party didn't crash. Clinton lost the EC and the Dems picked up seats in both houses.
Clinton +2.5 million votes.
The fantasy is seeing a collapse. Trump barely squeaked by.
Democrats picked up seats in both the House and the Senate, and won the popular vote by 3 million votes.
Who is MOST responsible for the 2016 crash of the Democratic Party?
The party didn't crash. Clinton lost the EC and the Dems picked up seats in both houses.
Clinton +2.5 million votes.
Whatever you have to tell yourself to keep from rolling up in a fetal ball, huh?
Democrats have lost from the WH to Congress to SCOTUS to state governorships to state legislatures. The DNC isn't even a regional party, it has become coastal with small pockets here and there within the nation's interior. Your bench was made up of old, rich white people in their late 60's and 70's. You have an extremely small bench as there are so few Democrats in any seat of power to draw on for future national elections. Yes, the DNC has crashed.
Democrats have won the popular vote in 6 of the last 7 general elections and Trump won with a fairly small margin. I would say the Republican are in a much bigger hole than the Dems.
Democrats picked up seats in both the House and the Senate, and won the popular vote by 3 million votes.
George W. Bush had better margins in both the House and the Senate in 2005, so your nonsense about "1920" is bullshit, too.
Who is MOST responsible for the 2016 crash of the Democratic Party?
The party didn't crash. Clinton lost the EC and the Dems picked up seats in both houses.
Clinton +2.5 million votes.
In case you haven't heard, the popular vote doesn't matter, and we have no way of knowing what the results would have been if it did.
In case you haven't noticed, the premise of the thread is that the democratic party has collapsed.
Getting more votes than your opponent in the general and gaining seats in both houses of Congress is hardly a collapse.
Oh no, I heard. And getting more votes still doesn't matter. The reason many people see it as a collapse is because the Demys thought they would take back the senate because the republicans had so many more seats to defend (24-10), but the Libs couldn't do it. You seem a bit touchy about it being labeled a COLLAPSE. Prep H that ass boi, maybe the swelling will go down in a month or 2. Bwahahahahaha.
The Democrats gained seats in both the Senate and the House. In a collapse you go down, not up.
Democrats picked up seats in both the House and the Senate, and won the popular vote by 3 million votes.
George W. Bush had better margins in both the House and the Senate in 2005, so your nonsense about "1920" is bullshit, too.
Republican Party the Strongest It's Been in 80 Years | RealClearPolitics
Let’s walk the through the sub-scores, one by one. In the state legislatures, Republicans modestly improved their positioning from the already strong position they had achieved in 2014. Their sub-score is 63.2 (again, on a scale of zero to 100). If we exclude the Reconstruction period, the Republican Party has achieved a higher score in the state legislatures in three elections: 1894 (64.7), 1904 (64.6), and 1920 (66.5).
Likewise, in the governorships, the GOP emerged from 2016 stronger than it was after 2014. This is unsurprising, since Democrats were reduced to just 16 governorships. The GOP’s sub-score of 67.3 was surpassed only in 1920 (70.8) and during the late Civil War and early Reconstruction period (1864, 1866, and 1868).
It was Boooooooooooosh.Out of the choices below, who is most responsible for the Dems having the least power in Washington since the 1920s?
Democrats fear another Trump trouncingOut of the choices below, who is most responsible for the Dems having the least power in Washington since the 1920s?