Nice duck.You still have not addressed the application of sovereignty.What part of my response do you not understand?You are ducking the question. Sovereignty can only be be applied by the sovereign nationals.That ducks the question.Why do you post here when you know so little?Your ''stolen Pally land" slogan is a total hoot.Sure, since you know so little about Israel.I'm not clear that Arab-Moslem wars of aggression aimed at Israel would describe ''wealth and power shoveled in its direction''.Israel has had wealth and power shoveled in its direction for over a hundred years while the surrounding countries have suffered under hostile foreign intervention. Palestine has suffered the most under hostile foreign intervention.can see a very marked difference between the development of Israel (a very positive outcome) and the development (a less successful outcome) of the surrounding Arab-related nations
Maybe if you wrote a coherent comment?
From the Rothschilds to little blue boxes, tax deductible "charity" donations, foreign aid, sweetheart corporate deals. Vetoes against everything Israel in the UN. After Israel kicked out the Palestinians stealing their land and everything else they wanted they went and robbed the banks.
The following question has been posed to you more times than anyone can count with no response, but here goes; what sovereign Pally land was stolen?
That information is all over the place. By 1947, the Jews had only bought 5-7% of Palestine. By 1948 they controlled 78%. How did that happen?
By vesting sovereignty with the Jewish nation in international law.
What you're conflating here is personal ownership with national sovereignty.
Till this day the Arabs make all sorts of threats and accusations referring to their supposed Ottoman deeds, but for some reason, they never dare to present them to make a precedent.
Why are Arabs afraid of revealing the Ottoman archive?
No, the question is addressed directly,
you just don't like the answer, but neither can refute.
So are you intentionally conflating personal ownership with national sovereignty,
or you're that stupid and just repeating the stupid things without understanding them?
Ok, but does that refute what I say?
I've answered yours, didn't see you answer mine.
No I understand now perfectly - because you can't defend any of the nonesense you mindlessly repeat, or address the followup questions, everyone else is stupid, not you.
See, It takes me just 2 posts before gaslighting
becomes a BDS-hole's last line of defense.
If you believe facts are on your side,
why do all your arguments end with mere accusations,
but you can't actually address anything or string an original thought?