Whistle Blower Notified the DOJ

[Lastamender]

Why wasn't this investigated? Whistle Blowers only count when they hurt Trump? This stuff just keeps coming out. Not a conspiracy here a factual report of today's news.

AZ State Rep Reads Dem Whistleblower’s Letter to the DOJ About 2020 Election Fraud During Election Integrity Hearing › American Greatness

In a letter to the Department of Justice last year, an anonymous Democrat whistleblower accused fellow Democrats in Pima County, Arizona of adding approximately 35,000 votes to each of the Democrat…

amgreatness.com

Please be advised the Pima County Recorder, located at 240 N. Stone Avenue in Tucson, Arizona, 85701 in Pima County, Arizona, and the Democrat Party added fraud votes. In the initial count of the vote by mail (VBM) totals released at 8 pm on November 3, 2020, There are approximately 35,000 fraud votes added to each Democrat candidates’ vote totals. Candidates impacted include County, State, and Federal Election candidates. Through the utilization of the automated ballot count machines in Pima County Elections, My understanding is that 35,000 was embedded into each Democrat candidates’ total votes. Below are the meeting notes.

On record at the DOJ.

 

[White 6]

Why wasn't this investigated? Whistle Blowers only count when they hurt Trump? This stuff just keeps coming out. Not a conspiracy here a factual report of today's news.

AZ State Rep Reads Dem Whistleblower’s Letter to the DOJ About 2020 Election Fraud During Election Integrity Hearing › American Greatness

In a letter to the Department of Justice last year, an anonymous Democrat whistleblower accused fellow Democrats in Pima County, Arizona of adding approximately 35,000 votes to each of the Democrat…

amgreatness.com

Please be advised the Pima County Recorder, located at 240 N. Stone Avenue in Tucson, Arizona, 85701 in Pima County, Arizona, and the Democrat Party added fraud votes. In the initial count of the vote by mail (VBM) totals released at 8 pm on November 3, 2020, There are approximately 35,000 fraud votes added to each Democrat candidates’ vote totals. Candidates impacted include County, State, and Federal Election candidates. Through the utilization of the automated ballot count machines in Pima County Elections, My understanding is that 35,000 was embedded into each Democrat candidates’ total votes. Below are the meeting notes.

On record at the DOJ.

Whoever it was wrote the whistleblower letter, not wishing to be named or involved. That's pretty convenient. Maybe you can raise money for another investigation. Probably good money to be made if you are part of the fund raising committee.

 

[Oddball]

Whoever it was wrote the whistleblower letter, not wishing to be named or involved. That's pretty convenient. Maybe you can raise money for another investigation. Probably good money to be made if you are part of the fund raising committee.

The IP address of the whistleblower is known, dipshchitt.

Why isn't a liberoidal jackass like you as concerned about the privacy of the whisleblower in this case, as you chumps were about the one in the first impeachment scam?

 

[White 6]

The IP address of the whistleblower is known, dipshchitt.

Why isn't a liberoidal jackass like you as concerned about the privacy of the whisleblower in this case, as you chumps were about the one in the first impeachment scam?

The first whistleblower was known to the inspector General, that received the complaint. This one was by random.fuk at a miscellaneous keyboard or laptop, not necessarily his own and no indication has been given anybody has a clue who that person is known to anybody processing or looking into the assertions, just somebody possibly with a grudge, wanting to hide and sick authorities on somebody. Who knows? To be fair, it could be, this guy knew there were bounties put out on the white house whistleblower, by people on the right and doesn't want to take a chance of going down that road, as his assertions are not important enough to him/her to take that kind of chance.

 

[Oddball]

The first whistleblower was known to the inspector General, that received the complaint. This one was by random.fuk at a miscellaneous keyboard or laptop, not necessarily his own and no indication has been given anybody has a clue who that person is known to anybody processing or looking into the assertions, just somebody possibly with a grudge, wanting to hide and sick authorities on somebody. Who knows? To be fair, it could be, this guy knew there were bounties put out on the white house whistleblower, by people on the right and doesn't want to take a chance of going down that road, as his assertions are not important enough to him/her to take that kind of chance.

The first "whistleblower" isn't a first-hand witness....In legal parlance, his word is known as "hearsay" , which is inadmissible in court.

You're not interested in fairness, so quit lying.

 

[White 6]

The first "whistleblower" isn't a first-hand witness....In legal parlance, his word is known as "hearsay" , which is inadmissible in court.

You're not interested in fairness, so quit lying.

I told you the truth of what I know. Quit your bitchin and right wing name calling. If your boy is not willing to come forward, you don't really know what he or she knows or what their standpoint is. Don't bother explaining the difference if you cannot prove what the difference is.

 

[Lastamender]

I told you the truth of what I know. Quit your bitchin and right wing name calling. If your boy is not willing to come forward, you don't really know what he or she knows or what their standpoint is. Don't bother explaining the difference if you cannot prove what the difference is.

The whistle blower in Trump's first impeachment never came forward either.

 

[candycorn]

Whoever it was wrote the whistleblower letter, not wishing to be named or involved. That's pretty convenient. Maybe you can raise money for another investigation. Probably good money to be made if you are part of the fund raising committee.

Well, they are probably embarrassed by how easy it is to completely blow the assertion out of the water.

For example. The OP alleges that every democrat running for office in Pima County got 35,000 votes. Keep that in mind. The county of PIMA has in it's boundaries two US Congressional districts. The AZ 2nd district is represented by a Democrat who got 185,000 votes. Supposedly 35,000 of those came out of nowhere! Yeah okay. But strangely the Democrat running in the AZ 1st(which is also in Pima County) Tiffany She'd walked away with only 37,000 votes. Is the OP alleging that only 2,000 votes were cast?

https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/elections/Election%20Results/General%202020%20Results.pdf

Lisa Ontondo represents the AZ 4th Senate district. Somehow, despite getting 35,000 free votes...she only netted 7,700 votes.

There were not even 35,000 votes cast in the entire contest.

Clearly the OP is full of shit and whomever supposedly was a "whistleblower" is even a bigger ass clown than the OP.

 

[Leo123]

Why wasn't this investigated? Whistle Blowers only count when they hurt Trump? This stuff just keeps coming out. Not a conspiracy here a factual report of today's news.

AZ State Rep Reads Dem Whistleblower’s Letter to the DOJ About 2020 Election Fraud During Election Integrity Hearing › American Greatness

In a letter to the Department of Justice last year, an anonymous Democrat whistleblower accused fellow Democrats in Pima County, Arizona of adding approximately 35,000 votes to each of the Democrat…

amgreatness.com

Please be advised the Pima County Recorder, located at 240 N. Stone Avenue in Tucson, Arizona, 85701 in Pima County, Arizona, and the Democrat Party added fraud votes. In the initial count of the vote by mail (VBM) totals released at 8 pm on November 3, 2020, There are approximately 35,000 fraud votes added to each Democrat candidates’ vote totals. Candidates impacted include County, State, and Federal Election candidates. Through the utilization of the automated ballot count machines in Pima County Elections, My understanding is that 35,000 was embedded into each Democrat candidates’ total votes. Below are the meeting notes.

On record at the DOJ.

The Democrats own the election process, D.C. and law enforcement. Little wonder why this stuff gets buried.

 

[Lastamender]

Well, they are probably embarrassed by how easy it is to completely blow the assertion out of the water.

For example. The OP alleges that every democrat running for office in Pima County got 35,000 votes. Keep that in mind. The county of PIMA has in it's boundaries two US Congressional districts. The AZ 2nd district is represented by a Democrat who got 185,000 votes. Supposedly 35,000 of those came out of nowhere! Yeah okay. But strangely the Democrat running in the AZ 1st(which is also in Pima County) Tiffany She'd walked away with only 37,000 votes. Is the OP alleging that only 2,000 votes were cast?

https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/elections/Election%20Results/General%202020%20Results.pdf

View attachment 575939

Lisa Ontondo represents the AZ 4th Senate district. Somehow, despite getting 35,000 free votes...she only netted 7,700 votes.

View attachment 575945
There were not even 35,000 votes cast in the entire contest.

Clearly the OP is full of shit and whomever supposedly was a "whistleblower" is even a bigger ass clown than the OP.

You did not see the part where it is calibrated by the number of eligible voters. Your numbers do nothing prove it did not happen.

 

[candycorn]

You did not see the part where it is calibrated by the number of eligible voters. Your numbers do nothing prove it did not happen.

Oh... so the glitch is a "calibrated" glitch in your fanciful yarn about voter fraud.

Earlier it was "approximately 35,000 votes" added to each Democrat.

You've retreated so fast you left skid marks.

 

[Lastamender]

Oh... so the glitch is a "calibrated" glitch in your fanciful yarn about voter fraud.

Earlier it was "approximately 35,000 votes" added to each Democrat.

View attachment 575971

You've retreated so fast you left skid marks.

Not my yarn, another American wrote that letter. Fraud.

 

[candycorn]

Not my yarn, another American wrote that letter. Fraud.

Yet you're the one promoting the clearly idiotic, moronic, stupid, and bat-shit crazy allegation that I blew out of the water while cooking dinner.

Thanks for the batting practice.

 

[Lastamender]

Yet you're the one promoting the clearly idiotic, moronic, stupid, and bat-shit crazy allegation that I blew out of the water while cooking dinner.

Thanks for the batting practice.

You know what? You do not know that. The DOJ did not even try to find out. Sounds legit to me. It is very easy to believe.

 

[candycorn]

You know what? You do not know that. The DOJ did not even try to find out. Sounds legit to me. It is very easy to believe.

Yet when you're shown clear contradictory evidence that disproves it...you ignore it. "Approximately 35,000" votes to each democrat when there were not even 35,000 votes cast in the election... Anyone who believes it is an idiot. So I'm not surprised you're buying into this nonsense.

 

[Lastamender]

Yet when you're shown clear contradictory evidence that disproves it...you ignore it. "Approximately 35,000" votes to each democrat when there were not even 35,000 votes cast in the election... Anyone who believes it is an idiot. So I'm not surprised you're buying into this nonsense.

It does not disprove shit. Try again.

 

[Faun]

You did not see the part where it is calibrated by the number of eligible voters. Your numbers do nothing prove it did not happen.

Then wouldn't there be about 100% turnout?

 

[Roudy]

Democrats commit fraud in every election. The 2020 election was Democratic election fraud, on steroids. They used COVID as an excuse to force most Democrat run cities and states into mail in voting areas. Then they planted and spread out massive numbers of fraudulent votes such that they could not be detected, if only a hand count audit occurs. Basically they did what they do best, commit election fraud.

 

[Lastamender]

Then wouldn't there be about 100% turnout?

That is what we are expected to believe, Nope.

 

[Faun]

That is what we are expected to believe, Nope.

You just said they calibrated the number according to the number of registered voters. So if they added the number of fake votes based on the number of registered voters who didn't vote, why wouldn't that be close to 100%?