White on White Crime

[IM2]

So as we watch this thread get moved while whites can post thread about the names we give our children and such threads aren't called race bait threads and don't get moved, perhaps people will have the courage to look at white on white crime. Mind you, I know what's about to come and any post about Chicago, democratic cities, democrats in the 1800's, the great society, white liberals, democratic plantations, per capita or black crime, or all the standard diversions will be reported from the start. I know this statement for some of you will mean an automatic invitation to troll. Do that if you want to but...

White on White Violence at College football game



Authorities suspect white supremacists and far-left extremists are behind violence at protests



White on white crime

 

[theHawk]

Whoever claimed there isn’t any white on white crime?

The difference is we don’t glorify it, and it’s rare.

 

[Correll]

So, what is your point? Yes, there is white on white crime, and I hope the criminals get caught and punished appropriately.


AND I fully want to lower the rates of it. I do not accept the level of it. I think that illegitimacy with single white mothers is a major problem and should be addressed and lowered as much as possible.


I support policy to reach that goal.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I don't believe it is white supremacists causing the violence, unless that is what you call the Marxists in the crowd (and they are white supremacists too, they are simply exploiting the plight of black folks for political gain).

But, I do find the claims about black on black violence to be irrelevant to many of the discussions. So, I at least agree on that point.

Why do black folks allow the fucking commies take over the protests and do all this shit to fuck up the real message?

I mean, do you really think that government owning all means of production will be a positive thing for black people?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

I don't believe it is white supremacists causing the violence, unless that is what you call the Marxists in the crowd (and they are white supremacists too, they are simply exploiting the plight of black folks for political gain).

But, I do find the claims about black on black violence to be irrelevant to many of the discussions. So, I at least agree on that point.

Why do black folks allow the fucking commies take over the protests and do all this shit to fuck up the real message?

I mean, do you really think that government owning all means of production will be a positive thing for black people?

There are dozens of examples like this that don't make it to Facebook and Twitter. It's what happens when you mix white people and booze.
Have a rational conversation about the legitimate concerns of black and you might start to make some headway. Instead, you jumble up a few hooligans bent
on chaos with the rest of the crowd who are just there to protest. That's how the message gets fucked. Not by them. By you.
Oh, yeah..and there's no one proposing that our government owns the means of production (socialism). Why do we keep repeating this talking point?

 

[MarathonMike]

Does the existence of "White on White" crime dismiss or diminish the existence of "Black on Black" crime?

 

[$ecular#eckler]

So as we watch this thread get moved while whites can post thread about the names we give our children and such threads aren't called race bait threads and don't get moved, perhaps people will have the courage to look at white on white crime. Mind you, I know what's about to come and any post about Chicago, democratic cities, democrats in the 1800's, the great society, white liberals, democratic plantations, per capita or black crime, or all the standard diversions will be reported from the start. I know this statement for some of you will mean an automatic invitation to troll. Do that if you want to but...

Again, what is your argument - white members are going to troll this thread rather than present cogent arguments to the argument that you are making???

What "will be reported from the start?" What are you warning about trolling responses??? I can show you responses to me that are trolling, and I ignore them - I do not care, anymore, because I am well aware that these Internet forums do not deliberate the issues as we contemplate they will, because there is no trial and jury system to do it. These forums are only good for what I use them for - trying to recruit people who do want to advance to a more deliberate system.

If you sense that you are being discriminated against here, then let's discuss that.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So as we watch this thread get moved while whites can post thread about the names we give our children and such threads aren't called race bait threads and don't get moved, perhaps people will have the courage to look at white on white crime. Mind you, I know what's about to come and any post about Chicago, democratic cities, democrats in the 1800's, the great society, white liberals, democratic plantations, per capita or black crime, or all the standard diversions will be reported from the start. I know this statement for some of you will mean an automatic invitation to troll. Do that if you want to but...

White on White Violence at College football game



Authorities suspect white supremacists and far-left extremists are behind violence at protests



White on white crime

Have you seen any "White Lives Matter!"? signs on the front lawn?

 

[Correll]

There are dozens of examples like this that don't make it to Facebook and Twitter. It's what happens when you mix white people and booze.
Have a rational conversation about the legitimate concerns of black and you might start to make some headway. Instead, you jumble up a few hooligans bent
on chaos with the rest of the crowd who are just there to protest. That's how the message gets fucked. Not by them. By you.
Oh, yeah..and there's no one proposing that our government owns the means of production (socialism). Why do we keep repeating this talking point?

Dozens? In a nation of over 300 million? I would expect there to be thousands of such videos. And it would prove nothing.

We can't have a rational discussion on the "legitimate concerns of blacks" becasue, 1. we are done being lectured by assholes, and 2. we have legitimate concerns too, and you won't listen to them.

 

[Lysistrata]

I don't believe it is white supremacists causing the violence, unless that is what you call the Marxists in the crowd (and they are white supremacists too, they are simply exploiting the plight of black folks for political gain).

But, I do find the claims about black on black violence to be irrelevant to many of the discussions. So, I at least agree on that point.

Why do black folks allow the fucking commies take over the protests and do all this shit to fuck up the real message?

I mean, do you really think that government owning all means of production will be a positive thing for black people?

Nothing in any protests in the United States has anything to do with what economic system we adopt. Protests in this country do not involve a debate of economic systems. One hears about "marxists" or "communists", but the protests have nothing to do with economics. There seems to be propagandists who want to deflect public discussion of legitimate social issues to economic issues that have not come up. Our discussion of police misconduct or food insecurity somehow morphs into an issue of what economic system we follow. It's very bizarre.

 

[Correll]

Nothing in any protests in the United States has anything to do with what economic system we adopt. Protests in this country do not involve a debate of economic systems. One hears about "marxists" or "communists", but the protests have nothing to do with economics. There seems to be propagandists who want to deflect public discussion of legitimate social issues to economic issues that have not come up. Our discussion of police misconduct or food insecurity somehow morphs into an issue of what economic system we follow. It's very bizarre.

YOu start talking the nuts and bolts of what your political leaders want, and it becomes economical real fast.


ANd BLM is a marxist organization. With marxist tactics and goals.

 

[MarcATL]

Why aren't the leaders of the white community speaking out against this OP? Is it because they're PROMOTING it?

 

[$ecular#eckler]

Why aren't the leaders of the white community speaking out against this OP? Is it because they're PROMOTING it?

I do not believe there is any hierarchy organizational rules to distinguish leadership from the groundlings.

 

[Correll]

Why aren't the leaders of the white community speaking out against this OP? Is it because they're PROMOTING it?

Probably because they are distracted by the violent black mobs murdering people in the streets.

 

[IM2]

Whoever claimed there isn’t any white on white crime?

The difference is we don’t glorify it, and it’s rare.

You've glorified it for years and it ain't rare. Look at what you call a president and you see crime.

 

[Correll]

You've glorified it for years and it ain't rare. Look at what you call a president and you see crime.

We don't. And "Rare" is a subjective judgement. The President is fine. Your fantasy of him as a supervillian is fine, for you, but don't expect us to play along.

 

[IM2]

I don't believe it is white supremacists causing the violence, unless that is what you call the Marxists in the crowd (and they are white supremacists too, they are simply exploiting the plight of black folks for political gain).

But, I do find the claims about black on black violence to be irrelevant to many of the discussions. So, I at least agree on that point.

Why do black folks allow the fucking commies take over the protests and do all this shit to fuck up the real message?

I mean, do you really think that government owning all means of production will be a positive thing for black people?

Well it's been proven so there that one goes. Why do whites like you call every black attempt at equality communist? And why do you defend a fascist president?

 

[Correll]

Well it's been proven so there that one goes. Why do whites like you call every black attempt at equality communist? And why do you defend a fascist president?

Probably because so many of you lefties are actually commie traitors.


I mean, you are, aren't you?

 

[IM2]

There are dozens of examples like this that don't make it to Facebook and Twitter. It's what happens when you mix white people and booze.
Have a rational conversation about the legitimate concerns of black and you might start to make some headway. Instead, you jumble up a few hooligans bent
on chaos with the rest of the crowd who are just there to protest. That's how the message gets fucked. Not by them. By you.
Oh, yeah..and there's no one proposing that our government owns the means of production (socialism). Why do we keep repeating this talking point?

It's the same thing whites do to us. They post videos of a few high or drunk hooligans then rant about blacks.

 

[IM2]

Does the existence of "White on White" crime dismiss or diminish the existence of "Black on Black" crime?

When white on white crime is three times higher and you use math to justify it, it does.