Who do they think they are fooling by blocking the Gaetz report?

[Stann]

What if they said the redactions were to protect the identity of sources, or whatever other reasons Jack Smigh gave that you were Kewl with?

I don't know what to do but they need to evaluate the situation. Then make a decision , not simply say no because it might adversely affect Trump's pitiful pick.

 

[SmokeALib]

It's a report of hearsay and innuendo.
They could just as easy write a report of diaper joe diverting funds from Medicare to electric car chargers - which is absolutely true.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

You`re already there...Unlike the president/ Leader of the Klan, Kamala is qualified. Generally speaking, MAGAs don`t like women or non-whites and Kamala gave you a two for the price of one. Which of the two candidates told their followers to beat up 130 cops?

Nope. Sand Stumbling *Joe made it quite clear she was a DEI choice.
Kommie made it quite clear during interviews.
She’s not very bright.

 

[SmokeALib]

View attachment 1042558

Just another fabrication. We'll have 12 years of this shit.

 

[Crepitus]

So you’re willing to endanger lives for a political witch hunt?

What lives?

 

[Stann]

It's a report of hearsay and innuendo.
They could just as easy write a report of diaper joe diverting funds from Medicare to electric car chargers - which is absolutely true.

Right ! I'm sure you are one of the few who are privy to.that information.

 

[Seymour Flops]

What lives?

If they told us that, the lives would be in danger, duh!

You thought it was fine when the Biden Justice Department used that excuse. Surely you are not going to be a hypocrit and say it is wrong now?

 

[Crepitus]

Would the OP be fine if the Ethics Committee released the report and it looked like this:

View attachment 1042821

I guess he'd have to, since it thought it was KEWL when Jack Smith did it.

Why would it look like that?

 

[Seymour Flops]

I don't know what to do but they need to evaluate the situation. Then make a decision , not simply say no because it might adversely affect Trump's pitiful pick.

People are not supposed to be adversely affected by accusations so weak that even the Biden Justice Department could not press charges on a Republican, when they had a plea bargain from the supposed accomplice to whatever Gaetz is supposedly accused of.

 

[SmokeALib]

Right ! I'm sure you are one of the few who are privy to.that information.

Nah - there are plenty of common sense Americans out there...You ain't one of 'em.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Why would it look like that?

Why did this look like that:

You didn't ask then, why ask now?

 

[Stann]

Well, the people who voted for Kamala aren't exactly Albert Einstein. See where I am going with this?

To ignore a man's faults and attack a woman's integrity seems like a juvenile act to me. Voting for such a man would be equally absurd.

 

[Crepitus]

If they told us that, the lives would be in danger, duh!

You thought it was fine when the Biden Justice Department used that excuse. Surely you are not going to be a hypocrit and say it is wrong now?

So, you're saying the violent republicans would seek retribution on people who contributed to the report?

Why did this look like that:

View attachment 1042842

You didn't ask then, why ask now?

That's not an ethics committee investigation.

Do you really not understand the difference?

 

[Stann]

Nah - there are plenty of common sense Americans out there...You ain't one of 'em.

Personal attacks don't make any common sense but there you go. I am not one who will be making the decision , hopefully sane heads will prevail ,not ones who have already been told what to do.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It's a report of hearsay and innuendo.

A stupid lie that you literally just made up on the spot.

One of his rape victims testified under oath that he raped her. Another person testified under oath that she watched him do it.

 

[Seymour Flops]

So, you're saying the violent republicans would seek retribution on people who contributed to the report?

I said nothing of the sort.

That's not an ethics committee investigation.

Do you really not understand the difference?

I understand that redacting is redacting.

Don't you?

 

[Crepitus]

I said nothing of the sort.

"If they told us that, the lives would be in danger, duh!"

Your words, yes?

Sounds like you do indeed think so.

 

[Seymour Flops]

"If they told us that, the lives would be in danger, duh!"

Your words, yes?

Sounds like you do indeed think so.

I didn't say they would be in danger from Republicans, that was your fantasy.

 

[Crepitus]

I didn't say they would be in danger from Republicans, that was your fantasy.

That is the weakest, lamest attempt at deflection I've seen in many a post.

SMH

 

[SmokeALib]

A stupid lie that you literally just made up on the spot.

One of his rape victims testified under oath that he raped her. Another person testified under oath that she watched him do it.

Anybody can say words.