White Male James Damore Goes After Google

[The Derp]

Same tired point over and over, you fucking pathetic loser.

A point you are completely unable to address. He signed a contract. He then violated the terms of the contract he signed. Google reserves the right to fire him if he violated that contract. Unless you're now saying that Conservatives sign contracts without reading them. Do you?

 

[martybegan]

Oh good. I can humiliate then fire every leftist on staff.

LOL! Well, you need a job and a company first, which you don't have because you're a loser.

Google didn't fire the guy because he was a Conservative, they fired him because he didn't conform to the employment contract he signed.

I know Conservatives don't take signed contracts seriously, but Google sure as shit does.

Poor baby needs pathetic lies.

He is going to end up owning Google.

Damore vs Google Class Action Lawsuit | Diversity (Business) | Class Action

poor idiot trumptard....

They want to be perpetual victims. That dude signed an employment contract that included a Code of Conduct. He violated that Code of Conduct, and Google fired him because of it.

He's got no ground to stand on...the judge will simply ask; "did you read the employment contract you signed?"

And again his Attorneys will tell google to prove it applied that policy fairly across the board.

And he will win, you poor retard.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

All he has to do is prove they allowed others to do political activity of a progressive bent, and he has a slam dunk case, and I'm sure they can find plenty of that.

Nope. He signed a contract that specifically prohibited him from engaging in the activity he engaged in. Companies have employment contracts for a reason. Check your own employment contract; I bet it doesn't allow you to engage in political activity during work hours. And it also reserves the right for the company to fire you if you do.

Contracts might mean nothing to you, but they mean plenty to Google.

And you are wrong that it isn't a protected class in California.
But keep trying to move that goalpost....lol....

Protected class for hiring, but not for firing. Google's well within its rights to fire any employee that engages in behavior Google finds unsuitable. That's thanks to you all destroying unions which protect employee free speech. Wondering why you suddenly now have your panties in a twist about it.

If he can show they fired him for the policy but allowed progressives to conduct political work on company time, he proves bias based on content, and that overrides any contract he may have had with google.

And it's not just hiring discrimination, but thanks for trying to shore up your busted point and making yourself look more and more like an ass,.

I won, you lost, now slink away and deal with it.

IT DOESN'T MATTER. Google has a strict code of conduct all its employees must follow, and all employees agree to follow it when they accept employment with Google.

From that link:

Who Must Follow Our Code?
We expect all of our employees and Board members to know and follow the Code. Failure to do so can result in disciplinary action, including termination of employment. Moreover, while the Code is specifically written for Google employees and Board members, we expect Google contractors, consultants, and others who may be temporarily assigned to perform work or services for Google to follow the Code in connection with their work for us. Failure of a Google contractor, consultant, or other covered service provider to follow the Code can result in termination of their relationship with Google.​

Again, it DOES matter, because if he can show they apply their policy arbitrarily, as a protected activity it falls under the employment laws of California.

No, it doesn't matter. Google reserves the right to fire whoever they want if they violate the Google Code of Conduct all Google employees agree to abide by as a condition of their employment.

The judge will simply ask; "did you read your employment contract before signing it?" Then the case will be dismissed because, yes, he did read the contract and understood his liability. His signature on his employment contract is the proof.

Yes it does matter, you ignorant cum bubble. CA law prohibits firing people for their political beliefs.

 

[martybegan]

Same tired point over and over, you fucking pathetic loser.

A point you are completely unable to address. He signed a contract. He then violated the terms of the contract he signed. Google reserves the right to fire him if he violated that contract. Unless you're now saying that Conservatives sign contracts without reading them. Do you?

You ignore what I say over and over. If it is shown they apply that term on a content-biased basis, it doesn't matter because they can be shown to be violating California's employment laws.

Moron.

 

[The Derp]

Then his attorney will show proof that Google only applies its policy to CERTAIN politics, and the contract term will then be seen as content specific, not content neutral, and thus in violation of California's employment laws..

Not in violation of employment laws. Google's employment contract is crystal clear; you violate the Code of Conduct, you suffer the consequences. Do Conservatives sign contracts without reading them? Sure looks like it.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

If the Google code of conduct has political motivations in their code of conduct ...their code of conduct is illegal in CA.

 

[BulletProof]

I see some news headlines saying he's suing Google for "alleged discrimination". You never see the media using "alleged" in reference to lawsuits alleging discrimination. It's about time someone pushes back against the discrimination and hypocrisy of companies like Google.

 

[The Derp]

If it can be shown that Google only applies the term of the contract when it comes to CERTAIN politics, not ALL politics, it's actions violate California's employment laws.Stop it you poor dumb simpleton.

IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER.

He signed the contract. He violated those terms. There's no such thing as "Equal Protection" when signing employment contracts. You waive certain rights and take on certain liabilities when you sign a contract.

Contracts mean nothing to Conservatives because Conservatives have no integrity.

 

[martybegan]

Then his attorney will show proof that Google only applies its policy to CERTAIN politics, and the contract term will then be seen as content specific, not content neutral, and thus in violation of California's employment laws..

Not in violation of employment laws. Google's employment contract is crystal clear; you violate the Code of Conduct, you suffer the consequences. Do Conservatives sign contracts without reading them? Sure looks like it.

If they can show arbitrary application, yes in violation of employment laws.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

read cali's employment walls you dumb twat.
Political affiliation is a protected class.

Maybe...but Damore signed an employment contract. One that has a strict Code of Conduct. A Code of Conduct he knowingly violated. So he doesn't get shit.

If it can be shown that Google only applies the term of the contract when it comes to CERTAIN politics, not ALL politics, it's actions violate California's employment laws.

Stop it you poor dumb simpleton.

Gimp is too stupid to understand that. I have known people who sued CA businesses out of business for illegal politically motivated firings.

 

[Correll]

So, you don't deny the discrimination is taking place,
your defense is that it is legal.
And from your spin, and his previous behavior, we can see that you support it.
Well, thanks for validating everything we cons though about liberals.
I hope some moderates see this, maybe so of those self deluding liberals that thought they were not bigoted scum.
Thanks for your help in this thread.
Please stick around for when the more mainstream libs show up and try denying that this discrimination occurred, or just try distracting from it.

Stop whining like a little bitch. He wasn't denied employment because of his political affiliations, he was fired because he expressed those positions on company time, which the Google employment contracts forbid.

Don't walk it back.

Did someone get to you already?


An honest lefty, even one just being honest for a little while, is so rare to find.


Your honesty on this would be a big help is moving the discussion forward,


normally when we see an issue like this, the whole discussion is just filthy lying lefties denying what we can all plainly see, and being such dishonest pricks that they hold to their lies, even when the Truth is rubbed in their faces.



Your honestly and open support of abuse of power and discrimination, could help us actually address the issue


of what vile discriminating and racist bigots lefties are and what we as a society should do about it.

When you sign a contract, you agree to what that contract says; you agree to the limitations put on you by the contract; you agree to your employer being able to fire you if you engage in behavior the company finds objectionable and damaging.

I know contracts mean nothing to you, but they mean a lot to Google.

<sigh> fine, I guess you have been brought back into line.


SO, if the man's claims about the abuse and discrimination is true, would you support it?

It doesn't fucking matter how badly you want this guy to be a victim.

His e-mail violated Google's Code of Conduct. Google reserves the right to terminate any employee who breaks that code of conduct. It's in the freakin' employment agreement these people sign before working at Google.

You might not think contracts mean anything, but they certainly do.

So, the black list that managers allegedly keep, to discriminate against conservatives, that is cool with you?

 

[martybegan]

If it can be shown that Google only applies the term of the contract when it comes to CERTAIN politics, not ALL politics, it's actions violate California's employment laws.Stop it you poor dumb simpleton.

IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER.

He signed the contract. He violated those terms. There's no such thing as "Equal Protection" when signing employment contracts. You waive certain rights and take on certain liabilities when you sign a contract.

Contracts mean nothing to Conservatives because Conservatives have no integrity.

TYPING IN CAPS DOESN"T MAKE YOU RIGHT YOU DUMB TWAT

So you are saying a contract can override employment laws or laws in general?

A person can contract themselves to become a slave despite the 13th amendment?

Keep digging yourself a deeper hole, cocksucker.

 

[The Derp]

And again his Attorneys will tell google to prove it applied that policy fairly across the board..

You don't seem to know how this works.

It's on the plaintiff to prove harm, not Google to prove no harm. The plaintiff in this case can't do that because they signed an employment contract that Google reserves the right to enforce however they want. If he didn't want to lose his job, he shouldn't have broken the contract he signed. Conservatives need to learn that actions have consequences.

 

[The Derp]

Yes it does matter, you ignorant cum bubble. CA law prohibits firing people for their political beliefs.

He wasn't fired for his beliefs, he was fired because he violated the terms of his employment contract, specifically the Code of Conduct he agreed to follow when he signed.

Remember what he did; he used his own Google account to write an internal company memo expressing his dissatisfaction with the state of things. Doing so violated the terms of his employment agreement.

If he had simply done it on a non-Google account, for public consumption across social media, that's OK and something he can do. But that's not what he did. He sent an internal memo out, from his Google employment account, within the company -then shared that memo publicly. That's why he was fired.

 

[martybegan]

And again his Attorneys will tell google to prove it applied that policy fairly across the board..

You don't seem to know how this works.

It's on the plaintiff to prove harm, not Google to prove no harm. The plaintiff in this case can't do that because they signed an employment contract that Google reserves the right to enforce however they want. If he didn't want to lose his job, he shouldn't have broken the contract he signed. Conservatives need to learn that actions have consequences.

Google CANNOT enforce it however they want. if they don't enforce it in a content neutral basis, they are violating the employment law.

 

[Correll]

Would you support this discrimination if it is true?

`
`
As a matter of fact: NO! I champion free speech whether I agree with it or not.

Thank you. THat is my position too.


It will be interesting to see how this case advances, and how various judges rule.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

I love how Gimpy thinks if he types in all caps it makes him right. Lmao! What a fucking spaz that guy is.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Yes it does matter, you ignorant cum bubble. CA law prohibits firing people for their political beliefs.

He wasn't fired for his beliefs, he was fired because he violated the terms of his employment contract, specifically the Code of Conduct he agreed to follow when he signed.

He was asked to give input, it upset their politically correct sensibilities. You are a moron and I hope you're not going to be representing Google in court....because if so, they'll lose big time.

 

[The Derp]

You ignore what I say over and over. If it is shown they apply that term on a content-biased basis, it doesn't matter because they can be shown to be violating California's employment laws.Moron.

I'm not ignoring it, I'm dismissing it because it's irrelevant.

He wrote an internal memo from his Google account, then shared that internal memo publicly across social media.

Clearly a violation of his employment terms.

Conservatives never want to be responsible for their actions.

 

[Correll]

Pretty damning.

Damore vs Google Class Action Lawsuit | Diversity (Business) | Class Action

Agreed.

And it is a class action suit, The lawyers could spend years tracking down whites, males, conservatives that were not hired or promoted or were fired, and handing out money.


This could be HUGE.