White Analyst Calls Out Republicans On Pulling Out Race Card, Encouraging Racism

Lets see what laws/government programs helped whites? Lets see:

1830 Indian Removal Act, specifically meant for white people Indian removal

Early in the 19th century, while the rapidly-growing United States expanded into the lower South, white settlers faced what they considered an obstacle. This area was home to the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chicasaw and Seminole nations. These Indian nations, in the view of the settlers and many other white Americans, were standing in the way of progress. Eager for land to raise cotton, the settlers pressured the federal government to acquire Indian territory.



The Homestead Act of 1862

Blacks were in slavery so this act overwhelmingly benefited white people


The Wagner Act. Created at a time when blacks were by and large excluded from AFL and CIO, the largest labor unions in the country at that time.


When the FHA was formed in the 1930s as a New deal federal govt program, there was no provision in it to stop the practice of redlining, which in overwhelmingly benefited whites. Because of this *FEDERAL GOVT* program, most whites in the country became homeowners which imbued them with a certain amount of wealth because of the equity tied to home, so the myth that most whites owned their houses through hard work without govt help is BS

Redlining in Philadelphia

Another link below explaining better what I just said, a shame they never teach white people this in school nor black people:

RESIDENTIAL RACIAL SEGREGATION


B. The Role of Government in Creating Housing Segregation

The role of federal and state government in creating and maintaining residential racial segregation must be understood, without excuse, as a reality of American history. On the federal level, the United States government reinforced discriminatory norms through various public policies. The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) adopted the practice of "red-lining," a discriminatory rating system used by FHA to evaluate the risks associated with loans made to borrowers in specific urban neighborhoods.[14] The vast majority of the loans went to the two top categories of the rating system, the highest of which included areas that were "new, homogenous, and in demand in good times and bad."[15] The second highest category was comprised of mostly stable areas that were still desirable. The third category, and the level at which discriminatory "red-lining" began, consisted of working class neighborhoods near black residences that were "within such a low price or rent range as to attract an undesirable element."[16] Black areas were placed in the fourth cate gory. Mortgage funds were channeled away from fourth category African American neighborhoods and were typically redirected from communities that were located near a black settlement or an area expected to contain black residences in the future.[17] As a result of these policies, the vast majority of FHA mortgage loans went to borrowers in white middle-class neighborhoods, and very few were awarded to black neighborhoods in central cities.[18] Between 1930 and 1950, three out of five homes purchased in the United States were financed by FHA, yet less than two percent of the FHA loans were made to non-white home buyers.[19] The FHA thus became the first federal agency to openly counsel and support segregation.[20]

The FHA was operated in a racially discriminatory manner since its inception in 1937 and set itself up as the "protector of all white neighborhoods," using its field agents to "keep Negroes and other minorities from buying houses in white neighborhoods."[21] Evidence also indicates that the federal government used interstate highway and urban renewal programs to segregate those blacks that had previously lived in more racially diverse communities.[22] Conse quently, these schemes increased the concentration of poverty where it has festered ever since and has caused the federal government to be labeled as "most influential in creating and maintaining residential segregation."[23]



There you have it above, documented proof of whites benefiting from govt programs, need any more history lessons you rightwing retards? I bet some of you retards would like to believe that the homes on your grandparents, great-grandparents and for you old timer rightwing retards, parents, were the result of hard work without federal govt help, check your history, whites have an established history of benefiting from the federal govt.

Anything more recent?

Like AA or something?
 
Lets see what laws/government programs helped whites? Lets see:

1830 Indian Removal Act, specifically meant for white people Indian removal

Early in the 19th century, while the rapidly-growing United States expanded into the lower South, white settlers faced what they considered an obstacle. This area was home to the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chicasaw and Seminole nations. These Indian nations, in the view of the settlers and many other white Americans, were standing in the way of progress. Eager for land to raise cotton, the settlers pressured the federal government to acquire Indian territory.



The Homestead Act of 1862

Blacks were in slavery so this act overwhelmingly benefited white people


The Wagner Act. Created at a time when blacks were by and large excluded from AFL and CIO, the largest labor unions in the country at that time.


When the FHA was formed in the 1930s as a New deal federal govt program, there was no provision in it to stop the practice of redlining, which in overwhelmingly benefited whites. Because of this *FEDERAL GOVT* program, most whites in the country became homeowners which imbued them with a certain amount of wealth because of the equity tied to home, so the myth that most whites owned their houses through hard work without govt help is BS

Redlining in Philadelphia

Another link below explaining better what I just said, a shame they never teach white people this in school nor black people:

RESIDENTIAL RACIAL SEGREGATION


B. The Role of Government in Creating Housing Segregation

The role of federal and state government in creating and maintaining residential racial segregation must be understood, without excuse, as a reality of American history. On the federal level, the United States government reinforced discriminatory norms through various public policies. The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) adopted the practice of "red-lining," a discriminatory rating system used by FHA to evaluate the risks associated with loans made to borrowers in specific urban neighborhoods.[14] The vast majority of the loans went to the two top categories of the rating system, the highest of which included areas that were "new, homogenous, and in demand in good times and bad."[15] The second highest category was comprised of mostly stable areas that were still desirable. The third category, and the level at which discriminatory "red-lining" began, consisted of working class neighborhoods near black residences that were "within such a low price or rent range as to attract an undesirable element."[16] Black areas were placed in the fourth cate gory. Mortgage funds were channeled away from fourth category African American neighborhoods and were typically redirected from communities that were located near a black settlement or an area expected to contain black residences in the future.[17] As a result of these policies, the vast majority of FHA mortgage loans went to borrowers in white middle-class neighborhoods, and very few were awarded to black neighborhoods in central cities.[18] Between 1930 and 1950, three out of five homes purchased in the United States were financed by FHA, yet less than two percent of the FHA loans were made to non-white home buyers.[19] The FHA thus became the first federal agency to openly counsel and support segregation.[20]

The FHA was operated in a racially discriminatory manner since its inception in 1937 and set itself up as the "protector of all white neighborhoods," using its field agents to "keep Negroes and other minorities from buying houses in white neighborhoods."[21] Evidence also indicates that the federal government used interstate highway and urban renewal programs to segregate those blacks that had previously lived in more racially diverse communities.[22] Conse quently, these schemes increased the concentration of poverty where it has festered ever since and has caused the federal government to be labeled as "most influential in creating and maintaining residential segregation."[23]



There you have it above, documented proof of whites benefiting from govt programs, need any more history lessons you rightwing retards? I bet some of you retards would like to believe that the homes on your grandparents, great-grandparents and for you old timer rightwing retards, parents, were the result of hard work without federal govt help, check your history, whites have an established history of benefiting from the federal govt.

Bump for the con-tards, why no reply to this? :lol: reality is hard to grasp for you rightwing tards.
 
Boy, o boy blacks are racist....Really they're a race of victims and whiners that always fall back on poor old me. Makes me want to puke.

You want to talk about who is racist? Blacks that only focus on race and vote based on race are the real racist. We whites are voting based on issues...We don't like Obama's far leftist, big government beliefs...
 
Lets see what laws/government programs helped whites? Lets see:

1830 Indian Removal Act, specifically meant for white people Indian removal

Early in the 19th century, while the rapidly-growing United States expanded into the lower South, white settlers faced what they considered an obstacle. This area was home to the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chicasaw and Seminole nations. These Indian nations, in the view of the settlers and many other white Americans, were standing in the way of progress. Eager for land to raise cotton, the settlers pressured the federal government to acquire Indian territory.



The Homestead Act of 1862

Blacks were in slavery so this act overwhelmingly benefited white people


The Wagner Act. Created at a time when blacks were by and large excluded from AFL and CIO, the largest labor unions in the country at that time.


When the FHA was formed in the 1930s as a New deal federal govt program, there was no provision in it to stop the practice of redlining, which in overwhelmingly benefited whites. Because of this *FEDERAL GOVT* program, most whites in the country became homeowners which imbued them with a certain amount of wealth because of the equity tied to home, so the myth that most whites owned their houses through hard work without govt help is BS

Redlining in Philadelphia

Another link below explaining better what I just said, a shame they never teach white people this in school nor black people:

RESIDENTIAL RACIAL SEGREGATION


B. The Role of Government in Creating Housing Segregation

The role of federal and state government in creating and maintaining residential racial segregation must be understood, without excuse, as a reality of American history. On the federal level, the United States government reinforced discriminatory norms through various public policies. The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) adopted the practice of "red-lining," a discriminatory rating system used by FHA to evaluate the risks associated with loans made to borrowers in specific urban neighborhoods.[14] The vast majority of the loans went to the two top categories of the rating system, the highest of which included areas that were "new, homogenous, and in demand in good times and bad."[15] The second highest category was comprised of mostly stable areas that were still desirable. The third category, and the level at which discriminatory "red-lining" began, consisted of working class neighborhoods near black residences that were "within such a low price or rent range as to attract an undesirable element."[16] Black areas were placed in the fourth cate gory. Mortgage funds were channeled away from fourth category African American neighborhoods and were typically redirected from communities that were located near a black settlement or an area expected to contain black residences in the future.[17] As a result of these policies, the vast majority of FHA mortgage loans went to borrowers in white middle-class neighborhoods, and very few were awarded to black neighborhoods in central cities.[18] Between 1930 and 1950, three out of five homes purchased in the United States were financed by FHA, yet less than two percent of the FHA loans were made to non-white home buyers.[19] The FHA thus became the first federal agency to openly counsel and support segregation.[20]

The FHA was operated in a racially discriminatory manner since its inception in 1937 and set itself up as the "protector of all white neighborhoods," using its field agents to "keep Negroes and other minorities from buying houses in white neighborhoods."[21] Evidence also indicates that the federal government used interstate highway and urban renewal programs to segregate those blacks that had previously lived in more racially diverse communities.[22] Conse quently, these schemes increased the concentration of poverty where it has festered ever since and has caused the federal government to be labeled as "most influential in creating and maintaining residential segregation."[23]



There you have it above, documented proof of whites benefiting from govt programs, need any more history lessons you rightwing retards? I bet some of you retards would like to believe that the homes on your grandparents, great-grandparents and for you old timer rightwing retards, parents, were the result of hard work without federal govt help, check your history, whites have an established history of benefiting from the federal govt.

Bump for the con-tards, why no reply to this? :lol: reality is hard to grasp for you rightwing tards.

Seeing how this country was 90% white between 1930-1950. That isn't saying a goddamn thing. Boy, you people love to spin and weasel around things.
 
Lets see what laws/government programs helped whites? Lets see:

1830 Indian Removal Act, specifically meant for white people Indian removal





The Homestead Act of 1862

Blacks were in slavery so this act overwhelmingly benefited white people


The Wagner Act. Created at a time when blacks were by and large excluded from AFL and CIO, the largest labor unions in the country at that time.


When the FHA was formed in the 1930s as a New deal federal govt program, there was no provision in it to stop the practice of redlining, which in overwhelmingly benefited whites. Because of this *FEDERAL GOVT* program, most whites in the country became homeowners which imbued them with a certain amount of wealth because of the equity tied to home, so the myth that most whites owned their houses through hard work without govt help is BS

Redlining in Philadelphia

Another link below explaining better what I just said, a shame they never teach white people this in school nor black people:

RESIDENTIAL RACIAL SEGREGATION






There you have it above, documented proof of whites benefiting from govt programs, need any more history lessons you rightwing retards? I bet some of you retards would like to believe that the homes on your grandparents, great-grandparents and for you old timer rightwing retards, parents, were the result of hard work without federal govt help, check your history, whites have an established history of benefiting from the federal govt.

Bump for the con-tards, why no reply to this? :lol: reality is hard to grasp for you rightwing tards.

Seeing how this country was 90% white between 1930-1950. That isn't saying a goddamn thing. Boy, you people love to spin and weasel around things.

So racism and legislation that benefited whites predominantly is irrelevant? Check the Constitution jackass, you argument is not a legitimate excuse nor does it negate my proof that white people benefited from federal handouts and legislation, the exact BS Republitards argue against.
 
Last edited:
Lets see what laws/government programs helped whites? Lets see:

1830 Indian Removal Act, specifically meant for white people Indian removal

Early in the 19th century, while the rapidly-growing United States expanded into the lower South, white settlers faced what they considered an obstacle. This area was home to the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chicasaw and Seminole nations. These Indian nations, in the view of the settlers and many other white Americans, were standing in the way of progress. Eager for land to raise cotton, the settlers pressured the federal government to acquire Indian territory.



The Homestead Act of 1862

Blacks were in slavery so this act overwhelmingly benefited white people


The Wagner Act. Created at a time when blacks were by and large excluded from AFL and CIO, the largest labor unions in the country at that time.


When the FHA was formed in the 1930s as a New deal federal govt program, there was no provision in it to stop the practice of redlining, which in overwhelmingly benefited whites. Because of this *FEDERAL GOVT* program, most whites in the country became homeowners which imbued them with a certain amount of wealth because of the equity tied to home, so the myth that most whites owned their houses through hard work without govt help is BS

Redlining in Philadelphia

Another link below explaining better what I just said, a shame they never teach white people this in school nor black people:

RESIDENTIAL RACIAL SEGREGATION


B. The Role of Government in Creating Housing Segregation

The role of federal and state government in creating and maintaining residential racial segregation must be understood, without excuse, as a reality of American history. On the federal level, the United States government reinforced discriminatory norms through various public policies. The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) adopted the practice of "red-lining," a discriminatory rating system used by FHA to evaluate the risks associated with loans made to borrowers in specific urban neighborhoods.[14] The vast majority of the loans went to the two top categories of the rating system, the highest of which included areas that were "new, homogenous, and in demand in good times and bad."[15] The second highest category was comprised of mostly stable areas that were still desirable. The third category, and the level at which discriminatory "red-lining" began, consisted of working class neighborhoods near black residences that were "within such a low price or rent range as to attract an undesirable element."[16] Black areas were placed in the fourth cate gory. Mortgage funds were channeled away from fourth category African American neighborhoods and were typically redirected from communities that were located near a black settlement or an area expected to contain black residences in the future.[17] As a result of these policies, the vast majority of FHA mortgage loans went to borrowers in white middle-class neighborhoods, and very few were awarded to black neighborhoods in central cities.[18] Between 1930 and 1950, three out of five homes purchased in the United States were financed by FHA, yet less than two percent of the FHA loans were made to non-white home buyers.[19] The FHA thus became the first federal agency to openly counsel and support segregation.[20]

The FHA was operated in a racially discriminatory manner since its inception in 1937 and set itself up as the "protector of all white neighborhoods," using its field agents to "keep Negroes and other minorities from buying houses in white neighborhoods."[21] Evidence also indicates that the federal government used interstate highway and urban renewal programs to segregate those blacks that had previously lived in more racially diverse communities.[22] Conse quently, these schemes increased the concentration of poverty where it has festered ever since and has caused the federal government to be labeled as "most influential in creating and maintaining residential segregation."[23]



There you have it above, documented proof of whites benefiting from govt programs, need any more history lessons you rightwing retards? I bet some of you retards would like to believe that the homes on your grandparents, great-grandparents and for you old timer rightwing retards, parents, were the result of hard work without federal govt help, check your history, whites have an established history of benefiting from the federal govt.

well, you got me there.

None of my ancestors benefitted from that so fuck off

PS I asked for exclusively and you could not do it.
 
Last edited:
Bump for the con-tards, why no reply to this? :lol: reality is hard to grasp for you rightwing tards.

Seeing how this country was 90% white between 1930-1950. That isn't saying a goddamn thing. Boy, you people love to spin and weasel around things.

So racism and legislation that benefited whites predominantly is irrelevant? Check the Constitution jackass, you argument is not a legitimate excuse nor does it negate my proof that white people benefited from federal handouts and legislation, the exact BS Republitards argue against.

White country=white benefitting.
Same could be said for black countries
Same could be said for Asian countries
Same could be said for Meso countries

People take care of their own kind and will always do that. When whites are wiped from this earth that will be so again.

Whites are the ones that developed democracy, repubicanism that brought freedom and rights for all of humanity. I doubt anyone else will stand up for them when we're gone.

How fun hating whites.
 
Lets see what laws/government programs helped whites? Lets see:

1830 Indian Removal Act, specifically meant for white people Indian removal

Early in the 19th century, while the rapidly-growing United States expanded into the lower South, white settlers faced what they considered an obstacle. This area was home to the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chicasaw and Seminole nations. These Indian nations, in the view of the settlers and many other white Americans, were standing in the way of progress. Eager for land to raise cotton, the settlers pressured the federal government to acquire Indian territory.



The Homestead Act of 1862

Blacks were in slavery so this act overwhelmingly benefited white people


The Wagner Act. Created at a time when blacks were by and large excluded from AFL and CIO, the largest labor unions in the country at that time.


When the FHA was formed in the 1930s as a New deal federal govt program, there was no provision in it to stop the practice of redlining, which in overwhelmingly benefited whites. Because of this *FEDERAL GOVT* program, most whites in the country became homeowners which imbued them with a certain amount of wealth because of the equity tied to home, so the myth that most whites owned their houses through hard work without govt help is BS

Redlining in Philadelphia

Another link below explaining better what I just said, a shame they never teach white people this in school nor black people:

RESIDENTIAL RACIAL SEGREGATION


B. The Role of Government in Creating Housing Segregation

The role of federal and state government in creating and maintaining residential racial segregation must be understood, without excuse, as a reality of American history. On the federal level, the United States government reinforced discriminatory norms through various public policies. The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) adopted the practice of "red-lining," a discriminatory rating system used by FHA to evaluate the risks associated with loans made to borrowers in specific urban neighborhoods.[14] The vast majority of the loans went to the two top categories of the rating system, the highest of which included areas that were "new, homogenous, and in demand in good times and bad."[15] The second highest category was comprised of mostly stable areas that were still desirable. The third category, and the level at which discriminatory "red-lining" began, consisted of working class neighborhoods near black residences that were "within such a low price or rent range as to attract an undesirable element."[16] Black areas were placed in the fourth cate gory. Mortgage funds were channeled away from fourth category African American neighborhoods and were typically redirected from communities that were located near a black settlement or an area expected to contain black residences in the future.[17] As a result of these policies, the vast majority of FHA mortgage loans went to borrowers in white middle-class neighborhoods, and very few were awarded to black neighborhoods in central cities.[18] Between 1930 and 1950, three out of five homes purchased in the United States were financed by FHA, yet less than two percent of the FHA loans were made to non-white home buyers.[19] The FHA thus became the first federal agency to openly counsel and support segregation.[20]

The FHA was operated in a racially discriminatory manner since its inception in 1937 and set itself up as the "protector of all white neighborhoods," using its field agents to "keep Negroes and other minorities from buying houses in white neighborhoods."[21] Evidence also indicates that the federal government used interstate highway and urban renewal programs to segregate those blacks that had previously lived in more racially diverse communities.[22] Conse quently, these schemes increased the concentration of poverty where it has festered ever since and has caused the federal government to be labeled as "most influential in creating and maintaining residential segregation."[23]



There you have it above, documented proof of whites benefiting from govt programs, need any more history lessons you rightwing retards? I bet some of you retards would like to believe that the homes on your grandparents, great-grandparents and for you old timer rightwing retards, parents, were the result of hard work without federal govt help, check your history, whites have an established history of benefiting from the federal govt.

well, you got me there.

None of my ancestors benefitted from that so fuck off

PS I asked for exclusively and you could not do it.

And you're sure of this? :lol:
 
Seeing how this country was 90% white between 1930-1950. That isn't saying a goddamn thing. Boy, you people love to spin and weasel around things.

So racism and legislation that benefited whites predominantly is irrelevant? Check the Constitution jackass, you argument is not a legitimate excuse nor does it negate my proof that white people benefited from federal handouts and legislation, the exact BS Republitards argue against.

White country=white benefitting.
Same could be said for black countries
Same could be said for Asian countries
Same could be said for Meso countries

People take care of their own kind and will always do that. When whites are wiped from this earth that will be so again.

Whites are the ones that developed democracy, repubicanism that brought freedom and rights for all of humanity. I doubt anyone else will stand up for them when we're gone.

How fun hating whites.

Still looking for excuses? America was never a white country, this country had slavery and millions of Afrodescendants who were discriminated against and excluded, your argument makes no sense and does not refute what I said. Whites enslaved blacks, kicked Native Americans off their lands and stole them and created legislation that benefited whites, even when whites were *NOT* the majority population:


U.S. Immigration Legislation: 1790 Naturalization Act


Native Americans were non citizens in their own land under this act made by white people to benefit themselves. My point is proven, next!
 
So racism and legislation that benefited whites predominantly is irrelevant? Check the Constitution jackass, you argument is not a legitimate excuse nor does it negate my proof that white people benefited from federal handouts and legislation, the exact BS Republitards argue against.

White country=white benefitting.
Same could be said for black countries
Same could be said for Asian countries
Same could be said for Meso countries

People take care of their own kind and will always do that. When whites are wiped from this earth that will be so again.

Whites are the ones that developed democracy, repubicanism that brought freedom and rights for all of humanity. I doubt anyone else will stand up for them when we're gone.

How fun hating whites.

Still looking for excuses? America was never a white country, this country had slavery and millions of Afrodescendants who were discriminated against and excluded, your argument makes no sense and does not refute what I said. Whites enslaved blacks, kicked Native Americans off their lands and stole them and created legislation that benefited whites, even when whites were *NOT* the majority population:


U.S. Immigration Legislation: 1790 Naturalization Act


Native Americans were non citizens in their own land under this act made by white people to benefit themselves. My point is proven, next!

What percentage of the country was white in 1790?

It was 80 percent white.

In 1890 it was 87 percent white.

In 1990 it was 80 percent white.
 
We built it is racist? lol

Democrats are total fucking morons, complete total fucking morons.
 
So racism and legislation that benefited whites predominantly is irrelevant? Check the Constitution jackass, you argument is not a legitimate excuse nor does it negate my proof that white people benefited from federal handouts and legislation, the exact BS Republitards argue against.

White country=white benefitting.
Same could be said for black countries
Same could be said for Asian countries
Same could be said for Meso countries

People take care of their own kind and will always do that. When whites are wiped from this earth that will be so again.

Whites are the ones that developed democracy, repubicanism that brought freedom and rights for all of humanity. I doubt anyone else will stand up for them when we're gone.

How fun hating whites.

Still looking for excuses? America was never a white country, this country had slavery and millions of Afrodescendants who were discriminated against and excluded, your argument makes no sense and does not refute what I said. Whites enslaved blacks, kicked Native Americans off their lands and stole them and created legislation that benefited whites, even when whites were *NOT* the majority population:


U.S. Immigration Legislation: 1790 Naturalization Act


Native Americans were non citizens in their own land under this act made by white people to benefit themselves. My point is proven, next!

Your a fucking clown. If whites wanted to we could of never gave a goddamn right to a single non-white group. We could of kept the pre-1965 immigration laws in place.

But sadly we're the race of thinkers that thought up human freedoms and rights for all. Sadly, that will be our undoing in the long term. Somehow, I think our idea's die with us.
 
Last edited:
White country=white benefitting.
Same could be said for black countries
Same could be said for Asian countries
Same could be said for Meso countries

People take care of their own kind and will always do that. When whites are wiped from this earth that will be so again.

Whites are the ones that developed democracy, repubicanism that brought freedom and rights for all of humanity. I doubt anyone else will stand up for them when we're gone.

How fun hating whites.

Still looking for excuses? America was never a white country, this country had slavery and millions of Afrodescendants who were discriminated against and excluded, your argument makes no sense and does not refute what I said. Whites enslaved blacks, kicked Native Americans off their lands and stole them and created legislation that benefited whites, even when whites were *NOT* the majority population:


U.S. Immigration Legislation: 1790 Naturalization Act


Native Americans were non citizens in their own land under this act made by white people to benefit themselves. My point is proven, next!

What percentage of the country was white in 1790?

It was 80 percent white.

In 1890 it was 87 percent white.

In 1990 it was 80 percent white.

This kind of throws your whole "even when whites were *NOT* the majority population" argument out the window huh?

You're too easy to pwn!!

Your own ignorance is your downfall.
 
Still looking for excuses? America was never a white country, this country had slavery and millions of Afrodescendants who were discriminated against and excluded, your argument makes no sense and does not refute what I said. Whites enslaved blacks, kicked Native Americans off their lands and stole them and created legislation that benefited whites, even when whites were *NOT* the majority population:


U.S. Immigration Legislation: 1790 Naturalization Act


Native Americans were non citizens in their own land under this act made by white people to benefit themselves. My point is proven, next!

What percentage of the country was white in 1790?

It was 80 percent white.

In 1890 it was 87 percent white.

In 1990 it was 80 percent white.

This kind of throws your whole "even when whites were *NOT* the majority population" argument out the window huh?

You're too easy to pwn!!

Your own ignorance is your downfall.

Yep,

I dare him to find another race or culture that has ever treated another equally. Whites are the only ones that did and put them into words. During the period of 1776-1960 we didn't, but we were the ones to lead the way in doing so.

Before you throw hot tar at us. Think.
 
Last edited:
The percentage of those white is a strawman, the constitution states all people are supposed to be treated equally and that was not the case, stupid monkeys looking for excuse to deny the obvious, lol
 
The percentage of those white is a strawman, the constitution states all people are supposed to be treated equally and that was not the case, stupid monkeys looking for excuse to deny the obvious, lol

Who wrote the constitution and who finally enforced it? Would blacks, indians or Asians of ever thought up the same?

Your hatred for whites isn't logical. You're judging us for acting like everyone else and not thinking about the other side of the coin where we actually did advance such idea's.

It isn't our fault that we had the brain power to beat Africans, Indians, ect at war. The world was one that favored the strongest in those times.
 
Last edited:
The percentage of those white is a strawman, the constitution states all people are supposed to be treated equally and that was not the case, stupid monkeys looking for excuse to deny the obvious, lol

Do you know what a "strawman" is?

Obviously not.

Allow me educate you:

The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position. This sort of "reasoning" has the following pattern:


Person A has position X.
Person B presents position Y (which is a distorted version of X).
Person B attacks position Y.
Therefore X is false/incorrect/flawed.

I challenged your statment that whites were not the majority at the time you given which was 1790. I didn't distort your position, I simply challenged it by showing proof that you were incorrect.

The 14th Amendment ratiifed in 1868 states that ''All people are equal before law''.

That is the ONLY mention about equality in the Constitution.
 

Forum List

Back
Top