- Sep 19, 2011
- 28,466
- 10,043
- 900
DUH????
I know,I know.. but I've YET to have any anti-pipeline person admit:
There would be MORE damage at a high chance of occurring from 1 million barrels in another shipwreck like Exxon Valdez then from a pipeline of oil that has at most 300 barrels flowing in one mile of pipe!
The ship wrecks.. millions of barrels of oil coating thousands of miles of coast!
VERSUS 300 barrels at the most damaging at the most less then 1 mile on land and easy to reclaim and restore!
FOLKS which would be worse???
I know,I know.. but I've YET to have any anti-pipeline person admit:
There would be MORE damage at a high chance of occurring from 1 million barrels in another shipwreck like Exxon Valdez then from a pipeline of oil that has at most 300 barrels flowing in one mile of pipe!
The ship wrecks.. millions of barrels of oil coating thousands of miles of coast!
VERSUS 300 barrels at the most damaging at the most less then 1 mile on land and easy to reclaim and restore!
FOLKS which would be worse???