Not at all. I'm trying to correct the false claim from people like you, that he gave the neo-nazis a pass or any type of support.
I don't want to get sidetracked into a discussion on Antifa or other groups that he might have been including as violent in that statement.
I'm certainly willing to discuss that, my primary intent is to call you lying libs out on your lie about his calling neo-nazis "very fine people".
It is important that that lie be debunked.
Because that is fucking important.
If the President of the United States is a neo-nazi sympathizer, that would be something that people would need to know.
If he is NOT, then what type of piece of shit would spread the lie that he was?
Yeah, yeah. Sell that bullshit walking. You edited out half the paragraph, including Trump's gratuitous reference to Obama (in a low-brow deflection).
Then Trump walked back, before doubling down, because he's a whiny c*nt.
He specified that this problem has been a problem BEFORE Obama, so it is not Obama's fault.
Are you really attacking him for THAT?
Or me, for not including it, in a post about what Trump did NOT say about neo-nazis?
How the hell would it help to clarify what Trump did not say about neo-nazis, to know that Trump was NOT blaming neo-nazis on Obama?
I cut and pasted the important part(s) of the transcripts, ie Trump specifying that he was NOT talking about neo-nazis, when he said, "Very fine people".
That was the point I was making. I made it. You are refusing to admit it, even though I have proved it.
You are just stonewalling and trying to deflect from the fact you are stone cold busted.
You edited out the "on many sides" part. The reason I posted the entire text is so you can see he didn't mention race, racism, antisemitism, or white nationalists.
After a lot of criticism, he came back with a prepared, insincere statement. After that didn't go over well, he reverted to "both sides".
Dude, he called some of the white nationalists and anti-semites "very fine people", then calls black American football players "sons-of-bitches" for exercising their fucking rights. Even a troglodyte out to be able to see the inherent prejudice in that.
He specifically did NOT call the white nationalists, "very fine people".
Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue?
"So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people --
and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly."
If you read the entire transcript, it is obvious that one of the "Sides" he is talking about, is the neo-nazis.
He does specify neo nazis and/or white supremacists multiple times in the transcripts, as you can see in the excerpt right above.
Guess that won't fly. Here it is AGAIN.
"...you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally....."
I'm happy to discuss other issues, but not at the cost of your using them to dodge the important point here.