White Supremacy Is Top Security Threat, Garland Says

The Big Lie Again: Attorney General Garland Says White Supremacists Top Terror Threat​

13 May 2021 ~~ By Robert Spencer
It could be worse: he could be on the Supreme Court. But as attorney general, Merrick Garland can do as much damage or more to our fragile and besieged republic than he could if Barack Obama had succeeded in placing him on the high court. A revealing piece in Yahoo News by “journalist” Alexander Nazaryan Wednesday revealed not only Garland’s frankly troubling agenda, but also how the establishment media runs interference and sells that program to a largely unsuspecting American public.
Garland, according to Nazaryan, “told Congress on Wednesday that violence incited by white supremacists poses ‘the most dangerous threat to our democracy.’ That assertion reflects near-universal consensus among national security experts, including those who worked for the Trump administration.”
Yeah, just like those seventeen intelligence agencies that had come to a consensus that Russia had hacked the 2016 presidential election. In both cases, they had a consensus, they just didn’t have any evidence.
But asking for evidence is likely white supremacist now as well. Nazaryan notes that “Garland’s warning came during a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, which was conducted by supporters of then-President Donald Trump and incited by white supremacist groups like the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys. Five people died as a result of the attack.”
~Snip~
So this is what we get from Yahoo News: actual violence from jihadis is not mentioned. Actual violence from leftists is dismissed as minor or unimportant amid “mostly peaceful” protests. The fact that there is virtually no violence from white supremacists is glossed over with claims that groups that aren’t white supremacist actually are, and assertions that they’re terrorist, with no evidence offered at all.
This is not just Yahoo News’ scenario; it’s clearly Garland’s and the Biden administration’s as well. This is deception and deflection at the highest level of government. The agenda of Garland and his colleagues is obvious and insidious: they’re going to find those white supremacist terrorists, and they’re going to prosecute and destroy them. If they don’t find any white supremacists in sufficient numbers, they will claim that law-abiding conservatives are white supremacists, and defame and destroy them accordingly. Garland’s spurious assessment of the domestic terror threat must be seen against the backdrop of the left’s increasingly common habit of referring to virtually anyone who opposes the hard-left, socialist agenda of Biden’s handlers and the establishment media as a white supremacist. This isn’t just a smear. It’s a smear with a definite purpose, and is heading us straight to the persecution of dissidents. That would be us.

Comment:
An Attorney General with a massive ideological chip on his shoulder or a Supreme Court Justice with hardcore biases...
No wonder the democrats thought he was such a great candidate for office. Absolutely the opposite of what a qualified person would look like, but that's becoming routine for them.
Merrick Garland is the consumate "Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Political Hack".
America dodged the bullet big time when Merrick Garland was NOT appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The man is nothing but a party hack! And the BIG LIE is ONLY a lie if one wants to believe the very strange tale being sold.
Hmm...., I guess the billions of dollars worth of damage from BLM and Antifa the first two simply didn't happen? Or - GASP - could it possibly be that it is the elite media that is minimizing the depredations of its darlings and exaggerating the effects of those it detests? No doubt AG Garland will shortly remind us of the existential threat to our liberties posed by the Tooth Fairy.
 

The Big Lie Again: Attorney General Garland Says White Supremacists Top Terror Threat​

13 May 2021 ~~ By Robert Spencer
It could be worse: he could be on the Supreme Court. But as attorney general, Merrick Garland can do as much damage or more to our fragile and besieged republic than he could if Barack Obama had succeeded in placing him on the high court. A revealing piece in Yahoo News by “journalist” Alexander Nazaryan Wednesday revealed not only Garland’s frankly troubling agenda, but also how the establishment media runs interference and sells that program to a largely unsuspecting American public.
Garland, according to Nazaryan, “told Congress on Wednesday that violence incited by white supremacists poses ‘the most dangerous threat to our democracy.’ That assertion reflects near-universal consensus among national security experts, including those who worked for the Trump administration.”
Yeah, just like those seventeen intelligence agencies that had come to a consensus that Russia had hacked the 2016 presidential election. In both cases, they had a consensus, they just didn’t have any evidence.
But asking for evidence is likely white supremacist now as well. Nazaryan notes that “Garland’s warning came during a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, which was conducted by supporters of then-President Donald Trump and incited by white supremacist groups like the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys. Five people died as a result of the attack.”
~Snip~
So this is what we get from Yahoo News: actual violence from jihadis is not mentioned. Actual violence from leftists is dismissed as minor or unimportant amid “mostly peaceful” protests. The fact that there is virtually no violence from white supremacists is glossed over with claims that groups that aren’t white supremacist actually are, and assertions that they’re terrorist, with no evidence offered at all.
This is not just Yahoo News’ scenario; it’s clearly Garland’s and the Biden administration’s as well. This is deception and deflection at the highest level of government. The agenda of Garland and his colleagues is obvious and insidious: they’re going to find those white supremacist terrorists, and they’re going to prosecute and destroy them. If they don’t find any white supremacists in sufficient numbers, they will claim that law-abiding conservatives are white supremacists, and defame and destroy them accordingly. Garland’s spurious assessment of the domestic terror threat must be seen against the backdrop of the left’s increasingly common habit of referring to virtually anyone who opposes the hard-left, socialist agenda of Biden’s handlers and the establishment media as a white supremacist. This isn’t just a smear. It’s a smear with a definite purpose, and is heading us straight to the persecution of dissidents. That would be us.

Comment:
An Attorney General with a massive ideological chip on his shoulder or a Supreme Court Justice with hardcore biases...
No wonder the democrats thought he was such a great candidate for office. Absolutely the opposite of what a qualified person would look like, but that's becoming routine for them.
Merrick Garland is the consumate "Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Political Hack".
America dodged the bullet big time when Merrick Garland was NOT appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The man is nothing but a party hack! And the BIG LIE is ONLY a lie if one wants to believe the very strange tale being sold.
Hmm...., I guess the billions of dollars worth of damage from BLM and Antifa the first two simply didn't happen? Or - GASP - could it possibly be that it is the elite media that is minimizing the depredations of its darlings and exaggerating the effects of those it detests? No doubt AG Garland will shortly remind us of the existential threat to our liberties posed by the Tooth Fairy.
No, this thread premise is a lie, from an unreliable source.

The AG is correct about the threat of rightwing terrorism and violence.
 

The Big Lie Again: Attorney General Garland Says White Supremacists Top Terror Threat​

13 May 2021 ~~ By Robert Spencer
It could be worse: he could be on the Supreme Court. But as attorney general, Merrick Garland can do as much damage or more to our fragile and besieged republic than he could if Barack Obama had succeeded in placing him on the high court. A revealing piece in Yahoo News by “journalist” Alexander Nazaryan Wednesday revealed not only Garland’s frankly troubling agenda, but also how the establishment media runs interference and sells that program to a largely unsuspecting American public.
Garland, according to Nazaryan, “told Congress on Wednesday that violence incited by white supremacists poses ‘the most dangerous threat to our democracy.’ That assertion reflects near-universal consensus among national security experts, including those who worked for the Trump administration.”
Yeah, just like those seventeen intelligence agencies that had come to a consensus that Russia had hacked the 2016 presidential election. In both cases, they had a consensus, they just didn’t have any evidence.
But asking for evidence is likely white supremacist now as well. Nazaryan notes that “Garland’s warning came during a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, which was conducted by supporters of then-President Donald Trump and incited by white supremacist groups like the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys. Five people died as a result of the attack.”
~Snip~
So this is what we get from Yahoo News: actual violence from jihadis is not mentioned. Actual violence from leftists is dismissed as minor or unimportant amid “mostly peaceful” protests. The fact that there is virtually no violence from white supremacists is glossed over with claims that groups that aren’t white supremacist actually are, and assertions that they’re terrorist, with no evidence offered at all.
This is not just Yahoo News’ scenario; it’s clearly Garland’s and the Biden administration’s as well. This is deception and deflection at the highest level of government. The agenda of Garland and his colleagues is obvious and insidious: they’re going to find those white supremacist terrorists, and they’re going to prosecute and destroy them. If they don’t find any white supremacists in sufficient numbers, they will claim that law-abiding conservatives are white supremacists, and defame and destroy them accordingly. Garland’s spurious assessment of the domestic terror threat must be seen against the backdrop of the left’s increasingly common habit of referring to virtually anyone who opposes the hard-left, socialist agenda of Biden’s handlers and the establishment media as a white supremacist. This isn’t just a smear. It’s a smear with a definite purpose, and is heading us straight to the persecution of dissidents. That would be us.

Comment:
An Attorney General with a massive ideological chip on his shoulder or a Supreme Court Justice with hardcore biases...
No wonder the democrats thought he was such a great candidate for office. Absolutely the opposite of what a qualified person would look like, but that's becoming routine for them.
Merrick Garland is the consumate "Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Political Hack".
America dodged the bullet big time when Merrick Garland was NOT appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The man is nothing but a party hack! And the BIG LIE is ONLY a lie if one wants to believe the very strange tale being sold.
Hmm...., I guess the billions of dollars worth of damage from BLM and Antifa the first two simply didn't happen? Or - GASP - could it possibly be that it is the elite media that is minimizing the depredations of its darlings and exaggerating the effects of those it detests? No doubt AG Garland will shortly remind us of the existential threat to our liberties posed by the Tooth Fairy.
Everybody who's tried to overthrow the American Democratic form of government oh, say since January 5, 2021 raise your hand.

Let's see...1,2,...

Yep, white supremacists each and every one.
 

The Big Lie Again: Attorney General Garland Says White Supremacists Top Terror Threat​

13 May 2021 ~~ By Robert Spencer
It could be worse: he could be on the Supreme Court. But as attorney general, Merrick Garland can do as much damage or more to our fragile and besieged republic than he could if Barack Obama had succeeded in placing him on the high court. A revealing piece in Yahoo News by “journalist” Alexander Nazaryan Wednesday revealed not only Garland’s frankly troubling agenda, but also how the establishment media runs interference and sells that program to a largely unsuspecting American public.
Garland, according to Nazaryan, “told Congress on Wednesday that violence incited by white supremacists poses ‘the most dangerous threat to our democracy.’ That assertion reflects near-universal consensus among national security experts, including those who worked for the Trump administration.”
Yeah, just like those seventeen intelligence agencies that had come to a consensus that Russia had hacked the 2016 presidential election. In both cases, they had a consensus, they just didn’t have any evidence.
But asking for evidence is likely white supremacist now as well. Nazaryan notes that “Garland’s warning came during a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, which was conducted by supporters of then-President Donald Trump and incited by white supremacist groups like the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys. Five people died as a result of the attack.”
~Snip~
So this is what we get from Yahoo News: actual violence from jihadis is not mentioned. Actual violence from leftists is dismissed as minor or unimportant amid “mostly peaceful” protests. The fact that there is virtually no violence from white supremacists is glossed over with claims that groups that aren’t white supremacist actually are, and assertions that they’re terrorist, with no evidence offered at all.
This is not just Yahoo News’ scenario; it’s clearly Garland’s and the Biden administration’s as well. This is deception and deflection at the highest level of government. The agenda of Garland and his colleagues is obvious and insidious: they’re going to find those white supremacist terrorists, and they’re going to prosecute and destroy them. If they don’t find any white supremacists in sufficient numbers, they will claim that law-abiding conservatives are white supremacists, and defame and destroy them accordingly. Garland’s spurious assessment of the domestic terror threat must be seen against the backdrop of the left’s increasingly common habit of referring to virtually anyone who opposes the hard-left, socialist agenda of Biden’s handlers and the establishment media as a white supremacist. This isn’t just a smear. It’s a smear with a definite purpose, and is heading us straight to the persecution of dissidents. That would be us.

Comment:
An Attorney General with a massive ideological chip on his shoulder or a Supreme Court Justice with hardcore biases...
No wonder the democrats thought he was such a great candidate for office. Absolutely the opposite of what a qualified person would look like, but that's becoming routine for them.
Merrick Garland is the consumate "Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Political Hack".
America dodged the bullet big time when Merrick Garland was NOT appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The man is nothing but a party hack! And the BIG LIE is ONLY a lie if one wants to believe the very strange tale being sold.
Hmm...., I guess the billions of dollars worth of damage from BLM and Antifa the first two simply didn't happen? Or - GASP - could it possibly be that it is the elite media that is minimizing the depredations of its darlings and exaggerating the effects of those it detests? No doubt AG Garland will shortly remind us of the existential threat to our liberties posed by the Tooth Fairy.
No, this thread premise is a lie, from an unreliable source.

The AG is correct about the threat of rightwing terrorism and violence.
You are a lie and unreliable source.
 
1620942087993.png


1620942124953.png


1620942187392.png


1620942289853.png


If he's talking about some of the one's pictured above he's probably right.

*****CHUCKLE*****



:)
 

The Big Lie Again: Attorney General Garland Says White Supremacists Top Terror Threat​

13 May 2021 ~~ By Robert Spencer
It could be worse: he could be on the Supreme Court. But as attorney general, Merrick Garland can do as much damage or more to our fragile and besieged republic than he could if Barack Obama had succeeded in placing him on the high court. A revealing piece in Yahoo News by “journalist” Alexander Nazaryan Wednesday revealed not only Garland’s frankly troubling agenda, but also how the establishment media runs interference and sells that program to a largely unsuspecting American public.
Garland, according to Nazaryan, “told Congress on Wednesday that violence incited by white supremacists poses ‘the most dangerous threat to our democracy.’ That assertion reflects near-universal consensus among national security experts, including those who worked for the Trump administration.”
Yeah, just like those seventeen intelligence agencies that had come to a consensus that Russia had hacked the 2016 presidential election. In both cases, they had a consensus, they just didn’t have any evidence.
But asking for evidence is likely white supremacist now as well. Nazaryan notes that “Garland’s warning came during a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, which was conducted by supporters of then-President Donald Trump and incited by white supremacist groups like the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys. Five people died as a result of the attack.”
~Snip~
So this is what we get from Yahoo News: actual violence from jihadis is not mentioned. Actual violence from leftists is dismissed as minor or unimportant amid “mostly peaceful” protests. The fact that there is virtually no violence from white supremacists is glossed over with claims that groups that aren’t white supremacist actually are, and assertions that they’re terrorist, with no evidence offered at all.
This is not just Yahoo News’ scenario; it’s clearly Garland’s and the Biden administration’s as well. This is deception and deflection at the highest level of government. The agenda of Garland and his colleagues is obvious and insidious: they’re going to find those white supremacist terrorists, and they’re going to prosecute and destroy them. If they don’t find any white supremacists in sufficient numbers, they will claim that law-abiding conservatives are white supremacists, and defame and destroy them accordingly. Garland’s spurious assessment of the domestic terror threat must be seen against the backdrop of the left’s increasingly common habit of referring to virtually anyone who opposes the hard-left, socialist agenda of Biden’s handlers and the establishment media as a white supremacist. This isn’t just a smear. It’s a smear with a definite purpose, and is heading us straight to the persecution of dissidents. That would be us.

Comment:
An Attorney General with a massive ideological chip on his shoulder or a Supreme Court Justice with hardcore biases...
No wonder the democrats thought he was such a great candidate for office. Absolutely the opposite of what a qualified person would look like, but that's becoming routine for them.
Merrick Garland is the consumate "Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Political Hack".
America dodged the bullet big time when Merrick Garland was NOT appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The man is nothing but a party hack! And the BIG LIE is ONLY a lie if one wants to believe the very strange tale being sold.
Hmm...., I guess the billions of dollars worth of damage from BLM and Antifa the first two simply didn't happen? Or - GASP - could it possibly be that it is the elite media that is minimizing the depredations of its darlings and exaggerating the effects of those it detests? No doubt AG Garland will shortly remind us of the existential threat to our liberties posed by the Tooth Fairy.
Everybody who's tried to overthrow the American Democratic form of government oh, say since January 5, 2021 raise your hand.

Let's see...1,2,...

Yep, white supremacists each and every one.
All anyone has to do is look at the first 112 days of this Chyna Joey Xi administration and tell us who is really trying to bring down this country....
Opening the border to illegal immigration and drugs, Raising taxes, attemping to blame all the ills of America on White Supremacy, instigating the Palestine attacks on Israel, Closing the buildong of the pipeline and fracking on federal lands...the list goes on and on.
 
There is no reason not to take the threat of domestic terrorism seriously, regardless of anything else that is going on. We can walk and chew gum at the same time.
 
The top terror threats in this Country is not White Supremacy.

The top terror threats in this Country is Marxist Ideology.

That includes Black LIES Matter, ANTIFA and other domestic terrorist groups.

And, there are all races and ethnicity involved in these groups.

It's not about race. It's about ideology.

General Garland is just another modern day Joseph Gobbels.
 
Once more the top security threat is white supremacists.

No matter how much the far right whines about it, it's fact.

I hope that this administration will actually do something substantial about it. Instead of just talking about it.

Dontcha love the way the Trumpsters jump in and get all pissy when this topic is brought up?
Democrats like to frequently bring up this false narrative.

Sane people respond because the premise is astoundingly absurd. It is like a 4 year old swearing to you that 2+2=5. You feel compelled to speak up to correct the obvious mistake. Like the 4 year old, Democrats will argue until they are blue in the face because they believe they are right despite being clearly wrong.

I disagree; they don't beleive their bullshit, and they all know they're lying pieces of shit.
 
Trumps DOJ said THE SAME THING bitches. Why do you guys love white supremacists? Just condemn white supremacy. Feel free to start a topic on all the Muslims terrorist attacks last year in the US. Oh wait.
I CONDEMN WHITE SUPREMACY!!!! THERE! SAID IT!

But, I am facing an unhappy dilemma.

I condemn white supremacy, but I also support free-market capitalism. As defined by the left, they are the same thing. I have read the bullshit. I know what the game is.

How can I condemn free-market capitalism AND support free-market capitalism at the same time?
You, hopefully, become a white supremacist. That's the aim of this white supremacist recruiting talking point.
 
Trumps DOJ said THE SAME THING bitches. Why do you guys love white supremacists? Just condemn white supremacy. Feel free to start a topic on all the Muslims terrorist attacks last year in the US. Oh wait.
I CONDEMN WHITE SUPREMACY!!!! THERE! SAID IT!

But, I am facing an unhappy dilemma.

I condemn white supremacy, but I also support free-market capitalism. As defined by the left, they are the same thing. I have read the bullshit. I know what the game is.

How can I condemn free-market capitalism AND support free-market capitalism at the same time?

They are not the same thing.

Anyone telling you otherwise is a low-grade moron.
 
Trumps DOJ said THE SAME THING bitches. Why do you guys love white supremacists? Just condemn white supremacy. Feel free to start a topic on all the Muslims terrorist attacks last year in the US. Oh wait.
I CONDEMN WHITE SUPREMACY!!!! THERE! SAID IT!

But, I am facing an unhappy dilemma.

I condemn white supremacy, but I also support free-market capitalism. As defined by the left, they are the same thing. I have read the bullshit. I know what the game is.

How can I condemn free-market capitalism AND support free-market capitalism at the same time?

They are not the same thing.

Anyone telling you otherwise is a low-grade moron.
See the white supremacists convulsing in this thread.
 
Trumps DOJ said THE SAME THING bitches. Why do you guys love white supremacists? Just condemn white supremacy. Feel free to start a topic on all the Muslims terrorist attacks last year in the US. Oh wait.
I CONDEMN WHITE SUPREMACY!!!! THERE! SAID IT!

But, I am facing an unhappy dilemma.

I condemn white supremacy, but I also support free-market capitalism. As defined by the left, they are the same thing. I have read the bullshit. I know what the game is.

How can I condemn free-market capitalism AND support free-market capitalism at the same time?

They are not the same thing.

Anyone telling you otherwise is a low-grade moron.
See the white supremacists convulsing in this thread.
I don't, point them out for me with proof they are supremacists. Thanks.
 

Forum List

Back
Top