White House Already Engaging in Impeachment Inquiry ‘Obstruction’ with Fake ‘No Evidence’ Disinformation Talking Points

[ThisIsMe]

That's not fake. There is no evidence.

True…but then that’s the purpose of the investigation. The left seems to think that you have to have evidence to do the investigation. It’s usually the other way around…

 

[Crepitus]

True…but then that’s the purpose of the investigation. The left seems to think that you have to have evidence to do the investigation. It’s usually the other way around…

Sorry, but here in America you can't start a criminal investigation outta nowhere just cause you don't like somebody.

 

[struth]

You are hopeless.

I think you have been forced off the dembot script and are frustrated

 

[ThisIsMe]

Sorry, but here in America you can't start a criminal investigation outta nowhere just cause you don't like somebody.

Sure you can…just look at the dems.

Aside from that, there have been credible allegations, that is what starts the investigation to find out if there is any evidence to support those allegations or not.

 

[progressive hunter]

But we're being told there is no evidence by the GOP:

Republican Representative Nick Langworthy tried to defend the GOP investigation into Joe Biden’s alleged corruption—only to end up admitting that they still don’t have any proof.​

​

Republicans have insisted for months that Biden is guilty of corruption and influence peddling overseas, despite producing no actual evidence. But they continue to claim they have proof that he and his son Hunter Biden accepted millions of dollars in bribes.​

​

But Langworthy fumbled that point big time on Thursday during an interview with Fox News. Fox correspondent Gillian Turner pointed out that Republicans have yet to produce “a smoking gun: clear-cut, undeniable proof of the president’s involvement.”​

​

“Well, we’ve never claimed that we have direct money going to the president, but many members of his family have received money from foreign governments,” Langworthy said.​

​

Turner interrupted to correct him: “That is precisely the claim that the chairman of your committee, James Comer, and also Jim Jordan have made many times,” she said, referring to House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan, who alongside Comer has spearheaded the charge against Biden.​

​

“We are putting an investigation together laying out the facts on the business dealings of this family,” Langworthy said awkwardly, trying to recover.​

​

Langworthy did not fare much better in the rest of the interview. He also said that Hunter Biden’s former business partner Devon Archer had testified to the Oversight Committee under oath, which Turner again pointed out was not true. (And regardless of how he testified, Archer also refuted many of Republicans’ talking points against Joe Biden.)​

​

Republicans’ main justification for continuing to investigate Biden is that they already have proof of his wrongdoing and are now just trying to expose the breadth of his crimes. Many Republicans, including House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, are starting to suggest opening an impeachment inquiry into Biden so that they can access more information and witnesses that will lead them to the truth.​

​

But Langworthy’s stumble reveals the actual truth: Republicans have nothing on Biden. The reason they keep pushing forward is because they are looking for something to actually substantiate their allegations.​

you are being told by people you have repeatedly called liars,,

I dont need people to tell me what to think like you do,,

 

[Crepitus]

Sure you can…just look at the dems.

Didn't happen.

Aside from that, there have been credible allegations, that is what starts the investigation to find out if there is any evidence to support those allegations or not.

No, there haven't. There's been nothing but tRumped up garbage. Fake "whistleblowers" cherry-picked "testimony", and misrepresented documents.

There has been nothing "credible" about this who frame-job.

 

[Marener]

I think you have been forced off the dembot script and are frustrated

You don’t think. You rationalize.

 

[alang1216]

I dont need people to tell me what to think like you do,,

I've read what you've written before and, yes, you do need someone to tell you the truth since you seem unable to discern it for yourself.

 

[Moonglow]

White House Already Engaging in Impeachment Inquiry ‘Obstruction’ with Fake ‘No Evidence’ Disinformation Talking Points​

Exclusive – McCarthy: White House Already Engaging in Impeachment Inquiry ‘Obstruction’ with Fake ‘No Evidence’ Disinformation Talking Points

Biden’s White House is already obstructing the U.S. House of Representatives' impeachment inquiry announced by Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA).

www.breitbart.com

17 Sep 2023 ~~ By Matthew Boyle

Democrat President Joe Biden’s White House is already obstructing the U.S. House of Representatives’ impeachment inquiry announced by Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) when it disseminated talking points to the media falsely claiming there was no evidence to begin the inquiry, McCarthy told Breitbart News exclusively.
McCarthy, who appeared on Breitbart News Saturday on SiriusXM 125 the Patriot Channel, said a document drafted by the White House counsel’s office and sent from formal White House staff to media outlets at the outset of the impeachment inquiry — which led to the false reports and the use of the disinformation talking point by many media outlets and Democrats allied with the White House—could amount to obstruction of the investigation.
~Snip~
This week, as Breitbart News reported in the aftermath of McCarthy impeachment inquiry announcement, several media outlets and Democrats were repeating the inaccurate talking point the White House disseminated that there was no evidence to proceed to an impeachment inquiry. McCarthy, during his interview on Breitbart News Saturday, recounted one such interaction with an Associated Press reporter on Capitol Hill where he forced the reporter to admit there was in fact evidence. He also pointed to a CNN fact check of him which actually found that each of the claims he made during his announcement of the impeachment inquiry about the Bidens were true.
~Snip~
Asked about a possible timeline for considering actual articles of impeachment against Biden, McCarthy said there is no timeline but that House Republicans will simply follow the facts wherever they lead. If it gets to that point eventually, they will move forward on it he said. But for now, the House GOP is conducting the impeachment inquiry so as to get the facts out about the president and the Congress will move if and when it rises to that level.
“Let me be very clear to everybody. We are not the Democrats. We watched them use impeachment for political reasons,” McCarthy said. “Tell me what evidence did they have to even move forward? So what we’re doing — and we’re not predetermining anything into the future. The only thing we’ll promise everybody is we’ll follow the facts and we’ll get the answers and we’ll lay them out for the American public. We’ll uphold our Constitutional authority but we don’t have pre-impeachment documents or anything else. We believe in the court of law. We believe in the honesty and integrity and remember none of this information would have been found had we not been doing the work we’re doing now. Let us continue our work and lay it out for the American public and let people be able to see what we’re finding.”


Commentary:
Whenever has the Democrat Party played by the rules of law?
Now why would the combined efforts of the Biden White House, the DoJ, the FBI and the Quisling Media want to obstruct a Congressional investigation into impeachment when we continue to find evidence they've all colluded to obstruct and hide evidence?
Trump was impeached the first time for allegations of a quid pro quo, and Biden bragged infamously about doing worse...and we got crickets from the brainwashed Democrat buffoons. No evidence or allegations against the Bidens??? Astonishing. Just look through Hunter's laptop stash of info, now that even the corrupt FBI is no longer insisting that it's "Russian disinformation."
Does anyone really believe the Whitehouse will suddenly be honest, roll over and tell Congress and we the people the truth.

That is not called obstruction it is called rhetoric...

 

[progressive hunter]

I've read what you've written before and, yes, you do need someone to tell you the truth since you seem unable to discern it for yourself.

anything I have said has been backed up with receipts,,

your failure to accept them is not my problem,,

all you do is tell me I am wrong and never show the proof,,

in this case its proof that the long list of claims doesnt exist,,

 

[Marener]

anything I have said has been backed up with receipts,,

your failure to accept them is not my problem,,

all you do is tell me I am wrong and never show the proof,,

in this case its proof that the long list of claims doesnt exist,,

Your “receipts” rarely back up what you say if they exist at all.

 

[Independent thinker]

White House Already Engaging in Impeachment Inquiry ‘Obstruction’ with Fake ‘No Evidence’ Disinformation Talking Points​

Exclusive – McCarthy: White House Already Engaging in Impeachment Inquiry ‘Obstruction’ with Fake ‘No Evidence’ Disinformation Talking Points

Biden’s White House is already obstructing the U.S. House of Representatives' impeachment inquiry announced by Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA).

www.breitbart.com

17 Sep 2023 ~~ By Matthew Boyle

Democrat President Joe Biden’s White House is already obstructing the U.S. House of Representatives’ impeachment inquiry announced by Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) when it disseminated talking points to the media falsely claiming there was no evidence to begin the inquiry, McCarthy told Breitbart News exclusively.
McCarthy, who appeared on Breitbart News Saturday on SiriusXM 125 the Patriot Channel, said a document drafted by the White House counsel’s office and sent from formal White House staff to media outlets at the outset of the impeachment inquiry — which led to the false reports and the use of the disinformation talking point by many media outlets and Democrats allied with the White House—could amount to obstruction of the investigation.
~Snip~
This week, as Breitbart News reported in the aftermath of McCarthy impeachment inquiry announcement, several media outlets and Democrats were repeating the inaccurate talking point the White House disseminated that there was no evidence to proceed to an impeachment inquiry. McCarthy, during his interview on Breitbart News Saturday, recounted one such interaction with an Associated Press reporter on Capitol Hill where he forced the reporter to admit there was in fact evidence. He also pointed to a CNN fact check of him which actually found that each of the claims he made during his announcement of the impeachment inquiry about the Bidens were true.
~Snip~
Asked about a possible timeline for considering actual articles of impeachment against Biden, McCarthy said there is no timeline but that House Republicans will simply follow the facts wherever they lead. If it gets to that point eventually, they will move forward on it he said. But for now, the House GOP is conducting the impeachment inquiry so as to get the facts out about the president and the Congress will move if and when it rises to that level.
“Let me be very clear to everybody. We are not the Democrats. We watched them use impeachment for political reasons,” McCarthy said. “Tell me what evidence did they have to even move forward? So what we’re doing — and we’re not predetermining anything into the future. The only thing we’ll promise everybody is we’ll follow the facts and we’ll get the answers and we’ll lay them out for the American public. We’ll uphold our Constitutional authority but we don’t have pre-impeachment documents or anything else. We believe in the court of law. We believe in the honesty and integrity and remember none of this information would have been found had we not been doing the work we’re doing now. Let us continue our work and lay it out for the American public and let people be able to see what we’re finding.”


Commentary:
Whenever has the Democrat Party played by the rules of law?
Now why would the combined efforts of the Biden White House, the DoJ, the FBI and the Quisling Media want to obstruct a Congressional investigation into impeachment when we continue to find evidence they've all colluded to obstruct and hide evidence?
Trump was impeached the first time for allegations of a quid pro quo, and Biden bragged infamously about doing worse...and we got crickets from the brainwashed Democrat buffoons. No evidence or allegations against the Bidens??? Astonishing. Just look through Hunter's laptop stash of info, now that even the corrupt FBI is no longer insisting that it's "Russian disinformation."
Does anyone really believe the Whitehouse will suddenly be honest, roll over and tell Congress and we the people the truth.

No one is above the law.

Except Democrats.

 

[candycorn]

Wow, you mean the White House is stiff-arming Congressional investigators? That almost never happens.

How did that daft bitch SweetSue92 put it?

Your game
Your rules
You’ll hate it

 

[Marener]

No one is above the law.

Except Democrats.

What law are you talking about? The article complains that Biden’s admin is putting out media talking points. Calling that obstruction is just nonsense.

 

[Independent thinker]

What law are you talking about? The article complains that Biden’s admin is putting out media talking points. Calling that obstruction is just nonsense.

Biden & Co just recently had a court rule against them for illegally trying to influence media and then they turned right around and shortly after that sent a letter to the media suggesting to them how they should report on the impeachment inquiry. Maybe it's not technically obstruction of justice, but it is a violation of the very same thing courts just ruled against them on, which is not allowing first amendment rights and illegally attempting to influence the media.

 

[Marener]

Biden & Co just recently had a court rule against them for illegally trying to influence media and then they turned right around and shortly after that sent a letter to the media suggesting to them how they should report on the impeachment inquiry. Maybe it's not technically obstruction of justice, but it is a violation of the very same thing courts just ruled against them on, which is not allowing first amendment rights and illegally attempting to influence the media.

My word. This is gibberish. The case you’re referring to has nothing to do with an administration providing their talking points to media. Even if it was, it’s actually on hold being reviewed further by SCOTUS.

Certainly you wouldn’t deprive people of their right to defend themselves against allegations of wrongdoing? That’s what you’re suggesting here. That Biden’s administration cannot speak out against the Republican’s smear campaign.

 

[bripat9643]

That's not fake. There is no evidence.

Fake news.

 

[Sixties Fan]

The narrative of "No evidence" is simply not sustainable. There is, in fact, a mountain of evidence that is beginning to be such an avalanche that denying that any evidence exists is just comical.

But none of you can show it, and the House cannot provide it.

Me thinks you have a problem.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Biden & Co just recently had a court rule against them for illegally trying to influence media and then they turned right around and shortly after that sent a letter to the media suggesting to them how they should report on the impeachment inquiry. Maybe it's not technically obstruction of justice, but it is a violation of the very same thing courts just ruled against them on, which is not allowing first amendment rights and illegally attempting to influence the media.

Recently blah, blah blah.

Do not forget to give the source for all of these "obstruction".

 

[Failzero]

But none of you can show it, and the House cannot provide it.

Me thinks you have a problem.

The house got two impeachment’s in the 21st Century without any evidence so far , why doubt them now ?