Hollie, P F Tinmore, et al,
Yes, Negative Propaganda can be an ugly business. The amplification in public, as well as in private, and can be direct and explicit --- as well as implicit indirect. One of the aspect levels of propaganda is its its character as a ‘‘inchoate’’ type crime. Encouragement through adoration and praise by prominent leaders like Mahmoud Abbas and Khaled Mashal can not be a intellectually felt by opponents to violence; but, cannot be directly tied to a fatal event as the principle initiating cause or primary agent which leads to Jihadism, Deadly Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence.
The notion of incitement to violence by Arab Palestinian Leaders implies that there is no possibility to hold these Arab Palestinians accountable. This is actually the primary weakness and flaw in the system of Human Rights promotion.
Article 20 of the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), described as being “among the strongest condemnations of hate speech” and the prohibition on incitement, states:
1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.
2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
The "Electronic Intifada" (ei) is a classic example
(but by far not the only one) of an outlet prinicple designed to incite hatred and violence on a mass media level. While the Human Rights Law (Article 20) does not to prohibit advocacy of hatred in private --- that instigates non-violent acts of racial or religious discrimination;” effective remedies applies further prohibition enforcement of incitement to national, racial or religious hatred? by the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) toward the Jewish People is non-existent. This is called tunnel vision by selective enforcement by the pro-Arab Palestinian movement.
Just as the HoAP advocates
(among many things) that the Arab League did not attack
(commit acts of aggression) against Israel in 1948, it communicate the idea that the HoAP fight to retrieve that which was taken; the instigation of an International Armed Conflict (IAC) by the HoAP and leaders is denied, overlooked or ignored. While the Israeli defense against HoAP activity is condemned, the attacks by the HoAP carried out with the aim of seriously intimidating the citizens of Israel, or intimidation a frightened Government or an international organization to perform or abstain from performing any act, or seriously destabilizing or destroying the fundamental political, constitutional, economic or social structures of a country or an international organization.
Who are the Palestinians?
Who are the Arab-Moslem Death Cultists?
(COMMENT)
In a conflict induced by the HoAP (in its various incarnations) for nearly seven decades, there is no question that Israel can be found to have taken improper actions and make poor decisions. And it is no big deal and hardly surprising, that of the thousands of interactions each day with Arab Palestinians, some adverse events will occur that the Electronic Intifada (ei) might capitalize on. But at the end of the day, the confrontations could stop if the Arab Palestinians actually wanted to focus their attentions to nationalization development projects that the West Bank and Gaza Strip need.
Who are the Palestinians? They are the culture that would rather glorify Jihadism, Deadly Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence than seek a peaceful solutions.
Most Respectfully,
R