Only a liar or a drooling retard could claim that it is not relevant.
You refused to answer. Because you don't support violence against communists.
Which means that your stated reason for supporting violence against this child, is a lie.
Are you a communist?
âYou refused to answer. Because you don't support violence against communists.â
LOLOL
Youâre still lying. Sadly for you, delusions and lies are all youâre armed with. Your lie is claiming that is the reason I wouldnât answer the question. I stated the reason and it wasnât because I care about violence against Communists. You donât have to like my reason; but then again, this brings us full circle to no one gives a shit about you. And because it bothers you to your core that I wouldnât answer that question in that thread where I find it irrelevant to that thread topic, you resort to lying about my position. Which reveals to me that you lost this argument.
âWhich means that your stated reason for supporting violence against this child, is a lie.â
Nope, no lie. Iâm not lying merely because youâre unhinged.
And that âchildâ is a nazi. Using your [il]logic, you defend him because youâre a nazi. See how assumptions work?
I asked that question to check the consistency of your stated reason for supporting violence against the white child in question.
All you had to do was say, "well, yes of course, I would support violence against a communist, as their ideology has genocided and mass murdered even MORE people that nazism".
But instead you dodged.
Thus, your stated reason was revealed to be a lie.
That you deny it, and all you say dancing around and deflecting, and what have you, are all more lies on top of that.