White Supremacy Is Top Security Threat, Garland Says

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

- pile up their bullshit?

China and their American cohorts, who need not be named again within the same post, are the greatest threat to this Republic.

White supremacy is top security threat, Garland says

White supremacy is without doubt the biggest threat. Sadly, they are usually aligned with repigs.
No doubt when they strike at Biden, none if you will object. Just like you all said nothing when those ratbags stormed the capital and the fascist POTUS accompanied by his kids and bimbos cheered them on from the bunker. Don't blame the left for them.

You are so confused!

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

- pile up their bullshit?

China and their American cohorts, who need not be named again within the same post, are the greatest threat to this Republic.

White supremacy is top security threat, Garland says

I am so glad that communist motherfucker is NOT on the SCOTUS. Jesus, we dodged a HUGE bullet.

 

[Correll]

One of the "arguments" made by Trumpsters is that, if you don't specifically officially proclaim yourself a WS, if you don't know the secret handshake and attend the meetings, then you're nothing like them in any way.

In reality, their angry and defensive behaviors on this thread provide a perfect example of how that isn't true. By attacking those who bring this topic up, they are enabling those being discussed. And enabling it puts them in the same seat as those they're enabling.

And they seem to think it's not obvious.

And, whom exactly are you discussing?

Trumpsters on this thread. Trumpsters who enable the WS's.

As I said.

I can only make this stuff so simple.

Oh? So, anyone on this board that supported Trump, are WS?

And I’m sure you have actual proof of their activities outside this board, in support of WS?

Because if not, then what you are doing here is run of the mill trolling.

Not even close. You completely missed the point.

This is why I don't bother. Play with someone else.

You smearing everyone with the ws label is divisive in a time when people are already dying in the streets.

 

[Mac1958]

One of the "arguments" made by Trumpsters is that, if you don't specifically officially proclaim yourself a WS, if you don't know the secret handshake and attend the meetings, then you're nothing like them in any way.

In reality, their angry and defensive behaviors on this thread provide a perfect example of how that isn't true. By attacking those who bring this topic up, they are enabling those being discussed. And enabling it puts them in the same seat as those they're enabling.

And they seem to think it's not obvious.

And, whom exactly are you discussing?

Trumpsters on this thread. Trumpsters who enable the WS's.

As I said.

I can only make this stuff so simple.

Oh? So, anyone on this board that supported Trump, are WS?

And I’m sure you have actual proof of their activities outside this board, in support of WS?

Because if not, then what you are doing here is run of the mill trolling.

Not even close. You completely missed the point.

This is why I don't bother. Play with someone else.

You smearing everyone with the ws label is divisive in a time when people are already dying in the streets.

View attachment 488999

And another Trumpster who completely missed what I said.

Boring.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

White supremacy is without doubt the biggest threat. Sadly, they are usually aligned with repigs.

Can you give us some examples of recent/current acts of white supremacy and what you have seen that makes you believe it is a threat?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Once more the top security threat is white supremacists.

No matter how much the far right whines about it, it's fact.

I hope that this administration will actually do something substantial about it. Instead of just talking about it.

White supremacy is top security threat, Garland says

Attorney General Merrick Garland told Congress on Wednesday that violence incited by white supremacists poses “the most dangerous threat to our democracy.” That assertion reflects near-universal consensus among national security experts, including those who worked for the Trump administration.

www.yahoo.com

Dontcha love the way the Trumpsters jump in and get all pissy when this topic is brought up?

Oh, by all means, please point out what you have seen recently that you consider a "white supremacy" threat.

I'll wait.

(you are so fucking duped by the Marxist you serve, and you don't even know it)

 

[Mac1958]

Once more the top security threat is white supremacists.

No matter how much the far right whines about it, it's fact.

I hope that this administration will actually do something substantial about it. Instead of just talking about it.

White supremacy is top security threat, Garland says

Attorney General Merrick Garland told Congress on Wednesday that violence incited by white supremacists poses “the most dangerous threat to our democracy.” That assertion reflects near-universal consensus among national security experts, including those who worked for the Trump administration.

www.yahoo.com

Dontcha love the way the Trumpsters jump in and get all pissy when this topic is brought up?

Oh, by all means, please point out what you have seen recently that you consider a "white supremacy" threat.

I'll wait.

(you are so fucking duped by the Marxist you serve, and you don't even know it)

I don't know. Do they have a website?

And why are you so hell-bent on illustrating my post for me?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

One of the "arguments" made by Trumpsters is that, if you don't specifically officially proclaim yourself a WS, if you don't know the secret handshake and attend the meetings, then you're nothing like them in any way.

In reality, their angry and defensive behaviors on this thread provide a perfect example of how that isn't true. By attacking those who bring this topic up, they are enabling those being discussed. And enabling it puts them in the same seat as those they're enabling.

And they seem to think it's not obvious.

And, whom exactly are you discussing?

Trumpsters on this thread. Trumpsters who enable the WS's.

As I said.

I can only make this stuff so simple.

Oh? So, anyone on this board that supported Trump, are WS?

And I’m sure you have actual proof of their activities outside this board, in support of WS?

Because if not, then what you are doing here is run of the mill trolling.

Not even close. You completely missed the point.

This is why I don't bother. Play with someone else.

You smearing everyone with the ws label is divisive in a time when people are already dying in the streets.

View attachment 488999

And another Trumpster who completely missed what I said.

Boring.

I didn't miss what you said. It was a bunch of generalities that support a flawed premise in the OP. We never get any specifics. Do you know why?

 

[Mac1958]

One of the "arguments" made by Trumpsters is that, if you don't specifically officially proclaim yourself a WS, if you don't know the secret handshake and attend the meetings, then you're nothing like them in any way.

In reality, their angry and defensive behaviors on this thread provide a perfect example of how that isn't true. By attacking those who bring this topic up, they are enabling those being discussed. And enabling it puts them in the same seat as those they're enabling.

And they seem to think it's not obvious.

And, whom exactly are you discussing?

Trumpsters on this thread. Trumpsters who enable the WS's.

As I said.

I can only make this stuff so simple.

Oh? So, anyone on this board that supported Trump, are WS?

And I’m sure you have actual proof of their activities outside this board, in support of WS?

Because if not, then what you are doing here is run of the mill trolling.

Not even close. You completely missed the point.

This is why I don't bother. Play with someone else.

You smearing everyone with the ws label is divisive in a time when people are already dying in the streets.

View attachment 488999

And another Trumpster who completely missed what I said.

Boring.

I didn't miss what you said. It was a bunch of generalities that support a flawed premise in the OP. We never get any specifics. Do you know why?

Don't care, sorry.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Not even close. You completely missed the point.

You do not have any point for anyone to miss.

 

[Mac1958]

Not even close. You completely missed the point.

You do not have any point for anyone to miss.

In your mind, sure. Doesn't matter to me.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Once more the top security threat is white supremacists.

No matter how much the far right whines about it, it's fact.

I hope that this administration will actually do something substantial about it. Instead of just talking about it.

White supremacy is top security threat, Garland says

Attorney General Merrick Garland told Congress on Wednesday that violence incited by white supremacists poses “the most dangerous threat to our democracy.” That assertion reflects near-universal consensus among national security experts, including those who worked for the Trump administration.

www.yahoo.com

Dontcha love the way the Trumpsters jump in and get all pissy when this topic is brought up?

Oh, by all means, please point out what you have seen recently that you consider a "white supremacy" threat.

I'll wait.

(you are so fucking duped by the Marxist you serve, and you don't even know it)

I don't know. Do they have a website?

And why are you so hell-bent on illustrating my post for me?

And what is that?

If we don't sit here and ACCEPT this unspecified allegation of a wide-spread white supremacy threat, we prove there is a white supremacy threat?

Do you always talk in circles? Do you ever give a straight answer to ANYTHING?

 

[TNHarley]

What a whacky administration.
Do they have ANY decent people in it? Doesnt look like it.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

One of the "arguments" made by Trumpsters is that, if you don't specifically officially proclaim yourself a WS, if you don't know the secret handshake and attend the meetings, then you're nothing like them in any way.

In reality, their angry and defensive behaviors on this thread provide a perfect example of how that isn't true. By attacking those who bring this topic up, they are enabling those being discussed. And enabling it puts them in the same seat as those they're enabling.

And they seem to think it's not obvious.

And, whom exactly are you discussing?

Trumpsters on this thread. Trumpsters who enable the WS's.

As I said.

I can only make this stuff so simple.

Oh? So, anyone on this board that supported Trump, are WS?

And I’m sure you have actual proof of their activities outside this board, in support of WS?

Because if not, then what you are doing here is run of the mill trolling.

Not even close. You completely missed the point.

This is why I don't bother. Play with someone else.

You smearing everyone with the ws label is divisive in a time when people are already dying in the streets.

View attachment 488999

And another Trumpster who completely missed what I said.

Boring.

I didn't miss what you said. It was a bunch of generalities that support a flawed premise in the OP. We never get any specifics. Do you know why?

Don't care, sorry.

Good, then shut the fuck up. You have nothing of substance to contribute.

 

[Mac1958]

One of the "arguments" made by Trumpsters is that, if you don't specifically officially proclaim yourself a WS, if you don't know the secret handshake and attend the meetings, then you're nothing like them in any way.

In reality, their angry and defensive behaviors on this thread provide a perfect example of how that isn't true. By attacking those who bring this topic up, they are enabling those being discussed. And enabling it puts them in the same seat as those they're enabling.

And they seem to think it's not obvious.

And, whom exactly are you discussing?

Trumpsters on this thread. Trumpsters who enable the WS's.

As I said.

I can only make this stuff so simple.

Oh? So, anyone on this board that supported Trump, are WS?

And I’m sure you have actual proof of their activities outside this board, in support of WS?

Because if not, then what you are doing here is run of the mill trolling.

Not even close. You completely missed the point.

This is why I don't bother. Play with someone else.

You smearing everyone with the ws label is divisive in a time when people are already dying in the streets.

View attachment 488999

And another Trumpster who completely missed what I said.

Boring.

I didn't miss what you said. It was a bunch of generalities that support a flawed premise in the OP. We never get any specifics. Do you know why?

Don't care, sorry.

Good, then shut the fuck up. You have nothing of substance to contribute.

Okie dokie!

 

[TNHarley]

One of the "arguments" made by Trumpsters is that, if you don't specifically officially proclaim yourself a WS, if you don't know the secret handshake and attend the meetings, then you're nothing like them in any way.

In reality, their angry and defensive behaviors on this thread provide a perfect example of how that isn't true. By attacking those who bring this topic up, they are enabling those being discussed. And enabling it puts them in the same seat as those they're enabling.

And they seem to think it's not obvious.

And, whom exactly are you discussing?

Trumpsters on this thread. Trumpsters who enable the WS's.

As I said.

I can only make this stuff so simple.

Oh? So, anyone on this board that supported Trump, are WS?

And I’m sure you have actual proof of their activities outside this board, in support of WS?

Because if not, then what you are doing here is run of the mill trolling.

Not even close. You completely missed the point.

This is why I don't bother. Play with someone else.

You smearing everyone with the ws label is divisive in a time when people are already dying in the streets.

View attachment 488999

And another Trumpster who completely missed what I said.

Boring.

I didn't miss what you said. It was a bunch of generalities that support a flawed premise in the OP. We never get any specifics. Do you know why?

Don't care, sorry.

Good, then shut the fuck up. You have nothing of substance to contribute.

Mac aint worth a fuck. Captain clorox destroyed him.
He used to be decent. He used to discuss. He didnt use to look like a flaming cultist every time he opened his mouth. Then trump happened. And it destroyed that silly faggot.
Fascinating to watch. I will be studying this phenomena for a while, it looks like. It goes deeper than i imagined.

 

[bripat9643]

One of the "arguments" made by Trumpsters is that, if you don't specifically officially proclaim yourself a WS, if you don't know the secret handshake and attend the meetings, then you're nothing like them in any way.

In reality, their angry and defensive behaviors on this thread provide a perfect example of how that isn't true. By attacking those who bring this topic up, they are enabling those being discussed. And enabling it puts them in the same seat as those they're enabling.

And they seem to think it's not obvious.

And, whom exactly are you discussing?

Trumpsters on this thread. Trumpsters who enable the WS's.

As I said.

I can only make this stuff so simple.

How did they "enable" the White Supremacist?

You have enabled the communists. heck. I forgot. You are a communist.

 

[j-mac]

One of the "arguments" made by Trumpsters is that, if you don't specifically officially proclaim yourself a WS, if you don't know the secret handshake and attend the meetings, then you're nothing like them in any way.

In reality, their angry and defensive behaviors on this thread provide a perfect example of how that isn't true. By attacking those who bring this topic up, they are enabling those being discussed. And enabling it puts them in the same seat as those they're enabling.

And they seem to think it's not obvious.

And, whom exactly are you discussing?

Trumpsters on this thread. Trumpsters who enable the WS's.

As I said.

I can only make this stuff so simple.

Oh? So, anyone on this board that supported Trump, are WS?

And I’m sure you have actual proof of their activities outside this board, in support of WS?

Because if not, then what you are doing here is run of the mill trolling.

Not even close. You completely missed the point.

This is why I don't bother. Play with someone else.

So, you have no proof of your own statement, and try to deflect upon direct questioning...

Sounds like trolling to me.

 

[Polishprince]

- pile up their bullshit?

China and their American cohorts, who need not be named again within the same post, are the greatest threat to this Republic.

White supremacy is top security threat, Garland says

Garland is a goof ball, America really dodged a bullet when he didn't get a seat on the Supreme Court.

I've met a lot of jackasses in my day, but I haven't seen a single "white supremacist" jackass in a quarter century and he wasn't a "security threat" at all.

Maybe his social circles are different in Washington DC?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

One of the "arguments" made by Trumpsters is that, if you don't specifically officially proclaim yourself a WS, if you don't know the secret handshake and attend the meetings, then you're nothing like them in any way.

In reality, their angry and defensive behaviors on this thread provide a perfect example of how that isn't true. By attacking those who bring this topic up, they are enabling those being discussed. And enabling it puts them in the same seat as those they're enabling.

And they seem to think it's not obvious.

And, whom exactly are you discussing?

Trumpsters on this thread. Trumpsters who enable the WS's.

As I said.

I can only make this stuff so simple.

How did they "enable" the White Supremacist?

You have enabled the communists. heck. I forgot. You are a communist.

You forgot. (let me step into my Mac character)

If you're not goose-stepping around with a sickle and hammer flag draped over your shoulders, you're not a Marxist. Far from it.