White male, White female Homosexual agenda to homosexualize the world.

[Two Thumbs]

Lets be honest for a moment shall we.

Seeing 2 dudes go at it does nothing for anyone.
If it did, there would be more gay porn than lesbian porn.

 

[random3434]

Lets be honest for a moment shall we.

Seeing 2 dudes go at it does nothing for anyone.
If it did, there would be more gay porn than lesbian porn.

In the movie, "The Kids are Alright" Annette Benning and Julianne Moore 'got it on' while watching gay men porn.

 

[bodecea]

Lets be honest for a moment shall we.

Seeing 2 dudes go at it does nothing for anyone.
If it did, there would be more gay porn than lesbian porn.

Don't get out much, do you?

 

[random3434]

You're right, but these are liberal whites.

And they are wrong, just as they are when it comes to racial issues too.

Another Lie From Tank!

Log Cabin Republicans is the only Republican organization dedicated to representing the interests of gay and lesbian Americans and their allies. The 30-year old organization has state and local chapters nationwide, a full-time office in Washington, DC, a federal political action committee and state political action committees.

Home - Log Cabin Republicans

I hate to get into that debate, but there does seem to be a disconnect.

Just because the Log Cabin Republicans are Republicans doesn't mean they aren't liberals.

"Republican," sadly, is not synonymous with "conservative."

So you're saying there are no gay conservatives? Come on now.......

 

[Two Thumbs]

Lets be honest for a moment shall we.

Seeing 2 dudes go at it does nothing for anyone.
If it did, there would be more gay porn than lesbian porn.

Don't get out much, do you?

pornotube.com

No, I don't.

 

[Two Thumbs]

Lets be honest for a moment shall we.

Seeing 2 dudes go at it does nothing for anyone.
If it did, there would be more gay porn than lesbian porn.

In the movie, "The Kids are Alright" Annette Benning and Julianne Moore 'got it on' while watching gay men porn.

Is it getting hot in here?

 

[Two Thumbs]

Another Lie From Tank!


Home - Log Cabin Republicans

I hate to get into that debate, but there does seem to be a disconnect.

Just because the Log Cabin Republicans are Republicans doesn't mean they aren't liberals.

"Republican," sadly, is not synonymous with "conservative."

So you're saying there are no gay conservatives? Come on now.......

about 2% of us are but only the social conservatives need to stay quite

 

[bodecea]

Another Lie From Tank!


Home - Log Cabin Republicans

I hate to get into that debate, but there does seem to be a disconnect.

Just because the Log Cabin Republicans are Republicans doesn't mean they aren't liberals.

"Republican," sadly, is not synonymous with "conservative."

So you're saying there are no gay conservatives? Come on now.......

I know quite a few.

 

[Liability]

Another Lie From Tank!


Home - Log Cabin Republicans

I hate to get into that debate, but there does seem to be a disconnect.

Just because the Log Cabin Republicans are Republicans doesn't mean they aren't liberals.

"Republican," sadly, is not synonymous with "conservative."

So you're saying there are no gay conservatives? Come on now.......

I said no such thing. I suggested no such thing. I implied no such thing. I merely noted that "Republican" is NOT synonymous with "Conservative."

YOU cited to Log Cabin Republicans as evidence that they weren't liberal. Being Republican does not mean they are conservative. There are lots of liberal Republicans.

 

[random3434]

I hate to get into that debate, but there does seem to be a disconnect.

Just because the Log Cabin Republicans are Republicans doesn't mean they aren't liberals.

"Republican," sadly, is not synonymous with "conservative."

So you're saying there are no gay conservatives? Come on now.......

I said no such thing. I suggested no such thing. I implied no such thing. I merely noted that "Republican" is NOT synonymous with "Conservative."

YOU cited to Log Cabin Republicans as evidence that they weren't liberal. Being Republican does not mean they are conservative. There are lots of liberal Republicans.

So I guess that means there are a lot of conservative democrats!

And yes, there is!

 

[Tank]

If the Homosexual population started to increase significantly, would any of you have a problem with that?

 

[bodecea]

If the Homosexual population started to increase significantly, would any of you have a problem with that?

I don't there's much worry about that....so, you can breath easier.

 

[Liability]

So you're saying there are no gay conservatives? Come on now.......

I said no such thing. I suggested no such thing. I implied no such thing. I merely noted that "Republican" is NOT synonymous with "Conservative."

YOU cited to Log Cabin Republicans as evidence that they weren't liberal. Being Republican does not mean they are conservative. There are lots of liberal Republicans.

So I guess that means there are a lot of conservative democrats!

And yes, there is!

No. But there are SOME mildly conservative Democratics.

They are less tolerated in the fold of the Democrat Party (which is to say the mainstream liberal component of the Democrat Party) than RINOs are welcome in the GOP.

 

[Liability]

Let me clarify something. I don't give a rat's ass whether a conservative is gay or straight. When I disagree with a liberal, I also don't give a damn whether that liberal is gay or straight.

Similarly, I don't give a hoot about the race of person, or his or her religion, ethnicity, nationality, etc.

None of any of that, in my opinion, has any relevance. What matters is how a person behaves in this life relative to his/her loved ones, family, friends, acquaintances, neighbors, strangers and others in general. What matters, also, is a person's basic philosophy.

The alarm often gets rung about birth rates: "OMG! The white folks are not reproducing at the same rate as Hispanics/blacks/Asians, etc!" I don't give a crap. What I do care about, in that regard, is whether the increasing pluralities are won-over by the cheap pandering rhetoric of the left or not. That analysis can be disconcerting.

To answer Tank's last question on this thread. Let's assume that the "gay" population is approximately 10%. Let's further assume (just for the sake of your question) that for some unknown reason the percentage of gays in the population has been found to be increasing and it is likely to settle at 20%. I cannot really understand why anybody would be worried about this.

 

[Mr.Owl]

There seems to be a White male and white female agenda aimed at homosexualizing the
the entire straight heterosexual world.

Looks like white people and gays are the new Muslims and terrorists

 

[Mad Scientist]

There seems to be a White male and white female agenda aimed at homosexualizing the
the entire straight heterosexual world.

Gotta' agree with you here. Homosexuals don't want to be equal, they want to be seen as better.

I have an offer for all Homosexuals: I won't call you "***" if you don't call me "Breeder". Deal?

 

[Liability]

There seems to be a White male and white female agenda aimed at homosexualizing the
the entire straight heterosexual world.

Gotta' agree with you here. Homosexuals don't want to be equal, they want to be seen as better.

I have an offer for all Homosexuals: I won't call you "***" if you don't call me "Breeder". Deal?

How about we don't call gay folks "fags" for ANY reason and how about we not worry about them calling us "breeders?"

I mean, does it ******* matter?

I am equally unconcerned when a racist black guy refers to me (or to white people in general) as a "honky." Who gives a shit?

 

[editec]

Lad, you sure think about GAY MEN a lot, don't you?

 

[Mad Scientist]

There seems to be a White male and white female agenda aimed at homosexualizing the
the entire straight heterosexual world.

Gotta' agree with you here. Homosexuals don't want to be equal, they want to be seen as better.

I have an offer for all Homosexuals: I won't call you "***" if you don't call me "Breeder". Deal?

How about we don't call gay folks "fags" for ANY reason and how about we not worry about them calling us "breeders?"

I mean, does it ******* matter?

I am equally unconcerned when a racist black guy refers to me (or to white people in general) as a "honky." Who gives a shit?

You brought up a good point. Blacks don't wanna' be called ****** but they call White people all sorts of names.

So if Gays don't wanna' be called ***, then they shouldn't use the word Breeder.

It's only "Fair". You want what's "Fair" don't you?

 

[random3434]

Let me clarify something. I don't give a rat's ass whether a conservative is gay or straight. When I disagree with a liberal, I also don't give a damn whether that liberal is gay or straight.

Similarly, I don't give a hoot about the race of person, or his or her religion, ethnicity, nationality, etc.

None of any of that, in my opinion, has any relevance. What matters is how a person behaves in this life relative to his/her loved ones, family, friends, acquaintances, neighbors, strangers and others in general. What matters, also, is a person's basic philosophy.

The alarm often gets rung about birth rates: "OMG! The white folks are not reproducing at the same rate as Hispanics/blacks/Asians, etc!" I don't give a crap. What I do care about, in that regard, is whether the increasing pluralities are won-over by the cheap pandering rhetoric of the left or not. That analysis can be disconcerting.

To answer Tank's last question on this thread. Let's assume that the "gay" population is approximately 10%. Let's further assume (just for the sake of your question) that for some unknown reason the percentage of gays in the population has been found to be increasing and it is likely to settle at 20%. I cannot really understand why anybody would be worried about this.

Good for you! Good post!