White House Officials Using Personal Accounts To Do Official Work

[g5000]

Cummings: WH officials using personal accounts to do official work - CNNPolitics

House Oversight Chairman Elijah Cummings said Thursday his committee has obtained new information that several senior White House officials have used personal email and messaging accounts to conduct government business, asserting that President Donald Trump's son-in-law communicated with foreign leaders through a private messaging application that appears to lack adequate safeguards.

In a Thursday letter to the White House, the Maryland Democrat alleged that Jared Kushner, who is also a senior White House adviser, had been using WhatsApp, a popular messaging application, to "communicate with foreign leaders" -- something he said that Kushner's attorney had confirmed in a private meeting.

LOCK! HIM! UP! LOCK! HIM! UP!


He also contended that Trump's daughter Ivanka Trump, also a senior adviser, may be in violation of the Presidential Records Act by her use of private emails.

LOCK! HER! UP! LOCK! HER! UP!

 

[RDD_1210]

More hypoc(R)isy from the GOP.

It's what they do.

 

[depotoo]

They did until they were given email addresses. Old news.

 

[g5000]

They did until they were given email addresses. Old news.

Wrong!

Even if you were right, which you aren't, they are still required by federal law to turn those communications over to the government.

 

[MisterBeale]

They did until they were given email addresses. Old news.

Wrong!

Even if you were right, which you aren't, they are still required by federal law to turn those communications over to the government.

Unless they decide it is personal business. They can just have their staff go through it all and delete what ever they don't feel like handing over apparently. . . .

 

[Dragonlady]

They did until they were given email addresses. Old news.

Bullshit. This is current and ongoing!

 

[g5000]

They did until they were given email addresses. Old news.

Wrong!

Even if you were right, which you aren't, they are still required by federal law to turn those communications over to the government.

Unless they decide it is personal business. They can just have their staff go through it all and delete what ever they don't feel like handing over apparently. . . .

Which part of "used personal email and messaging accounts to conduct government business" did you not understand, blind man?

They already admitted to it.

 

[MisterBeale]

More hypoc(R)isy from the GOP.

It's what they do.

Both sides do it, they are all hypocrites.

When they decide to run, their campaign managers ask them; "Are you willing to lie, cheat, steal and be hypocritical?"



From the article; "Cummings said would constitute a "major security breach."



Didn't seem he was too concerned about a security breach a few years back when a Democrat was doing the same thing, eh?

Politicians. . .

 

[MisterBeale]

They did until they were given email addresses. Old news.

Wrong!

Even if you were right, which you aren't, they are still required by federal law to turn those communications over to the government.

Unless they decide it is personal business. They can just have their staff go through it all and delete what ever they don't feel like handing over apparently. . . .

Which part of "used personal email and messaging accounts to conduct government business" did you not understand, blind man?

They already admitted to it.

Better a personal email than a whole goddamned SERVER!!!!

 

[RDD_1210]

More hypoc(R)isy from the GOP.

It's what they do.

Both sides do it, they are all hypocrites.

When they decide to run, their campaign managers ask them; "Are you willing to lie, cheat, steal and be hypocritical?"



From the article; "Cummings said would constitute a "major security breach."



Didn't seem he was too concerned about a security breach a few years back when a Democrat was doing the same thing, eh?

Politicians. . .

Oh the "both sides are the same argument"!

So where are your chants of "lock him up"?

 

[rightwinger]

Lock them up

 

[Andylusion]

More hypoc(R)isy from the GOP.

It's what they do.

Both sides do it, they are all hypocrites.

When they decide to run, their campaign managers ask them; "Are you willing to lie, cheat, steal and be hypocritical?"



From the article; "Cummings said would constitute a "major security breach."



Didn't seem he was too concerned about a security breach a few years back when a Democrat was doing the same thing, eh?

Politicians. . .

Oh the "both sides are the same argument"!

So where are your chants of "lock him up"?

So the very moment that they put the information on a private email server, use professional erasing software to wipe it before investigators can see it, then claim they had no classified information on it, and then when it turns out they did, claim they could not tell the difference between classified and un-classified information.........

When they do all that..... I will guarantee that I would chant with you to lock them up.

Here's the bottom line.....

Hillary only avoided a prison sentence, because the investigators said she could not tell the difference between classified and un-classified information. You can read it yourself. That's why the investigation ended.

That means that either Hillary is a bold faced liar who knew full well that there was classified information on her private email server, which is exactly why she had it professionally wiped... or she is one of the most incompetent politicians to walk this Earth. The women has been in the highest levels of government for literally decades, and NOW she says she can't tell the difference between classified and non-classified information?

How utterly incompetent would you have to be, after decades to not know the difference?

So she is either the most incompetent politician in the history of this country.... or she is a bold faced criminal liar, that should be in prison.

You pick which one you think fits her, because either one disqualifies her being in office.

As for Trump.... again... you show me he did everything Hillary did, and I'll support his removal. Until then you are just a dog barking at your own hypocrisy.

 

[MisterBeale]

More hypoc(R)isy from the GOP.

It's what they do.

Both sides do it, they are all hypocrites.

When they decide to run, their campaign managers ask them; "Are you willing to lie, cheat, steal and be hypocritical?"



From the article; "Cummings said would constitute a "major security breach."



Didn't seem he was too concerned about a security breach a few years back when a Democrat was doing the same thing, eh?

Politicians. . .

Oh the "both sides are the same argument"!

So where are your chants of "lock him up"?

Sure.

I'll do you one better.

Let's line up the corporate boards, the boards of governors of all the big banks, all of congress, the entire CFR and it's legacy memberships, the boards of all the most powerful foundations, all the bureaucracy of silicon valley and the entire intelligence upper echelon, let's really clean house and do it right, eh? Let's bring back the free market and stop the socialism for good, eh?

 

[Lesh]

More hypoc(R)isy from the GOP.

It's what they do.

Both sides do it, they are all hypocrites.

When they decide to run, their campaign managers ask them; "Are you willing to lie, cheat, steal and be hypocritical?"



From the article; "Cummings said would constitute a "major security breach."



Didn't seem he was too concerned about a security breach a few years back when a Democrat was doing the same thing, eh?

Politicians. . .

But YOU STILL seem concerned about THAT...but not THIS.

Odd huh?

 

[Lesh]

So the very moment that they put the information on a private email server, use professional erasing software to wipe it before investigators can see it, then claim they had no classified information on it, and then when it turns out they did, claim they could not tell the difference between classified and un-classified information.........

When they do all that..... I will guarantee that I would chant with you to lock them up.

We're going to hold you to that

 

[Andylusion]

So the very moment that they put the information on a private email server, use professional erasing software to wipe it before investigators can see it, then claim they had no classified information on it, and then when it turns out they did, claim they could not tell the difference between classified and un-classified information.........

When they do all that..... I will guarantee that I would chant with you to lock them up.

We're going to hold you to that

You don't need to. I didn't vote for Trump to start with, and I'll have no problem having him removed if he is engaging in something actually illegal. It won't bother me one bit.

Mike Pence for President is a motto of mine.

 

[MisterBeale]

More hypoc(R)isy from the GOP.

It's what they do.

Both sides do it, they are all hypocrites.

When they decide to run, their campaign managers ask them; "Are you willing to lie, cheat, steal and be hypocritical?"



From the article; "Cummings said would constitute a "major security breach."



Didn't seem he was too concerned about a security breach a few years back when a Democrat was doing the same thing, eh?

Politicians. . .

But YOU STILL seem concerned about THAT...but not THIS.

Odd huh?

Huh? Are you feeling all right?

I just said, let's execute them ALL.

How did you even post and not see the VERY LAST POST? #13

 

[blackhawk]

If you showed the same outrage when Hillary was using her private server in her home and members of the Obama administration did the same with private e-mail accounts by all means call out the Trump administration for this if not please spare us your hypocrisy. Same goes for those on the right who don't care now but did when it was Obama and Hillary hypocrisy is one of the few things both sides have in common.

 

[Lesh]

More hypoc(R)isy from the GOP.

It's what they do.

Both sides do it, they are all hypocrites.

When they decide to run, their campaign managers ask them; "Are you willing to lie, cheat, steal and be hypocritical?"



From the article; "Cummings said would constitute a "major security breach."



Didn't seem he was too concerned about a security breach a few years back when a Democrat was doing the same thing, eh?

Politicians. . .

But YOU STILL seem concerned about THAT...but not THIS.

Odd huh?

Huh? Are you feeling all right?

I just said, let's execute them ALL.

How did you even post and not see the VERY LAST POST? #13

Let’s see if you stay consistent. Anyone wanna bet his very next post will be as one sided and partisan as always?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

So the very moment that they put the information on a private email server, use professional erasing software to wipe it before investigators can see it, then claim they had no classified information on it, and then when it turns out they did, claim they could not tell the difference between classified and un-classified information.........

When they do all that..... I will guarantee that I would chant with you to lock them up.

We're going to hold you to that

You don't need to. I didn't vote for Trump to start with, and I'll have no problem having him removed if he is engaging in something actually illegal. It won't bother me one bit.

Mike Pence for President is a motto of mine.

It’s a ridiculous ‘motto.’

Meanwhile, conservatives continue to prove that they’re masters of both hypocrisy and red herring fallacies.